IEO might soon become an history in crypto world soon

[Maxstl007]

Another thing that's wrong but right about IEO projects are the fee of top exchanges for IEO launchpad, for example binance exchange requires way too much but I believe new projects who are damn serious about the success of their project should be able to come in agreement with binance team

[Maxstl007]

The only project that still use DYCO for crowdfunding is origin protocol, I need to see more than just one project getting succeed through DYCO before I can give a try, I can still remember IMO till date if that still rings a bell, for now I prefer IEO, thanks for sharing

If DYCO can work very well and still requires not too costly money then it might be the best choice for small time project team who aren't well funded, at least they will stop using p2pb2b or vindax exchange

[ven7net]

IEOs are not public offerings, which entirely misses the principle of crowdfunding, am I right or wrong? ICO is the only fundraising strategy that works wonders publicly but since we have no better crowdfunding than the not so transparent crowdfunding (IEO) we just have to accept things as they are presently?

The only crowdfunding I'm looking forward to is DYCO ( dynamic coin offering) which I once thought was a complete joke but not until Orion Protocol used this crowdfunding platform to raise fund and the result were satisfying, DYCO is from DAO MAKER and it is designed to increase the effectiveness of token fundraising events.

For the first 16 months after token distribution, the entire circulating supply is backed by USDC. 80% of the funds raised initially are set aside to be used to buy back tokens from dissatisfied holders.

Note: I'm just sharing this on my own, I'm not part of DYCO team and I'm not paid to do this, if you want to learn more about DYCO check the link down below, thanks

https://daomaker.com/dyco

This is really interesting information. Of course, for the development of the crypto market, as well as the market for crypto crowdfunding companies, new and improved systems are needed. We already know ICO, IEO and others and see how they work. I can’t say that they show excellent results, since very often problems arise with the same IEOs. Maybe DYCO will be a success, but it needs to get more attention and there should be more new crowdfunding companies on its base to show its efficiency. It is certainly important for the crypto community to have a stable system, as this would solve a number of problems in this direction. Thanks to your information, I will pay more attention to DYCO to understand how effective this system is.

[InwardContour]

If DYCO actually promises to refund dissatisfied investors according to OP, this means it beats IEO in that regard. However, when comparing the all new DYCO and IEO, be sure to do side by side comparison with their pros and cons. The bottom line remains to achieve success in crowdfunding and also to exclude scam, so IEO still plays a big role for now and has been really helpful especially when done on reputable exchanges. I didn't really know orionprotocol made use of DYCO, sounds good.

[semobo]

IEOs are not public offerings, which entirely misses the principle of crowdfunding, am I right or wrong? ICO is the only fundraising strategy that works wonders publicly but since we have no better crowdfunding than the not so transparent crowdfunding (IEO) we just have to accept things as they are presently?

The only crowdfunding I'm looking forward to is DYCO ( dynamic coin offering) which I once thought was a complete joke but not until Orion Protocol used this crowdfunding platform to raise fund and the result were satisfying, DYCO is from DAO MAKER and it is designed to increase the effectiveness of token fundraising events.

For the first 16 months after token distribution, the entire circulating supply is backed by USDC. 80% of the funds raised initially are set aside to be used to buy back tokens from dissatisfied holders.

Note: I'm just sharing this on my own, I'm not part of DYCO team and I'm not paid to do this, if you want to learn more about DYCO check the link down below, thanks

https://daomaker.com/dyco

No matter what type of crowdfunding method is used to collect the funds still all the funds are going to be in the hands of project team so its their responsibility to spend the collected money towards the development of the project as they proposed while collecting funds but most of them will slip from their promise and give just the words to the investors without actually any progress towards developing their project.

[Greatdev]

IEOs are not public offerings, which entirely misses the principle of crowdfunding, am I right or wrong? ICO is the only fundraising strategy that works wonders publicly but since we have no better crowdfunding than the not so transparent crowdfunding (IEO) we just have to accept things as they are presently?

