It's always about your choice

[Viscore]

What makes a bounty manager better? It's not about the success of the projects they introduce, it's about

1. How the handle the campaign
2. It's about fulfilling what was promised to bounty hunters
3. It's about fighting the fair fights for bounty hunters

The success of a bounty project is not in the hand of a bounty manager, the ball is in your courts, you are responsible for the bounty projects you choose, if they fail it's never bounty managers fault. Always remember this.

You have found it right but can't just blame BM of what it happens to the campaign because they are also relying on the project developers. However, it is big factor that BM how will run the campaign and how they care for their participants.

We can't deny that even reputed Bounty Managers are carefull in choosing bounty offering but its like to see that they can't make it perfect and all will run smoothly. And that makes them sounded harsh when people put a blame with them because in the first place, they don't want it to happen. It is the project owners who have a huge control.

[cryptoknightt]

but before accepting the project, the manager should first research the project that he will promote.
so at least he made an effort to reduce the scam project that was hanging around.
managers will always be indirectly responsible for the failure or success of the project they run.

[BigBos]

I agree with that statement. however, all project power lies with the team. Good bounty managers are those who struggle to get their participants paid for it. however, there are currently several bounty managers like that, who struggle to get their participants paid on time and have clear pay time.

[takana212]

the role of the bounty manager is indeed very influential for the bounty hunter, if a manager has handled the project to the maximum but instead ends up with a scam, then that is not his fault, because he is also governed by the ICO / IEO team.

[Iyanu14]

What makes a bounty manager better? It's not about the success of the projects they introduce, it's about

1. How the handle the campaign
2. It's about fulfilling what was promised to bounty hunters
3. It's about fighting the fair fights for bounty hunters

The success of a bounty project is not in the hand of a bounty manager, the ball is in your courts, you are responsible for the bounty projects you choose, if they fail it's never bounty managers fault. Always remember this.

You're very right about your points but I don't totally agree with them.  While a good bounty manager is respected for doing those three points you mentioned, you cannot be saying it is not the responsibility of the BM to bring in good bounties, I don't agree with that point at all.  Fine, it is the responsibility of the hunters or investors to do enough findings before taking step, however, BM that also brings in successful projects are highly respected.  What is the essence of a useless token/coin paid into my wallet.  To me, BMs that manage "LOTS" of unsuccessful projects are neither good nor reliable.

[isaac_clarke22]

~

Most of the time, you wouldn't consider #2.
Those types of promises like the distribution of tokens are mostly handled by the devs.
Bounty managers are mostly the ones in charge of their participants weekly post counts/ shares in social media, as well as counting the stakes weekly.
It would be plus of a point for me if they're even validating each participant, in case someone claims to be another account just to get to the highest rank with higher stakes of course.

Success of the bounty isn't fully dependent on the success of the project.
There are some successful scams and tend to disappear in thin air, leaving bounty hunters complaining.

[princerepon]

What makes a bounty manager better? It's not about the success of the projects they introduce, it's about

1. How the handle the campaign
2. It's about fulfilling what was promised to bounty hunters
3. It's about fighting the fair fights for bounty hunters

The success of a bounty project is not in the hand of a bounty manager, the ball is in your courts, you are responsible for the bounty projects you choose, if they fail it's never bounty managers fault. Always remember this.

If bounty manager is not in team member of project then it's totally useless to blame bounty manager for project fail. If project fails somehow it's because of team management nothing else. And this is bounty hunters duty to check out how much reliable project they are going to work. I totally agree with OP's point. If you didn't find those point in bounty manager then you should be careful from that manager. A good quality bounty manager always make right decision and stand their word no matter which kinda problem he/she facing.

[dataispower]

Bounty Managers that don't value bounty hunters can be a real pain in the ass, they can make the campaign a very frustrating one and unenjoyable for bounty hunters but who cares? It's always about the reward isn't it? Life itself is not a straight forward road, whatever you see as a bounty hunter always know it's about risks

Sometimes its not entirely the fault of those campaign managers no matter how you see it, but like you mentioned some don't value hunters, and are just interested in their pay from the team. I stopped doing bounties for a campaign manager (name withheld) who never escrow funds, always allows hunters to be at the mercy of the project's team after campaign no matter how people complain in the Bounty group. We just need to analyze properly before joining any campaign.

[10BTCaDay]

I agree with that statement. however, all project power lies with the team. Good bounty managers are those who struggle to get their participants paid for it. however, there are currently several bounty managers like that, who struggle to get their participants paid on time and have clear pay time.

I think that bounty managers can not influence the time of payment. it's all about the team. no matter how good the manager is, he will not be able to make the team pay if the team does not want to do it

[crustycrab666]

but before accepting the project, the manager should first research the project that he will promote.
so at least he made an effort to reduce the scam project that was hanging around.
managers will always be indirectly responsible for the failure or success of the project they run.

