Archive

[anonymousminer]

.

[1715234963]

1715234963

[1715234963]

1715234963

[1715234963]

1715234963

[1715234963]

1715234963

[FFrankie]

How do we know it’s a blank and not a peeled one?

Or is a blank one equal to a peeled one without hologram?

[anonymousminer]

How do we know it’s a blank and not a peeled one?

Or is a blank one equal to a peeled one without hologram?

ICG authenticated it as a blank.  ZERO residue found.  ZERO toning difference on the reverse of the coin.  There is a 0.01% chance this was a peeled Casascius Bitnickel..... so VERY unlikely.

[phishead]

How do we know it’s a blank and not a peeled one?

Or is a blank one equal to a peeled one without hologram?

ICG authenticated it as a blank.  ZERO residue found.  ZERO toning difference on the reverse of the coin.  There is a 0.01% chance this was a peeled Casascius Bitnickel..... so VERY unlikely.

hmm... were there a lot of blanks Mike made? I thought the test pieces he handed out to media had 'VOID' on them?

[FFrankie]

How do we know it’s a blank and not a peeled one?

Or is a blank one equal to a peeled one without hologram?

ICG authenticated it as a blank.  ZERO residue found.  ZERO toning difference on the reverse of the coin.  There is a 0.01% chance this was a peeled Casascius Bitnickel..... so VERY unlikely.

Ahhhh okay. So I gotcha so the difference between a blank and a peeled is the toning and residue. And I’m fairly certain almost 100% sure that it’s ICGs job to determine if the coin was cleaned or not.

Thanks for the info.

[seek3r]

0.011 BTC

[goldlyre]

Or is a blank one equal to a peeled one without hologram?

IMHO I would rather take the latter if I'm choosing one of them on equal run.
Though I may be wrong.

[goldlyre]

0.012BTC

[Veezy]

0.013BTC

[goldlyre]

0.0135BTC

[owlcatz]

0.014 BTC

[goldlyre]

0.0145BTC

[goldlyre]

0.015BTC

[owlcatz]

0.016 BTC

[goldlyre]

0.017BTC

[owlcatz]

0.018BTC

[goldlyre]

0.018BTC

Congratulation to you, Owlcatz.

[owlcatz]

Congratulation to you, Owlcatz.

Thank you kindly!