One game vs a variety: which gives higher potential to a casino?

[kryptqnick]

I've recently created a thread about the lack of success of new casinos, and one of the replies was the following:

The chances are low and odds are against unless the new casino aims to be a specific game focused gambling platform. The long term success will happen but there are questions have to be answered by the team before going to accept this decision: Will they be able to advertise among the new casino and gain the trust of players among all the old established brand casinos?

My question is, do you believe that a casino that focuses on a specific game is more likely to succeed than a casino that offers a variety of options? Is there any data related to the topic, and what is your personal opinion on the matter? Bustabit and Primedice are good examples of casinos centered around one game, but FortuneJack and Bitcasino.io succeeded with the opposite strategy. When you're choosing a casino, which seem more appealing to you: those that offer one game or those offering many games?

[1715303966]

1715303966

[1715303966]

1715303966

[1715303966]

1715303966

[swogerino]

I think and my personal preference is to have a really wide variety of choices as a gambler sometimes think when he loses money that maybe it was that slot fault so I try another one or we get mad when we lose in sport betting and then we say I will not bet anymore in sport betting and change to another type of game.

[Darker45]

I would, of course, prefer a casino which offers various games. Whether it is online or land-based, a casino where you can hop from one game to another is much preferable.

After a few hours with one game, it might grow a bit boring or you feel too unlucky with that game. If you are playing in a one-game casino, your only option is to leave or to continue gambling without having much fun or lengthen your losing streak. If the casino is offering several games, however, your option may be to shift to another game.

[imstillthebest]

one game on a good site can beat any site that has a variety of games but they are bad other things   .  not sure if what ill answer on the poll , it can be 1 and 3 i guess  ?    . every site is different  . one time i visit the site with both one games on it but i dont like the design of one site but they have other advantage or new features that cant be seen on the other site that i play    .  i also tried playing on a multi game site to try other game but one of thier games is so bad  .

[Shimmiry]

~

For an online gambling platform, focusing on one game is enough as it attracts players that seeks consistency on a game and doesn't want any other features because somehow if they focused making a good game it might out stand other platforms that offer the same game (if and only if they can make a best version). It was like making a better rip-off of a common game. Yet, for me, I preferred some platforms that I can enjoy many games with many options and features to take.

Also, if that specific platform that offers only one best version of a gambling game, they might wanted to have a good UI/UX as well with no fairness issues.

[DarkDays]

I think the casino that gives its players the most variety has the best chance of succeeding.

Not only because it is able to cater to multiple different types of players, but also because it gives the players it already has more things to do.

Crypto.games is the perfect example of this, it has a bunch of different games that cater to different player styles;

Playing for fun? Minesweeper. Want to test out strategies? Dice and roulette.

That said, I do believe there is a balance between number of features, house edge, and marketing efforts. All three need to be on point to really succeed these days.

[bitbunnny]

To my opinion variety is advantage. Casino with wide offer will attract more gamblers because each one of use has different preferences, we are all.dofferent types of players. Having narrow choice is always a risk and such casino will struggle much more to attract bigger number of players and make decent profit. Variety is always better.

[20kevin20]

I think a large contributor to the success of a casino is also the amount of people who play the said game. For example, you can't start a casino that focuses on Chess game gambling and hope for it to succeed very well.

If I was to be an owner of a casino, I'd start off with a game and make it all catchy: UI, animations, community etc. As soon as I feel like it's time to add another game and if the community wants that to happen, I would do it.

Another way I'd do it is by creating multiple websites so that each of it serves a certain gambling game. For example, I guess "PrimeDice" attracts way more dice players than "BitcoinCasino" does since it has "Dice" in its domain & brand name.

If there was a "PrimeJack" for Blackjack, a "PrimeSlots" for Slots etc I believe it might be easier to attract a wider variety of users than having a general name. Same goes for precious metals. When you want to buy Silver, chances are you'd click a "GoldSilver" domain before/instead of a "MetalShop" website.

[ethereumhunter]

If a gambling website can have many gambling games, that can attract many gamblers to visit and play the games, and I think they will stay for a long time because they are curious about every game on that site. If they can have many gambling games, they can make a big profit from various games. I prefer to play many games than in one game because if I feel bored, I can move to the other gambling games.

