Not all new project team can afford top exchanges

[totoy4741]

It's true that not all new projects can afford top exchanges but we have few exchanges that aren't that costly for IEO like binance or okex, here are some exchanges that are still good and less costly

1. Hoo.exchange
2. Probit exchange
3. Upbit
4. Bithumb

These exchanges still have good results of past IEO projects

Probit is one off top choice of the up and coming project to host for their IEO so I won't get disagree with your choice but I don't really about the other exchanges you mentioned but recently OIKOs has successfully concluded their IEO in hoo, but that is the first time I have heard about, while in bithumb there are some projects didn't really turned out well as expected.

[1715128705]

1715128705

[1715128705]

1715128705

[1715128705]

1715128705

[1715128705]

1715128705

[1715128705]

1715128705

[Gunday_07]

It's true that not all new projects can afford top exchanges but we have few exchanges that aren't that costly for IEO like binance or okex, here are some exchanges that are still good and less costly

1. Hoo.exchange
2. Probit exchange
3. Upbit
4. Bithumb

These exchanges still have good results of past IEO projects

Probit exchange still have past bad histories on the projects that did IEO on the exchange, it's not too bad and it's not too good at the same time and hoo exchange only perform very good with their first IEO which was OIKOS project, we never know how projects will perform later on Hoo exchange

[Mehedi72]

Actually you know what? this is one kind of scamming chain process from them. They don't need to bear a large amount of money to list their project on Low rank exchanges. Then they scam & launch another project & continue to scam investors. This is a common way, they made money

[Wingsbtc]

Determined team who knows exactly what they want for their project will never use shit exchange or low rated exchanges, this is not ICO but IEO and for IEO project to be attractive to investors and become successful the project must use very good exchange

[kotajikikox]

Determined team who knows exactly what they want for their project will never use shit exchange or low rated exchanges, this is not ICO but IEO and for IEO project to be attractive to investors and become successful the project must use very good exchange

Wrong,Because even if they will use cheap and not popular exchange yet it is not enough reason to tag them as shit.
Because there are some exchange that Legit but only starting so far and they need good listing to prove how they are trust worthy and competent in this market.

Actually you know what? this is one kind of scamming chain process from them. They don't need to bear a large amount of money to list their project on Low rank exchanges. Then they scam & launch another project & continue to scam investors. This is a common way, they made money

Of course there are so many cases but still there are some who is trusted even though they are not listed in Huge exchange.

[bastian466]

It all depends on the developer of the project itself if they choose the right place such as a large exchange with a real amount of volume that can have an impact on the success and investment members can also influence the success of the project

[sayulita]

I do not understand why top exchanges didn´t adjust the listing fees for the new IEO projects. They still collecting same amount of money like in 2017, but the difference is that investors do not invest even one-tenth of what they invested in 2017. 

And all the exchanges are having record collection on trading fees as the userbase is growing so automatically does the trading fees that the exchanges earn from the users and never should we forget the withdrawal fees that they take, it is always too high compared to a normal transaction form our own private wallet. The ICO hype is over now because of a lot of ICO frauds that happened in 2017 along with the loss of investors by investing in projects that didn't even got listed on the exchanges, because of this IEO offerings were started and those initial ones did a great job and provided handsome returns to the investors.

[wywoc]

Currently with the market situation in the past 2 years, it is very difficult to attract investors. And the cost to list IEO on leading exchanges is huge so not many projects can meet it.
The only way I see now is that they self-finance and develop the project step by step, then look for capital from private equity funds.

[Saisher]

Currently with the market situation in the past 2 years, it is very difficult to attract investors. And the cost to list IEO on leading exchanges is huge so not many projects can meet it.
The only way I see now is that they self-finance and develop the project step by step, then look for capital from private equity funds.

Your recommendation is right they should do private crowdfunding and the funds generated from private sales can be used to fund the project, on your former suggestion, yes developing the project first is also good like what they are doing now on Idena, they are developing the project so when the platform is fully set up they can use it to nominate their project in listing to big exchanges.

