It's time to dump the rule of the Eton/Oxford elite.

[Jet Cash]

So Boris Johnson promised to shut down Brexit negotiations if there wasn't a deal by yesterday. I always felt unconfotable about him as Prime Minister. He is a graduate of Eton and Oxford, and comes from a banking family. All of his family are remainers with affiliations to the Bilderberg dynasties. We voted to come of the EU five years ago, and the process was specified in great detail Basically, it ended all EU political and legal control and trading was to be done under WTO rules. The details were intended to panic us, but the British voters were not intimidated, and went for the restoration of independence that had been stolen from us by the Eton/Oxford civil servants. That shocked the elite pirates, and they prompt;y appointed a banking remainer and Oxford graduate to try to reverse the will of the people. This has cost the UK billions of pounds, and lost an enormous quantity of trade, as well as lower our food standards, and bankrupting or exporting thousands of businesses. It seems that Boris was appointed to pretend to implement the bankers' version of Brexit, whilst pretending to obey the will of the people.

It is now time to escape the control of the Eton/Oxford elite across the world, and don't forget that Clinton is one of them - he received a Rhodes scholarship to Oxford. Their influence is expanded by associations with Harvard, The Dorbonne and Sandhurst amongst other education institutions that are used to groom recruits to the elite dynasties war room. You will never get a free country whilst they control the appointment of politicians, military commanders, judges, and other government officials.

ps. it is no coincidence that Oxford University is the major player in the research into pharmaceuticals and vaccines which are used to hijack human immune systems.

[franky1]

when a leaders education and experience is only based in language and debate.. but ends up sounding like a babbling twit on camera and cant negotiate at meetings. then it just shows his experience and education went to waste

government leaders dont need to be business manager experienced. but having a knowledge of human resources and logistics would be better than language/debate secretary/newspaper editor

business managers who enter politics treat government as a business where its to benefit the shareholders/chairmen. and not the customers at the bottom..

as for where they get their education. well that does play a little into it. but even an idiot can pay his way into education. so it should be based on what skills they actually have

yes boris was elected due to his language/debate resume. however its now showing he wasnt elected as top boy from proven skill. but more so just being in the club via the buddy system


i think that things do need to change. im not saying let every idiot put his name in as a candidate(lord buckethead). but if you have real life experience of understanding the needs of people. and not the needs of chairmen. and you can actually push things through rather then setting 4 year deadlines.. then give it a shot

[Juggy777]

So Boris Johnson promised to shut down Brexit negotiations if there wasn't a deal by yesterday. I always felt unconfotable about him as Prime Minister. He is a graduate of Eton and Oxford, and comes from a banking family. All of his family are remainers with affiliations to the Bilderberg dynasties. We voted to come of the EU five years ago, and the process was specified in great detail Basically, it ended all EU political and legal control and trading was to be done under WTO rules. The details were intended to panic us, but the British voters were not intimidated, and went for the restoration of independence that had been stolen from us by the Eton/Oxford civil servants. That shocked the elite pirates, and they prompt;y appointed a banking remainer and Oxford graduate to try to reverse the will of the people. This has cost the UK billions of pounds, and lost an enormous quantity of trade, as well as lower our food standards, and bankrupting or exporting thousands of businesses. It seems that Boris was appointed to pretend to implement the bankers' version of Brexit, whilst pretending to obey the will of the people.

It is now time to escape the control of the Eton/Oxford elite across the world, and don't forget that Clinton is one of them - he received a Rhodes scholarship to Oxford. Their influence is expanded by associations with Harvard, The Dorbonne and Sandhurst amongst other education institutions that are used to groom recruits to the elite dynasties war room. You will never get a free country whilst they control the appointment of politicians, military commanders, judges, and other government officials.

ps. it is no coincidence that Oxford University is the major player in the research into pharmaceuticals and vaccines which are used to hijack human immune systems.

@Jet Cash according to experts Boris deal will cause major losses for the UK economy, and this deal should not pass under the current form, and there’re hopes that they’ll be able to make certain changes otherwise this deal will not be good for the UK economy in the long run.