[mersal]

It depends on the game, I will go for the site which has one game and giving better user experience while playing because they can give best compared to multiple casino game sites.But if we just love to play different games at the same time then multiple casino is the good to go.For me its the one game gambling site is more appealing.

[bitbollo]

having a a wide variety of games is often an advantage since it can be very useful for attract players with different interests.
There are few examples of that in bitcoin/crypto industry.

Site focused in just one game can develop their brand related a specific game, but it's always a risk since if you're not the first/bigger/best you should fight against a lot of competitors ... spending energies, money etc before getting to the top.

[rhomelmabini]

Casinos are meant to have a variety of games, am I right? Can we call them a casino if they are just offering one game? I don't mean to be off-topic but I think it needs to be decode because the meaning of a casino is related to being variance.

I voted for "It does not matter, there are more important things" since future things will come up to this rather just focusing on what game you play or how many games you play on a gambling platform.

[ralle14]

More games would give their players convenience since they don't have to switch casinos but on the other hand that convenience might not be enough since we see a few of the biggest gambling sites here still going strong with just one game. For new casinos having one game is probably the best approach so they could be known for that game (plus there would be less issues to worry if there's bugs or glitches) and then start dishing out extra games.

[Ulven]

It makes no difference to me if the site offers one or more games, And most importantly, !!if the site contains many real players, imagine with me while you choose the site offers a lot of offers, but while playing your favorite game you find yourself in front of unreal players, but a group of robots. I personally love to join a fair and reliable casino, !! If the casino is reliable and fair, this is enough to attract clients, and diversification is not an important issue.

[robelneo]

My question is, do you believe that a casino that focuses on a specific game is more likely to succeed than a casino that offers a variety of options? Is there any data related to the topic, and what is your personal opinion on the matter? Bustabit and Primedice are good examples of casinos centered around one game, but FortuneJack and Bitcasino.io succeeded with the opposite strategy. When you're choosing a casino, which seem more appealing to you: those that offer one game or those offering many games?

Based on the result of the poll I can safely say that gamblers are looking for variety, it's boring for gamblers if we can only play one game,it's beneficial for both sides, some gamblers likes to play in Dice, other like Poker others like slot, the more games the more time gambler will remain on the site and that's more prof gambling operators.

[BitcoinTurk]

Although the answer to the question you mentioned is actually related to many other factors, I think the main reason is to suggest more game options. When there is only one type of game, users will not get bored or prefer this game over time, but the same service will provide different game services in different types, and will prevent the same users from prefering other services and will have the opportunity to earn the highest winnings for each user. For this reason, I voted for more than one option among the options mentioned in the questionnaire.

[deisik]

When you're choosing a casino, which seem more appealing to you: those that offer one game or those offering many games?

Seems like a tricky question to me

If there are many games available in a casino, it is reasonable to expect that it will be pretty sophisticated. Aside from a few examples you mentioned (which are single-game casinos only due to historical reasons), every casino tries to add more games as it is a winning marketing strategy and sound business model overall

However, the more games there are, the more obsolete they may become over time. With hundreds of games on board, it turns into a daunting task to keep them all up to date. Indeed, with simple games like dice it is not a serious issue, but with more advanced ones it is. It's like playing some FPS from 90's (say, Duke Nukem or Half Life) again and again

[adzino]

I would say a variety would give a casino higher potential of attracting more users. Again, we don't want the casino to be filled with hundreds of potential games (like most of the casino. Same shit but different rules). Just like 7/8 games would be enough to keep users entertained.
If there were like just one single game, people would burn out playing that and will eventually move to other casino. But, if the casino provides alternative games, there is a chance users will be able to keep themselves entertained without shifting to other casino.

[chaser15]

My question is, do you believe that a casino that focuses on a specific game is more likely to succeed than a casino that offers a variety of options?

This is quite difficult to answer. Gamblers have "different" taste.

That's not the basis for success to me. It's about how gambling site behaves along the way alongside features, promotions, etc.

