Exclusive Tax Proposals On American Billionaires

[davis196]

Does anyone have an explanation for american business being treated unfairly in global markets.

The American business treated unfairly by the global markets?Are you kidding me?
In what world are you living in?The American corporations were,are and will most likely always dominate the global markets.The global economy is more or less centered around the US.The fact that some countries and the EU want to limit the monopoly of the US high tech corporations can't be called "unfair treatment". 
Bernie Sanders is a communist.What else are you expecting from him?

[Savemore]

I think it will not work, there are now a lot of senators all over the world that want to the tax the rich more but the rich people are always getting away with it because there are a lot of ways to reduce taxes legally. Look at the laws about taxes that been passed in the congress, many people think that the rich will be taxed more but in the reality the middle class persons are the one who shoulder the taxes that been implemented. There are a lot of tax avoidance that is legal and for sure that the rich will continue to use it.

[MCobian]

What Sanders did to seek public support, by attacking US billionaires like Bezos and Musk. This way of politics is very unhealthy,
because it is detrimental to several parties. I doubt the one-time tax will work out well and fairly. Because this could be an abuse of
power, if I as the people of America would not vote against politicians Sen. Sanders.

[Yatsan]

The proposal was not an attack or mistreat for American billionaires and no wonder this have come into a proposal for the Americans because right now they are facing a real serious crisis and the way to do crowd funding to support the needy is to raise up the tax. But if that proposal would be approved, there might come a time that the power would be abused whenever a crisis like this would arise pushing the billionaires into force to pay a high rate tax that although for a good purpose but still it is undeniable to be a big amount.

I think that one-time tax won't work out that easily for at first glance it is duly unfavorable for the American billionaires paying out a high amount of tax in the middle of this pandemic and take note it on a one time blow. Maybe the taxation for billionaires would take place more properly if the proposal would undergo certain provisions that would be fair and agreeable at the same time for the billionaires since it is clearly stated that it would be used for health support amid with the existence of the pandemic. The taxation rate must be reasonable and be fair for everyone no matter what social class they do belong. This must not just serve for the billionaires but also for the high rate income earners to prove the fairness of putting up a taxation for the benefit of the goods.

[Vishnu.Reang]

What Sanders did to seek public support, by attacking US billionaires like Bezos and Musk. This way of politics is very unhealthy,
because it is detrimental to several parties. I doubt the one-time tax will work out well and fairly. Because this could be an abuse of
power, if I as the people of America would not vote against politicians Sen. Sanders.

Socialism is a failed ideology. If you have any doubt, you can ask the residents of Venezuela, Cuba or the former USSR. In the United States there are people who support Sanders because they don't have any first-hand experience of Socialism. You can't tax the rich people beyond a certain threshold. If you do that, then there will be no more rich people after certain time. They will either become poor, or they will migrate to some other country. France learnt this the hard way, after François Hollande came up with his crazy 75% tax on the HNW individuals.

[Sanitough]

What Sanders did to seek public support, by attacking US billionaires like Bezos and Musk. This way of politics is very unhealthy,
because it is detrimental to several parties.

Good for the people as they will benefit on the tax, but why only tax billionaires in crypto?
I don't know how he come up with the idea knowing crypto is volatile in nature, and therefore the value of your ownership may change from time to time, so if one will pay taxes, probably coming from an asset he is holding, he might still end up holding lower than what he paid when the price move not on his favor. This is legal matter but I disagree with this tax proposal. 

 I doubt the one-time tax will work out well and fairly. Because this could be an abuse of
power, if I as the people of America would not vote against politicians Sen. Sanders.

This isn't fair IMO, most taxes are based on income, and these people could potentially make more in the future or lose, so maybe they just treat these people covered under the current crypto laws if there's one.

[abhiseshakana]

Socialism is a failed ideology. If you have any doubt, you can ask the residents of Venezuela, Cuba or the former USSR. In the United States there are people who support Sanders because they don't have any first-hand experience of Socialism. You can't tax the rich people beyond a certain threshold. If you do that, then there will be no more rich people after certain time. They will either become poor, or they will migrate to some other country. France learnt this the hard way, after François Hollande came up with his crazy 75% tax on the HNW individuals.

