🎲BetFury.io| 🔥Sign up on BetFury | 🤑Get Welcome Bonus up to 590% + 225 FS

[babygun]

I'm kind of new to BetFury and I would like to participate in this pool is there a chance to get the BFG easily such as buying on exchange or I can only get BFG by wagering to any of their games or can I invest directly to your website? Was it also possible to sell the BFG if I wanted to?

You will earn BFG tokens by wagering (win or loose) and you could also buy (or sell) these on some exchanges (hotbit, biswap, apeswap,...). You can not buy the tokens on the website itself.

For the first time, just because I saw these comments here, I wanted to try that "farming" with some amount of my BFG's! Of course, the first thing I saw is "connect wallet" and we can choose Metamask and Binance chain! WTF?

So from day 1, I am playing with TRX, my account is with TronLink... now I need to connect with some other chains? I don't get it, so I will pass this for sure...

By the way, APR is 126% at the moment!

It is indeed linked to the binance chain. APR has already dropped a lot, but it is still interesting to try it out!

[1715393553]

1715393553

[1715393553]

1715393553

[1715393553]

1715393553

[Manager BetFury]

​🎟 Exclusive Promo Codes 🎟
New Feature for Newcomers
https://betfury.tv/3AEmJXz

Use a Promo Code while registering -
get Hot Crypto Bonus

♨️The bonus is credited after activating the account
♨️Play Games, reach wager to unlock privileges
More details here: https://betfury.tv/3AEmJXz

❗️Promo code can be used only once per player

To attract more Referrals, use promo codes next to your referral link.
You Get Referrals - They Get Bonuses!

 PROMO  CODE  
🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻    
    BFtalk10      
🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺

[bitgolden]

BFG has a higher chance to be listed there first if they actually apply.

With what's happening on Binance right now (forcing KYC on all users), I'd rather choose Kucoin. I don't have big balance on centralized exchanges and I trade mostly on AMM's that's why I prefer those that won't ask personal information for a few hundreds/thousands trades.

KYC did not start recently on Binance. They had a KYC before and they just made it a little tighter but it wasn't something that was recently. You may prefer Kucoin but the world is still preferring Binance over any other place. They are more than double to the closest place so it is obvious that they are by far the most popular option even right now.

This is why I believe that we should not be considering Binance as some worse place now because they have worse KYC, it is obvious that they are by far still the best at what they are doing and it is not even a close competition. Any coin or token listed there would get so much benefit that Binance has the power to decide who will get that benefit, places are willing to spend millions to get their tokens listed there.

[markk1]

​🎟 Exclusive Promo Codes 🎟
New Feature for Newcomers
https://betfury.tv/3AEmJXz

Use a Promo Code while registering -
get Hot Crypto Bonus

♨️The bonus is credited after activating the account
♨️Play Games, reach wager to unlock privileges
More details here: https://betfury.tv/3AEmJXz

❗️Promo code can be used only once per player

To attract more Referrals, use promo codes next to your referral link.
You Get Referrals - They Get Bonuses!

 PROMO  CODE  
🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻    
    BFtalk10      
🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺

Code doesn't work anymore.

[24Kt]

BFG has a higher chance to be listed there first if they actually apply.

With what's happening on Binance right now (forcing KYC on all users), I'd rather choose Kucoin. I don't have big balance on centralized exchanges and I trade mostly on AMM's that's why I prefer those that won't ask personal information for a few hundreds/thousands trades.

KYC did not start recently on Binance. They had a KYC before and they just made it a little tighter but it wasn't something that was recently. You may prefer Kucoin but the world is still preferring Binance over any other place. They are more than double to the closest place so it is obvious that they are by far the most popular option even right now.

This is why I believe that we should not be considering Binance as some worse place now because they have worse KYC, it is obvious that they are by far still the best at what they are doing and it is not even a close competition. Any coin or token listed there would get so much benefit that Binance has the power to decide who will get that benefit, places are willing to spend millions to get their tokens listed there.

And I think, the reason why BFG team switched to BSC network because of the target that they may list this token to binance. I understand the frustrations of some here because binance has compulsory KYC now, but still people trust this network so you really have no problem when it comes to trading volume. Kucoin may not have compulsory KYC today but who knows later on, they will implement also as they will try to comply the requirements of the country they are operating.

[Dewi Aries]

BFG has a higher chance to be listed there first if they actually apply.

With what's happening on Binance right now (forcing KYC on all users), I'd rather choose Kucoin. I don't have big balance on centralized exchanges and I trade mostly on AMM's that's why I prefer those that won't ask personal information for a few hundreds/thousands trades.