Building a reputation doesn't purely base on the numbers of games.

[carlfebz2]

I've recently created a thread about the lack of success of new casinos, and one of the replies was the following:

The chances are low and odds are against unless the new casino aims to be a specific game focused gambling platform. The long term success will happen but there are questions have to be answered by the team before going to accept this decision: Will they be able to advertise among the new casino and gain the trust of players among all the old established brand casinos?

My question is, do you believe that a casino that focuses on a specific game is more likely to succeed than a casino that offers a variety of options? Is there any data related to the topic, and what is your personal opinion on the matter? Bustabit and Primedice are good examples of casinos centered around one game, but FortuneJack and Bitcasino.io succeeded with the opposite strategy. When you're choosing a casino, which seem more appealing to you: those that offer one game or those offering many games?

It would vary since no one can really judge out if a casino would succeed or not depending on the number of games that it do offer neither it would be single

or multiple ones because demand or interest would always be the key to success for a certain gambling site.If interest would stick out even on a single focused game

then it does signify that the site is doing well or does offer something unique or does interest out lots of people.

[Ryker1]

Well, we have a different way of choosing a gambling site. For me, it's a matter of number in a variety of games, just like all in one. You did not need to transfer into other gambling sites if you are looking a bookmakers' sites while the gambling site had a variety of games such as dice, roulette, slot, or even crush game ^{[that's the feature of Roobet has]}, this could be one factor that it has a potential to all gamblers to stay on the site, big PLUS is the promotion altogether with reputation.

[Mahanton]

I think the casino that gives its players the most variety has the best chance of succeeding.

Not only because it is able to cater to multiple different types of players, but also because it gives the players it already has more things to do.

Crypto.games is the perfect example of this, it has a bunch of different games that cater to different player styles;

Playing for fun? Minesweeper. Want to test out strategies? Dice and roulette.

That said, I do believe there is a balance between number of features, house edge, and marketing efforts. All three need to be on point to really succeed these days.

You are right and i do believe the same thing which if people can able to see a wide variety of games that they can play on then the more chances that it would hooked up lots of players since they do able
to see that the games that they are seeking on are already listed or available on the platform that they had visited.Almost new online casinos does offer several games compared to those who are
one or solo game been offered but we cant really avoid the fact that there are old sites that do gain up their popularity and still getting of sufficient number of players to make their business continue running like
bustabit and other similar solo-operated games.

[justdimin]

I would, of course, prefer a casino which offers various games. Whether it is online or land-based, a casino where you can hop from one game to another is much preferable.

After a few hours with one game, it might grow a bit boring or you feel too unlucky with that game. If you are playing in a one-game casino, your only option is to leave or to continue gambling without having much fun or lengthen your losing streak. If the casino is offering several games, however, your option may be to shift to another game.

Me too because while it is great to have casinos that offer a single game like Primedice never added more games but they are still one of the biggest casino but that is because dice is quite popular and primedice is the most reputed casino.

I have been following bitsler since a long time and they are a gambling giant because they always innovated themselves further and added new and cool games along with vip levels and that is why they are as popular now.

Casinos need to either make a game exclusive to their casinos or they need to continue adding new games like stake adds new slots and recently added Slide too.

[DoublerHunter]

When you're choosing a casino, which seem more appealing to you: those that offer one game or those offering many games?

Seems like a tricky question.

^ Definitely right, probably because we have different opinions on this. As I see, few of them here voted on a gambling platform that has a variety of games and I am also on them. Probably this will give a higher potential to the gambling casinos to catch the interest of gamblers to visit the site.
Some gamblers prefer to choose a way that you have a wide variety of games to choose from. Nevertheless, this kind of feature is an advantage to the gamblers, because there is no shortage of games to play, the probably busy exploring all the time and they probably did not feel "boring" if they will be experienced playing games had. But in the casino owner, this probably had a lot of work to do, take time to up to date and probably there is possible number of bugs.

[stomachgrowls]

When you're choosing a casino, which seem more appealing to you: those that offer one game or those offering many games?

Seems like a tricky question.