If that is the only way or (there is no alternative - TINA) then this is very possible to do, especially if it is related to national threats. One economic observer in the country once suggested two things so that economic growth in my country would progress rapidly, namely:

1. The President issues a decision or regulation on "capital flight with the threat of imprisonment. That is, anyone who sends money abroad without an underlying import document will be subject to the capital flight article, for example being saved or deposited abroad or buying assets abroad. those who do not have productive businesses abroad, assets must be withdrawn back into the country. If they are not subject to the capital flight clause, it is sufficient to report productive businesses because they are the country's GNP.

2. Simultaneously with the decision above, the bank interest rate is signed to zero.

It is hoped that the effect of this policy is that capital flights can be stopped and the local economy will be flooded with capital and avoid the habit of depending on foreign debt. Business people and investors who usually earn 5% interest per year suddenly get nothing on their deposits. So sooner or later they will try to invest in the real national sector which will eventually turn the wheels of the economy and bring in foreign exchange.

[Vishnu.Reang]

If that is the only way or (there is no alternative - TINA) then this is very possible to do, especially if it is related to national threats. One economic observer in the country once suggested two things so that economic growth in my country would progress rapidly, namely:

1. The President issues a decision or regulation on "capital flight with the threat of imprisonment. That is, anyone who sends money abroad without an underlying import document will be subject to the capital flight article, for example being saved or deposited abroad or buying assets abroad. those who do not have productive businesses abroad, assets must be withdrawn back into the country. If they are not subject to the capital flight clause, it is sufficient to report productive businesses because they are the country's GNP.

2. Simultaneously with the decision above, the bank interest rate is signed to zero.

It is hoped that the effect of this policy is that capital flights can be stopped and the local economy will be flooded with capital and avoid the habit of depending on foreign debt. Business people and investors who usually earn 5% interest per year suddenly get nothing on their deposits. So sooner or later they will try to invest in the real national sector which will eventually turn the wheels of the economy and bring in foreign exchange.

Similar measures were tried in the past by various Communist/Socialist regimes such as Argentina, Venezuela and Cuba. In none of the instances, they were successful. People are ready to go to jail in order to save their wealth and they can go to any extent in doing that. In these countries, these measures resulted in more harm than good (in every single case).

[bitgolden]

It is always interesting to see people who are not billionaires and people who will not pay a single cent would go out and support these billionaires on their behalf. You do know that if everyone who will not be affected by this supported the idea, we would have a lot less billionaires in the world which makes sense because while someone makes 80+ billion dollar profit we are talking about people who are unemployed and waiting for government hand out which should not exist at the same time.

"Creating jobs" is also a big lie, they are paying people under starvation level of income and they are doing everything in their power to keep the company profiting as much as possible that people who work on amazing literally DIED from overexhaustion and never made it to news.

So, all in all I would say that one time big tax would help out a lot to American economy if that money went to people. Plus all the billionaires in other nations are paying a hefty share of their taxes, it is only the Americans that get away with it, otherwise they are not "attacked" they are just asked to pay their taxes like any other person.

[stompix]

This bill will never pass. It's a gimmick. Sanders is just trying to score political points.

Yeah, the same regurgitated material, I'll fight for you, I'll tax the rich, I'll give you money!
I'm just wondering why is he still trying, he's  78, by the next elections he will be 82, he will have no chance of getting nominated, especially after the got pushed aside so easily now, and y who...

Is he that desperate for attention?
Or are others just pushing him to come in public with those ideas and to reap a few votes here and there?

Similar measures were tried in the past by various Communist/Socialist regimes such as Argentina, Venezuela and Cuba. In none of the instances, they were successful. People are ready to go to jail in order to save their wealth and they can go to any extent in doing that. In these countries, these measures resulted in more harm than good (in every single case).

The capital control he envisions will simply destroy the economy, people will be afraid to transfer money, international commerce will decline, people will try to avoid the rules by switching to other currencies and in the end, it will all backfire as it has always happened. But the funny part is that we're here on bitcoin talk discussion this, the same place where BTC is praised to be a tool of avoiding the same capital control. Ironic, isn't it?

Good for the people as they will benefit on the tax, but why only tax billionaires in crypto?

Nobody said anything about taxing cryptos, nor are any cryptos ever mention in the bill or in the articles, this has nothing to do with them!

