BAN APPEAL KrisAlex18 - I AM BANNED WITHOUT REASON.

[KrisAlex18ALT]

As you can see this is my account: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1036961

I am banned without plagiarizing anything, I suspect it's because of this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5263303.msg54832045#msg54832045

Which I explain that my post are like that because I am sick and my post is little off-topic. That one post is little off topic, and after that I explain my situation on best change and they understand and give me a chance.

And today I am permanently ban without reason, Guys please help me, to get my account back. Or if I can't get it back, please explain why I am banned without plagiarizing any content.  

Thank you for those who are going to help me.


I am not a reputable member here like LoyceV or any other member that has good reputation, but I can say that I am a good quality member with a 60 earned merits and doing my best and enjoying interacting here in forum, It would mean a lot if some moderator will un-ban me so I can recover my account. 

[The Sceptical Chymist]

When you get banned, you get a PM that gives you a reason (whether you agree with it or not), so what did the PM say? 

I don't think you were banned because some mod thought you were a bot, but maybe it was for spamming--apparently a lot of your posts didn't seem to have anything to do with the thread which they were in. 

Also, did you get a permaban or is it just a temporary one?

[KrisAlex18ALT]

When you get banned, you get a PM that gives you a reason (whether you agree with it or not), so what did the PM say? 

I don't think you were banned because some mod thought you were a bot, but maybe it was for spamming--apparently a lot of your posts didn't seem to have anything to do with the thread which they were in. 

Also, did you get a permaban or is it just a temporary one?

permaban sir and no message to me. I think sir I am not spamming, English is not my first language but my post right now are on point on the topic, I am also not burst-posting I keep my posting interval into 30 minutes or more to make sure I am not breaking any forum rules.

[Little Mouse]

permaban sir and no message to me. I think sir I am not spamming, English is not my first language but my post right now are on point on the topic, I am also not burst-posting I keep my posting interval into 30 minutes or more to make sure I am not breaking any forum rules.

If this is your English quality, then how come you have written posts with such good quality English? I am sure that you are using any kind of automated text generator and you have been caught.
Anyone is free to check his latest posts and this thread. Compare both English, you can easily detect he is using any kind of auromated text generator.

[KrisAlex18ALT]

permaban sir and no message to me. I think sir I am not spamming, English is not my first language but my post right now are on point on the topic, I am also not burst-posting I keep my posting interval into 30 minutes or more to make sure I am not breaking any forum rules.

If this is your English quality, then how come you have written posts with such good quality English? I am sure that you are using any kind of automated text generator and you have been caught.
Anyone is free to check his latest posts and this thread. Compare both English, you can easily detect he is using any kind of auromated text generator.

You are the one that accuse me as a bot and now accusing me to be using a text generator. So you really want me to be ban?

I am banned now, Thank you


I am posting now without checking my grammar because I am shock and didn't expect to be ban without reason at all.

[yahoo62278]

Pretty sure the Admins get 99.9% of the bans correct, but I do think for the sake of transparency users banned should be shown why they were banned to avoid these threads. Everyone says they didn't do anything wrong, then 12 hours later users have flooded the thread with proof they plagiarized or didn't quote media sources.

Looking at the 1st 20 posts in your profile I can see you're a discussion board sig spammer. Prob had a load of posts reported.

[Little Mouse]

So you really want me to be ban?  

Come on. Why would I want anyone from the forum would be banned? No reason of my such wish. I found your posts irrelevant, kind of automated text and that's what I have written. Moreover, you are not sure why you have been banned. Wait for a mod to respond here.

[KrisAlex18ALT]

So you really want me to be ban?  

Come on. Why would I want anyone from the forum would be banned? No reason of my such wish. I found your posts irrelevant, kind of automated text and that's what I have written. Moreover, you are not sure why you have been banned. Wait for a mod to respond here.

If you are really a "concern" member here, you will not create a thread accusing me as a bot instead, you will message me to check things. But no, you instantly create a thread and drag me down without concrete evidence

[nutildah]

Pretty sure the Admins get 99.9% of the bans correct, but I do think for the sake of transparency users banned should be shown why they were banned to avoid these threads. Everyone says they didn't do anything wrong, then 12 hours later users have flooded the thread with proof they plagiarized or didn't quote media sources.

Bingo. Plagiarism.

Copy:

Cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Ether and hundreds more are a hot commodity in online trading, and it’s possible for a smart investor to make a big profit. But the prospect of quick riches can blind some people to the risks and enable crooks to lure them into scams.

Original:

Cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Ether and hundreds more are a hot commodity in online trading, and it’s possible for a smart investor to make a big profit. But the prospect of quick riches can blind some people to the risks and enable crooks to lure them into scams.

Additionally, this post is partly plagiarized from here, so it wasn't just a one off thing.

I do agree that it would be better if the mods could mark the reason for the ban so it could be displayed to the banned user.

[Yogee]

"Quality" member getting paid $45 a week copies from two articles and then provide link to one article to avoid detection.

[nutildah]

"Quality" member getting paid $45 a week copies from two articles and then provide link to one article to avoid detection.

Surprised to learn it pays that much.

That is almost a weekly salary for millions of Filipinos; perhaps it is a weekly salary for millions more.

I'd almost feel bad but they really should have put more effort into it since they were obviously treating it as a job. Instead they tried to cut corners and got caught.