^ Definitely right, probably because we have different opinions on this. As I see, few of them here voted on a gambling platform that has a variety of games and I am also on them. Probably this will give a higher potential to the gambling casinos to catch the interest of gamblers to visit the site.
Some gamblers prefer to choose a way that you have a wide variety of games to choose from. Nevertheless, this kind of feature is an advantage to the gamblers, because there is no shortage of games to play, the probably busy exploring all the time and they probably did not feel "boring" if they will be experienced playing games had. But in the casino owner, this probably had a lot of work to do, take time to up to date and probably there is possible number of bugs.

When it comes to maintenance then we do know having multiple games on board would really have more job compared to those who do just focus on a single game.

This is part of the thing they had to deal with because they have been offering much more on what others dont have.They had the advantage in numbers and possible chances

to attract lots of players compared to those who do had a single game into their site.Overall, this do matter with preference because even if we do see that common Dice game, there

are still people who do keeps coming back on where they do feel comfortable or does suit them.

[abel1337]

It's better to have choices than stuck in just a single game if you ask me, This will be an advantage to the gamblers who are playing multiple gambling games. It's ok to have many games in a single casino as long as they can manage the games and avoid conflicts or lags because there are too many games in the site. User experience is the most important thing. Also one of the advantages of a casino that has many games is you can avoid transaction fees whenever you want to switch games. Comparing to a single game gambling site that you need to transfer your funds and spend more fees on just transferring to another casino that has the game you wanted to play.

[ReiMomo]

I would say, this is a case to case basis and I can't conclude which is really give a potential advantage to a certain casinos.

There are two options that I figured out about this.
First, if your gambling site is newly launched, variety of games or solo games doesn't matter. Why? because few gamblers are seeking promotions and want to test the casino first.

Second is if your gambling site has been fully built a community trust, I would say you're reputation is good enough. A variety of games doesn't matter. Look at those dice sites that focus only in dice, they are existed until now. Because they are good gambling sites. Example Bustadice, Yolodice, and Primedice.

So, I voted the last part of the choices.

[StephenJH]

There are other factors affect this decision and I doubt the specific game centered will be preferable choices after the long term business experience in this field. The variety of games gives more choices and having alternative games will not make the game session boring. The losers usually look for another game for satisfying inside cheated feeling and it should be unacceptable by the casino side to let the customer who wanna withdraw bankroll to an alternative online casino. Just my 2 cents.

[alani123]

A casino is usually related to a website with many games traditional gambling games. Roulette, baccarat, craps etc.
Some slots maybe too and potentially blackjack.

In terms of multiplier games, I think it's always better for a casino to specialize in them. That's especially true with poker. Even with bitcoin sites, we see this being true. Seals with Clubs for example is known especially for their poker tournaments and the overall community around poker.

Other than that, adding more games to a casino is going to make the initial investment required greater. I think the games that tie best with BTC and crypto for a casino are dice, maybe crash-style games and some custom ones. So in my honest opinion, best bet for someone starting a new crypto gambling website would be to invest in some known provably fair games like dice and build on them for a nice interface, cool features and neat community. It's how just dice and prime dice became big for example.

In my humble opinion, these simple provably fair games are much better than the flashy and expensive licensed casino games produced by third parties.

[Ucy]

I guess people who have specific choices will go for those that offer specific rather than multiple games, probably because the owners/admins will know the game well enough and good at providing better/quality services and handling issues easily, than what they would provide if their attentions/services were divided or focused on multiple games.
I think the multi games would be more attractive to many, especially if individual games can be handled well together by the owner/admins.       An owner could even create a betting platform and allow any kind of game launch on them, then filter out the best games for bettors to bet on. That will probably be easier than having and developing the multiple games yourself?

