Always look at the coins MAX supply

[bitgolden]

Even Bitcoin with a max supply of only 21 million needed massive amount of capital to get where it is now. So any coin with double that, will need the double amount of capital to get to the same place. So with so many options out there if you want good value pump. Look for something with max supply of only like 1 million. (which of course needs to have a utility too to stay in growing demand)

You have a point and at the same time you're sounding like you are having your wrong assumption as well. Just because of low supply, a coin/token cannot have a good future; it may get delisted from exchanges when there are no continuous investors for it. Do not make your investment decisions just because of low supply; this will definitely lead to big disappointment because you are just looking into ONLY supply which must be one of the criteria for good value for one particular coin and there must be other criteria also to be considered for speculating about the future of a coin.

I'm not seeing any differences on considering low supply against considering marketcap. Because both are implicitly denoting the same thing. Marketcap of a coin is being calculated along with circulating supply.

Multi billion supply and high marketcap and it have proven if a product is much more important.

I agree even with multi-billion supply, a coin might have related good value when it is having a good real world application; it means if a coin is capable of addressing a problem of real-world then it might get continuous investor which must be the core reason on deciding the future of that coin.

[Ulven]

It is not necessary to pay attention to the total width of the coin. Alternatively, the project can be evaluated whether it is in the right direction or whether the team developing the coin is building a trick. We have seen many projects that have a small display of icons but are dead.

[FreeStreamer]

I don't care too much about the total supply of the project. I am only interested in project and team products. If they have a good project and a good product, I believe the price will keep going up and be valid in the future. But if the project is poor quality and scam then it will quickly die and the investor will lose money

Total supply doesn't matter when it has a useful product. You can see how CRO was going crazy caused by it has already developed a very good product and it has its own exchange site too.
Multi billion supply and high marketcap and it have proven if a product is much more important.

It matters from Return of Investment point of view. There is no ROI if it's a stablecoin

[JeotQ]

The lower the max supply the better the value? Well that's not always the real thing, if the max supply is so low and there is no demand due to lack of better use case then it still going to be another shitcoin, few coins have large max supply but it never affect the price, if the project is handled by professionals you will be amazed with the result

[arufox]

For me the first thing of projects is team behind them. If team active he will bring project become success. I hold about 5 kind of tokens which my opinion is potential for future, i choose it because of the team behind them, but i dont trully care about max supply. I see coins which have max supply same as bitcoin but the price not same, so max supply for me is not very meaningful

[xZork]

I think the project with small supply is not different from the project with large supply. It cannot be asserted that a one million-cent supply project would be easier to raise than a ten-million project.
If a project wants to add value it needs to have many factors, which are product quality, professional development team and project promotion.

Just like what you said, the project needs to do more to raise prices. The supply does not affect too much of the project, it only determines whether the price of the token is high or low in this market

If someone invested in the project just because the supply of the project was low I am sure he would be at a loss. A good project depends on many factors, among factors affecting the success of the project, the supply factor does not really affect too much.

[wywoc]

I think the most important is the amount in circulation, from which we can calculate the current market capitalization of that coin. Then we need to refer to its vesting period, usually, it takes a long time for a coin to reach its maximum supply.

The market cap is distributed among the amount in circulation. To predict the price performance in long term, you need to figure out the emission of coins and then look at max supply to understand how widely capital will be distributed and diluted in the chain.

Of course, that's why I said that we need to research about its vesting periods, for the long term price. The most obvious example is XRP, when they unlock millions of XRP every month for teams and organizations, and with that number, we can easily make a decision whether or not to invest.

[Iyanu14]

So there's 6000+ coins out there. Look at the max supply. A coin with a large max supply and rapid emission of new coins will most likely never surge in value. This is because the worlds total capital is divided with so many optional coins. The larger the supply, the more capital it needs to spike in value. Even Bitcoin with a max supply of only 21 million needed massive amount of capital to get where it is now. So any coin with double that, will need the double amount of capital to get to the same place. So with so many options out there if you want good value pump. Look for something with max supply of only like 1 million. (which of course needs to have a utility too to stay in growing demand)

Well, there is iota of truth here.  We have seen coins with little supply and are no where to be found today.  Likewise, there have been coins of millions in supply and was making it big.  If a project has nice concept and good utility, people will continue to demand for it even if the supply is much.  Some came with the idea of deflationary tokens just to solve the issue of much supply, but 95% of them are dead now.  Concept, idea, utility are very important in any project's development.