[Reatim]

What Sanders did to seek public support, by attacking US billionaires like Bezos and Musk. This way of politics is very unhealthy,
because it is detrimental to several parties. I doubt the one-time tax will work out well and fairly. Because this could be an abuse of
power, if I as the people of America would not vote against politicians Sen. Sanders.

Socialism is a failed ideology. If you have any doubt, you can ask the residents of Venezuela, Cuba or the former USSR. In the United States there are people who support Sanders because they don't have any first-hand experience of Socialism. You can't tax the rich people beyond a certain threshold. If you do that, then there will be no more rich people after certain time. They will either become poor, or they will migrate to some other country. France learnt this the hard way, after François Hollande came up with his crazy 75% tax on the HNW individuals.

Big possibilities that if only if this will passed migrations will be expected, no rich people in their right mind will continue to live inside the state knowingly that by any chance the wealth that they possessed will be subject for this huge taxes.

This kind of mentalities is not appropriate those people who created jobs and help the economy doesn't have extra liabilities.

As long as they paying their taxes there's should be no extend things like this, it shouldn't be obliged since they are super billionaires they need to
pay extra for that.

[Vishnu.Reang]

Big possibilities that if only if this will passed migrations will be expected, no rich people in their right mind will continue to live inside the state knowingly that by any chance the wealth that they possessed will be subject for this huge taxes.

This kind of mentalities is not appropriate those people who created jobs and help the economy doesn't have extra liabilities.

As long as they paying their taxes there's should be no extend things like this, it shouldn't be obliged since they are super billionaires they need to
pay extra for that.

There is a widespread belief that rich people pay a lower amount of tax compared to the middle-class. The media as well as the populist politicians have tried their best to spread this lie. The truth is that the rich pay a higher tax when compared to the others. They are not just subjected to the income tax. They also need to deal with inheritance tax, estate tax, capital gains tax and dozens of other shitty tax regimen. All I am saying is that the taxation on the rich is close to the saturation point. If you tax them further, then there will be negative repercussions.

[Hydrogen]

There is a widespread belief that rich people pay a lower amount of tax compared to the middle-class. The media as well as the populist politicians have tried their best to spread this lie.

This illustrates where the concept of the rich not being taxed enough came from originally.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVOwaMWewGY

Description: Warren Buffet and Bill Gates discuss why a flat tax would be a mistake, how taxes on the wealthiest Americans are too low, and how the tax system has been tipped totally in favor of the wealthy.  From a 2005 program on Nebraska public television.

This was before Bill Gates, Warren Buffett and many others shifted their stance on this topic 180° degrees.

Many large corporations like google started out with mottos like "don't be evil" which they later put aside and did the opposite of.

Warren Buffett admitted he was taxed at 17% of income years ago. That was without exploiting tax loopholes or resorting to any of the commonly utilized methods of tax avoidance utilized by the rich. Many americans pay 30% to 50% or higher of taxes on income.

That's the origins story behind where the idea of the rich not being taxed enough* comes from.

[bits4books]

This is very bad for me. Any point increase in the tax burden (everyone's favorite progressive tax) is the worst thing the economy can face. What do the authorities want? What would the largest companies and successful enterprises take their business out of the country to a place where they will be treated humanely? Or that all of them will just raise prices which will hit ordinary people? Very strange behavior that has no explanation-precisely because the rules apply only to the US-companies and not all who conduct their business in the country.

[panganib999]

That tax proposal was really intended to American billionaires and the author was also an American senator so no wonder why the exclusiveness is for American billionaires only. But if that would be the case, it would sound insane most specially for the billionaires part for they are already paying the right amount of tax stated by the law and all of a sudden raising up a proposal which is unfavorable for their part since even them are affected by the effect of the pandemic. There should be still fairness on the taxation without exception because such proposal might lead those billionaires to be migrating into another nation where they would be treated fairly. If that would happen, another economic declination will happen to US.

Millionaires and billionaires are also paying the designated amount of tax based on the income they have from their businesses so it is very insane if they would be added taxation rate just to support the financial crisis faced by the country. If they would let it happen, surely this would happen again in the future when the economic state is at the edge of declining and in need to have source of financial assistance coming from taxes. That would be unfair for those billionaires because supposedly the taxation must be fair to all nothing more and nothing less. Just the right rate for designated classes.

