✅ SwC Poker ♣️ Player Lounge

[scammed-by-nitro]

And they keep all critical posts after that 1.

What a sore company. More people should give them according trust feedbacks.

[1714808807]

1714808807

[1714808807]

1714808807

[1714808807]

1714808807

[1714808807]

1714808807

[ThatOneGuyOnHere]

Thank you to our loyal players that understand how hard it is to run SwC Poker.

We see the complaining players are louder than the happy players that enjoy our bitcoin poker room but we will continue to build the site better and better.

2021 will be a great year for us with new features and improvements.

Thank you for the support!

This is a horribly unprofessional response and should be deleted.  This just reeks of higherhighs and his smug chat.  Can't you find someone with more tact to deal with the customers on and off site? This would make your life so much easier.

It really does sound like HH, but wow this is such an unprofessional post.  This is honestly why I do not want to patronize this site often. They don't get it that the people complaining are regs that have carried them on through the years. They have been promising updates and announcements for a year now and have nothing to show. They dropped the ball and lost their domain name and still got people to come back, which is crazy when you think about it. When are they going to drop the ball on their Bitcoin wallet and not be able to pay player funds. This site has only existed this long because of the regular players continue to come back. They're ongoing campaign to grow the site has failed miserably and has only costed them regular players that contribute to the site.

[Steamtyme]

And they keep all critical posts after that 1.

What a sore company. More people should give them according trust feedbacks.

You can definitely leave them neutrals for their behavior and customer service. Until they scam someone, or begin behavior that is scammy red tags are not appropriate use of the feedback system.

I've moved on to different platforms. Wasn't feeling the environment anymore, and not running our series there made it easier to cut ties.

[SkyReVo]

And they keep all critical posts after that 1.

What a sore company. More people should give them according trust feedbacks.

You can definitely leave them neutrals for their behavior and customer service. Until they scam someone, or begin behavior that is scammy red tags are not appropriate use of the feedback system.

I've moved on to different platforms. Wasn't feeling the environment anymore, and not running our series there made it easier to cut ties.

Do you mean like closing accounts and declining withdrawals to "get in contact" with people and have them agree to a list of demands, including "stop critique here", before reinstating the accounts of letting people withdraw

Because that has happened atleast twice now.

[AlexTrebbert]

ANOTHER DELETED POST FROM THE MAIN SWC THREAD






Lower the heads up rake.

[arallmuus]

They dropped the ball and lost their domain name and still got people to come back, which is crazy when you think about it.

Its not when you realize that they are probably the only decent poker site left that only allow bitcoin deposits. Not to mention that the prizepool for some tournaments there are pretty decent with far smaller fields if you compare them with other poker sites. That alone should be enough reason for some people to keep coming back

I've moved on to different platforms. Wasn't feeling the environment anymore, and not running our series there made it easier to cut ties.

I have withdrawn 95% of what I had there. When they lost the domain, it kinda feels unprofessional and that its not safe to leave my funds in there. Left some small balance there in case efi wants to start the series again lol

Because that has happened atleast twice now.

Thats dirty

[Marauders80]

And they keep all critical posts after that 1.

What a sore company. More people should give them according trust feedbacks.

You can definitely leave them neutrals for their behavior and customer service. Until they scam someone, or begin behavior that is scammy red tags are not appropriate use of the feedback system.

I've moved on to different platforms. Wasn't feeling the environment anymore, and not running our series there made it easier to cut ties.

Do you mean like closing accounts and declining withdrawals to "get in contact" with people and have them agree to a list of demands, including "stop critique here", before reinstating the accounts of letting people withdraw

Because that has happened atleast twice now.

Have payouts been declined or held up because of this thread and the open discussion and critique in this thread?  Have they declined payouts due to any criticism in the unofficial 2p2 thread too?

This would be a first. But w btc where it’s at, lots of people/companies are probably looking to join the crypto-milly-lambo fraternity.  I wouldn’t mind taking a look at one of those emails (w any identifying data redacted). 

It’s tough not knowing what to do, as I’m an affiliate at the swc poker club, and so have a duty to represent them.  Yet, my first duty is to place the players with the right site, as best as possible, with the highest rewards possible - whether on swc, kings main, kings home games, Pbros Diamond under a club owner/union official, or ONC.  If I don’t know who’s paying me, personally, I’m more wary.  Cuz payouts are much easier when you know your cashier personally and can access all the tools in your toolbox to ensure players are paid, happy etc

I hope everybody gets paid.  My stomach is growling, gotta feed the beast.  Appreciate the rake charts and I’m not really sure what the harm in this thread is, or why so many posts have been deleted. 