KYC did not start recently on Binance. They had a KYC before and they just made it a little tighter but it wasn't something that was recently. You may prefer Kucoin but the world is still preferring Binance over any other place. They are more than double to the closest place so it is obvious that they are by far the most popular option even right now.

This is why I believe that we should not be considering Binance as some worse place now because they have worse KYC, it is obvious that they are by far still the best at what they are doing and it is not even a close competition. Any coin or token listed there would get so much benefit that Binance has the power to decide who will get that benefit, places are willing to spend millions to get their tokens listed there.

And I think, the reason why BFG team switched to BSC network because of the target that they may list this token to binance. I understand the frustrations of some here because binance has compulsory KYC now, but still people trust this network so you really have no problem when it comes to trading volume. Kucoin may not have compulsory KYC today but who knows later on, they will implement also as they will try to comply the requirements of the country they are operating.

Even Berfury has the opportunity to implement KYC The scheme we have seen so far is when looking for casino customers is free KYC but after growing KYC must be implemented we have seen examples in several casinos just see when they are already famous

[robelneo]

Even Berfury has the opportunity to implement KYC The scheme we have seen so far is when looking for casino customers is free KYC but after growing KYC must be implemented we have seen examples in several casinos just see when they are already famous

A gambling casino must be flexible if they want to remain in the business, there's a possibility that they are going to ask KYC, but if they are going to do that just to comply with their partnership and the authorities they have to be transparent in telling their community, so we'll know what's coming, there are players who will agree for KYC and those that will not, gamblers are divided when it comes to KYC.

[UserU]

Code doesn't work anymore.

I can imagine lots of bots farming the promo codes

[delfastTions]

A gambling casino must be flexible if they want to remain in the business, there's a possibility that they are going to ask KYC, but if they are going to do that just to comply with their partnership and the authorities they have to be transparent in telling their community, so we'll know what's coming, there are players who will agree for KYC and those that will not, gamblers are divided when it comes to KYC.

There are many reasons for the player to hide their identity.  From family secrets to the likelihood of a gangster attack.  Therefore, the obligatory KYC does not suit many people, of course.  Therefore, if a casino introduces KYC, and a person has good reasons to be anonymous, then he simply stops playing in such a casino.  And then there is a casino that operates in jurisdictions where KYC is not mandatory.  And so far, such casinos are always found.  Of course, it is bad if known and familiar casino players conduct a mandatory KYC.  But I hope it won't be soon.

[robelneo]

A gambling casino must be flexible if they want to remain in the business, there's a possibility that they are going to ask KYC, but if they are going to do that just to comply with their partnership and the authorities they have to be transparent in telling their community, so we'll know what's coming, there are players who will agree for KYC and those that will not, gamblers are divided when it comes to KYC.

There are many reasons for the player to hide their identity.  From family secrets to the likelihood of a gangster attack.  Therefore, the obligatory KYC does not suit many people, of course.  Therefore, if a casino introduces KYC, and a person has good reasons to be anonymous, then he simply stops playing in such a casino.  And then there is a casino that operates in jurisdictions where KYC is not mandatory.  And so far, such casinos are always found.  Of course, it is bad if known and familiar casino players conduct a mandatory KYC.  But I hope it won't be soon.

So far Betfury community is solid on non KYC, there could be a disruption of that unity when KYC is implemented, for a gambling casino that's fighting its way to becoming one of the top gambling casinos this is something that they avoided, even if there is a consensus and majority voted that they do not want KYC if that will delay what BetFury wants to achieve, it's an action that they need to address, I'm sure they are going to cross the bridge when they get there.

[ultrloa]

A gambling casino must be flexible if they want to remain in the business, there's a possibility that they are going to ask KYC, but if they are going to do that just to comply with their partnership and the authorities they have to be transparent in telling their community, so we'll know what's coming, there are players who will agree for KYC and those that will not, gamblers are divided when it comes to KYC.

There are many reasons for the player to hide their identity.  From family secrets to the likelihood of a gangster attack.  Therefore, the obligatory KYC does not suit many people, of course.  Therefore, if a casino introduces KYC, and a person has good reasons to be anonymous, then he simply stops playing in such a casino.  And then there is a casino that operates in jurisdictions where KYC is not mandatory.  And so far, such casinos are always found.  Of course, it is bad if known and familiar casino players conduct a mandatory KYC.  But I hope it won't be soon.

So far Betfury community is solid on non KYC, there could be a disruption of that unity when KYC is implemented, for a gambling casino that's fighting its way to becoming one of the top gambling casinos this is something that they avoided, even if there is a consensus and majority voted that they do not want KYC if that will delay what BetFury wants to achieve, it's an action that they need to address, I'm sure they are going to cross the bridge when they get there.

