But there is no unity. We have countries in Europe that didn't take any refugees since 2015 and the EU has no mechanism to deal with these countries.
Hmmm the lack of unity is weird since that was one of the founding ideas of the EU? I mean it really didn't work but it was a good plan - and like most plans the execution kinda failed it.
It's one of the big problems with the EU as a system in general, the west view it as them paying money to strengthen the east and as them offering jobs to citizens of poorer eastern countries, the east probably view it as either a protection against explotation of jobs (i've seen eastern workers mock the EU because of low minimum wages but 'we at least have contracts and rights' - in a bit of a sarky tone).
Any economic block bigger than about 15 million in population IMO is destined for failure and division.
Short and medium term immigration does truly hurt some nations who are already facing issues in regards to wage increase issues (as more supply into the labor market is going to bring wages down) and then there's some thoughts about the safety net programs and if they're allowed to be utilized by immigrants (that's a country to country issue)
The poverty line in the uk is $150 a week, if the only way to go about taking in a large number (say 1 million) refugees is by getting them just above that line then I think it's not too harsh a price to pay - if they're not paying for housing then that'd be more than enough to live off.
In a similar context, I wouldn't be fully against the idea that we could just make a new country within the EU that is governed by EU law and seeks to produce a stable economy for them - although the EU and europe as a whole is pretty tiny...
Yeah. Put them all into slave-labor camps and live high on the hog off their work.
Ummmmm? Government teaching of anything without supplementation from external sources will always fail - pretty much every school system in the world is awful and outdated.
Since when are europeans slaves to the lazyness and greed of thrird world countries they have shown their humanity but they are going to far.
The UK and France caused a lot of the problem by not restoring curdistan back to it's original independent country and not putting in any effort to try to produce some sort of democracy.
These migrant/refugees are not high skilled communists or christians they are often lazy racist or nazis etc. They join antifa in the west and try to rob the locals like blm did
Is this from first hand knowledge? Also wasn't the nazi party Christian (they got voted in in one of the most Christian countries in Europe and were anti Jewish)?
The high skilled ones aren't the ones who fuel the economy, more low skilled workers mean high skilled workers are paid more - relative to lower skilled onew - in their wake as money either becomes more scarce or more available.
Also some England councils are
happy to elect our own terrorists to office?