The only crowdfunding I'm looking forward to is DYCO ( dynamic coin offering) which I once thought was a complete joke but not until Orion Protocol used this crowdfunding platform to raise fund and the result were satisfying, DYCO is from DAO MAKER and it is designed to increase the effectiveness of token fundraising events.

For the first 16 months after token distribution, the entire circulating supply is backed by USDC. 80% of the funds raised initially are set aside to be used to buy back tokens from dissatisfied holders.

Note: I'm just sharing this on my own, I'm not part of DYCO team and I'm not paid to do this, if you want to learn more about DYCO check the link down below, thanks

https://daomaker.com/dyco

Lol I don't believe this sir, IEO is the best thing ever, for a new project to get listed on binance the team always make sure the project won't ruin their reputation, I like MakerDAO but I'm not sure they can screen new projects like how top exchanges can but IEO is still doing so well

[Bonwin]

Those who are giving their fundraising programme another name are only rebranding. IEO is still very much relevant and to me, it is still the best, most especially those that are done on bigger exchanges.
Even if the name is rebranded, in as much as it is doe on a reputable exchange, it is still a sister to IEO.

[ScamViruS]

IEO is still in a good position in the hands of some big exchanges. Those exchanges have somehow fixed the IEO and are giving profits to the participants. So it seems to investors more interested to the IEO than ICO. However, no one knows the news behind it and no one keeps track of the market dump after the listing. So there will be some more time in the IEO market. And the scam exchanges, which have stolen the money of their own customers using the name of IEO, will not be able to stay in the market for long. So it seems to me that IEO will continue to be listed on the big exchanges in the days ahead.

[KaratX]

IEO is still going to be around for a very long time to come, it works better than ICO in terms of reliability, all it's gonna cost is top exchanges and the result will definitely be a satisfying one, DYCO can work out but can't beat IEO

[suvo05]

In 2016-2018 cryptoworld was flooded with a huge large number of ICOs, among which more than 70% were fake. When all were searing for a solution the IEO brought the solution to bring back the trust on the legit projects. If you ask people to invest now 90 out of 100 times they will choose IEO over the ICO.

[Anonylz]

Eventually project team will make the decision of which fundraising system will be much better for them to raise funds to support their project, I also think ieo are not 100% the sure way to raise funds especially for new startup projects because the conditions of some exchange are often too difficult for this new project to meet up with, at the end, the project will not be able to raise the desired funds required to start project development,
Am not very familiar with dyco but whatever will be better and much secure for new projects to raise funds will be a great idea, if dyco system of fundraising will be better than what we have at present, then I think project team should make their decision accordingly.

[Festac]

Eventually project team will make the decision of which fundraising system will be much better for them to raise funds to support their project, I also think ieo are not 100% the sure way to raise funds especially for new startup projects because the conditions of some exchange are often too difficult for this new project to meet up with, at the end, the project will not be able to raise the desired funds required to start project development,
Am not very familiar with dyco but whatever will be better and much secure for new projects to raise funds will be a great idea, if dyco system of fundraising will be better than what we have at present, then I think project team should make their decision accordingly.

I understand, it's very hard for some new projects to go on binance and other top exchanges because of their high requirements but isn't this the reason why we have less bad projects on top exchanges? That's the part you missing

[wmaurik]

I don't think IEO is a public offering and this is more like an event listing on an exchange, but this certainly won't be easy to disappear because I think that until next year IEO will still be there because it's like an ICO trend that hasn't been lost even though people investing in ICO It's been drastically reduced, if there is something new this is a good thing, I just found out about DYCO in terms of the concept is quite interesting and seems to be the next trend like IEO.

