CDC has lost it as it says corona doesn’t spread through air.

[BADecker]

i only needed to watch 2 minutes of the video badecker linked and found 3 things mentioned that are wrong

1. the reason the hospitalisations vs infections is low is because
a. they are doing more testing on people without symptoms to include asymptomatic people now.
    in march/april/may they only wanted people with symptoms to ask for a test.
b. they are doing more tests then before. so while it appears that cases are going up higher and faster then march and the government has not done another full lockdown yet. its because they only done a full lockdown before when it started overwhelming hospitals. so the important number is the hospitalisation rate. which is starting to rise now
c. by socially distancing and wearing masks the viral load a person gets when infected is far less than in march situation. so less are getting high viral load and thus thus also causes the difference to the hospitalisation/case confirmed numbers

meaning the lockdown and precautions have done their job of reducing hospitalisation numbers and risk.
however cases are going up and hospitalisations are starting to go up because people are starting to ignore the precautions

2. the reason why deaths decreased in may/june/july is because of the precautions doing their job to 'curb the peak'
if there were no precautions then the deaths would have been lower. as proven by the now relaxed rules causing case rises.
if there was no distance/mask policy the numbers would be worse

so when the video suggests that the numbers NOW are low. its because of the precautions.

wake up and realise the reality of things.
those telling you not to reduce your risk are people that want to harm other people

Standard franky1. Knows what it is all about after reading only the first couple of lines. Then spouts the same kind of blab that has been debunked dozens of times.

Solomon said, Proverbs 18:13, "To answer before listening-- that is folly and shame."

[1715532526]

1715532526

[1715532526]

1715532526

[1715532526]

1715532526

[1715532526]

1715532526

[virasog]

There are honest scientists among the crooks who are trying to control us. The CDC has both. Sometimes the good scientists are winning. Sometimes the bad ones are. Sometimes we listen to the good ones who are trying to show us that there never was a reason for a pandemic. Sometimes we listen to the bad ones, and huddle in fear in our basements.

More than the CDC or health organization, it is the government who are playing their part in spreading the news as they want it to be published. Sometimes they want the patients to increase and panic to be created and they use CDC and media to show the wrong figures.

This is more sort of a pandemic drama.

[BADecker]

People are going to have to find a different use for all those masks. And governments are going to have to find a different use for all those millions of test kits they have been purchasing from the medical companies for the last 3 1/2 years.


Based on latest CDC data, the Wuhan coronavirus poses virtually no death risk whatsoever

New CDC data confirm that the Wuhan coronavirus poses almost zero death risk in people below the age of 50 (see details below). At the same time, these data also confirm the virus remains extremely dangerous to people over the age of 70, and the CDC estimates that 1 in 18 elderly people who contract the virus (i.e. are "infected") end up being killed by it.

Meanwhile, the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) for people 50 – 69 years is 1 in 200, making it far deadlier than the seasonal flu for individuals in that group.

But for people aged 20 – 49 years, the IFR drops to just 1 in 5000. This means that for every 5,000 people who are infected within this age group, one fatality is expected.

Those below the age of 20 have an even lower fatality rate: About 1 in 33,000.

In summary, the risk of death from the coronavirus in people under the age of 50 is extremely small, and approaching zero.

These numbers are based on the CDC's new data released at the following link, using "Scenario 5" which is labeled, "Current Best Estimate."

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html

CDC data confirm the danger to elderly people while simultaneously showing how little risk there is to younger Americans

What's especially notable in these CDC data is how they simultaneously confirm three very important things:

1) Yes, the coronavirus was killing a very high percentage of infected people as it was sweeping through nursing homes where mostly elderly people were present. During its peak in early-to-mid April of this year, we calculated the virus was killing 1 in 10 people who showed symptoms. This is very similar to the CDC's current data for the 70+ age group, where the virus is currently killing 1 in 18 people who are infected, while 40% of infections are asymptomatic. This means 10.8 people out of the 18 are symptomatic, which is nearly identical to our calculated number of 1 in 10. Notably, the early deaths in America were happening almost exclusively among the elderly, which is one reason why the death rate was initially so high.

