@Polo7. Up your meme game and join 4chan. The good people there will be able to explain to you what others here are too gentlemanly to state properly. Times like these, I miss @TMAN.
Seriously though, Where is TMAN??!! He hasn't been on since March..
Only a retard would say they miss a proven scammer and self confessed trust abuser that has never posted anything that is original thought provoking and made any lasting difference here at all. Hence why it was no surprise to see your name there lauda I mean amishmash.
I concur the moderation here is at times concerning. I have posted a delete that no mod would care to stand behind.
I have seen others make similar challenges which mods flee from.
I don't share the OPs views regarding bitcoin although I have seen no irrefutable evidence provided to conclusively debunk his claims.
However when you do bring up undeniably correct points that don't suit those benefitting or that have designed the mechanisms that define the status quo here on the forum you can expect to be unfairly moderated and your freedom of speech suddenly be restricted to a level it would not be if you were pushing the opposing but clearly debunked views.
This is wrong.
Either defend your argument, debunk opposing arguments or accept there is no way to validate or debunk and move on.
Deleting posts that are undeniably and demonstrably true is only going to ruin the rep of the forum.
Of course making claims you can't validate or strongly corroborate with independently verifiable evidence that are especially outrageous or potentially damaging should be warned to provide evidence or cease.
There is no point repeating things over and over that have been debunked or that have no independently verifiable evidence that corroborated your claims. That could well be grounds for moderation. The forum should do its best to allow members to access useful and accurate information as frequently as freely as possible.
Bitcointalk is not optimal in that respect as yet and is moving in the wrong direction in recent times. This should be watched closely.
Fortunately I notice it primarily operates poorly in meta/rep which most members don't visit.