Furthermore Boris almost called off this deal and was prepared for a Brexit without a deal in place, however negotiators are yet trying to to reach a middle ground which is acceptable to all the parties.

Also if what you say is correct then why aren’t the UK citizens calling for his resignation, why is he yet in power despite the fact that his deal will cause massive losses to UK?.

Source:

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/oct/18/experts-claim-boris-johnsons-thin-eu-deal-will-cause-major-economic-upset

[Jet Cash]

The Guardian is about the worst source to quote. It is a very Europhile organ with distorted and non-factual reports. There was a lot of posturing about the losses to the financial services if the EU played hardball. The fact is that 80% of the EU derivatives are traded through London, and they don't have the capacity to replace this. They are also based on LIBOR ( The London Interbank Offer Rate), and, as they are toxic, if they had to be renegotiated, then the whole EU banking system would collapse even sooner than its planned demise.

We buy more than twice as much from the EU than we sell to them, and it is easier to replace most of the items at lower prices and higher quality. That doesn't seem to me to be a recipe for disaster. We have more than 50 trade deals with countries outside the EU, and if you couple that with the removal of the rip off payments we make to the EU to restrict our trading, then we are going to see a massive expansion in the UK.

The only things that will hold us back and the masons, livery companies and other societies that are a legacy of the Knights Templar. We have seen the removal of some of their agents, including the head of the civil service, and there seems to be a mood to remove even more. The handling of the Corona minor epidemic shows that there is still massive support for the bankers, Pharma companies and the eugenicists. Evidence against them is being published all the time, and lets hope it will hasten the reduction of their powers in the near future. In the meantime, we have to optimise our personal circumstances to carry us through to enjoy the verdant sunlit pastures of the future.

[Mauser]

The Guardian is about the worst source to quote. It is a very Europhile organ with distorted and non-factual reports. There was a lot of posturing about the losses to the financial services if the EU played hardball. The fact is that 80% of the EU derivatives are traded through London, and they don't have the capacity to replace this. They are also based on LIBOR ( The London Interbank Offer Rate), and, as they are toxic, if they had to be renegotiated, then the whole EU banking system would collapse even sooner than its planned demise.

I agree with you, the Guardian is not the independent great newspaper it once was. I prefer reading BBC which is also very pro EU. I don't understand why the newspapers only focus on fishing when banking is so much more important
While it's true that most derivatives are being managed from London the current plan is to get all the EU stuff out of London in the next 3 years. Sure the UK could just stop overnight to manage them, but what would they actually achieve with that? They are earning good fees from that and actually want to keep managing it.

We should stop listening to elitist who only want to make them self richer. We need more normal people who make up their own mind in politics.

[Jet Cash]

We should stop listening to elitist who only want to make them self richer. We need more normal people who make up their own mind in politics.

That won't happen while the E/O graduates are in charge of the selection of politicians and senior civil servants.

Fishing is important for several reasons, and not really a lot to do with fish. The UK is a maritime nation, and has control over a vast area of water, and a massive air space. If the UK blocked EU air traffic from British air space, then it would increase costs and flying time for many European flights. Then there is the matter of immigration and the control of refugees, and don't lets forget the mineral resources under the seas. Macron is a Goldman Sachs banker,and he plays the long game in favour of the elite dynasties. He isn't interested in the welfare of the French, and it is a mystery to me as to why they allow him to have so much power. But then the UK let Theresa May - the Oxford banking remainer attempt to derail Brexit.,

[Cnut237]

It's time to dump the rule of the Eton/Oxford elite.

I disagree with the body of your post, but agree wholeheartedly with the thread title.

the Guardian is not the independent great newspaper it once was. I prefer reading BBC which is also very pro EU.

The BBC is and always has been just the PR arm of the Conservative party. They play a major role in shaping public opinion and keeping the Conservatives in power. They are as 'establishment' as you can get.
https://www.socialist.net/politics-at-the-bbc-a-who-s-who-of-the-establishment.htm

Whilst every mainstream media source has inherent preferences and biases, I'd still regard the Guardian as better than most. In recent years, they've been responsible for breaking news on Wikileaks, Snowden, Panama Papers etc., and unlike every other paper they are run by an independent Trust.