...

Open the schools, the cities, the churches, the restaurants and the movie theaters. End the mask mandates and recommend vitamin D, zinc, quercetin and licorice root herbs. Legalize hydroxychloroquine nationwide and we can end this entire pandemic for the vast majority of the population [almost immediately].

[Smartvirus]

Well it is a respiratory virus, so it spreads through the exhalation of infected people. That sounds like air to me

The formal claim
The health agency had said COVID-19 could spread through airborne particles that can remain suspended in the air and travel beyond six feet

The new claim
Currently, the agency’s guidance says the virus mainly spreads from person to person through respiratory droplets, which can land in the mouth or nose of people nearby.

What Trump said
Earlier this month, US President Donald Trump took exception to comments from the CDC director, who said masks might be even more effective than a vaccine for the novel coronavirus that could be broadly rolled out in mid-2021.

Check this also
The UN health agency still believes the disease is primarily spread through droplets, but in enclosed crowded spaces with inadequate ventilation, aerosol transmission can occur, said Mike Ryan, executive director of the WHO’s emergencies programme.

No offense but, going through the comments so far, only users Jet Cash and Charle-Tim seemed to have viewed the article on the link and understood what's been said.
To me, OP misunderstood what was been said. It's a misinterpretation and a lot of users eager to comment just went with it without clicking the pasted link. I stand to be corrected should I be wrong but,
From what I understand, six feet is a distance either more or less is an infection pathway only air and water can be it's transmission agent. It said, the infection is contained in droplets that can either enter a victims mouth, eyes and nose. In that instance, it got out and traveled by air (Airborne instance one). It also said, it could be suspended in the air (Airborne instance two).
Let's try to read from source of information often before concluding. I don't know what OP was is trying to imply but, if it's literally what the words 'not airborne mean', I think the OP should review the link pasted again.

[JohnBitCo]

There are honest scientists among the crooks who are trying to control us. The CDC has both. Sometimes the good scientists are winning. Sometimes the bad ones are. Sometimes we listen to the good ones who are trying to show us that there never was a reason for a pandemic. Sometimes we listen to the bad ones, and huddle in fear in our basements.

More than the CDC or health organization, it is the government who are playing their part in spreading the news as they want it to be published. Sometimes they want the patients to increase and panic to be created and they use CDC and media to show the wrong figures.

This is more sort of a pandemic drama.

I don't think it is a drama. The death are real one , the symptoms are real and the virus is real too. The numbers may be manipulated and the death rates may be showed high in some areas but this does not mean there is no virus and everything is normal.

No offense but, going through the comments so far, only users Jet Cash and Charle-Tim seemed to have viewed the article on the link and understood what's been said.
To me, OP misunderstood what was been said. It's a misinterpretation and a lot of users eager to comment just went with it without clicking the pasted link. I stand to be corrected should I be wrong but,
From what I understand, six feet is a distance either more or less is an infection pathway only air and water can be it's transmission agent. It said, the infection is contained in droplets that can either enter a victims mouth, eyes and nose. In that instance, it got out and traveled by air (Airborne instance one). It also said, it could be suspended in the air (Airborne instance two).
Let's try to read from source of information often before concluding. I don't know what OP was is trying to imply but, if it's literally what the words 'not airborne mean', I think the OP should review the link pasted again.

But masks only prevent mouth and nose. No one told to protect the eyes as virus can be transmitted through eyes also. Isn't ?
And what about the ears ? Can't it be transmitted through our ears ? The chances are low but still the possibility is there.

[Tash]

..........
The death are real one ,

Yes old and sick people do die.

the symptoms are real and the virus is real too.

Yes there is a new sickness from a new frequency, like original Sars was from which noone got sick for a very long time already. it just vanished  again.

 The numbers may be manipulated

Yes numbers are manipulated.

But masks

Mask prevent nothing, prolonged usage maks sick. (acidic blood.....)


Virus can not be transmited person to person.
It only can be injected, needle, mosquito...
Wearing a mask wont prevent getting malaria, its plain stupit believing so.