BOUNTY AND UNFAIR TREATMENT OF HUNTERS

[Doranile432]

It is of no doubt that many investors detest bounty hunters as they usually attribute the fault of price fall and dump to them, instead of blaming the project teams that do not put things in place to make their projects stand out.
Today, the team equally treat the hunters wickedly as if they're beggars after the hunters have completed the tasks assigned to them.

I recently witnessed a bounty pool of $15,000 with a participants of around 2,000. The bounty bounty was first scheduled for 4 weeks and later extended to 20 without a dime added to the pool.

The hunters endure the hash condition to complete the project and the hunters' were still delayed for several months after the bounty ended. When the started to pay, just 20% was released extending the rest of the payment to over 9 months.

Despite all these, the token price is still not attractive. Are all these hash treatments meted on hunters worth it!

No one is forcing bounty hunters to promote a project, it's a matter of choice, if offer isn't good enough bounty hunters should leave, a bounty pool of 15000$ shouldn't be allowing 2000+ bounty hunters, this means you won't get any reasonable reward from such bounty project, stay away and if it's good enough for you then join. It's that simple.

[1714946708]

1714946708

[1714946708]

1714946708

[1714946708]

1714946708

[acdc]

The majority of projects spend only a very small part of the supply for bounty hunters, usually within 1 ~ 5% of the project's total coin. In my opinion it is not right to blame the bounty hunter, if the project is good it is certain that the entire bounty hunter sold off his money would not affect it.

[mezzaluna]

It is of no doubt that many investors detest bounty hunters as they usually attribute the fault of price fall and dump to them, instead of blaming the project teams that do not put things in place to make their projects stand out.
Today, the team equally treat the hunters wickedly as if they're beggars after the hunters have completed the tasks assigned to them.

I recently witnessed a bounty pool of $15,000 with a participants of around 2,000. The bounty bounty was first scheduled for 4 weeks and later extended to 20 without a dime added to the pool.

The hunters endure the hash condition to complete the project and the hunters' were still delayed for several months after the bounty ended. When the started to pay, just 20% was released extending the rest of the payment to over 9 months.

Despite all these, the token price is still not attractive. Are all these hash treatments meted on hunters worth it!

That is currently what is happening to most Alternate Coins and that is why I really got lucky to have a weekly signature campaign.

These developers would just create a hyped situation in which they consider their Alternate Coin to gain profit and have these maximum value but when they achieve their profits in the middle of campaigns, they stop developing their projects which really sucks and would really be a scar to people who are enthusiastic with campaigning.

[Kasabus]

It is of no doubt that many investors detest bounty hunters as they usually attribute the fault of price fall and dump to them, instead of blaming the project teams that do not put things in place to make their projects stand out.
Today, the team equally treat the hunters wickedly as if they're beggars after the hunters have completed the tasks assigned to them.

I recently witnessed a bounty pool of $15,000 with a participants of around 2,000. The bounty bounty was first scheduled for 4 weeks and later extended to 20 without a dime added to the pool.

The hunters endure the hash condition to complete the project and the hunters' were still delayed for several months after the bounty ended. When the started to pay, just 20% was released extending the rest of the payment to over 9 months.

Despite all these, the token price is still not attractive. Are all these hash treatments meted on hunters worth it!

That is currently what is happening to most Alternate Coins and that is why I really got lucky to have a weekly signature campaign.

These developers would just create a hyped situation in which they consider their Alternate Coin to gain profit and have these maximum value but when they achieve their profits in the middle of campaigns, they stop developing their projects which really sucks and would really be a scar to people who are enthusiastic with campaigning.

Bounty hunters are not worth it to be treated like this and this is the reason why they are free to choose the campaign they think has high potentials to succeed. If the project will just run like this, bounty hunters are also free to stay or leave. Because we can do nothing about this once the bounty campaign rules is already fixed and established by its project developer.

[ije07]

We need to be smart when choosing projects to join bounty programs. If the project is longer than 20 weeks, I will quit it immediately. The effort needs to be put in the right place.
There are hundreds of petty bonuses out there and we need to revisit the project before we get started.

True, a review before joining a project is clearly needed by every bounty participant, because adjustments between the duration of time and the allocations given for the bounty campaign must also be seen, not because chasing a reward in a bounty but it can harm time indirectly.

So the issue is between fixed prize allocations or limited participants? I personally like projects with limited participants and fixed prize allocation. at least it's worth the effort we put into promoting their project, but if this project really succeeds in the market, and if not then I also know the risk of losing time.

[JahriMeayer]

It's really unfair, the way they treated with hunters. but haven't found any solution cause hunters don't have right to change the rules when manager have. I found most of manager mention that "rules can be changed",  that's the reason they exceeded the week without any further notice. Sometimes they reduce reward or exceeded distribution date & hunters have nothing to do. But if the project real, then nothing to worry about those issue

[chikading2016]

There are so many things that can affect the prices, i believe that the small percent of the token that is alocated to bounty hunters can affect the prices if they dump it but if the project is promising it will rise again after few weeks or months. I also believe that we can also put a blame on investors who buy in a big discount that also dump thier token, its really unfair if the bounty hunters are always blame in the falling of the token price.

