earlier I apologize if my English is bad
This is what is always on my mind "bitcoin, ethereum, ripple etc. are cryptocurrencies or digital assets?"
have you ever thought that the naming of cryptocurrency is very influential on bitcoin etc.? because the naming of cryptocurrencies that are currently attached to bitcoin etc. makes bitcoin clash with government regulations relating to the applicable currency
what happens when the name cryptocurrency is changed to a digital asset? I think this will make it easier for bitcoin to be adopted in various countries because it doesn't conflict with financial regulations
I think the naming of cryptocurrency or digital assets plays a big role in the perspective and development of bitcoin
this is just my assumption, what do you think?
If you are going to categorize cryptocurrencies as digital assets, then it implies that you are also putting them on the same field as digital photos, videos, songs, and other word documents that are also intangible. Cryptocurrencies, in my opinion, are on another field and category on its own due to being a digital asset and an investment. As a decentralized and volatile currency, it has a significant value that is substantial and distinct from the conventional digital asset that we know.
I think the name of cryptocurrency is not mattered for the legalization of Bitcoin. As you know, various counties already legalize the cryptocurrency, and digital asset names can be a little impact but not more for legalization so that you can mention different names of cryptocurrency, digital assets, and digital currencies.
Changing the name of cryptocurrencies into digital does not change that much in my opinion as the legalization will totally depend upon its nature. As a decentralized currency, lack of regulation by the government seems to hamper its development from being accepted from all countries in the world.