This is not surprising if the community of Betfury will became more bigger since for sure they will be required to do that and their players should be prepare on the possibilities since for now this is now almost normal thing on crypto casinos. I understand that many doesn't want to undergo on KYC process but we cannot do anything with it as we can't trust other platform so best to choose the best casino since this will give a less risk for us if we provide our personal details.

[UserU]

So far Betfury community is solid on non KYC, there could be a disruption of that unity when KYC is implemented, for a gambling casino that's fighting its way to becoming one of the top gambling casinos this is something that they avoided, even if there is a consensus and majority voted that they do not want KYC if that will delay what BetFury wants to achieve, it's an action that they need to address, I'm sure they are going to cross the bridge when they get there.

You have to understand that the KYC is for them to keep their certificate that adheres to the law, and not because they want to as they please.

Of course everyone wants to play without any restrictions but if you're a casino owner, you'd want to ensure that there are no frauds committed by players that are draining your funds or be involved with any minors.

[Fredomago]

So far Betfury community is solid on non KYC, there could be a disruption of that unity when KYC is implemented, for a gambling casino that's fighting its way to becoming one of the top gambling casinos this is something that they avoided, even if there is a consensus and majority voted that they do not want KYC if that will delay what BetFury wants to achieve, it's an action that they need to address, I'm sure they are going to cross the bridge when they get there.

You have to understand that the KYC is for them to keep their certificate that adheres to the law, and not because they want to as they please.

Of course everyone wants to play without any restrictions but if you're a casino owner, you'd want to ensure that there are no frauds committed by players that are draining your funds or be involved with any minors.

It's for them to balance and weight everything, Betfury team needs to know what is best for their business jus like what you have said. They need to make sure that they are protecting their business in not to allow anyone to abuse their platform. Things like this are part of the reason why they need to ask for verification, but we don't know yet what is the real score behind.

They need to check both sides, things always be research and not to be decided in a such a rush way, for sure this team have
someone who knows how to balance to make sure both the company and the players are well protected.

[aioc]

You have to understand that the KYC is for them to keep their certificate that adheres to the law, and not because they want to as they please.

Of course everyone wants to play without any restrictions but if you're a casino owner, you'd want to ensure that there are no frauds committed by players that are draining your funds or be involved with any minors.

If asking KYC will get them in a good position in the industry, players will have no option but to comply or go for other casinos that do not ask for KYC, I'm sure many of the players will think twice about leaving Betfury you are not playing here to win, they have a profit-sharing feature, and if you're making a profit or benefit from their games and features why not follow the rule.
I'm playing on Betfury and if they introduce KYC to continue playing I have no choice but to comply or lose the daily profit from staking, I have to choose between the risk and the benefit, and the benefit gets the best of my decision.

[AmoreJaz]

You have to understand that the KYC is for them to keep their certificate that adheres to the law, and not because they want to as they please.

Of course everyone wants to play without any restrictions but if you're a casino owner, you'd want to ensure that there are no frauds committed by players that are draining your funds or be involved with any minors.

If asking KYC will get them in a good position in the industry, players will have no option but to comply or go for other casinos that do not ask for KYC, I'm sure many of the players will think twice about leaving Betfury you are not playing here to win, they have a profit-sharing feature, and if you're making a profit or benefit from their games and features why not follow the rule.
I'm playing on Betfury and if they introduce KYC to continue playing I have no choice but to comply or lose the daily profit from staking, I have to choose between the risk and the benefit, and the benefit gets the best of my decision.

how is the discussion of KYC thing here came about? maybe, i'm missing something here. but so far, they are not requiring to submit KYC before withdrawal. are they saying that they will implement KYC soon? when they launch their gaming license, they haven't asked for KYC. based from their KYC -item #11 in their Terms, they will ask KYC if it is necessary (https://betfury.io/termsAndConditions.pdf) maybe for high rollers or those suspicious accounts, but right now, i don't think they will be asking kyc for all players.

[LUCKMCFLY]

So far Betfury community is solid on non KYC, there could be a disruption of that unity when KYC is implemented, for a gambling casino that's fighting its way to becoming one of the top gambling casinos this is something that they avoided, even if there is a consensus and majority voted that they do not want KYC if that will delay what BetFury wants to achieve, it's an action that they need to address, I'm sure they are going to cross the bridge when they get there.

You have to understand that the KYC is for them to keep their certificate that adheres to the law, and not because they want to as they please.

Of course everyone wants to play without any restrictions but if you're a casino owner, you'd want to ensure that there are no frauds committed by players that are draining your funds or be involved with any minors.