[Festac]

Eventually project team will make the decision of which fundraising system will be much better for them to raise funds to support their project, I also think ieo are not 100% the sure way to raise funds especially for new startup projects because the conditions of some exchange are often too difficult for this new project to meet up with, at the end, the project will not be able to raise the desired funds required to start project development,
Am not very familiar with dyco but whatever will be better and much secure for new projects to raise funds will be a great idea, if dyco system of fundraising will be better than what we have at present, then I think project team should make their decision accordingly.

Not all new projects deserved to be here, Cartesi get listed on binance because the team are prepared, I'd say if new devs aren't prepared for successful fundraising they shouldn't launch their projects, IEO still works and I like the fact that without top exchanges you can't get good results

[cryptonx]

IEOs are not public offerings, which entirely misses the principle of crowdfunding, am I right or wrong? ICO is the only fundraising strategy that works wonders publicly but since we have no better crowdfunding than the not so transparent crowdfunding (IEO) we just have to accept things as they are presently?

The only crowdfunding I'm looking forward to is DYCO ( dynamic coin offering) which I once thought was a complete joke but not until Orion Protocol used this crowdfunding platform to raise fund and the result were satisfying, DYCO is from DAO MAKER and it is designed to increase the effectiveness of token fundraising events.

For the first 16 months after token distribution, the entire circulating supply is backed by USDC. 80% of the funds raised initially are set aside to be used to buy back tokens from dissatisfied holders.

Note: I'm just sharing this on my own, I'm not part of DYCO team and I'm not paid to do this, if you want to learn more about DYCO check the link down below, thanks

https://daomaker.com/dyco

not so fast, because the demands on IEO still high my friend
maybe someday IEO will be a history just like STO, but as i said before thats need more time
about Dyco, i just heard this crowfunding methode from you

[Shallow]

Although we can't rule out the fact that it might be hard for IEO to become history but we can also have in mind that change is the only thing that is constant in this world, and the crypto space is not exempted. Yes, IEO is very legit unlike ICO or better still, IEO on good exchanges are worthwhile which has reduced exit scam to a lowest minimum but what if another method comes up with better features? There will be a competition and the one that users finds more favourable will win, that is to say users are the determinant factor of which fundraising method that will work or not. But till then, let's continue using IEO as it is still working well till date until a better one comes up.

[hatshepsut93]

IEO isn't bad only because of exchanges, all these crypto offerings are inherently flawed, because it's a perfect model for scamming - scammers stay anonymous on the Internet, offer people to buy useless digital coins with a promise that one day they will be useful, but in reality there is no mechanism for verifying that these developers will even lift a finger to developer the product.

[NS-Soul]

I don't think that IEO will became a history all I can say it will remain and IEO was upgraded unlike ICO that became the history because they didn't change the way they run to run a funds for now who is the one that upgrade into something it will be remain and the people like the IEO because it was handle on the exchange itself they don't need a gas to transfer their funds into exchange.

[Yaunfitda]

IEO isn't bad only because of exchanges, all these crypto offerings are inherently flawed, because it's a perfect model for scamming - scammers stay anonymous on the Internet, offer people to buy useless digital coins with a promise that one day they will be useful, but in reality there is no mechanism for verifying that these developers will even lift a finger to developer the product.

Specially after the developers got the needed funding, the thought to exit scam will be present. And as we all know, this is just a rehearse of an old ICO model, nothing has change a bit, except that this is being run or launch from a supposedly reputed exchange. But it didn't mitigate the risk that the people behind can still scam people and developers are not going to give a shit as long as they are making easy money from gullible individuals, IEO will not stop.

[torrantz]

IEO is still going to be around for a very long time to come, it works better than ICO in terms of reliability, all it's gonna cost is top exchanges and the result will definitely be a satisfying one, DYCO can work out but can't beat IEO

ICO is even still existed until today even it's not so impressive as IEO. As long as the key of ICO that called exchange site will be alive and there was no reason for IEO to be another history in the future.
DYCO is not getting hyped caused by it's an overrated mechanism. People still prefer with IEO