[New_order]

It's really unfair, the way they treated with hunters. but haven't found any solution cause hunters don't have right to change the rules when manager have. I found most of manager mention that "rules can be changed",  that's the reason they exceeded the week without any further notice. Sometimes they reduce reward or exceeded distribution date & hunters have nothing to do. But if the project real, then nothing to worry about those issue

Developers and few bounty managers are rules breakers, since all bounties have this rule that ' bounty rules can be adjusted or change at any time' gives majority of new projects the chance to manipulate rules or postpone bounty hunters payment at any time, this year so far the only bounty project that wasted no time to pay bounty hunters is Cartesi, the kept their promises and treated bounty hunters like their own.

[robelneo]

I have a lot of unfair treatment from a lot of campaigns since 2018, there are still no good projects until now that can match what we are getting back 2016 and 2017, it's not even half of what we used to get, it started when so many bounties started locking the bounty then they start giving a specific number of coins instead of allocating a pool, bounty hunters are not complaining so these projects thought that even if they give these bounty hunters pennies it will be ok because it's ok to them.

Unless bounty hunters are content on what they are getting, this treatment will continue.

[aryana42]

I've seen a lot of projects like that and to be honest it's not fair. Bounty hunters are always the last in this case, dumper tokens are always paired by bounty hunters, especially if a project extends the project duration and in the end they don't pay the participants. there are many reasons for this.

Yes, there are many reasons for this, but one of the very strong reasons is when there are big dumper and people tend to blame the bounties, even though they don't know anything about it, so it seems ridiculous to have someone around. who blames the bounty participant in this.

[vermigerous]

Some of the investors blames bounty hunter for the price fall of their token, yet some bounty hunters also blame that investors are the ones who put the price of tokens to fall since they are the ones who has more tokens allocated conpared to bounty hunters. But i think we as a crypto enthusiast, we shouldn't put the blame to anyone. Just unite and promote the project for the better development.

[ven7net]

It is of no doubt that many investors detest bounty hunters as they usually attribute the fault of price fall and dump to them, instead of blaming the project teams that do not put things in place to make their projects stand out.
Today, the team equally treat the hunters wickedly as if they're beggars after the hunters have completed the tasks assigned to them.

I recently witnessed a bounty pool of $15,000 with a participants of around 2,000. The bounty bounty was first scheduled for 4 weeks and later extended to 20 without a dime added to the pool.

The hunters endure the hash condition to complete the project and the hunters' were still delayed for several months after the bounty ended. When the started to pay, just 20% was released extending the rest of the payment to over 9 months.

Despite all these, the token price is still not attractive. Are all these hash treatments meted on hunters worth it!

I have been participating in the bounty since mid-2017 and have already seen a lot of interesting things. You are right, the attitude towards the bounty participants has become very bad. At the beginning and during the process of each bounty, the treatment of participants is more or less normal, and when it comes to payments, this is where the most interesting begins. The admins of bounty companies are starting to stall for time and create a number of obstacles to getting earned money. And I see it has already become a habit. But what I hate most is when bounty members are accused of dropping prices. I have observed many times how the investors or the team themselves dumped tokens, thereby sending the price to the bottom and at the same time they shouted that the bounty participants were to blame. And there are such bounty companies as, for example, DigitalBits, which simply did not want to pay. And the most offensive thing is that no one can do anything to them.

[vermigerous]

I think there's no need to blame everyone for a coin that is gonna dump. We should be lenient and don't put the blame to every single on of us because we are all same as a crypto enthusiast. We should unite and promote our own project so that everyone would benefit in the long run. Besides, if some says that bounty hunters are the one who's capable of thr dump, then look at the bounty project's total allocation, it is very small compared to investors part.

[jrrsparkles]

I think there's no need to blame everyone for a coin that is gonna dump. We should be lenient and don't put the blame to every single on of us because we are all same as a crypto enthusiast. We should unite and promote our own project so that everyone would benefit in the long run. Besides, if some says that bounty hunters are the one who's capable of thr dump, then look at the bounty project's total allocation, it is very small compared to investors part.

But the project team is not generous to distribute that small amount to the people who helped that project to exists this much longer, Karma is a bitch.

[okala]

I do agree with what most of the hunters are saying and most of us here especially active accounts has suffered through nor payment of bounty tokens. Since January this year I have worked for over 8 different bounty and only 2 has paid so far.

[joecolern]

I viewed a part of this issue of bounty hunters facing harsh condition of cryptocurrency project been emanated from the fear of the team as many project are/would not be successful or reach its goal on time (struggled hard trying to reach softcap) after all hassle to bring it up, which is why team tends to slash the reward pool and even distributed out rewards in 12 months installmental.

