Trump has Coronavirus :(

[virasog]

Trump is out and not in quarantine which is very dangerous that he is going to infect more people.
He released a video a couple of hours ago saying that he got a medicine which made him feel healthy and that the US has a ton of this medicine. This doesn't mean that his body is clear from the virus and he will not infect more people...

So is this drama done to proof that US Vaccine is tested on the president and it is the best vaccine for Covid-19  

How far these people can go to proof themselves right  and impact on the people's opinion

[BADecker]

your weird obsession to repeat 'its not been isolated' is where you are quoting kaufman that wrote something in march-april.. about silly things he read in january..

when you can atleast understand its october now.
and then when you can stop just reading kaufman 20 times a day but the actual research he mis-represents and misunderstands. and then look at the actual research that occured after january. you will see why you have been wrong so many times and for such a long time

an exosome is like a golf ball shape and is under 100nm. covid is a spikey ball and is 150nm.
using the same scale thats like comparing a hedgehog to a hampster.
i know you dont understand the biological differences but there are many differences.

there is 10 months of research available for free everywhere. made by many countries. your ignorance to it and your obsession to only want to re-read one person that is not  virologist shows that you are not making any valid points

maybe actually try to do some research, find the actual facts. then maybe you wont be endlessly called an ignorant stupid troll

Research for microsphere nanoscope examination of exosome/virus action on cells is not easily found. Why would it be important? Because it would show what is going on in the cells, way better than we can see with our partial assumptions and guesses that we have done for the last couple hundred years.

It seems that there are researchers who show that some exosomes look exactly the same as some viruses. After all, standard reports for viruses show that they come in loads of different shapes and sizes. The same for exosomes. Just because you haven't matched up the virus with its counterpart exosome, doesn't mean that such matching doesn't exist.

Wake up and see that your simple interpretations of the exceedingly complex cellular machinery, is really self-maintained ignorance.

[franky1]

here we go again. badecker trying to compare a trash collection vehicle to a tank
badecker tries to compare a fully auto rifle to a kids water pistol
badecker compares a golf ball to a dog spikey squeeky toy

not only do they look different but they have different sizes. functions and they cause different results in their utility.

badecker cannot understand the real world that if he had a 3d printer that usually prints off miniature models of people. and then someone inputs the code to print off a plastic gun that can fire a bullet. he will proclaim that the plastic gun that can kill is just a miniature model of a person

whats next..
badecker an obvious white guy from arizona.  looks at a picture of barack obama, a smarter black guy.. and badecker proclaims he is obama and obama is just a clone of badecker all because .. 2 feet.

seriously badecker. try to do some research because your kaufman obsession doesnt make kaufman right. it just makes you blind to facts and easily led by kaufman fiction

do some proper research. learn what an exosome does. learn what dimensions it has learn, its chemical makeup and purpose.

then go and learn about viruses
and no. you cant just reply back with another kaufman quote. he got debunks 4 months ago. litterally weeks after he started promotion his fantasy
yep kaufman got debunked by the very doctor that kaufman misrepresented.
kaufman mis-quoted without understanding what he was reading and the original source corercted him and debunked him

[BADecker]

^^^ I did a bunch of research. But I couldn't find any information on viruses, because they don't exist. Oh sure, a bunch of people say they exist. Talk is easy. Proving it is difficult. Exceptionally difficult when they don't exist.

[Tash]

^^^ I did a bunch of research. But I couldn't find any information on viruses, because they don't exist. Oh sure, a bunch of people say they exist. Talk is easy. Proving it is difficult. Exceptionally difficult when they don't exist.

The virus hocus-pocus is nothing else as acidic overload from wrong diet or issues with proper oxygen intake.
Healthy diet is 3/4 alkaline and 1/4 acid.
Extreme simplified all fruit, vegetables, herbs and spices is basic (alkaline) the rest acidic.
In winter when fresh fruit and vegies (and sunlight) is in short supply and expensive people get sick.
Seafood (fresh water or ocean), cheese… high loads of acid. Lemon acidic in nature, when consumed its basis.
 An Apple has a pral (potential kidney acid load) score of ~-2 just about perfect.
The majority of sicknesses is inappropriate levels of  sugar, salt, oil,vitamin….intake.

