i can proof my economy knowldege anyone who critizsed me i have good question

[Polo7]

so everybody who said my opinion about economy is wrong

ill ask you guys the question and i have answer to this question 100% if you guys dont have this answer please dont add baseless pointless comments about my predictions.


let me ask a question do you guys even know how the money is produced in to economy?  and how much it can produce?
do you anyone here knows how much the bank can produce money in to eonomy?  do you guys know how they know what ammount is right ammount and how they calculate this?  
if banks need to add money into economy there is exacly numbers what they multyply to get exaccly ammount will be injected in to economy....i just want to see if anyone here knows this? 

i know and im waiting you guys to who added bad comments to tell me this i just want to see how many of you here knows anything?

[1714094116]

1714094116

[1714094116]

1714094116

[jackg]

Moneys introduced through Central banks adding an extra few % to the monatory supply:
For developed stable countries it's about 1.7%-2%
For markets that don't move as fast and lesser developed countries it's about 4-10%

(this is only for big countries as some smaller ones - I'm told - base it off other metrics such as gdp).

There are a few types of banks beyond the central bank though and the two main ones that seem to be mentioned are full reserve and fractional reserve..

97% of UK currency is produced via the fractional reserve system, I think it's similar across the rest of the developed world as most loans are generally not too difficult to pay off and collateral can increase faster than the debt interest if only a few people default (with things like housing).

Most have the fraction of reserves as a 10% reserve leaving the rest of the funds to be leant or spent - which produces a recursive step so they can keep doing it with the next deposits - hence why we get a 3% reserve.

[Polo7]

Moneys introduced through Central banks adding an extra few % to the monatory supply:
For developed stable countries it's about 1.7%-2%
For markets that don't move as fast and lesser developed countries it's about 4-10%

(this is only for big countries as some smaller ones - I'm told - base it off other metrics such as gdp).

There are a few types of banks beyond the central bank though and the two main ones that seem to be mentioned are full reserve and fractional reserve..

97% of UK currency is produced via the fractional reserve system, I think it's similar across the rest of the developed world as most loans are generally not too difficult to pay off and collateral can increase faster than the debt interest if only a few people default (with things like housing).

Most have the fraction of reserves as a 10% reserve leaving the rest of the funds to be leant or spent - which produces a recursive step so they can keep doing it with the next deposits - hence why we get a 3% reserve.

no you see its not quite right here!


its like this:

lets say like now the banks want to inject new  money into economy
so they will count all the people in the country or  single currency area such us usa dollar eur or other currency.
they count how many people are and then they will multyply this with  10 000 usd its calculated that 10000 usd is needed to inject for 10 years into economy per each person.




now we know why they brought people from the middle east to europe.
and why they brought people from mexico to usa.  



every 10 years is money printing circle.
now all the banks will inject money into economy for next 10 years.

it means we will have economy boom next 5 years.
you dont belive me? do the math calculate and you will be shocked how accurate numbers and facts i have here


i cant belive i really share this info for free here again and again.


and this is just the dip of the iceberg what i know

[jackg]

You got a citation/source for this?

I'm not even sure your post makes any sense...

Moneys introduced through Central banks adding an extra few % to the monatory supply:
For developed stable countries it's about 1.7%-2%
For markets that don't move as fast and lesser developed countries it's about 4-10%

(this is only for big countries as some smaller ones - I'm told - base it off other metrics such as gdp).

There are a few types of banks beyond the central bank though and the two main ones that seem to be mentioned are full reserve and fractional reserve..

97% of UK currency is produced via the fractional reserve system, I think it's similar across the rest of the developed world as most loans are generally not too difficult to pay off and collateral can increase faster than the debt interest if only a few people default (with things like housing).

Most have the fraction of reserves as a 10% reserve leaving the rest of the funds to be leant or spent - which produces a recursive step so they can keep doing it with the next deposits - hence why we get a 3% reserve.

no you see its not quite right here!


its like this:

lets say like now the banks want to inject new  money into economy
so they will count all the people in the country or  single currency area such us usa dollar eur or other currency.
they count how many people are and then they will multyply this with  10 000 usd its calculated that 10000 usd is needed to inject for 10 years into economy per each person.




now we know why they brought people from the middle east to europe.
and why they brought people from mexico to usa. 



every 10 years is money printing circle.
now all the banks will inject money into economy for next 10 years.

it means we will have economy boom next 5 years.
you dont belive me? do the math calculate and you will be shocked how accurate numbers and facts i have here


i cant belive i really share this info for free here again and again.


and this is just the dip of the iceberg what i know

[Polo7]

You got a citation/source for this?

I'm not even sure your post makes any sense...

Moneys introduced through Central banks adding an extra few % to the monatory supply:
For developed stable countries it's about 1.7%-2%
For markets that don't move as fast and lesser developed countries it's about 4-10%

(this is only for big countries as some smaller ones - I'm told - base it off other metrics such as gdp).

There are a few types of banks beyond the central bank though and the two main ones that seem to be mentioned are full reserve and fractional reserve..

97% of UK currency is produced via the fractional reserve system, I think it's similar across the rest of the developed world as most loans are generally not too difficult to pay off and collateral can increase faster than the debt interest if only a few people default (with things like housing).