[stomachgrowls]

It is of no doubt that many investors detest bounty hunters as they usually attribute the fault of price fall and dump to them, instead of blaming the project teams that do not put things in place to make their projects stand out.
Today, the team equally treat the hunters wickedly as if they're beggars after the hunters have completed the tasks assigned to them.

I recently witnessed a bounty pool of $15,000 with a participants of around 2,000. The bounty bounty was first scheduled for 4 weeks and later extended to 20 without a dime added to the pool.

The hunters endure the hash condition to complete the project and the hunters' were still delayed for several months after the bounty ended. When the started to pay, just 20% was released extending the rest of the payment to over 9 months.

Despite all these, the token price is still not attractive. Are all these hash treatments meted on hunters worth it!

I have been participating in the bounty since mid-2017 and have already seen a lot of interesting things. You are right, the attitude towards the bounty participants has become very bad. At the beginning and during the process of each bounty, the treatment of participants is more or less normal, and when it comes to payments, this is where the most interesting begins. The admins of bounty companies are starting to stall for time and create a number of obstacles to getting earned money. And I see it has already become a habit. But what I hate most is when bounty members are accused of dropping prices. I have observed many times how the investors or the team themselves dumped tokens, thereby sending the price to the bottom and at the same time they shouted that the bounty participants were to blame. And there are such bounty companies as, for example, DigitalBits, which simply did not want to pay. And the most offensive thing is that no one can do anything to them.

And thats the most pissing part on where you do all the hard work and make use of your resources on doing the task for several months and you do end up nothing since you havent been paid by the team.

Basing off into my bounty experience back in the past then i did really able to meet these kind of unfortunate events and thats the reason why i did left and never comeback to bounty hunting.

They're good in some intro which they do make out some sweet promises but ending up to be dumped in the end of the campaign.You would really be just like a beggar who do keep asking for your pay
and then they would just tell you an indefinite time for those rewards to be distributed.

Its always been unfair but there are still people whom do waste up their time with bounties and does still had some hope and believe into something.

[ronaldo40]

we can't really do something about it but it's true i've seen that there's a lot of works for bounty hunters and yet most of the time the payments were all delays and sometimes wasn't able to receive it but there's nothing you can do if the projects managed to delay the payment since it's their decision.

[vlast01]

It is of no doubt that many investors detest bounty hunters as they usually attribute the fault of price fall and dump to them, instead of blaming the project teams that do not put things in place to make their projects stand out.

Bounty hunters are not at full fault on price fall of tokens. I may say that its mainly because of dumping of tokens of the investors and other parties who got the tokens earlier than others. Having these token before the official release got them the advantage to control the price. One team(dumping) will go on massive selling and different advertisements to gain fame to the public then the other team(pumping) will buy it expensively to raised its value and continue these cycle. Until other parties(bounty hunters,traders) will do the pumping and
when the value is on its peak the dumping team will sell their huge amount of token that will makes a huge decrease on its value and at the end other parties including the bounty hunters and other hodler of token will be at the edge to do dumping cover some losses.

Today, the team equally treat the hunters wickedly as if they're beggars after the hunters have completed the tasks assigned to them.

I recently witnessed a bounty pool of $15,000 with a participants of around 2,000. The bounty bounty was first scheduled for 4 weeks and later extended to 20 without a dime added to the pool.

They make lots of requirements to stall time in order to make a perfect control on the market.Well the bounty manager is not really the one to blame on these because he/she are only managing the campaigns accordingly on the order given by the higher ups.

The hunters endure the hash condition to complete the project and the hunters' were still delayed for several months after the bounty ended. When the started to pay, just 20% was released extending the rest of the payment to over 9 months.

Despite all these, the token price is still not attractive. Are all these hash treatments meted on hunters worth it!

As of now we must endure these kind of treatment these will pass soon and I'm getting used to it just be patient and soon you will gain the fruit of your effort.

[Furryball]

It is of no doubt that many investors detest bounty hunters as they usually attribute the fault of price fall and dump to them, instead of blaming the project teams that do not put things in place to make their projects stand out.
Today, the team equally treat the hunters wickedly as if they're beggars after the hunters have completed the tasks assigned to them.

I recently witnessed a bounty pool of $15,000 with a participants of around 2,000. The bounty bounty was first scheduled for 4 weeks and later extended to 20 without a dime added to the pool.

The hunters endure the hash condition to complete the project and the hunters' were still delayed for several months after the bounty ended. When the started to pay, just 20% was released extending the rest of the payment to over 9 months.

Despite all these, the token price is still not attractive. Are all these hash treatments meted on hunters worth it!

If you are into joining bounties from any body you will eventually promote projects that are hash like this, they will delay probably for years and they will keep postponing payment over and over, it's a wise choice to follow good bounty managers that takes no nonsense from any project team