Ill Pill Gates is financing vaccine for something which does not exist.

High number greater acid load. all food together daily should sum up to -2

Code:

Amaranth	7.3
Barley	2.5
Buckwheat	3.4
Buckwheat flour -0.5
Bulgur, dry	3.8
Millet, raw	8.8
Oat bran, raw	16.9
Quinoa	-0.2
Rice, brown, long-grain, raw	7.5
Oats	13.3
Rye	12
Wheat, hard red spring	9.1
Wheat, hard red winter	5.6
Wheat, sprouted	5
Apricots, raw	-4.3
Bananas, raw	-6.9
Apples, raw, with skin	-1.9
Avocados, raw 	-8.2
Blackberries, raw	-2.8
Blueberries, raw	-1
Cherries, sweet, raw	-3.8
Figs, raw	-4.9
Figs, dried, uncooked	-14.1
Grapefruit, raw, pink and red, Florida	-2.5
Kiwi fruit, raw	-5.6
Lemons, raw, without peel	-2.3
Mangos, raw	-3
Melons, cantaloupe, raw	-5.1
Oranges, raw, all commercial varieties	-3.6
Tangerines, (mandarin oranges), raw	-3.1
Pears, raw	-2.2
Pineapple, canned,	-2.7
Pomegranates, raw	-4.8
Plums, dried (prunes), uncooked	-13.4
Raisins, seedless	-12
Raspberries, raw	-2.4
Strawberries, raw	-2.5
Watermelon, raw	-2
Dates, medjool	-13.7
Beans, navy, mature seeds, raw	-5.3
Soybeans, mature seeds, raw	-4.7
Lentils, pink, raw	8.6
Tofu, raw, -0.3
Beans, adzuki, mature seeds, raw	-6.7
Beans, great northern, mature seeds, raw	-9.1
Beans, kidney, all types, mature seeds, raw	-8.4
Beans, pinto, mature seeds, raw	-9.6
Beans, white, mature seeds, raw	-23.2
Chickpeas (garbanzo beans), mature seeds, raw	0.3
Lentils, raw	5.4
Lima beans, large, mature seeds, raw	-18.3
Mung beans, mature seeds, raw	-7.5
Peanuts, all types, raw	6.2
Seeds, sunflower seed kernels, dried	12.1
Nuts, almonds	2.3
Nuts, brazilnuts, dried, unblanched	8.1
Nuts, cashew nuts, raw	8.9
Nuts, hazelnuts or filberts	-1.9
Nuts, macadamia nuts, raw	-1.4
Nuts, pecans	2.1
Nuts, pistachio nuts, raw	2.2
Nuts, walnuts, english	5.6
Seeds, flaxseed	2.1
Squash, summer, zucchini, includes skin, raw	-4.1
Sweet potato, raw, unprepared	-5.6
Tomatoes, red, ripe, raw, year round average	-4.1
Turnips, raw	-3.2
Turnip greens, raw	-7.2
Alfalfa seeds, sprouted, raw	1.8
Asparagus, raw	-1.9
Mung beans, mature seeds, sprouted, raw	-0.4
Beets, raw	-5.4
Beet greens, raw	-16.7
Broccoli, raw	-4
Broccoli raab, raw	-1.8
Cabbage, chinese (pak-choi), raw	-5
Carrots, raw	-5.7
Cauliflower, raw	-4.4
Chard, swiss, raw	-8.1
Collards, raw	-4.1
Cucumber, with peel, raw	-2.4
Dandelion greens, raw	-7.9
Eggplant, raw	-3.9
Kale, raw	-8.3
Leeks, (bulb and lower leaf-portion), raw	-3.2
Lettuce, green leaf, raw	-3.1
Onions, raw	-2.1
Peppers, sweet, red, raw	-3.4
Purslane, raw	-10.7
Radishes, raw	-4.4
Spinach, raw	-11.8

[/size]

[franky1]

^^^ I did a bunch of research. But I couldn't find any information on viruses, because they don't exist. Oh sure, a bunch of people say they exist. Talk is easy. Proving it is difficult. Exceptionally difficult when they don't exist.

there are many scientific studies. thousands of them. they list the lab location the equipment used and the methodology

but your 'research' are videos of non-viralogists that have not done any lab tests to disprove anything. they just sit infront of a camera saying their opinion.

notice the difference?