Most have the fraction of reserves as a 10% reserve leaving the rest of the funds to be leant or spent - which produces a recursive step so they can keep doing it with the next deposits - hence why we get a 3% reserve.

no you see its not quite right here!


its like this:

lets say like now the banks want to inject new  money into economy
so they will count all the people in the country or  single currency area such us usa dollar eur or other currency.
they count how many people are and then they will multyply this with  10 000 usd its calculated that 10000 usd is needed to inject for 10 years into economy per each person.




now we know why they brought people from the middle east to europe.
and why they brought people from mexico to usa. 



every 10 years is money printing circle.
now all the banks will inject money into economy for next 10 years.

it means we will have economy boom next 5 years.
you dont belive me? do the math calculate and you will be shocked how accurate numbers and facts i have here


i cant belive i really share this info for free here again and again.


and this is just the dip of the iceberg what i know

yes it makes sense  if know anything about economcy then you should know that  ammount of currency cant be siginically bigger then the actual population if it is like this then the money will be  with high inflation.
to keep inflation low you need to control money supply ,to know money supply how much can be produced you need to know how many money users as people will be.


just ask me and ill shove you with ecacty facts how why and when

[Polo7]

to know all this and even more its easy to know what will happens with stock market where is good economy where is bad economy


as anyone saw that my predictions was 100% true

[adzino]

no you see its not quite right here!


its like this:

lets say like now the banks want to inject new  money into economy
so they will count all the people in the country or  single currency area such us usa dollar eur or other currency.
they count how many people are and then they will multyply this with  10 000 usd its calculated that 10000 usd is needed to inject for 10 years into economy per each person.




now we know why they brought people from the middle east to europe.
and why they brought people from mexico to usa.  



every 10 years is money printing circle.
now all the banks will inject money into economy for next 10 years.

it means we will have economy boom next 5 years.
you dont belive me? do the math calculate and you will be shocked how accurate numbers and facts i have here


i cant belive i really share this info for free here again and again.


and this is just the dip of the iceberg what i know

Please stop before you embarrass yourself any further. On your last post, you gave some "information" which made no sense and then you were asking for "donation" for more information. Based on this post, it sounds like you are trying to pocket some money from naive people by using big words to sound smart.

That is not how money is printed. The government doesn't count people to print money lol. Like I said on your previous thread, the main factor is output of goods/services. If they print money based on number of people, it will only cause inflation. Prices of goods will rise and the value of the currency will drop.

to know all this and even more its easy to know what will happens with stock market where is good economy where is bad economy


as anyone saw that my predictions was 100% true

If your predictions are correct, you might be rich by now trading stocks... but why are you looking for donations?

[jackg]

so right now usa need to produce exacly  this ammount of money
if they did printed some part of this then  they must get this much money to complete the money injecting target

3313463440000

The FED already printed 6 trillion to inject into the market though? So you're already out by a SF of 2.

just ask me and ill shove you with ecacty facts how why and when

I thought I did?

[The Sceptical Chymist]

do you guys know how they know what ammount is right ammount and how they calculate this?  
if banks need to add money into economy there is exacly numbers what they multyply to get exaccly ammount will be injected in to economy....i just want to see if anyone here knows this? 

First of all, what you wrote above isn't even clear.  It's not a question I can answer because I'm not at all sure what exactly you're asking.  Maybe that's why you've been getting the criticism you mentioned--you're obviously not writing in your first language and your thoughts aren't coming across in a coherent manner.  Hell, you could be the the banking king in whatever country you're from, but you'd never be able to tell from your writings.

i cant belive i really share this info for free here again and again.
<snip>
and this is just the dip of the iceberg what i know

Since no one outside someone living in a psychiatric institute would pay you for your "knowledge" you might as well just stop sharing it.  It's obvious you feel you're underappreciated.  The fact is that your posts are almost incoherent. 

What part of an iceberg is the dip, anyway?

[suchmoon]

ill ask you guys the question and i have answer to this question 100% if you guys dont have this answer please dont add baseless pointless comments about my predictions.

Your "predictions" are baseless and pointless and your incessant stream of new threads is a crime against the English language. No amount of willy-waving can change that. Multiplying the population by 10000 only proves that you can do third grade math, it doesn't show any "knowldege" [sic] of economics whatsoever.

Take a break, read a book (or a dictionary) and the rules of this forum and perhaps figure out a way to not sound like an illiterate knob if the opinions of other people about your opinions are so important to you.

[wxa7115]

No offence but why do you feel the need to prove that you are right about your knowledge and that those which criticize you are in the wrong? If you are right then believe me over the course of your life this is going to show and those that are wrong will suffer the consequences of not listen to you, this is a classic case of ‘living well is the best revenge’, there is not need to come here and demonstrate anything to anyone, follow your knowledge and over the years you will get your answer.

However you need to accept the possibility that you are the one in the wrong and if that is the case you will need to accept as well the consequences of your actions.

[mindrust]

how the money is produced in to economy?  and how much it can produce?
do you anyone here knows how much the bank can produce money in to eonomy?  do you guys know how they know what ammount is right ammount and how they calculate this?  
if banks need to add money into economy there is exacly numbers what they multyply to get exaccly ammount will be injected in to economy....i just want to see if anyone here knows this?  

i know and im waiting you guys to who added bad comments to tell me this i just want to see how many of you here knows anything?

Banks can create money in 2 ways:

1- Money can be produced out of thin air by the central banks. They don't have to have any "real" assets to back their money. They clap their hands and wham $1b is created out of nowhere.

2- Money can also be created by the "normal" banks by creating debt on their customers. Banks are our loan sharks with licenses. The more they loan money, the more money gets injected into the system. If the guy who took the loan doesn't pay the money back, banks can't really do anything other than freezing his bank accounts and seize his assets. If he doesn't own anything and bought physical gold with the borrowed money, now that's the part it gets tricky.

If you remember 2008 and before, how banks were handing out the mortgages to almost anybody even if they had no jobs, if you can't remember, go watch the movie, "the big short", that's how they get fucked in the end and it has no end to it because if the banks can't sell their mortgages they go bankrupt. That's why when nobody takes any loans, they started to give it to everybody and they went bankrupt anyway.

Tldr; It is all a major scam.