[dothebeats]

The election is nearing, and I don't think this will pass into various readings considering that everyone's attention and efforts are not really directed into making billionaires pay hefty taxes. Everyone running for a position in the government are trying their hardest to appeal the masses and get their votes. Anyway, there would be some opposition for this, surely. Then again, we are in the age wherein most people feel like the billionaires aren't already paying enough taxes (which is true, partly) that they have to increase their contribution to the public coffers for the welfare of all. The intention is good, though the timing isn't, and can be purely for show and appeal.

[South Park]

snip

Sen. Sanders proposes one-time tax that would cost Bezos $42.8 billion, Musk $27.5 billion

Source:  https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/06/sanders-billionaire-tax-bill-would-cost-bezos-musk-zuckerberg.html


....


Isn't it strange how chinese billionaires, EU billionaires and asian billionaires are not attacked this way.

Only billionaires responsible for creating jobs and innovation in the american economy are attacked.

The same precedent applies to anti trust laws and monopolies. American corporations are exclusively targeted by them. Unionization and tax hikes on the private sector likewise reserved for american business only. Journalists and media publish a highly disproportionate amount of hate pieces intended to influence the public into hating Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos. Why.

The question is why. Does anyone have an explanation for american business being treated unfairly in global markets. What does everyone think.

Billionaires are hated everywhere not only in America, the governments and the population see that one person has so much money and they cannot fathom that somehow this person got this rich by his ingenuity, intelligence and great money management skills, what they see is that if this person has so much money then that means that another person does not have access to that money and they want to become like the legendary Robin Hood and steal from the rich to help the poor.

But in my opinion as long as that person got all of that money following the law then no one has the right to take their private property away and if they decide to do so anyway that is the first sign that the economy of that country is over.

[Vishnu.Reang]

The election is nearing, and I don't think this will pass into various readings considering that everyone's attention and efforts are not really directed into making billionaires pay hefty taxes. Everyone running for a position in the government are trying their hardest to appeal the masses and get their votes. Anyway, there would be some opposition for this, surely. Then again, we are in the age wherein most people feel like the billionaires aren't already paying enough taxes (which is true, partly) that they have to increase their contribution to the public coffers for the welfare of all. The intention is good, though the timing isn't, and can be purely for show and appeal.

OK. Let me translate this in to simple English.

In short, the lazy welfare rats want free money by taxing the hard working rich people. They want to tax capital gains and dividends, at a rate which is equal to the tax on regular income. But if the tax level is increased to such an amount, then why the rich should make investments? They can simply hold their wealth in the form of bullion or treasury bonds and avoid paying any tax. But then, there will be widespread unemployment and the economy will be ruined (I am sure that the welfare rats won't mind that, since they are not impacted).

[carlisle1]

The election is nearing, and I don't think this will pass into various readings considering that everyone's attention and efforts are not really directed into making billionaires pay hefty taxes. Everyone running for a position in the government are trying their hardest to appeal the masses and get their votes. Anyway, there would be some opposition for this, surely. Then again, we are in the age wherein most people feel like the billionaires aren't already paying enough taxes (which is true, partly) that they have to increase their contribution to the public coffers for the welfare of all. The intention is good, though the timing isn't, and can be purely for show and appeal.

OK. Let me translate this in to simple English.

In short, the lazy welfare rats want free money by taxing the hard working rich people. They want to tax capital gains and dividends, at a rate which is equal to the tax on regular income. But if the tax level is increased to such an amount, then why the rich should make investments? They can simply hold their wealth in the form of bullion or treasury bonds and avoid paying any tax. But then, there will be widespread unemployment and the economy will be ruined (I am sure that the welfare rats won't mind that, since they are not impacted).

Very precise and your point is valid. Why rich people will help the economy if they will see that this taxes will haunt them up, they will keep their assets in other forms or fly away from the country and start a fresh life in another place where rules like this is not implemented.
It's not really good if this senator are looking for additional sources of funds for the country, longer effects like you mentioned, if those rich people will stop providing job, the lower sect of people will feel the impacts, those who are in power will not going to be affected as they already have comfortable life.

[mezzaluna]

Its not their fault that they can rack up the money faster than other people because of their ideas and inventions. What they did is truly beneficial to all the people that is using it and implementing tax laws just for them can somehow be helpful to other people but that law must be fair to all people. We cannot just ask them for money because on some occasions, they are also helpful in their own ways.