Not all new project team can afford top exchanges

[TopTort777]

Each project can try their luck in Binance listing vote contest. At least a try does not cost anything. Kucoin and crex24 have loyal prices for listing. And of course you can always try crappy p2pb2b or similar, where listing doesnt cost a penny. Last but not least - forkdelta always have open doors for newcomers

[1715152419]

1715152419

[Dpat]

The new projects to be exist in the market is not mandatory to go for a top exchange rather they need to work on the project itself which do better in long term and must have to provide a unique service to the user. Then only the demand of the project growing hence the token also backed by this. So, the team member first of all should work on the project the decide to top exchanges gradually.

[someone703]

Exciting, but can you please share more details on the solution, please?

Of course, yes. Centric is the world's first dual-cryptocurrency payment network. Its innovative and unique concept is engineered to achieve breakthrough as a reliable form of payment. But better Google them to have a closer look

Looks like this guy is using 2 accounts and is talking to each other. And the conversation of these two accounts has nothing to do with this topic, hoping someone can handle him because he is trying to spam in this forum.

[Ann Impas]

There are still exchanges out there that has good reputation and most IEOs out there can be listed. It's like a kick starter to get you going on the market. When when the token's price pumps, then you can list it to another exchange. Being flexible on the market is key for success.

[gwaposakon]

It is hard to imagine how some top exchanges ask for ridiculously high listing fees for projects to list their coin in the exchange. Listing fees of top exchanges that reach up to a million-dollar is just big that could be used by project in other ways. These high listing fees do not help small projects in any way.

[Nazmul012]

I think if they don't have enough fund, then they shoundt launch any project. Cause we can see, many projects launched their IEOs on low quality exchanges, Afterward they get scam. That's make no sense. So never invest any IEOs without top exchange

[ScamViruS]

I think if they don't have enough fund, then they shoundt launch any project. Cause we can see, many projects launched their IEOs on low quality exchanges, Afterward they get scam. That's make no sense. So never invest any IEOs without top exchange

Not just lack of funds. There are bigger reasons behind this. The big exchanges check a lot before listing an IEO, so there is nothing to hide from the project and can not think of scam. So they don't list ieo in big exchanges but list their ieo on small exchanges in order to make people fool.

[noorman0]

The exchange shows a picture of how the project's seriousness in achieving its objectives and top exchange as a support for its success. All projects want the top exchange by displaying it on their site that the application is in progress. Unfortunately, the top exchange has its own eligibility criteria that a crypto will be approved is on the list.

Achievement of fundraising targets cannot be forced if the project does not have attractive objectives even if it ultimately extends the sales schedule. As a result, new projects are only able to be listed in small exchanges and listing applications on the top exchanges will remain forever in the progress  until the project stops operating. The only way to get funds easily is that their goals must be really interesting, their ideas must be completely new. We are only limited to supporting them in terms of promotion, nothing more. For results, their own ideas are decisive.

[shinratensei_]

There are still exchanges out there that has good reputation and most IEOs out there can be listed. It's like a kick starter to get you going on the market. When when the token's price pumps, then you can list it to another exchange. Being flexible on the market is key for success.

As long as the IEOs are not launched on the low tier or even scam tier exchange site like p2p, latoken, coinsbit, chainx, vindax and that will have a good future.
A new listing can't be done instantly and that needs a lot of consideration from the new exchange site.

[South Park]

One mistake projects of today do is that they focus too much on how much their token would worth; instead of focusing on how much value their product would bring.

If you have a good working product ;top exchange platforms would offer you a chance to list without stress and that aside, anywhere your project lists, it demands great volume.

Agreed, they have it backwards, but this because they know very well they are not capable to create a valuable product, they know they will create a coin that is just like the other thousands of coins that we have in the market and as such the only chance they have to make money for themselves is that their coin shows positive growth at least for some time so they can attract some investors to their coin, but as we know this very difficult to achieve unless they get access to the top exchanges which is why they are always trying to figure out for a way to get in those exchanges without having to pay the necessary fee for it.

[fauzan123]

true, not all projects are capable of listing coins on a  exchange or large exchange the opposite happened Most projects afford listing a small market because funds that can be when IEO is minimal, better to choose IEO with a large partner and have personal capital

[Cvetik56]

It's true that not all new projects can afford top exchanges but we have few exchanges that aren't that costly for IEO like binance or okex, here are some exchanges that are still good and less costly
1. Hoo.exchange
2. Probit exchange
3. Upbit
4. Bithumb
These exchanges still have good results of past IEO projects

Its now has been 4 years since I am a crypto user and I can claim that I did not use any of them except Probit. I've heard about Bithumb after their big loss caused by hack, but thats it.
For a fresh new project that could mean - get ready to face very little demand and most of the times it has nothing to do with actual usability of the product

[sorrros]

I do not understand why top exchanges didn´t adjust the listing fees for the new IEO projects. They still collecting same amount of money like in 2017, but the difference is that investors do not invest even one-tenth of what they invested in 2017. 

[robelneo]

I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...

What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?

IEO is probably the easiest way to generate fund, everything the developers are looking for is all there, Trust Hype and exchange support and this is what makes the project looks great when it comes to crowdfunding Trust is very important.
Unless there is new crowdfunding that can generate trust among investors I don't see other crowdfunding can equal IEO mechanism projects should raise initial funds so they can do IEO in the most trusted exchange that they can get into.

[OrangeII]

I do not understand why top exchanges didn´t adjust the listing fees for the new IEO projects. They still collecting same amount of money like in 2017, but the difference is that investors do not invest even one-tenth of what they invested in 2017. 

the quality and brand of each exchange are different, because of that the fee will be different. however, I think that every project has the opportunity to list on popular markets, it's just that they don't want to work on it and are quickly satisfied when their tokens have been traded on several unpopular exchanges.

[Oneandpure]

New project looking for cheapest fees exchange for listing their coin on IEO or trading time, they will choose an exchange like probit, p2pbx exchange, latoken and many small exchange for listing their coin, but when we find with new project brave for listing on bigger exchange will make many investor are interested for investing on their coin, they will be glad with new project have listed with bigger exchange.

[pungopete468]

Registering in a large exchange also requires a lot of money and we ourselves must know that actually if our project is good and in terms of good communication it can get that exchange easier, in my opinion the most important thing for each project is to develop and focus on the products they offer

[slashz9]

some good exchanges don't charge fees for doing IEO or listing on their exchanges, just make sure your project has advantages and good development then they will accept your project and promote it.

[Sterbens]

Having team skills is a major factor for building quality projects, look at some projects that don't take long for prime listings on binance, such as cartesi which only a few weeks after the bounty ends can trade trading in binance, it's incredible.

They are with a very professional team that is able to create the best products and be able to be accepted in the community so that it will be easier if there is a lot of support from the community.

Many projects now use fake teams to trick investors into buying their tokens during sales.

[peter0425]

I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...

What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?

The solution?stop ICO and IEO and let people here return to traditional trading in which we can use our skills and Knowledge ,and we are the one who will be responsible in our own losses and not these scammers.

Of course not all new projects can afford in the top exchanges you know the listing fee is too high for them but they can be successful even they are not in the top exchanges, the important is the project how promising it is and also the team should avoid to list in the suspicious exchanges.

That is one stupid idea,Listing with High price and then in the end the project still scam?they are just capitalizing the system just to let their scamming legitimate.