NEW STYLE OF CAMPAIGN

[leea-1334]

It sounds like a good rule at first but should not all people be just required to act normally as they would at any regular activity without doing different? And everyone who uses social media has patterns, but all platforms view burst posting as spam, even Twitter and FB will block you for doing that. But counting between hours? That is already quite difficult and very unnatural to do.

[1715084464]

1715084464

[1715084464]

1715084464

[1715084464]

1715084464

[1715084464]

1715084464

[CaVO32]

Bounty managers have every right to make any rules for their Campaigns, I don't see how this is surprising for you OP because it's not new at all, if you don't like the rules just leave the Campaign and find another one

Correctly said. No one is forcing you to join this bounty. If this doesn't fit you, try a different one.
In my opinion, it's a better strategy to reduce spam and keep the conversation in the forum healthy.
Many people seems to be making posts just to complete their post requirements in a short amount of time.
This restriction would place a cooling period where the users would go through posts and decides what and where would they be involved in discussion increasing healthy conversation.

Their campaign, their rules. As long as it is align with the forum's rules and regulations, there's no problem with that. So it is up to the bounty participant if he will join or not, given those requirements. One should not complain about being strict as this is their project. They have the privilege to choose their participants. Also, being in a campaign is a privilege as well, because this is not the main goal of the forum. To share knowledge and have meaningful discussions are just few objectives of this forum. Campaign and bounty programs are just perks.

[Bitstar_coin]

This is often done to reduce burst posting, many participants usually post more within seconds although I know it seem a bit strict kind of rules to apply on a campaign, because often someone can just make 2-3 post within 4 hours, I think it would have been better if the bm make it an hour each, 4hrs in between post is just too much in my opinion, but again the bm have the final say on how best to run his campaign.

[Greatchu]

This bounty rule is too strict, this isn't a way to avoid spamming, I've seen bounty campaigns that ask hunters to make 15 posts per week which can be completed doing 3 posts per day but forcing 4 hours per posts every day isn't good, an hour between posts is still better, many members on here have other things to do than spending hours on the forum everyday, they make posts on here with their spare times

[Genemind]

I think this isn't bad it seems since the only post required to be eligible for the stake is just 10 posts weekly, you can even finish that by just posting at least twice daily. This is to avoid spamming. In regards to bounty rules and even accepting participants, it all depends on the manager since they have the discretion to do so just like any bounty managers.

[Kotone]

Bounty managers have every right to make any rules for their Campaigns, I don't see how this is surprising for you OP because it's not new at all, if you don't like the rules just leave the Campaign and find another one

Maybe thats too much for him. Actually they are lucky to post minimal in forum and still they got awarded stake. The campaign manager seems to hate the spammers on this forum thats why he created this kind of rules. I dont know if this was implemented before but I dony agree with the span of posting its too long. They limited it to 4hrs, what if there is an idea and you should post but you forgot since you need to post before you post again.

[plvbob0070]

This is often done to reduce burst posting, many participants usually post more within seconds although I know it seem a bit strict kind of rules to apply on a campaign, because often someone can just make 2-3 post within 4 hours, I think it would have been better if the bm make it an hour each, 4hrs in between post is just too much in my opinion, but again the bm have the final say on how best to run his campaign.

That's true, this rule can really reduce burst posting. The campaign only required 10 posts per week so I think the rules are quite suitable for the campaign. Just like what others say here, only the bounty managers have the right to create/change the rules in the campaign. Being a bounty hunter, we are obliged to follow the rules in order to earn the rewards. And I agree with @VDraci, it's better to find another campaign if you are not satisfied with the rules of the campaign.

Some of the people here hate seeing spam post and they even report it. That's why having that kind of rule is quite good for me. Who knows if the bounty manager will change the rules.

[pilosopotasyo]

10 posts a week that's roughly 2 posts daily I think it's manageable you can do it in the morning then do it again the evening , just be sure that you are posting with substance, not just posting for the sake of posting, I prefer this in bounty campaign on ICO.

[raidarksword]

I am okay with this rule on signature campaign to avoid spam post which is a very effective by the way. You can reach 10 post per week if you post 2 times a day on morning and evening. In my opinion it's effective measures for assurance of spam free in the forum.  I observed that deletion of some post due to outburst posting that really triggered the moderators, so it's okay that to have gap per post to maintain the organic conversation in the forum.