The responsible BM will definitely consider it well before choosing to work with the project. There are a number of bounty managers who prefer hiatus because there are no promising projects on offer. That's better, if the project he handled was problematic, it would definitely affect his reputation.
Well, the bounty manager (who is not part of the internal team) only manages the bounty, all technical matters and the final decision are based on the agreement of the devil. We as bounty hunters must also understand the position of BM, understand all the risks we have to face, be patient and be ready to get the worst possible. There is always a choice not to choose, so if you are in doubt then don't join, it's a simple choice.

[Botnake]

What makes a bounty manager better? It's not about the success of the projects they introduce, it's about

1. How the handle the campaign
2. It's about fulfilling what was promised to bounty hunters
3. It's about fighting the fair fights for bounty hunters

Agree with all of these, as long as the bounty manager is professional, then things would work professionally regardless of the result of the project being promoted.

The success of a bounty project is not in the hand of a bounty manager, the ball is in your courts, you are responsible for the bounty projects you choose, if they fail it's never bounty managers fault. Always remember this.

There are a lot of things to consider, first we need to consider the bounty manager as they are the bridge to us to the team, without them, there will be no bounty, so choosing a reputable one would really help. Some bounty hunters are just lazy, they just look who will manage and they just joined blindly or maybe they have already a full trust to the bounty manager as the reputation says a lot already about the work, but then, it still does not guarantee a success, so we need to accept if the project will fail and we would not get anything for our effort.

[torrantz]

There is always a choice that you don't have to do anything. Cryptocurrencies are risky, ICOs are extremely risky, so you can't expect that you constantly earn a nice sum of money.

As long as you were choosing the right project and then you can even earn a lot of bucks instantly. In fact, this has already proven by so many people who have already invested through use the good platform like IEO platform that launched by the binance exchange site.

[Kasabus]

I agree with that statement. however, all project power lies with the team. Good bounty managers are those who struggle to get their participants paid for it. however, there are currently several bounty managers like that, who struggle to get their participants paid on time and have clear pay time.

I think that bounty managers can not influence the time of payment. it's all about the team. no matter how good the manager is, he will not be able to make the team pay if the team does not want to do it

Success of the project comes to those who have good working team between the bounty manager and the bounty hunters. It's not only the bounty manager that is responsible for the outcome of the project but it also depends more on how the bounty hunters promote the project. So if the project also fails, bounty managers and its participating team are also reliable for it.

[Savemore]

What makes a bounty manager better? It's not about the success of the projects they introduce, it's about

1. How the handle the campaign
2. It's about fulfilling what was promised to bounty hunters
3. It's about fighting the fair fights for bounty hunters

The success of a bounty project is not in the hand of a bounty manager, the ball is in your courts, you are responsible for the bounty projects you choose, if they fail it's never bounty managers fault. Always remember this.

You have found it right but can't just blame BM of what it happens to the campaign because they are also relying on the project developers. However, it is big factor that BM how will run the campaign and how they care for their participants.

We can't deny that even reputed Bounty Managers are carefull in choosing bounty offering but its like to see that they can't make it perfect and all will run smoothly. And that makes them sounded harsh when people put a blame with them because in the first place, they don't want it to happen. It is the project owners who have a huge control.

Shit campaign and projects are inevitable because even campaign manager is trusted, there is still a high chance that the project is shit and most likely a scam. I do not participate anymore in bounties because for me it is now a waste of time and effort. I allocate now most of time in trading because for me there are more opportunities on it. For those bounty hunters out there, be sure that you will pick bounties wisely because there are some that are scam so always caveat!

[flagpara]

I think that bounty managers can not influence the time of payment. it's all about the team. no matter how good the manager is, he will not be able to make the team pay if the team does not want to do it

Success of the project comes to those who have good working team between the bounty manager and the bounty hunters. It's not only the bounty manager that is responsible for the outcome of the project but it also depends more on how the bounty hunters promote the project. So if the project also fails, bounty managers and its participating team are also reliable for it.

I couldn't participate in the running "Bubbalex" campaign. Bounty hunters are getting paid as Bubbalex promised to hunters. If bounty hunters want to, they can do it easily. By escrow or taking early payment, bounty managers can keep their promises. Only for a few bounty hunters, one project can't die or fail. Bounty hunters help with promoting, development team work is different.

