IEO might soon become an history in crypto world soon

[CaVO32]

IEO is still going to be around for a very long time to come, it works better than ICO in terms of reliability, all it's gonna cost is top exchanges and the result will definitely be a satisfying one, DYCO can work out but can't beat IEO

ICO is even still existed until today even it's not so impressive as IEO. As long as the key of ICO that called exchange site will be alive and there was no reason for IEO to be another history in the future.
DYCO is not getting hyped caused by it's an overrated mechanism. People still prefer with IEO

People prefer IEO on top exchanges like Binance. But for other substandard exchanges, IEO is not an attractive launchpad especially those with low trading volumes. The case of Binance is different, because before a project is accepted to their launchpad, Binance is very strict and is doing their investigation per se. However, there are still few projects that can surpass their strict selection. But in any case, people trust more if Binance is handling the IEO. Right now, IEO is still alive but if projects continue to fall even with BNB management, IEO will also be a history soon.

[1715116151]

1715116151

[1715116151]

1715116151

[Denamen]

I don't think IEO is a public offering and this is more like an event listing on an exchange, but this certainly won't be easy to disappear because I think that until next year IEO will still be there because it's like an ICO trend that hasn't been lost even though people investing in ICO It's been drastically reduced, if there is something new this is a good thing, I just found out about DYCO in terms of the concept is quite interesting and seems to be the next trend like IEO.

Most people come to IEO for profit and after they have made enough money they will tend to leave the project. I am familiar with this and if the IEO project is launched at reputable exchanges like Binance, the investor will skip the evaluation and quickly look for opportunities to participate. I guess, IEO will always exist in this market and will certainly be better than ICO so if you are considering then should only choose IEO projects at the exchanges that people often recommend.

[Doranile432]

It's only something that doesn't work becomes history, IEO works better than ICO through top exchanges and I'm loving it, right now I don't even pray for another ways to raise funds, quack new projects are the only projects that will have problem raising funds through top exchanges

[LuciferMorningstar]

Soon is a stretch definition when I haven't yet seen any reliable method of raising fund that could replace IEO effective. Sure not every IEO promise back profit but they are mile better than ICO and if some thing want to replace it, they also need to mile better than the current IEO.

[blockman]

IEO is still performing well in this market, I still see a lot of projects are successfully raising funds with IEO and prices have increased many times compared to the beginning. Choose the IEO of the top exchanges in this market to be as safe as possible

If that's what you think about IEO, ok. But to me, it's also going with the same path as the ICOs did. The factor is big if the IEO is being done on a known exchange so that's why I have said nearly, and soon they might be dead for real once there's nothing new anymore about them.

Saying IEO and ICO are near their dead bed is unacceptable because it's like you saying binance exchange and other big exchanges aren't performing very well with new IEO projects anymore, IEO still rocks and once binance and other top exchanges start giving bad IEO results then I will belief its the end for IEO

It's ok if you can't accept it, that's only an opinion of mine. It's nearly to be like that but as long as it survives then that's ok for IEO supporters and investors.

[Untomabur]

Soon is a stretch definition when I haven't yet seen any reliable method of raising fund that could replace IEO effective. Sure not every IEO promise back profit but they are mile better than ICO and if some thing want to replace it, they also need to mile better than the current IEO.

IEO projects are better than ICO, why? because we can distinguish IEO from good and bad,
while ICO is very difficult for us to distinguish, so IEO is much better

[rahmatullah9305]

IEO projects are better than ICO, why? because we can distinguish IEO from good and bad,
while ICO is very difficult for us to distinguish, so IEO is much better

Actually, we can distinguish between the two fundraising programs, only for ICO is a little more difficult to distinguish, because the flow is almost the same in all projects, but that is not something that cannot be done, and for IEO it is indeed very clear to distinguish it , because IEO is made in the exchange, so the difference can be seen also through good exchange or bad exchange.

[kaseygriffin]

IEO is coming to an end, it has been around for more than 2 years and has helped a lot of projects successfully raise capital, but then those projects are also unable to develop and deliver products to the community. Now only the IEOs at the top exchanges in this market can provide profit to investors

IEO is still performing well in this market, currently there are still many successful projects with IEO and helping many investors to be profitable. Only the ICO is dead and if any project implements an ICO, it is quite sure they are a scam

[forexandcryptoauditor]

At least we can have IEOs as a trusted method when it is on renowned exchanges. ICOs are managed by the projects itself but its not trustworthy. Maytimes it is observed with few ICOs that they don't update the fund raised value until it is completed.
There was another method applied by a few projects like VELIc is IAO. Initial auction offering. I think as far as fund raising is transparent and with trust, any method should work fine.

[judeafante]

So far IEO is doing good it is still well supported by investors, as long as Binance is doing this IEO is still preferred by investors, I don't know much about this DYCO crowdfunding, but if this is legal and trusted and will yield profit for investors why not, we need to protect investors because they are the life of any project.

[flagpara]

IEO is coming to an end, it has been around for more than 2 years and has helped a lot of projects successfully raise capital, but then those projects are also unable to develop and deliver products to the community. Now only the IEOs at the top exchanges in this market can provide profit to investors

From the beginning, the top exchange IEO was better than any other crowdfunding. Only a few top exchange IEO failed, including Binance exchange. Actually the top exchange IEO didn't provide a good return to investors without a few IEO. The best time is during the correction time of a good volume coin.

