Ninjastic.space - BitcoinTalk Post/Address archive + API

[TryNinja]

Wouldn't it be much better to include that in the BPIP Extension? I haven't installed it yet, but if I'd ever do, one extension is better than two

That would be better. But suchmoon would need to let me help them or implement those features through my API. I would be willing to do any of that, but maybe they already have too much work to do.

[icopress]

It was yesterday and today .. I cleared the cache but in vain.

[suchmoon]

Wouldn't it be much better to include that in the BPIP Extension? I haven't installed it yet, but if I'd ever do, one extension is better than two

That would be better. But suchmoon would need to let me help them or implement those features through my API. I would be willing to do any of that, but maybe they already have too much work to do.

PM me+ibminer what you have in mind and we can figure something out.

From my personal point of view - we can add links to user pages on your site like we're planning to do for LoyceV's site. For privacy reasons we probably wouldn't link directly to deleted posts.

Notification feature is on my "to do" list for the extension version after next. I haven't decided yet if I would want to use BPIP data or a third party API like yours. Or both and let the user choose.

I'm not worried about forking if need be. The source code is open by definition, anyone is free to do whatever they want with it.

[FatFork]

+1 for Ninjastic browser extension.
On what dkbit98 has already suggested, I would also like to see a link on the topics for topic statistics.

It was yesterday and today .. I cleared the cache but in vain.

Everything checks out fine from my end. Or TryNinja already solved the problem.

[icopress]

Something went wrong.. I tried to reset the cache again.

Archive: https://archive.is/83968

[LoyceV]

Something went wrong..

Mine shows the exact same number of posts for Meta and Reputation.

[TryNinja]

Something went wrong.. I tried to reset the cache again.

Mine shows the exact same number of posts for Meta and Reputation.

Thanks! I ended up causing some caching issues. It's fixed now.


Since I'm already here... you can now access someone's user page through their user uid:

https://ninjastic.space/user/icopress
https://ninjastic.space/user/id/1137579

[dkbit98]

Something went wrong.. I tried to reset the cache again.

I noticed the same thing, and I think I had the same or similar numbers 1487 posts in meta for last 7 days
Ninja is fast like all ninjas so he fixed it fast and added new features.
Good work

[TryNinja]

New update:

-> Address page

- Added BTC and ETH address balance.
- Added ETH tokens balance.
- Added copyable list of users who mentioned the address.
- Added last token transfers, linked to the potential owners of the addresses (or user's who mentioned it).




-> User page

- Top 5 favorite addresses.
- User mentioned adresses are shown individually and all posts mentioning them are grouped together.

[LoyceV]

-> Address page

- Added BTC and ETH address balance.

Address 1FeexV6bAHb8ybZjqQMjJrcCrHGW9sb6uF shows Something went wrong... instead of the balance.

If I search for my addresses, can you add the balance of each address too? I don't recognize most of them, but adding the balance might help to highlight what's interesting. Or even sort them by balance (apparently I have mentioned 6,723 addresses).

[TryNinja]

Address 1FeexV6bAHb8ybZjqQMjJrcCrHGW9sb6uF shows Something went wrong... instead of the balance.

It's working for me. I use SoChain's api for the BTC balances and they are done on the client (for now).

If I search for my addresses, can you add the balance of each address too? I don't recognize most of them, but adding the balance might help to highlight what's interesting. Or even sort them by balance (apparently I have mentioned 6,723 addresses).

This page actually shows every case where you mentioned an address, separately. For example, if you mention 2 addresses in your post, the count will increase by 2 and you will see two new entries (mentioned X address in post 123; mentioned Y address in post 123).

If you want to know which addresses are most likely to be yours, it's better to check your user page, since it now has the top 5 addresses by number of mentions and also shows all the addresses only once (grouping all the posts where they were mentioned).

I'm thinking about also adding an option to group all posts in the /addresses search page or just changing it all together to look like the one on the user page.

I hope that's not too confusing.

[LoyceV]

I use SoChain's api for the BTC balances and they are done on the client (for now).

Maybe it doesn't allow Tor-connections.

This page actually shows every case where you mentioned an address, separately.

I sometimes post long lists of addresses indeed.

If you want to know which addresses are most likely to be yours, it's better to check your user page

Let's see:

Code:

BTC 1foreverDArUNEX2gVD26vautcx3b8zTZ (24)
BTC 1TarasQyKwPJRuod6qwh7n8BjMHC49ZNY (8)
BTC 1MsY1HjLQQ6e8tiQZUyR5mdmShyWqGT7bk (7)
BTC 1SubSiKMkZuqMBaCeqehVQ1zSunVBAER8 (7)
BTC 1bL43dPysh1TXQBRrQHdQRyEwN5H7qFrE (7)

The first one makes sense
The second one: When I click ">", it shows many posts made by Taras. At my user page, I'd expect to see only my own posts. This isn't my address, but I posted it several times indeed.
All the titles here link to https://google.com instead of the post. Is that a bug?
The other addresses: all not mine either, but I've posted them several times (in a table).

