I will believe Quickseller over Bitcoin SV on his claim. However, I asked him to report the message to mod/admin to prove the legitimacy.
I seriously doubt QS sent BSV an unsolicited PM trying to extort bitcoin from him, especially since QS started this thread first, and BSV started what looks to be a
revenge thread. Given how BSV has acted previously, I'm 99.99% confident in my assessment here--but hey, if the mods care to step in and verify the facts, I'm all for that.
They should just launch a signature campaign and ask their participants to merit their posts - that's easy enough and obviously working and business as usual for some...
Hopefully that's sarcasm, but it's hard to tell on the interwebz. I also hope you're not referring to Chipmixer or Foxpup's avatar thing, because nobody's asking anybody to send merits to fellow campaign participants in either one. Just sayin'.
Sorry for late response - hum, not sure I'd call it sarcasm - there are campaigns where participants merit each other's posts or to be exact, merit their client's posts no matter what - funnily, even when posts are written in a language they don't even understand. So what's the stand when it comes to something like this here in the forum? I see people complaining about other's doing merit giveaways etc. but this is fine? Couldn't care less but the double standards (forum ethics/moral) are pretty annoying.
And no, I wasn't referring to Chipmixer or Foxpup cycling crew.