[deisik]

Some gamblers prefer to choose a way that you have a wide variety of games to choose from. Nevertheless, this kind of feature is an advantage to the gamblers, because there is no shortage of games to play, the probably busy exploring all the time and they probably did not feel "boring" if they will be experienced playing games had

Methinks we should distinguish between "general-purpose" casinos and more specialized ones

Examples of this would be online poker rooms or chess communities. You would expect them to stick to a single game, be it poker with its varieties or chess with various contests (standard, blitz, or whatever), right? Moreover, if a casino lists poker or chess among dozens of other games, you would be in doubt whether it is worth playing these two games there, especially when you consider yourself a seriously-minded poker or chess player

[stadus]

I think gamblers would love to have a lot of options, and as we noticed now, there are already popular casinos that are starting to add a sportsbook on their site, these are stake.com and fortunejack.

[akram143]

Number of games is not really matters to me, all I will look for their reputation and user experience.I love to try different games than sticking with a same game for too long so casinos with more games will be priority than single game.

[Genemind]

A casino with varieties of games is good, however, excessive game choices are just a waste. I've seen some sites that there are different kinds of slot games, different kinds of poker games. Having a few and selected games will allow the team to focus more on the development instead of having too much variation. I also admire gambling platforms who has their own specialization in regards to a kind of game. Such as Primedice, Bust-a-bit, satoshimines, and etc.

[mirakal]

I think gamblers would love to have a lot of options, and as we noticed now, there are already popular casinos that are starting to add a sportsbook on their site, these are stake.com and fortunejack.

I haven't gambled with fortunejack yet, particularly on sports but I am a fan of stake.com, they launch their casino just like other regular casinos but when they added a sports betting in their site, that made me amaze and I started to love the site, so yeah, I like casinos that are offering different kind of games.

[acroman08]

My question is, do you believe that a casino that focuses on a specific game is more likely to succeed than a casino that offers a variety of options?

No, I've seen several online casinos that only focuses on one game that died out and the same for casinos that has a variety of games.

Is there any data related to the topic, and what is your personal opinion on the matter?

I can't give any data. I am just speaking from my personal observation.

Bustabit and Primedice are good examples of casinos centered around one game, but FortuneJack and Bitcasino.io succeeded with the opposite strategy.

even with a different strategy, you'll notice that these casinos and other successful crypto casinos have a great system on their website that gamblers look for which other gambling sites don't have or lack something that these successful casinos have.

When you're choosing a casino, which seem more appealing to you: those that offer one game or those offering many games?

although I would look more into a gambling site that has a variety of games, but in the end, great service is still my priority

[Crypto22265]

I definitely think that a casino with multiple games is better and that's because there are options available for anyone to play on that casino. If you are a one game based casino you are only going to attract people attracted to that specific game. Of course,if it's a popular game then the casino might also become popular but these days you would have to create a new game that a lot of people enjoy and it's not yet listed on other casinos and that's kind of hard to do. Primedice and bustabit are two of the oldest crypto casinos in the industry and at the time they launched their platforms I'm sure there weren't many options available out there. That's why they got so popular and everyone plays dice and crash on their website.

[Assface16678]

For me, I think one of the best ways to make more earning in your business if this is a casino is making a lot of games so many people right away are playing those games and earn that money and if you think most of the players or customer are falling down their money on your games this is a good opportunity to make a lot of income. As a user of different games, this is a good thing because sometimes it is more tiring to have the same game and losing all of those games.

Having the different option is good too and it depends right now to the player if they are doing to stay to that game or change your game and try your luck and chance to win

[plvbob0070]

Obviously, I will choose those who offer various games. As a gambler, people usually get tired of doing or playing the same thing over and over, it would be better to have different choices to enjoy. Some gamblers like to explore different games while playing so they will stick to a gambling site if they feel contented with the games they offer.

And if you are operating a casino, you will attract more customers if you have a variety of games since you can gather those customers even if they have different tastes. But if you will just stick with a single game, you will only attract gamblers who like that game.

[Sadlife]

I for one prefers a gambling site that has many variety of games to play on due to the fact that after a while of playing. The game becomes boring especially when its repetitive and a strategic game.
It's better to try out new things because it gives you the thrill and excitement.

[kryptqnick]

I think and my personal preference is to have a really wide variety of choices as a gambler sometimes think when he loses money that maybe it was that slot fault so I try another one or we get mad when we lose in sport betting and then we say I will not bet anymore in sport betting and change to another type of game.

