Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 07:44:45 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Liquidity Pools Sound Similar To Fractional Reserve Banking. Are They?  (Read 109 times)
topshelfcrypto (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 79
Merit: 27


View Profile WWW
September 06, 2020, 07:45:02 PM
 #1

I just read this article from CoinDesk to try to learn about yield farming. (good articel btw) ...

https://www.coindesk.com/defi-yield-farming-comp-token-explained

When I came to the following quote ...

Quote
On Uniswap, there is at least one market pair for almost any token on Ethereum. Behind the scenes, this means Uniswap can make it look like it is making a direct trade for any two tokens, which makes it easy for users, but it’s all built around pools of two tokens. And all these market pairs work better with bigger pools.

... and found myself thinking, hmm, that sounds suspiciously like some kind of fractional reserve banking. Then thought, nahhh....

Then I read ...

Quote
If there were a run on Compound, users could find themselves unable to withdraw their funds when they wanted.

and ...

Quote
It’s possible to lend to Compound, borrow from it, deposit what you borrowed and so on. This can be done multiple times ...

and ...

Quote
And weird things have arisen. For example, there’s currently more DAI on Compound than have been minted in the world.

... then I was like, yeahhhh ...

And this ...

Quote
In a simple example, a yield farmer might put 100,000 USDT into Compound. They will get a token back for that stake, called cUSDT. Let’s say they get 100,000 cUSDT back ...

They can then take that cUSDT and put it into a liquidity pool that takes cUSDT on Balancer, an AMM that allows users to set up self-rebalancing crypto index funds.

... sounds like trading derivatives

check my premium crypto domains for sale here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5211098
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715586285
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715586285

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715586285
Reply with quote  #2

1715586285
Report to moderator
topshelfcrypto (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 79
Merit: 27


View Profile WWW
September 06, 2020, 07:47:58 PM
 #2

Note to mods: Not sure if I posted this in the best section, please feel free to move it if you wish.

check my premium crypto domains for sale here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5211098
topshelfcrypto (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 79
Merit: 27


View Profile WWW
September 08, 2020, 08:15:06 PM
 #3

Bump. This is an important question. Bitcoin was supposedly invented to circumvent the traditional banking system. Now it appears some part of crypto is following in the old path of unsound money. Anyone?

check my premium crypto domains for sale here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5211098
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!