Wishing everybody a happy new year.  Last year was the year of the Rat (yuck).  This is the year of the Blackjack and I think it’s going to work out just fine for everybody.   Plenty of good games online still, including at swc’s poker club I’m sure.  Just gottta be persistent in finding them, in this dynamic online poker scene.  Been playing a lot of single draw recently in a mix.  It’s got too many big bet games for my taste but it might appeal to some.

Anyways, I hope everybody makes money - the sites; the players; everieee body.  And hopefully these cashouts are rectified shortly for those waiting.  Financial solvency/security has never been a problem st swc before.  I was pretty surprised to learn of this stuff re the withdrawals today.  If anybody needs any assistance with anything, I can’t make many promises obv, but I never mind working on solutions that help the players. 

Y’all know how to get in touch, take it easy and gl

[Steamtyme]

Do you mean like closing accounts and declining withdrawals to "get in contact" with people and have them agree to a list of demands, including "stop critique here", before reinstating the accounts of letting people withdraw
Because that has happened atleast twice now.

I do. I would have people bring proof of that here if they give a shit. That's f'd up behavior. I have no problem with a company deciding to not allow a customer to play on their site and bad mouth them at the same time - Jon Little syndrome.

I do have a problem with them holding funds hostage, and I imagine most of the BTC. community would as well.

[AlexTrebbert]

Do you mean like closing accounts and declining withdrawals to "get in contact" with people and have them agree to a list of demands, including "stop critique here", before reinstating the accounts of letting people withdraw
Because that has happened atleast twice now.

I do. I would have people bring proof of that here if they give a shit. That's f'd up behavior. I have no problem with a company deciding to not allow a customer to play on their site and bad mouth them at the same time - Jon Little syndrome.

Out of curiosity how do you suggest SWC identify customers to be banned for behavior off site.  This is a no dox forum, as is 2p2. SWC is a no dox poker site.  How on earth can you connect a SWC account with one that is on this forum by any means other than pure speculation. In theory SWC accounts only belong to the email address associated with the account. Identifying users by devices used or the location of devices used is purely an educated guess, albeit very accurate but nonetheless just an assumption that the same person is on multiple accounts.  Without dox, hypothetically you could even consider an AI to be human depending on how you define a human. And this is the conundrum that is SWC. They have adopted a new attitude and a new face to their brand in the last 6 months which has infuriated a huge percentage of their base yet they have no clear means of controlling who that base is because there are no dox.  You would think if a company was in this position they would try to have an open line of communication with excellent customer service to attempt to keep something in control that has so many vulnerabilities.  I often think SWC has no clue how much their users loved the community at SWC and the site itself. There wouldn't be all this backlash otherwise.

I do have a problem with them holding funds hostage, and I imagine most of the BTC. community would as well.

You might want to ask SWC about this in the main thread or email them.  Proof is going to be rather hard to come by unless people post emails or screenshots. Neither of which are really proof of anything.

[ThatOneGuyOnHere]

Do you mean like closing accounts and declining withdrawals to "get in contact" with people and have them agree to a list of demands, including "stop critique here", before reinstating the accounts of letting people withdraw
Because that has happened atleast twice now.

I do. I would have people bring proof of that here if they give a shit. That's f'd up behavior. I have no problem with a company deciding to not allow a customer to play on their site and bad mouth them at the same time - Jon Little syndrome.

Out of curiosity how do you suggest SWC identify customers to be banned for behavior off site.  This is a no dox forum, as is 2p2. SWC is a no dox poker site.  How on earth can you connect a SWC account with one that is on this forum by any means other than pure speculation. In theory SWC accounts only belong to the email address associated with the account. Identifying users by devices used or the location of devices used is purely an educated guess, albeit very accurate but nonetheless just an assumption that the same person is on multiple accounts.  Without dox, hypothetically you could even consider an AI to be human depending on how you define a human. And this is the conundrum that is SWC. They have adopted a new attitude and a new face to their brand in the last 6 months which has infuriated a huge percentage of their base yet they have no clear means of controlling who that base is because there are no dox.  You would think if a company was in this position they would try to have an open line of communication with excellent customer service to attempt to keep something in control that has so many vulnerabilities.  I often think SWC has no clue how much their users loved the community at SWC and the site itself. There wouldn't be all this backlash otherwise.

I do have a problem with them holding funds hostage, and I imagine most of the BTC. community would as well.

You might want to ask SWC about this in the main thread or email them.  Proof is going to be rather hard to come by unless people post emails or screenshots. Neither of which are really proof of anything.

