-

[Bitstarzisascam]

-

[1714994210]

1714994210

[1714994210]

1714994210

[1714994210]

1714994210

[TryNinja]

If all you want to do is hold USDT and other cheaper altcoins, then it's probably ok. There are better alternatives, though. They lack a few basic *advanced* features like fees customization and are not open-source, so they only seem like a "good alternative" if you really want a simple user-friendly wallet.

If you are holding the ERC-20 USDT token, you can use pretty much any Ethereum wallet, which includes the Trezor wallet itself (Beta), MyEtherWallet, Metamask, etc...

[bitmover]

You can see a guide here on how to connect your trezor to My Ether wallet


https://wiki.trezor.io/Apps:MyEtherWallet

This is problably the best solution, as myetherwallet is recommended by the manufactorer

 https://www.myetherwallet.com/

[hugeblack]

Hey guys, do you recommend connecting a Trezor to a Exodus wallet and use it from there? since it supports USDT and other stable coins.

Understand why you choose them because they appear as the first search results, when you search for wallets for some altcoin wallets.
It is dangerous to rely on Exodus wallet to secure a lot of money, and since you use hardware wallet, I assume you are saving a lot of money.
Also, USDT is on several platforms, so it is better to use trust wallet with it and send it to Trezor Hardware wallet.

[HCP]

It is dangerous to rely on Exodus wallet to secure a lot of money, and since you use hardware wallet, I assume you are saving a lot of money.
Also, USDT is on several platforms, so it is better to use trust wallet with it and send it to Trezor Hardware wallet.

It's not really "dangerous" if you're using a Trezor (or other compatible hardware wallet)... in general, the software wallet you are using in combination with a hardware wallet is not that important, provided of course that you pay attention to what the hardware wallet is displaying/telling you in regards to the outputs being created/sent... and addresses being generated for receiving etc.

The obvious downside to Exodus is simply that it dictates fees... there isn't even any "low priority", "high priority", let alone a "custom" setting... and from what I've seen, the fees it suggests "enforces", are generally over-estimated which will result in extra costs.

[Darker45]

If all you want to do is hold USDT and other cheaper altcoins, then it's probably ok. There are better alternatives, though. They lack a few basic *advanced* features like fees customization and are not open-source, so they only seem like a "good alternative" if you really want a simple user-friendly wallet.

It's probably for disposal if OP is looking for a hot wallet to connect to his/her hardware wallet. Well, OP is saying he/she intends to use it from the software wallet. There is probably no point to import from a hardware wallet to a software wallet if the intention was holding.

Anyway, I'm not sure what other stablecoins does OP wish to own and use but as far as USDT is concerned why not stick to Trezor's own?