Hi all.
Ampleforth has had a great hype recently, and today I did some research on it. The ethics of something like this is a problem for me, and I'm discussing it to understand it better.
As you know, a ponzi scheme is a fraud in which the system pays profit to the early investors using some of the money it takes from the late investors. Now, doesn't ampleforth look like one?
AMPL says the project changes the total supply of the coin when the supply/demand changes. So if the price rises they increase the total supply (and give every wallet new coins) and if it falls they decrease the number of supply and everybody's coins. This video explains it well if you want to know the system:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-8yjmsshFg&feature=youtu.be===============
Now, the coin used to have a circulating supply of about 1,638,000 at the beginning of 2020, then at the beginning of July 2,525,000 and now after a few days of price rise the supply jumped to 296,000,000!!
What does it mean? Huge gain for early investors. But what about the new investors who bought it for $3-4 a few days ago? The coin probably won't be able to continue like this (otherwise its marketcap surpasses BTC in a few days), so probably a huge sell-off mostly by the old investors who have the most AMPL tokens now takes the price to <$1 range and subsequently the supply decreases, and the marketcap will correct to more rational numbers.
Now, what happens to the new investors? What if the coin stays in <$1 range for a long time? They lose a huge amount of money, right?