[Claudio99]

It seems that many don't know that top exchanges aren't always 100% a must, I knew some mid rated crypto projects that are still well developed today and they never listed on binance or okex and they are doing so fine, new projects that suffers good funds for development still have hope if the team are serious

[RabbiTANK]

New projects can survive and do well in the market without top exchanges, teams should just find the Exchanges that suits them, I believe that new project teams know what they are doing if they choose small exchanges, this still doesn't mean the project is bad

[MrMojoRising26]

Yes It is unfortunate that money talks, and can get you big exchange listing. Usually if an alt has a community and some decent volume exchanges are more likely to give it a shot.

[Dollar_Hunter]

I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...

What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?

listing on the top exchange requires a large fee. projects have to spend a lot of money if they want to, but most projects don't want to, this is a good exchange only list by top projects

[Zionatin]

If a project can't afford to be listed they probably shouldn't be making Anns and going public. If you don't have the money for a website to start up and are using free hosting then how can people trust you? You need to have the funds upfront. It shows you have planned. Many places that rely on advertising wait till they get their payment before paying their users and this is wrong. If you cannot afford to do what you need to do then you shouldn't be doing it, to begin with. However, I can understand if someone has a very good idea but not enough funds to be listed. I don't think it is an altogether bad idea to not be listed. Being listed encourages people to dump rather than true believers. Your project should have a use for the coins it uses and then people won't need to have an exchange to dump on.

[TheClownSong]

I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...

What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?

The growing popularity of IEO makes many new exchangers who do IEO and this in my opinion requires caution. Large exchangers will certainly carry out rigorous verification of projects that are listed, while small exchangers sometimes do IEO too often so that they seem just to get a fee

[StephenJH]

In my opinion, most investors choose to take part in the IEO and that too is done in large markets. Because they feel safer when they are about to spend money. As for if there are alternatives other than IEO in large markets, I think using the trusted Escrow service can be a solution.

l do agree with your view on that, most investors prefer to take part in the IEO, that is why they think IEO is safer than ICO. They are tired of ICO scam projects. Maybe that is the reason for preferring IEO so a lot. That doesn't mean there is not any bad project of IEO, but much better than ICO. That is absolutely right to use the trusted Escrow service can be the best choice, because there is just a little thing in which we can avoid our money from scammers.

[ancafe]

Where is the data showing that if you ain't in a top exchange, "70% chances that you will come out with a bad result"? Plenty exchange at a very reasonable fee and have a decent amount of volume. You don't need to spend every penny to get listed on top exchanges when that penny can be placed toward dev, marketing, hire a legal adviser,...

Well, the problem with registering on popular exchanges is that the price is very expensive. in fact, some of the regulations may be strict enough that the tokens you put in there can be delisted at any time when you violate them. Well, however, the popular exchange is not suitable for projects that want to develop half-measures.
in fact, if a project strives for it, I think all projects have their own opportunities.

[huu78]

Indeed, IEO is already considered bad for investors because the results are no longer appropriate, many garbage projects that only want to get funding and run away do not take care of their projects anymore. But to solve this problem, actually, the only exchange that made this IEO even more professional was to filter the seeds of new project seeds that really had quality, not just for fundraising. There are still many markets now that hold IEO and many are successful as I always follow, namely Hoo Exchange, providing good profits for traders there. So hopefully investors still want to glance at IEO again at this time.

[Bitbtc8]

And that is a good thing. If every project can afford to have IEO sale on top exchange easily, what do you think will happen? It will become just like the ICO, bad project can still hold IEO on top exchange and hurt both exchange's reputation and trust of IEO.

It's never going to happen anyway, top exchanges becomes top exchanges because they have good reputations and that's something they don't want to ruin by taking in new projects that aren't reliable, once they do mistake once or twice they are going down.

[bittraffic]

If they haven't planned the listing of the project I think the team shouldn't start asking for funds.