[arufox]

That's not new style, there are already bounty using rules like that, it is the prerogative of the bounty manager. I think easy, if you dont like rules like that, dont join in champaign, still many champaign not using that rules

I see you join in HOMT signature champaign, so why did you take care of that?? Just focus in your champaign

[casperBGD]

it is a rule that should compromise spam posting, but it could not do it
meaningful posts could be written with less than 4 hours between posts, and you can use timer to write posts every four hours, and those posts could not be worth anything

while one should consider the rule before entering campaign, bounty managers should also read the feedback from hunters, to improve rules and post quality in next campaigns, but you can not see that with managers on btt

[rahmatullah9305]

Shouldn't be a problem for you if you don't like rules, just find another Signature campaign that suits your taste, I don't have all that time to post every 4hours, I made three to four posts everyday and the difference is just minutes, I have other things to do

Yes, that's right, actually it is not a problem to be debated about, moreover the rules in each campaign are clearly different, so if the rules of the campaign are very burdensome for us, then it is better to find others according to the tastes that we want, besides everyone also have their respective activities which are more important than posting.

[memed97]

10 posts a week that's roughly 2 posts daily I think it's manageable you can do it in the morning then do it again the evening , just be sure that you are posting with substance, not just posting for the sake of posting, I prefer this in bounty campaign on ICO.

It all depends on our personal judgment, others might not like it because of the very long duration of posts, and you like those rules for reasons that are easier to manage, so every campaign hunter besides adhering to campaign rules must also be good at set the time, because everyone also has another job besides this forum.

[Axelseseclevz]

I think it depends on the bounty campaign project rules and it depends on the bounty manager who put the rules. The freedom is still there but hunters should foollow whatever rules a bounty manager  imposed either they need to post with 4hours gap or 10post a day with 2hours gap limit or whatever rules is it.As long as it will not broke the rules of the forum.

[Reid]

But it also takes out the freedom of having an idea and you just don't want to forget it.  
Anyone could come up with new ideas and opinions anytime.

IMO, I don't like that rule.
This is a forum and you are supposed to read and input your opinion.
Also, there are members who cannot access the forum anytime they want and there is also the timezone.

As long as it is a quality post then, there is no problem with it.

[mezzaluna]

The rules are reasonable because they want their applicants to not spam different threads and campaigns are always aiming for quality content and not just the amount of posts that their applicant can do. Every campaign wants to have their applicants to post quality content because of the fact that Quality is better than Quantity in the aspect of posting.

Some past campaigns already did that but not a lot of Campaign Managers implemented this rules.

[fuer44]

maybe it is an effort to reduce spammers. but in my opinion it is personally too long. because 4 hours post distance allows anyone to only make 2 posts each day. whereas if the target is 10 posts, it will not be achieved. and I'm also sure that the participants here don't just work for the bounty campaign, there must be others. and worse, it's still unclear whether the project will be a big success or not. if yes, the price of the token reaches 0.1 - 1 eth, I think it will be a suitable reward.

[harapan]

This isn't new style because previously there was a campaign that implemented such rules before and it is true that projects that implement such rules not interest hunter because most hunters don't have enough time to wait 4 hours, they still have jobs out there that are clearly producing money (their real job)

[bittick]

10 posts a week that's roughly 2 posts daily I think it's manageable you can do it in the morning then do it again the evening , just be sure that you are posting with substance, not just posting for the sake of posting, I prefer this in bounty campaign on ICO.

It can be done easily and there was no problem with this kind of rules. As long as the hunters can deal with it and it's free for anyone to follow it when they were participating in the blueheaven bounty campaign.

[Yamifoud]

Every Bounty manager had also freedom to make his own sets of rules. But I don't think 4 hours in a gap is really reasonable for a reason that we are not all been in the forum in 24 hours or to find yourself getting online every 4hours just to make a post. Even though we think that it could help to combat spammers and burst posting but it was too long to have it. I'm not sure if there is a mistake but something like that.

Anyways, that's the call of the manager. I believe the manager isn't pushing everyone to participate in the campaign but just yourself who've brought on there. Everyone has also a freedom to leave or just ignore and find another one. Nothing to urge yourself if you are not comfortable with the said rule.