[BADecker]

^^^ I did a bunch of research. But I couldn't find any information on viruses, because they don't exist. Oh sure, a bunch of people say they exist. Talk is easy. Proving it is difficult. Exceptionally difficult when they don't exist.

there are many scientific studies. thousands of them. they list the lab location the equipment used and the methodology

but your 'research' are videos of non-viralogists that have not done any lab tests to disprove anything. they just sit infront of a camera saying their opinion.

notice the difference?

Anybody with a lab can do lab work. The point of the reports that have been produced from the studies is, if the reports are accurate records of the studies, there are all kinds of assumptive conclusions drawn from them.

As you, yourself, ave erroneously mentioned in another post, eliminating human cell particles from a solution doesn't leave the virus. Rather, it leaves all kinds of other things. Because the RNA/DNA of the virus is the same as a snippet of DNA/RNA in Chromosome 8, the virus is removed right along with the removal of human tissue particles.

The point is, the lab work in all the studies is blatantly subject to contamination and misinterpretation, and assumption. Such isn't science. Rather, it is lies, because the researchers know about the potential contamination.

Or, as I have been asking, will you show us the place in a report, and a link to the report, where there isn't any way the process used wasn't open to contamination? Obviously, mistakes could always have been made. So, we would need a whole bunch of studies done the same way, so that if a mistake was made in one or two, the rest would show what is really there.

So far, all the studies have been open to contamination as shown by the processes used. They are, therefore, inconclusive. We don't really even know that there is a Covid virus.

[franky1]

As you, yourself, ave erroneously mentioned in another post, eliminating human cell particles from a solution doesn't leave the virus. Rather, it leaves all kinds of other things. Because the RNA/DNA of the virus is the same as a snippet of DNA/RNA in Chromosome 8, the virus is removed right along with the removal of human tissue particles.

Or, as I have been asking, will you show us the place in a report, and a link to the report, where there isn't any way the process used wasn't open to contamination? Obviously, mistakes could always have been made. So, we would need a whole bunch of studies done the same way, so that if a mistake was made in one or two, the rest would show what is really there.

So far, all the studies have been open to contamination as shown by the processes used. They are, therefore, inconclusive. We don't really even know that there is a Covid virus.

nope
we already went down this path with you. i know you have memory problems but instead of just replying with repeated nonesense check your own post history and remind yourself of when you got debunked

many have already proved your koch rivers, bell. and went through your other weird critiques of centrifuges and other stuff
you been shown the reports you been told the equipment needed you been told the processes of disposible pipettes and small batch of chemicals that get routinely checked.
you have been told all this including given the equipment details to then go research specs of the equipment.
here is the thing. one lab might make a mistake . but your trying to ignore the evidence and push a stupid thought that all labs in all states of all countries are wrong.

thousands of doctors and equipment wrong.. or just badecker
i choose badecker
in short if you were a bitcoin block. you would be orphaned off the chain and forgotton

[BADecker]

As you, yourself, ave erroneously mentioned in another post, eliminating human cell particles from a solution doesn't leave the virus. Rather, it leaves all kinds of other things. Because the RNA/DNA of the virus is the same as a snippet of DNA/RNA in Chromosome 8, the virus is removed right along with the removal of human tissue particles.

Or, as I have been asking, will you show us the place in a report, and a link to the report, where there isn't any way the process used wasn't open to contamination? Obviously, mistakes could always have been made. So, we would need a whole bunch of studies done the same way, so that if a mistake was made in one or two, the rest would show what is really there.