[rozak]

What makes a bounty manager better? It's not about the success of the projects they introduce, it's about

1. How the handle the campaign
2. It's about fulfilling what was promised to bounty hunters
3. It's about fighting the fair fights for bounty hunters

The success of a bounty project is not in the hand of a bounty manager, the ball is in your courts, you are responsible for the bounty projects you choose, if they fail it's never bounty managers fault. Always remember this.

yes for some reason you are right if the project that was followed failed it is definitely a mistake of choice and the lack of information obtained on yourself, but it's not like it's easy to choose it doesn't matter if it hasn't been long after following, but if you know that the project is not as predicted in some time we can leave the project and look for another but when the project is almost complete can only follow until it is finished no matter the project will fail because it is already over,

[Coin BTC]

The success of a bounty project is not in the hand of a bounty manager, the ball is in your courts, you are responsible for the bounty projects you choose, if they fail it's never bounty managers fault. Always remember this.

Are you not aware when writing this. The success of a project is very dependent on the project manager. In fact, many projects managed by trusted managers are successful, see project history starting in 2017, and compare with now.
In the past the project was not managed by just anyone, and now everyone manages the project, even relying on newbie accounts to manage the project, and there is no community manager.
The newbie account does not have the slightest risk if the project fails, even the project is his own, just create a website with wordpress and promote it in this forum. Is this what is called a project? How it works. Everyone has responsibilities, managers have a big responsibility for the projects they manage. Do not just manage, the ending, scams.

Can you specify the how the success of a project depends on the bm? How is it the responsibility of the bm if the project succeed or not! Other than managing the campaign by keeping records of all participants and their activities during the bounty campaign and handing over the comprehensive list of participants to the team what else you think the bm will do make a project a success! I can disagree on this because the power of a bm ended in the campaign and there is nothing more he would do.

Don't you see that there are currently many successful projects in the hands of trusted bounty managers. If indeed BM's role is very small for the success of the project, why should the team pay BM to promote their project? Why didn't the team directly promote the project itself thereby saving their pockets? At a minimum, after the project is successful and the allocation token for the bounty participant is handed over to the BM, the BM does not disappear.

[Chato1977]

I think that bounty managers can not influence the time of payment. it's all about the team. no matter how good the manager is, he will not be able to make the team pay if the team does not want to do it

Success of the project comes to those who have good working team between the bounty manager and the bounty hunters. It's not only the bounty manager that is responsible for the outcome of the project but it also depends more on how the bounty hunters promote the project. So if the project also fails, bounty managers and its participating team are also reliable for it.

I couldn't participate in the running "Bubbalex" campaign. Bounty hunters are getting paid as Bubbalex promised to hunters. If bounty hunters want to, they can do it easily. By escrow or taking early payment, bounty managers can keep their promises. Only for a few bounty hunters, one project can't die or fail. Bounty hunters help with promoting, development team work is different.

Lol bounty hunters has no power over the payments, they can demand but still it is the managers to push but the team/owner will decide .

payments even made sometimes with their shitcoins that will never enter exchange after the payments,

[stomachgrowls]

I think that bounty managers can not influence the time of payment. it's all about the team. no matter how good the manager is, he will not be able to make the team pay if the team does not want to do it

Success of the project comes to those who have good working team between the bounty manager and the bounty hunters. It's not only the bounty manager that is responsible for the outcome of the project but it also depends more on how the bounty hunters promote the project. So if the project also fails, bounty managers and its participating team are also reliable for it.

I couldn't participate in the running "Bubbalex" campaign. Bounty hunters are getting paid as Bubbalex promised to hunters. If bounty hunters want to, they can do it easily. By escrow or taking early payment, bounty managers can keep their promises. Only for a few bounty hunters, one project can't die or fail. Bounty hunters help with promoting, development team work is different.

Lol bounty hunters has no power over the payments, they can demand but still it is the managers to push but the team/owner will decide .

payments even made sometimes with their shitcoins that will never enter exchange after the payments,

One of the risk of being a bounty hunter is that you wouldnt know if those coins you had gained through bounty would ever had the chance for it to hit on exchangers which simply means that you cant still be sure

that you had successfully able to make profits even though the said project had paid you out some coins.Everything will still vary on the potential or with the end game of such coin whether it do get some value

or would just simply add up on the pile of shit coins in the market which had been always the usual case for all bounty hunters and its part of the risk.

[dunfida]

What makes a bounty manager better? It's not about the success of the projects they introduce, it's about

1. How the handle the campaign
2. It's about fulfilling what was promised to bounty hunters
3. It's about fighting the fair fights for bounty hunters

The success of a bounty project is not in the hand of a bounty manager, the ball is in your courts, you are responsible for the bounty projects you choose, if they fail it's never bounty managers fault. Always remember this.

1. Its always been a good thing on how they would handle the campaign well.
2. Not that really an accurate thing because in terms of pay which the project owners would be still in decision.
3. Fight is a good initiative but everything will still vary on teams decision.Manager cant do anything if they wont be paying up.

Don't rely that much but its good that you would be sticking into those managers which are known and good on handling out the community
in terms of bounties.