suchmoon is trolling people topics and leaving negative feedbacks for no reason

[suchmoon]

It is on point that the OP didn't scammed anyone

I didn't say he did. The flag doesn't say so either. Please read it again.

[1714919495]

1714919495

[1714919495]

1714919495

[peloso]

Using escrow isn't holding the funds yourself, idiot. You’re looking shady as hell right now.

Flag supported.

you stupid idiot so tell us why asshole Vod holding the funds yourself ?
i know you ll never ansver so i advise you to shut up

Flag opposed

Fuck your mom and yor fucking gang

[Stedsm]

@spy100, I can't say you scammed anybody unless I get a proof, but I can truly say tht you're just talking shit about escrows and motivating people to go and trade here with anyone without and escrow, the result of which could lead to serious financial damages and losses to many of those noobs who will just listen to you and try to save measly bucks but will probably end up getting scammed and losing their money if the work/service isn't delivered to the other party. What will the party do? They'll just come here and tell us the scammer's name but what do they get? Nothing.

No hard feelings, just my opinion. And trust me, I am not a part of any gangs whatsoever.

[Laudanum]

Let's be crystal clear Suchmoon is not vod.  Suchmoon is far more likely to be Lauda.

Suchmoon is either a fat girl ( who is still doable if you like bbw, face not too bad) or her weasel faced partner who orders computer components in her name.

Even so it should not be on DT.

There is clear evidence here of Lauda lying and deceiving people for financial gain. That is scamming.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5231720.0

Suchmoon was first to oppose that flag. Why? Because like suchmoon was first to attack theymos for requesting the scammer lauda removed from DT.... it is Lauda. Their " caustic " style and they both speak Croatian.

Then again timelord that dumb shit opposed the flag on the scammer lauda but could not explain why either.
So is just another autistic spaz.

Lfc well laudas felching clown.
Vod best pals with lauda and tman.
Owl and lauda pal and scumbag

The Entire DT1 is corrupt or complicit.

Only Gmax has the courage to be straight and give credible reasons when asked or challenged.

The rest have no place on a trust system at all.

Don't even bother to complain because they all collude and protect each other.  Not surprising since most are just alts of each other.

Dig credible dirt on them where there is clear and independently verifiable evidence and just keep mentioning it whenever it is on topic and relevant.

Suchmoon is dirty but smarter than most of the DT1 goons who have histories with actual scamming or scam facilitating in them.
There is a dox on suchmoon. Owl. Vod. And a few others.

[savetheFORUM]

You need to understand that what you did was childish and idiotic. You offered to escrow P2P bets and was offering the service at 10% fees which is high but let's leave that alone since anyone can have their fees setup and offer any service.

Now where this goes wrong, please read and understand.

1- You don't have a credible trust score that is usually required for escrow services yet you made a thread and after a reputable member warned you, you said fuck off and never gave a proper answer.

2- Instead of politely apologizing for your mistake, you are trying to prove him wrong when clearly he is not.

Look any trusted forum member who is part of the DT has a small responsibility that they protect new users from POSSIBLE scam and while I am not accusing you of scamming but clearly what you were doing was pretty risky and hence sucmoon leaving a feedback is actually justified.

You might be a great designer or coder but the behavior you exhibit here is not trustworthy at all, the feedback might be harsh but there had to be a better way or approaching him and requesting him to remove it.

Making a mistake is acceptable as long as you realize and apology instead of trying to counter your mistake by aggression.

[actmyname]

https://i.ibb.co/qBwqnLZ/1111111.png

I don't understand why you would block out the lower name portion of the emails, especially considering there are mentions of both the email recipient and sender in the upper half.

Mark your image with some more blocks.

[Poker Player]

Out of curiosity I've looked at OP's trust and I've seen that he's tagged many forum members as Chinese Communists. WTF? I don't know about the others but I've read The Pharmacist on the Economics section and he doesn't look to me like a communist at all.

OP doesn't have any credibility.



I won't be surprised if he also tags me as a Chinese Communist now.

[dkbit98]

I was not aware there are so many Chinese communists in this forum, but anti-chinese communist Spy1000 don't want to play his game with me and bet with his fake escort.
Is he a chicken or a man?

Anyway, this is obvious abuse of trust system.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

<snip>you're just talking shit about escrows and motivating people to go and trade here with anyone without and escrow, the result of which could lead to serious financial damages and losses to many of those noobs who will just listen to you and try to save measly bucks but will probably end up getting scammed and losing their money if the work/service isn't delivered to the other party.

I hear what you're saying, but I seriously doubt any newbies are going to be dissuaded from using an escrow because of anything spy100 wrote--especially not if they also read this thread.  His opinion about escrowing funds doesn't really carry much weight, and frankly his writing is a mess to begin with so members of any rank likely wouldn't follow what he was trying to say.

You need to understand that what you did was childish and idiotic.

You registered in March of 2020?  You've got to be the alt of a more senior member, but I'm having a hard time guessing what that other account is.  Anyway, you're right about the above statement but the chances of spy100 having the capacity of that much brutally honest self-reflection are so close to zero that I'm going to go ahead and call them zero.

I don't know about the others but I've read The Pharmacist on the Economics section and he doesn't look to me like a communist at all.

Hell no, I'm not a communist!  I have capitalism running through my veins, and if I didn't I sure as hell wouldn't care about discussing bitcoin's price and wouldn't have written all the other stuff that plopped out of my noodle and splattered onto the Economics section (among others).  This dude spy100 is like Joseph McCarthy, who was so focused on communism that he ended up seeing it everywhere.

OP doesn't have any credibility.

Which is a good thing, because Joseph McCarthy did, and he also had a lot of power.  That ended up leading to a lot of abuses of that power.