To you and many others writing that many games are better:
I understand that, but at the same time one could argue that when a casino focuses on one game, the user experience with this game is high-quality. If a casino pulls the same amount of resources in 15 games, each if these games might be so-so. So for a new casino that doesn't have much money and other resources it might be more effective to focus on making one game great rather than many games on mediocre level.

I see that a majority of voters choose a casino with a variety of games, and I see why it makes a lot of sense, at least from user experience.

[FlightyPouch]

I don't know but for me, I go with one game online site. I started betting on sites like FreeBitco.in and PrimeDice since I am just playing Dice at that time. I guess with the growing community of crypto gamblers, the demand for other games grows with it and that just means more games they wanted.

For me, one game is the best. It is my personal preference since I will not be looking in another game and consider playing it which might cut my balance into two that will make me suffer in the long run.

[semobo]

I don't know but for me, I go with one game online site. I started betting on sites like FreeBitco.in and PrimeDice since I am just playing Dice at that time. I guess with the growing community of crypto gamblers, the demand for other games grows with it and that just means more games they wanted.

For me, one game is the best. It is my personal preference since I will not be looking in another game and consider playing it which might cut my balance into two that will make me suffer in the long run.

Obviously I will choose gambling site with multiple games availability because we no need to spend too much time while playing different games but is this not only enough to get success They also need to make every user feel comfortable while betting,if there is any issue regarding anything the customer support should be available at any time and prorize their issue so this can earn trust to the site.

[smyslov]

A casino that offers many games wins unanimously because gamblers prefers a lot of game, some gamblers had a habit of shifting games they want to test games in one night to see what games will get them lucky bet and roll, in some of the gambling sites I played three games and I'm sure some gamblers also do this.

[glowing10]

A casino that offers many games wins unanimously because gamblers prefers a lot of game, some gamblers had a habit of shifting games they want to test games in one night to see what games will get them lucky bet and roll, in some of the gambling sites I played three games and I'm sure some gamblers also do this.

I would personally love to have many games since after a certain time of playing a game I want change and cannot just sit on the same game again. Also, at times your luck may also favour much better playing other games then a single game where you keep losing. So, from an individual perspective wider the choice, more the entertainment for me and more fun to play as well.

[lixer]

This is quite difficult to answer. Gamblers have "different" taste.

But having multiple games would always have an advantage over a single game because the casino offers multiple games does not affect that single game anyways so having multiple games is best for any casino but only as long as you can manage the users and don't get crashed. Recently goosebet opened and they offer a few games but the website was lagging so much I had to just stop betting there once my deposit was lost.

Building a reputation doesn't purely base on the numbers of games.

That is very correct and once you have a good reputation it is easy to run the casino with just a single game and unique features and giveaways. I feel more than games and anything people love to see getting bonuses from time to time and that is what a few casinos know and hence some casinos are so massive while others can't even manage operational costs.

[stomachgrowls]

I've recently created a thread about the lack of success of new casinos, and one of the replies was the following:

The chances are low and odds are against unless the new casino aims to be a specific game focused gambling platform. The long term success will happen but there are questions have to be answered by the team before going to accept this decision: Will they be able to advertise among the new casino and gain the trust of players among all the old established brand casinos?

My question is, do you believe that a casino that focuses on a specific game is more likely to succeed than a casino that offers a variety of options? Is there any data related to the topic, and what is your personal opinion on the matter? Bustabit and Primedice are good examples of casinos centered around one game, but FortuneJack and Bitcasino.io succeeded with the opposite strategy. When you're choosing a casino, which seem more appealing to you: those that offer one game or those offering many games?

The more the better just like in Crypto.games which do offer Dice, Slot, Blackjack, Roulette, Video Poker, Plinko, Minesweeper and Lott but gaining up popularity and trust wont really be just enough on offering lots of games.

Of course it will require lots of effort on making your site to be trusted and when you are just new then thats the most challenging part of it owners on how they would able to gain up trust and support.

We do see that even single game type of gambling sites do able to get users.Why? they give out the best service out there and also you can sure about fairness.

These are the common qualities on where gamblers do seek of.