It's for them to balance and weight everything, Betfury team needs to know what is best for their business jus like what you have said. They need to make sure that they are protecting their business in not to allow anyone to abuse their platform. Things like this are part of the reason why they need to ask for verification, but we don't know yet what is the real score behind.

They need to check both sides, things always be research and not to be decided in a such a rush way, for sure this team have
someone who knows how to balance to make sure both the company and the players are well protected.

Currently one of the biggest problems on the part of players is the requirement of the KYC, nobody likes to stick to that system, many are lovers of privacy and anonymity, however one of the first options that Betfury took was to list their token in a Decentralized exchange like Biswap, which, for those who want to trade, they can do it without problem there.

The bad thing that the entire industry in the world is accepted by casinos, is that they must always comply with regulations due to the demands of governments and institutions, the reason is "control" ... this will always be the case.

[tygeade]

There are many reasons for the player to hide their identity.  From family secrets to the likelihood of a gangster attack.  Therefore, the obligatory KYC does not suit many people, of course.  Therefore, if a casino introduces KYC, and a person has good reasons to be anonymous, then he simply stops playing in such a casino.  And then there is a casino that operates in jurisdictions where KYC is not mandatory.  And so far, such casinos are always found.  Of course, it is bad if known and familiar casino players conduct a mandatory KYC.  But I hope it won't be soon.

Mine is basically just when I am found that I gamble then my nation charges me around 500$ as a fine. It is not really so horrible that they would put me in jail or give me some court date or anything serious. It is just a penalty that I would have to pay and I understand the situation, it is only 500 bucks and yes that is a lot of money, almost like how much money I make in a month and that is why it is a bad thing for me.

I would basically just hide it so that I would not have to be paying that 500 bucks and that is why I do not like the KYC situation and as long as it is avoidable then I will have to keep on avoiding without paying in the end.

[robelneo]

There are many reasons for the player to hide their identity.  From family secrets to the likelihood of a gangster attack.  Therefore, the obligatory KYC does not suit many people, of course.  Therefore, if a casino introduces KYC, and a person has good reasons to be anonymous, then he simply stops playing in such a casino.  And then there is a casino that operates in jurisdictions where KYC is not mandatory.  And so far, such casinos are always found.  Of course, it is bad if known and familiar casino players conduct a mandatory KYC.  But I hope it won't be soon.

Mine is basically just when I am found that I gamble then my nation charges me around 500$ as a fine. It is not really so horrible that they would put me in jail or give me some court date or anything serious. It is just a penalty that I would have to pay and I understand the situation, it is only 500 bucks and yes that is a lot of money, almost like how much money I make in a month and that is why it is a bad thing for me.

I would basically just hide it so that I would not have to be paying that 500 bucks and that is why I do not like the KYC situation and as long as it is avoidable then I will have to keep on avoiding without paying in the end.

So much depends on the location and the situation that people will not go through KYC, we will have to deal with it when the time comes, here
in my country, we have no problem with online casinos so it's ok for us to do KYC as long as the site is trustworthy, I might do a KYC when the time comes but I think it will take months or a year before that happens or it might not happen at all let's see the scenario when it happens.

[babygun]

how is the discussion of KYC thing here came about? maybe, i'm missing something here. but so far, they are not requiring to submit KYC before withdrawal. are they saying that they will implement KYC soon? when they launch their gaming license, they haven't asked for KYC. based from their KYC -item #11 in their Terms, they will ask KYC if it is necessary (https://betfury.io/termsAndConditions.pdf) maybe for high rollers or those suspicious accounts, but right now, i don't think they will be asking kyc for all players.

I don't know how the discussion started, but Betfury has no plans to implement KYC right now or in the near future. They will ask this when there is something suspicious with your account or a real big amount (but that's the same for all casinos).

[robelneo]

how is the discussion of KYC thing here came about? maybe, i'm missing something here. but so far, they are not requiring to submit KYC before withdrawal. are they saying that they will implement KYC soon? when they launch their gaming license, they haven't asked for KYC. based from their KYC -item #11 in their Terms, they will ask KYC if it is necessary (https://betfury.io/termsAndConditions.pdf) maybe for high rollers or those suspicious accounts, but right now, i don't think they will be asking kyc for all players.

I don't know how the discussion started, but Betfury has no plans to implement KYC right now or in the near future. They will ask this when there is something suspicious with your account or a real big amount (but that's the same for all casinos).

We never know but in case that there is a plan to do that we'll take the discussion where we left it, this is a discussion and we are having a healthy discussion on the possibility of having one.
This is not to promote anything but I just notice that there are new casinos that created their own token with the same feature as Betfury where you can dividends from just holding their token, I know there were in the past but I have seen one doing a bounty campaign, imitation is really the highest form of flattery