So far, all the studies have been open to contamination as shown by the processes used. They are, therefore, inconclusive. We don't really even know that there is a Covid virus.

nope
we already went down this path with you. i know you have memory problems but instead of just replying with repeated nonesense check your own post history and remind yourself of when you got debunked

many have already proved your koch rivers, bell. and went through your other weird critiques of centrifuges and other stuff
you been shown the reports you been told the equipment needed you been told the processes of disposible pipettes and small batch of chemicals that get routinely checked.
you have been told all this including given the equipment details to then go research specs of the equipment.
here is the thing. one lab might make a mistake . but your trying to ignore the evidence and push a stupid thought that all labs in all states of all countries are wrong.

thousands of doctors and equipment wrong.. or just badecker
i choose badecker
in short if you were a bitcoin block. you would be orphaned off the chain and forgotton

It's truly a shame that you can't show the reports, link to them, break down the reports to show the location of virus isolation therein, explain how they aren't lacking in isolation purity... along with contact locations to question the researchers who made the reports.

Even one that is a pure, clean, uncontaminated-test, report would be a start. But we should actually get hundreds, many of them done by various doctors/researchers from different countries, all substantiating each other. But you can't even find one, because there aren't any.

Probably the greatest thing that all the reports lack is, none of them introduced an isolated virus into any other people to see if it made them sick just like it did the person the sample was taken from in the first place.

This greatest thing alone topples any credibility that the reports might have had. But there is more in the ways the samples were not filtered properly for the viruses therein, making it unknown what substance might have been isolated.

You know this, and yet you keep on stating that we have loads of satisfactory, conclusive test reports. This makes you to be extremely naive person to look to for information, or else it makes you into a troll. How much does your trolling pay you?

[otto2012]

Allegedly, Trump took the drug Regeneron which cured him unbelievably fast. It appears that this particular treatment is developed using fetal tissue, which is subject to a stringent code of ethics. Simply put, physicians and scientists need more abortions to advance their work.

Do you think Trump knows about the origin of Regeneron?

[mu_enrico]

4D chess by Trump #claps
Pretending to be infected and then pushes the "recovery" campaign?

This Regeneron?

To develop REGN-COV2, Regeneron scientists evaluated thousands of fully-human antibodies produced by the company's VelocImmune® mice, which have been genetically modified to have a human immune system, as well as antibodies identified from humans who have recovered from COVID-19.

https://investor.regeneron.com/news-releases/news-release-details/regenerons-regn-cov2-antibody-cocktail-reduced-viral-levels-and

[Spendulus]

Allegedly, Trump took the drug Regeneron which cured him unbelievably fast. It appears that this particular treatment is developed using fetal tissue, which is subject to a stringent code of ethics. Simply put, physicians and scientists need more abortions to advance their work.

Do you think Trump knows about the origin of Regeneron?

4D chess by Trump #claps
Pretending to be infected and then pushes the "recovery" campaign?

This Regeneron?

To develop REGN-COV2, Regeneron scientists evaluated thousands of fully-human antibodies produced by the company's VelocImmune® mice, which have been genetically modified to have a human immune system, as well as antibodies identified from humans who have recovered from COVID-19.

https://investor.regeneron.com/news-releases/news-release-details/regenerons-regn-cov2-antibody-cocktail-reduced-viral-levels-and

Both are true. The cell line was from abortion tissue, but mice play a big factor.

Human abortion use banned since June 2019 in the USA.

[TwitchySeal]

Simply put, physicians and scientists need more abortions to advance their work.

They've still got plenty to work with from the fetus that was aborted in 1973.

I think the babies are safe from being harvested by evil baby eating scientists.

[Xembin]

Corona virus has no respect to any man that fail the protocol of avoiding the virus. Trump disobey the way to avoid corona virus that make the virus effected he and his wife.
Trump has done well in his first term that make the citizens to vow to support his re-election that is coming up soon in the country. Trump and his wife retested of covid-19 show negative. Show that nothing will stop his re-election coming soon.
I guess Trump has confirmed negative of Corona virus right now. Corona cannot stop Trump not to win his re-election in US that make many people to come out for his campaign that is ongoing in the country.

[BADecker]

^^^ Obviously. How do we know? Even Trump seems to believe much of the Covid lie.