[disconnectme]

IEO has come to stay, even during the ICO boom exchanges were still doing IEO but not at the current rate, nothing is wrong with IEO, it is a win-win situation for everyone involved. I do not fancy buy back, buy back is different from burning (Burning is used when a project makes profit and use part of the profit to buy tokens from the market unlike buy back that happens when the team use part of the ICO money to buy tokens instead of development

[JHORN]

Centralized exchanges owns IEO success and saying IEO will be history means top exchanges like binance will be out of business, well it's completely hard to accept this fact of yours, IEO and Centralized exchanges are one and it will be like that for many years to come

[sana54210]

IEO has come to stay, even during the ICO boom exchanges were still doing IEO but not at the current rate, nothing is wrong with IEO, it is a win-win situation for everyone involved. I do not fancy buy back, buy back is different from burning (Burning is used when a project makes profit and use part of the profit to buy tokens from the market unlike buy back that happens when the team use part of the ICO money to buy tokens instead of development

But OP is stating some flaws about IEO's basic mechanism like it is lagging in transparency I am not sure that the government approved stocks are doing the same thing about transparency while they are entering into crowdfunding. OP is not providing sufficient external references to support his claim. When there is something wrong in the basic fundamentals of IEO, I guess that needs to be fixed before exchanges will be swallowing innocent investors' all the money.

We cannot simply assume that there will be nothing wrong with the currently ongoing IEO model. It has fully become centralized compare to when ICOs went being conducted on this forum. Always centralized things are known for manipulation and possible hidden things. This is the reason I cannot simply ignore what OP is emphasizing.

[Idrix1]

IEOs are not public offerings, which entirely misses the principle of crowdfunding, am I right or wrong? ICO is the only fundraising strategy that works wonders publicly but since we have no better crowdfunding than the not so transparent crowdfunding (IEO) we just have to accept things as they are presently?

Left to me i believe IEO's are public offerings and it has been more secured than ICO,  The entire market had enough of every project coming up just to scam investors but since the beginning of IEO, i can assure you that projects that Launch IEO on top exchanges such as Binance and Gate hardly exit scam. Infact I'm not sure if any has exited scam so far but the rate of scams has reduced if you invest in IEO's on major exchange...the button line is, i believe IEO is here to stay

[Rengga Jati]

A crowdfunding may be  expired in certain period. But for IEO, it may not end as soon as possible. SO far, IEO is better than ICO and it is mostly used for current new projects. However, we also cannot say that this is the best way because IEO may be not good if listing the coin/token in the small exchange with small trading volume It will not be good for the development of the coin/token itself. We can still say that IEO is worthy enough if it is listed at least in the moderate exchange that has good trading volume and at least listed on CMC.

Why?
Because, if we are offered a new coin listed in IEO, the first one to ask is "what exchange?".
IN this case,as long as the team chooses more to the good exchanges, I believe that IEO will still last longer. However, if most new projects only list the or new coins in small and not worthy exchange, be ready that it may end in several years or months.

[FanEagle]

Centralized exchanges owns IEO success and saying IEO will be history means top exchanges like binance will be out of business, well it's completely hard to accept this fact of yours, IEO and Centralized exchanges are one and it will be like that for many years to come

When more people like you and I, start ignoring IEOs then it will become a history regardless of top exchanges are still into business or not; I just notify you about the other possibility for making IEO a history . When IEO checks all the basics of crowdfunding and it is being conducted only for reasonable projects after enough due diligence then I guess it will survive forever; otherwise people will start ignoring when they find more projects are not keeping their words.

We can still say that IEO is worthy enough if it is listed at least in the moderate exchange that has good trading volume and at least listed on CMC.

That is because of their dedicated userbase. What about the success rate of all listed projects? They have started delivering what they have promised? How many of coins/tokens have returned its IEO contributors more than 10% return so far. If the percentage is more than 50% of project then we can assume like IEO is doing by checking all the basics of crowdfunding.

We are not here concerned about the success of a project's crowdfunding results when they try with IEO but we need more detailed information about those IEO contributors along with their ROI.

[Bitbtc8]

Let's accept that DYCO becomes more impressive than all IEO can do combined, this won't eradicate IEO still because IEO has no problem, the choice will be left for new developers, they will choose between IEO or DYCO, that's if DYCO ever works well though

[michellee]

Centralized exchanges owns IEO success and saying IEO will be history means top exchanges like binance will be out of business, well it's completely hard to accept this fact of yours, IEO and Centralized exchanges are one and it will be like that for many years to come

Well, I think that it is normal if IEO soon will be a history in the crypto because the trend will change, and there will be a new trend that will attract more people or new people to comes to the crypto world. That happens too in the real world, and we don't have to surprise that, and we can prepare for the next new trend in the crypto world. Meanwhile, if you are still making a profit from the IEO, you can still search for another project to make more profit from crypto.

[joshua123]

It seems you been overwhelmed by dyco first list orion protocol result when it started trading. Actually thats how hype created, we all knew that the token is highly tradede because of it. Also I like yo add that dyco has specific approach or have insurance to investors. So it likely to be invested by a lot of people. I like IEO on top exchanges but some of them in the shit exchange were completely useless. IEO would never fade I think and would not be like forgotten ICO of 2017.