[Barbut]

For me the first thing of projects is team behind them. If team active he will bring project become success. I hold about 5 kind of tokens which my opinion is potential for future, i choose it because of the team behind them, but i dont trully care about max supply. I see coins which have max supply same as bitcoin but the price not same, so max supply for me is not very meaningful

It's not so important for me too. Bitcoin will never be widely used, because of it low supply, and some coins aim for mass usage and their max supply is higher. If they become popular with time their price will rise anyway, with any max coin supply. It's important to know what you can expect from some coins and to know what you can expect you need to know their max supply.

[MCDev]

I do not think that supply can affect the price of a project (except for projects with infinite supply like DOGE). The price of a project is based on many factors such as the quality of the project, the effectiveness of product promotion and a bit of luck.

[FreeStreamer]

I do not think that supply can affect the price of a project (except for projects with infinite supply like DOGE). The price of a project is based on many factors such as the quality of the project, the effectiveness of product promotion and a bit of luck.

The price is formed by distributing the value and market capital among the circulating supply. By finding out the rate oft the emission of new coin in relation to max supply you can get an idea how volatile or stable the coin will be.

[New_order]

Coin max supply is just a tip of the iceberg mate, do not choose coins because they have low max supply, ARCS project has 21billion max supply and this token is trading at 0.33$ to 0.55$, use case and roadmap of every project is more important than max supply

[FreeStreamer]

Coin max supply is just a tip of the iceberg mate, do not choose coins because they have low max supply, ARCS project has 21billion max supply and this token is trading at 0.33$ to 0.55$, use case and roadmap of every project is more important than max supply

That's what I said. Didn't you even read the post? I simply stated that the volatility of the coin can be estimated from the max supply. The larger max supply, likely the less volatile, because the vast max supply evens out the volatility by distributing the value more.

[Kvalentine]

Use cases are more important to me, even if a coin has 100billion max supply it can still do better than majority of 21 million max supply coins, with real use case demand will be high and thus making the price more bullish, look how good dogecoin is doing today with that massive max supply

[shinratensei_]

Use cases are more important to me, even if a coin has 100billion max supply it can still do better than majority of 21 million max supply coins, with real use case demand will be high and thus making the price more bullish, look how good dogecoin is doing today with that massive max supply

The main point should be the real use case that will be determining how big the impact will be created by the total supply. As you can see some coins have multi-billion supply but they can still make it goes to the moon right now. CRO has proven it can be done with the real use case.

[Dariusburst]

So there's 6000+ coins out there. Look at the max supply. A coin with a large max supply and rapid emission of new coins will most likely never surge in value. This is because the worlds total capital is divided with so many optional coins. The larger the supply, the more capital it needs to spike in value. Even Bitcoin with a max supply of only 21 million needed massive amount of capital to get where it is now. So any coin with double that, will need the double amount of capital to get to the same place. So with so many options out there if you want good value pump. Look for something with max supply of only like 1 million. (which of course needs to have a utility too to stay in growing demand)

The only way to double the amount of capital is not by intentionally pumping money into the project since it's not a pump and dump scheme but with good use case there will be good demand and this will keep attracting new whales to the project, the more the demand the better for the project

[TanakabZX]

Limited max supply is always better, if combined with very good use case it will be more better than having large max supply, only very few crypto projects with large max supply are doing fine today, like dogecoin and ripple for example. Limited max supply is better

[Lantind]

Limited max supply is always better, if combined with very good use case it will be more better than having large max supply, only very few crypto projects with large max supply are doing fine today, like dogecoin and ripple for example. Limited max supply is better

True, the limited supply of coins is always better for the potential price and volume, because if a coin is limited in supply and there is very much demand, then obviously the price will also be very reasonable when in the market.

[Viscore]

Limited max supply is always better, if combined with very good use case it will be more better than having large max supply, only very few crypto projects with large max supply are doing fine today, like dogecoin and ripple for example. Limited max supply is better

True, the limited supply of coins is always better for the potential price and volume, because if a coin is limited in supply and there is very much demand, then obviously the price will also be very reasonable when in the market.

Not only that, the size of the supply matters too, though there are coins with huge supply that are successful, investors would still prefer to invest in a project with only millions of supply. Of course limited supply or fix supply is better, just like bitcoin, it's a good model to follow for a project to be successful.

Supply though is just one of the factors to look into, but most of the coins that rises high in value are those with low supply, so as long as you believe on the project and you like the supply, you should invest on it as these kind of coins are good for long term hold.

[jrrsparkles]

Maximum supply has no effect if the project is good, its price value per unit will be calculated based on the demand high max supply means the price per unit will be cheaper but make sure that coin doesn't have infinite volume in that case only the coin will lose its value if coins are mined or printed by the team.