[TryNinja]

Maybe it doesn't allow Tor-connections.

That's probably the case. I'll reverse proxy the API through my server to fix that. edit: done

At my user page, I'd expect to see only my own posts.

Makes sense. I just changed that.

All the titles here link to https://google.com instead of the post. Is that a bug?

Opss... fixed.

The other addresses: all not mine either, but I've posted them several times (in a table).

Yeah, there isn't much more I can do to figure out what is really yours and what is not. People will need to look on the list and do their own research. Another thing I plan to add is priorize addresses on the big "staked addresses" topic.

[LoyceV]

All the titles here link to https://google.com instead of the post. Is that a bug?

Opss... fixed.

It took a hard reload, but it works now

Another thing I plan to add is priorize addresses on the big "staked addresses" topic.

It will be interesting if you also process the quotes for which the original post has been deleted. There's always a chance someone faked a quote that was never made, but I haven't seen this happen (yet).

[PrimeNumber7]

The other addresses: all not mine either, but I've posted them several times (in a table).

Yeah, there isn't much more I can do to figure out what is really yours and what is not. People will need to look on the list and do their own research. Another thing I plan to add is priorize addresses on the big "staked addresses" topic.

There are certain subs in which people often post addresses belonging to others and in which they often post their own addresses.

If someone posts more than one address in a post, they are probably not posting any of their own addresses. (this would be difficult to automate) If someone posts an address in a signature/bounty campaign thread, it probably belongs to them.

In some subs, the likelihood of an address belonging to someone may depend on if they are the OP of the thread or not. For example, a lender may post the addresses they funded loans to in their lending thread.

[TryNinja]

~

That's too complicated. I don't think I'll ever tag an address as someone's official/staked address, so false-positives aren't really an issue. All I want to do is make it easier for the spambusters find out which addresses may be owned by each user.

Instead of looking for addresses on someone's 300+ pages post history, you can go to their Ninjastic user page, get a list of addresses and easily cross-check them with other users while doing your own research. That's why those tools were created.

It will be interesting if you also process the quotes for which the original post has been deleted. There's always a chance someone faked a quote that was never made, but I haven't seen this happen (yet).

I could do that:

please sir 35hK24tcLEWcgNA4JxpvbkNkoAcDGqQPsP

But now this address is linked to my profile and not to yours. The bot only cares about the actual author of the post (me).

[PrimeNumber7]

~

That's too complicated. I don't think I'll ever tag an address as someone's official/staked address, so false-positives aren't really an issue. All I want to do is make it easier for the spambusters find out which addresses may be owned by each user.

Instead of looking for addresses on someone's 300+ pages post history, you can go to their Ninjastic user page, get a list of addresses and easily cross-check them with other users while doing your own research. That's why those tools were created.

It will be interesting if you also process the quotes for which the original post has been deleted. There's always a chance someone faked a quote that was never made, but I haven't seen this happen (yet).

I could do that:

please sir 35hK24tcLEWcgNA4JxpvbkNkoAcDGqQPsP

But now this address is linked to my profile and not to yours. The bot only cares about the actual author of the post (me).

Someone who posts in the Reputation sub for example may have a lot of addresses listed in "all mentioned" addresses that do not belong to that person. This makes doing research difficult.

Adding filters as to which addresses are displayed can be resource-intensive, while only displaying addresses posted in posts that meet certain criteria would be substituting your judgment for others'.

 

[Stalker22]

I think TryNinja's approach to this is valid. It's better to have a few false positives in a search results than to miss finding some related addresses.
It is up to scam/spam busters to do their own research and not rely solely on tools

[LoyceV]

It will be interesting if you also process the quotes for which the original post has been deleted. There's always a chance someone faked a quote that was never made, but I haven't seen this happen (yet).

I could do that:

please sir 35hK24tcLEWcgNA4JxpvbkNkoAcDGqQPsP

But now this address is linked to my profile and not to yours. The bot only cares about the actual author of the post (me).

I meant to do this only for the Stake your Bitcoin address here thread. This post for example:

Steak (and beans) please

14nknk1KNjRAK2LuZHx2QygR6anEu5b7ar

I assume this was really made by ollierexx, but the original post was removed. It would be good if you can add those (with a warning that it's only quoted). Removing a staked address could indicated the account was sold.
The problem for processing the data is that not all quotes use the same format, some use code-tags too. I tried 2 years ago.

[Csmiami]

I can't even image how difficult it is.

It's just matter of convenience, but it is possible to bold text on the posts that matches the content/keyword? For example, if i use content/keyword "blockchain", all texts containing "blockchain" would be bolded automatically.

I think it is. I'll look at it later today.

What did happen to this? I was going to propose this, but I saw that it had already been mentioned...

It'd be a very helpful implementation to look for certain specific stuff so... refloating the petition!