[shoreno]

A casino that offers many games wins unanimously because gamblers prefers a lot of game, some gamblers had a habit of shifting games they want to test games in one night to see what games will get them lucky bet and roll, in some of the gambling sites I played three games and I'm sure some gamblers also do this.

I would personally love to have many games since after a certain time of playing a game I want change and cannot just sit on the same game again. Also, at times your luck may also favour much better playing other games then a single game where you keep losing. So, from an individual perspective wider the choice, more the entertainment for me and more fun to play as well.

i prefer different games too  .  its my ritual that when i loose or win on one game ill then stop playing it because the game will make revenge on me in the long run but ill only play a different game or different casino if that casino im playing doesnt support other games  .  casino's now are adding more games slowly but most of them started with one game only  .  thats good so that we can avoid jumping from one site to another , if the site already offer good incentives  .

[tbterryboy]

I personally prefer a casino with multiple games and the reason behind it is because after playing a particular game over a week or two weeks makes me feel very dizzy and bored from the game. When primedice was first introduced dice was such a great idea and looked like dice alone can carry the crypto gambling but with time people got bored and now new games are required like Plinko, Slots, bustabit and Keno and many others are there.

As far as chances of winning goes, I feel they don't change much depending on whatever game I play because when I am lucky I will be winning even if I am spinning roulette and if I am not lucky even sports bet at 1.01 will lose.

[dentolas]

I think that having a range of games to choose from is the best choice as you always have something else to play after you get frustrated in a specific game, it allows you to choose according to your mood and it just seems more apealing than to have a whole casino dedicated to that one game

[seleme]

I've recently created a thread about the lack of success of new casinos, and one of the replies was the following:

The chances are low and odds are against unless the new casino aims to be a specific game focused gambling platform. The long term success will happen but there are questions have to be answered by the team before going to accept this decision: Will they be able to advertise among the new casino and gain the trust of players among all the old established brand casinos?

My question is, do you believe that a casino that focuses on a specific game is more likely to succeed than a casino that offers a variety of options? Is there any data related to the topic, and what is your personal opinion on the matter? Bustabit and Primedice are good examples of casinos centered around one game, but FortuneJack and Bitcasino.io succeeded with the opposite strategy. When you're choosing a casino, which seem more appealing to you: those that offer one game or those offering many games?

Yes, I still hold the same opinion and there is no reason to believe the all followers have to agree with me. The Chinese game focused casinos which I have liked most mainly focus on the unique games or they put more effort on one side of the "weighing machine". Btw, it will not cost big, and having an extra budget will let the management develop the features of the casino as agreed with gamblers.

[desticy]

All people are different, and as much coverage as possible is important for a casino. If there is no variation, some people may not be interested in what is available in the casino.
Besides losing people often want to change the "situation" and try something else, if this is not possible, they will have to look for another place, and this may lead to loss of customers.
In my opinion, the more opportunities people are given, the more free they feel in decision-making.

[Vaculin]

I voted.

Casinos that offers many games, this is the new type of casinos now, they don't limit the number of games as they know there's a big competition in the space already. More games could attract more gamblers, that's how they get their volume increase and would result to increase of income as well.

[kawetsriyanto]

I think both the casinos focusing on one game or various games have the same chance to succeed.
Even if casinos with various games can attract more types of gamblers but there are more important things having crucial factors to determine the success of the casinos. The crucial factors that I think play a more important role are reliability, friendly services, cheap cost, security, and many gift offers. These should be things to make gamblers feel comfortable in that casino sites. It doesn't matter if the casino sites only have a single game, with having better those crucial factors, then they can have a chance to be successful.

[finaleshot2016]

Since the casino is built for gaming and is a venture for the owner, it would be easy to draw more gamblers by offering many games. If I'm going to get a chance to go to a casino, I 'm going to do it all and get fun on all different kinds of gambling games, because it's better to experience a lot of things. In the other hand, casino centered around a game is an advantage, people with the same interest can find your casino quickly as it is focused about this one game. And if you've managed to popularize your casino on a particular game and have a lot of other games too, then maybe that would lead you to success as a casino owner.