I saw this happen. The one time I was aware of was for locking the account not holding funds because of stuff said on here. I Don't know if the player directly referenced themselves in an event or by their name. SWC did comment though that it was locked to get their attention.

[figmentofmyass]

I've moved on to different platforms. Wasn't feeling the environment anymore, and not running our series there made it easier to cut ties.

+1, i finally got around to cleaning out my account last night. the coins arrived this morning. i noticed their wallet at least uses native segwit now.

but yeah, the rake issues, chat issues, and general bad vibes from management all had me heading this direction. the domain snafu felt really unprofessional---that was the last straw for me.

[scammed-by-nitro]

They wont do that.

Cvnts like ugot try to stage an upraising but this will bring nothing as well. Most players say they join a strike and then puss out, you will see.

Shitty site and mostly shitty people playing at swc. Not to mention the scammers that multi account all the time.

[SkyReVo]

They wont do that.

Cvnts like ugot try to stage an upraising but this will bring nothing as well. Most players say they join a strike and then puss out, you will see.

Shitty site and mostly shitty people playing at swc. Not to mention the scammers that multi account all the time.

What happened?



You just said that and left. You have a tilt problem, my friend.

[scammed-by-nitro]

They wont do that.

Cvnts like ugot try to stage an upraising but this will bring nothing as well. Most players say they join a strike and then puss out, you will see.

Shitty site and mostly shitty people playing at swc. Not to mention the scammers that multi account all the time.

What happened?


You just said that and left. You have a tilt problem, my friend.

Im not ur friend. Any input was ignored anyway so why bother joining this shit.
Btw,  I said that days ago. Not wasting my time on swc or people that play there. I quit playing on swc weeks ago btw.

And quit sharing peoples swc or other account names on this platform u dumb fuck.

[SkyReVo]

Just thought maybe something specific happened.

That's pretty rich from someone who doxxed my real name on this forum before, don't you think?

Anyways, good luck elsewhere.

[AlexTrebbert]

ANOTHER DELETED POST FROM THE MAIN SWC THREAD

This has happened to me before (for smaller amounts), I was not compensated. What is the policy here, SWC had an outage that multiple people can vouch for. Please atleast auto-unreg people who lost connection.

Hey ugot0chance why would SwC do anything for you when you are organizing rake strike with beansontoast?

Are you suggesting that there are different rules and policies for different players at SWC depending on whether or not they publicly support SWC's policies?  That would be really bad.  Rules and policies should be enforced equally.  Bootlickers shouldn't get special treatment. The site needs to remain impartial in all instances to allow the user base to be confident that the games are fair.

[AlexTrebbert]

ANOTHER DELETED POST FROM THE MAIN SWC THREAD






Please make rake competitive with the rest of the poker industry.  The most troublesome area is the limit hu rake at mid stakes $1.00/$2.00 - $15.00/$30.00.  These stakes mix games are your bread and butter and are practically the only non nlh tables that get more than 2 players.  You would think you would have super low rake heads up at these like the SWC of past to get them started so they could fill and then the games could be raked more and generate more players on the site.  

It also might help if the regs who start these games weren't chat banned. #freebeans #freebert #freeuGot

[ThatOneGuyOnHere]

Where is support? I'm shocked half the post are still up in the other thread! Then they post tournament information directly below a post about not getting a response from them. It is very odd. Especially with them saying they needed to work on communication more. Another odd thing is that all their recent twitter posts have no replies, which they normally do. Not sure if you can disable those or not. Just seems like they went radio silent and are just posting automated tournament stuff now.

[AlexTrebbert]

ANOTHER DELETED POST FROM THE MAIN SWC THREAD

Seems like swc is running out of money now that many regs are striking and have withdrawn their money.

Cant even reply to my mails, posts or my scam accusation thread.

This is how far we have come now.

If you could let us know what your screenname/names are on SWC are, that would be very helpful to figure if this is incompetence on SWC's behalf or if you are one of the many regulars that SWC has chosen to ignore and/or mistreat in support's recent policy shift of playing favorites with regards to answering emails, monitoring chat, and providing refunds for site outages.

If you don't feel comfortable outing your SNs, that's completely understandable. If this is the case, please let us know if you have clashed with SWC's chat moderator or support in the past.

[Maasdamer]

They once again locked their thread.

I reported xgoodfella for chat abuse with a lot of screenshot of him insulting players, here is the answer.

"Thank you for taking the time to send SwC a screenshot of player chat you felt was inappropriate. We will analyze the player's chat and determine what steps to take, if any.

Good luck at the tables."

If any, right. He still has his chat by the way. Mine was perma banned for nothing.

This site is just something else.