.

[Lucius]

Interesting findings.
This guy elmanchez sent me PM some time ago and he offered to make me some ANN topic design for free, even if I never asked him to do this.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2553198

He never made anything and never talked with me after that.

I also got a PM from elmanchez some time ago regarding the sale of BTC for PayPal, and we have not traded before, nor have in any way asked publicly or privately that I want something like that. Only bob123 as DT member then reacted and red tag elmanchez, and this was almost a month ago.

I wonder why other DTs avoided at least leaving a neutral tag if they felt there wasn’t enough evidence - and why elmanchez still has more positive and neutral feedbacks than negative ones after all the evidence presented?

[1714805561]

1714805561

[1714805561]

1714805561

[dkbit98]

I also got a PM from elmanchez some time ago regarding the sale of BTC for PayPal, and we have not traded before, nor have in any way asked publicly or privately that I want something like that. Only bob123 as DT member then reacted and red tag elmanchez, and this was almost a month ago.

I wonder why other DTs avoided at least leaving a neutral tag if they felt there wasn’t enough evidence - and why elmanchez still has more positive and neutral feedbacks than negative ones after all the evidence presented?

No idea what others are doing, but after LoyecV confirmation I am giving negative tag to this guy.
He is also a liar doing ban evasion, and should be banned.

fantom1962. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=899777 BANNED
Webcelerator https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=388221 BANNED
fantom1962 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=142300 Inactive
Webcelerator. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=893299 BANNED
elmanchez https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2553198 ?

[suchmoon]

Only I was alarmed right away that he asked me in PM to borrow $ 60 in Bitcoin, but for some reason he wanted to explain the details in telegram, and not in PM.

Taking a loan from Ratimov for 15 days to solve "Scam accusation" .... ammout 60usd worth bitcoin.
Funding adress : 3KqYoA1LW8WPmWK3fs7xfhqkd4cLv96vJF

So if I'm getting this right, he was scamming, denying the scams, then trying to borrow money (AKA scam again) under the pretense that he was trying to compensate the scam victim. That's quite clever.

[hacker1001101001]

Sad to see it turned out this way for @elmanchez. Some of his explanations about such previous exchange scam accusations on him were pitiful at most. But looking at how the above PM confirms, it seems he was probably motived to pull out money any way possible. I am still hoping for his explanation if there is any.

[Lucius]

Sad to see it turned out this way for @elmanchez. Some of his explanations about such previous exchange scam accusations on him were pitiful at most. But looking at how the above PM confirms, it seems he was probably motived to pull out money any way possible. I am still hoping for his explanation if there is any.

There is nothing sad in the fact that one scammer was discovered along with what appears to be a whole bunch of alt accounts with which a lot of bad has been done to forum users. What is sad that he still did not get perma ban, given all the evidence presented.

This is something which should go into the category of plagiarism, without mercy and too much thinking - the man literally made a criminal online organization.

[hacker1001101001]

Sad to see it turned out this way for @elmanchez. Some of his explanations about such previous exchange scam accusations on him were pitiful at most. But looking at how the above PM confirms, it seems he was probably motived to pull out money any way possible. I am still hoping for his explanation if there is any.

There is nothing sad in the fact that one scammer was discovered along with what appears to be a whole bunch of alt accounts with which a lot of bad has been done to forum users. What is sad that he still did not get perma ban, given all the evidence presented.

This is something which should go into the category of plagiarism, without mercy and too much thinking - the man literally made a criminal online organization.

I was sad about how hard it is to track a single person doing multiple scam attempts, and how un-noticed one can go here, leading to such unexpected damage as done to the OP.

Anyways, I agree a permanent ban is valid due to ban envision in this case, but I would not go as far as calling him a criminal though.

[Lucius]

Coincidence? I dont think so..

Same modus operandi as before, he wants to build a reputation by sending first to trusted members, and of course he hopes that they will leave him positive feedback which he will use to scam other users. Of course the user made his first post in the Russian board...

Hello i want exhcange 49 ETH.
Ready sent first partial 10 each transaction with any trusted users.
Other users be ready deal first or hire escrow.
Leave message here.

Anyways, I agree a permanent ban is valid due to ban envision in this case, but I would not go as far as calling him a criminal though.

I find it strange that you have any empathy for people like him given that his only goal was and still is to deceive as many people as possible in order to gain financial gain. I don’t know how we should call such people, should it even matter if we say he’s an ordinary online criminal or just a thief?

[DireWolfM14]

I created a type 3 flag for elmanchez:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2163

[The Cryptovator]

I created a type 3 flag for elmanchez:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2163

Sorry for your loss, that's the disadvantage of gaining quick trust. From the beginning, his activity was quite suspicious, but he had managed successfully those suspensions. Once a time he had asked me for a loan, but since I am not a lender so I denied him that time. However, he had made an avatar for me when he was a newbie. And have made a few contributions by creating the free design. Eventually, he successfully gained trust from lenders including TMAN. 

Sorry once again for your losses, the amount was quite big. Supported flags and tagged as well.

[khaled0111]

I created a type 3 flag for elmanchez:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2163

flag supported.
His last post was made 15 days ago so I suppose he doesn't care about this account anymore or how many negative feedbacks it gets.

Don't know why his account is not banned yet! Did OP report it correctly and mentioned the reason behind reporting the PM (ban evasion)?

[khaled0111]

I reported private message which he sent to me and added this thread link.

If the mod who handled the report read only the original post and didn't read all the replies, there is no way he would figure out you reported it for ban evasion.
He would think you reported it for scamming which is what this topic is about. Scams are not moderated, so he would mark it as bad and move on.

I suggest you report it again and clearly state you are reporting it for ban evasion and add links of the connected accounts, just to make things easier.

[nutildah]

Got his new account. Profile https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2833487

I was searching smth from my telegram chats and randomly saw that he has changed his telegram ID, but he keeped chat with me so I know its our guy Webcelerator aka fantom1962 aka Webcelerator. aka fantom1962. aka elmanchez

I have this telegram chat from 19 July when I exposed elmanchez was multiaccounting and ban evading.

JasonClauch profile is created on 24th July

of course lol, free money !
pm me in telegram @JamyNRK

archived for telegram ID reference https://archive.is/HFTJ8

Damn man, that was a really good catch. Can you link the post where you put that image earlier? Is it already in this thread or a similar one?

I noticed there was something just a little bit fishy about this guy and actually suspected it was Rambotnic building up a new account. First, he told an insane story about how he had a hard drive with bitcoins on it and his grandfather turned it into a keyholder. He managed to rack up a few merits there. Then he started posting betting predictions that were just awful, telling small lies about the outcome of his bet.

I Won

Krasnodar 0:3 and Spartak Moscorw 2:1

And lost Boton 2:1 and Anderleht 2:2.

I cashouted then Boston was 0:1 and Anderleht 0:0 around 0.037 ETH

No, you lost. You bet Spartak Moscow to win and they tied. You picked a 4 game parlay and you lost 3 of 4 games. If people would have bet how you bet, they would have lost.

Even cashing out before your first official loss at 0.037 ETH results in a net loss of 0.013 ETH.

Hi

Oh, lol, i saw that Spartak played 2:2

Here is screen of my cashout https://i.ibb.co/qg8zwqF/image.png

He's been kind of silent for a while, maybe he knew it wasn't gonna work out and moved on.