[HELP] TRUST ABUSE BY PLAGIARIST / DT MEMBERS PLEASE HELP

[SiNeReiNZzz]

You make it great easy for yourself...
Now you have to shift everything on me, even though you have not behaved any better...

Main thing you are proud of this...sorry I'm out, have fun!

dont make this personal. you broke the rules when you plagiazed the text and I called you out on it and you didnt like it.

also there is a difference between you and me. you tried to get in DT for weeks. just see your trust list on bpip. you added 5 people every week and you gave positive feedback to half of the forum for basically everything. you were obviously hoping that someone trusts you back that you get in DT.

I dont care if I am DT or not. I just dont want to get negative feedback by a plagiarist like you.

Please stop talking bullshit.
You're doing it again, that's the problem. This is ridiculus... and you too, if you mean like that!
The only one who makes anything personal here, is you.

And if I think again about the bad trust to you, you deserve it!
Because you only want to damage my reputation in the Forum as much as you can!
Wait, no I'm done with you...

A bad character and the worth of your soul can unfortunately be recognised by your behaviour.
Because I've made a mistake and I can stand by it.
You are simply a false snake that delights in exposing others.
Not real criminals with with harmful behaviour, but good people with a big heart.
(my little 5year old daughter confirms this every day to me!)
I can look in the mirror despite your accusations... and knows what it means, to reflect yourself!  

Oh wait, you do this, because I am sooo a bad criminal spammer...
This is your opinion, and maybe of some other Members here.
And this is how I end this here. Do what you want!

I've explained myself more than once!
Because I can rely on set you on my ignoring list, without doing trust abusing or something other against the rules...

Good luck with snitching, in the future, but sooner or later, everyone gets what they deserve.
You too, you holy samaritan.
And please do not misunderstand this!
Not from me.
I am, as I said before, done with you...

Have a nice Life!

[Stalker22]

It's on page 323. You just opened the preview...

No.  I followed the link you gave as "proof".

Of course google won't show you the whole source, it's a commercial book. There are many ways to get a complete book online (for free) but, I won't go into that here. And, of course, it would be illegal to share links to such sources on this forum.

So if you really want to check proof (without quotes) I'm sure you'll be able to do it. 

[Timelord2067]

Of course google won't show you the whole source, it's a commercial book.

Hello, yes I've been waiting (and waiting) for the page to load, but found it hasn't fully loaded. 

So if you really want to check proof (without quotes) I'm sure you'll be able to do it.  

I never doubted Jeremy Franklin's link (as such), but was puzzled when following the link they provided found that google itself then said the text couldn't be found so it's good to know that others have been able to corroborate the OP's assertions.

[lovesmayfamilis]

Hello, yes I've been waiting (and waiting) for the page to load, but found it hasn't fully loaded. 

Why look for a link to the source if  SiNeReiNZzz provided it himself in his message? But I agree that Jeremy is so actively pursuing the SiNeReiNZzz has something personal.

Jeremy Franklin not the author of the post, which accused SiNeReiNZzz of plagiarism. But from August 29, 2020, he begins to demand to ban SiNeReiNZzz from the moderators.
It all looks strange.

I can assume that Jeremy has a grudge against people who managed to escape the ban. He remembered those, many who had been banned earlier.

I can advise Jeremy to apply for the position of moderator, since, as you say, it is the moderators' fault that SiNeReiNZzz is still not banned.

I see that recently many have returned from the ban. For some people from the local Arab section, the strict rules did not apply. But I believe that it is the right of the moderators what to do in such cases. After all, we shouldn't pursue anyone here and start wars.
If someone doesn't like someone, you can always use the ignore button.

I am not making excuses for SiNeReiNZzz in any way. Also, I think it is inappropriate for a DT member to leave personally relevant reviews. And Jeremy should have a little tolerance and acceptance of those decisions that were made by the moderators. Otherwise, the forum will be anarchy.

[Stalker22]

I never doubted Jeremy Franklin's link (as such), but was puzzled when following the link they provided found that google itself then said the text couldn't be found so it's good to know that others have been able to corroborate the OP's assertions.

I just spent an extra five minutes on this. 
As it turns out, google won't be of much help if some form of word spinning and article rewriting tools are used, as it is done in this case. So I tried with some other sentences and phrases from the post in question.

Take this, for example:

Logistics platforms based on blockchain technology are not only technically demanding, but also require the clarification of many legal issues.
...

If we put quotation marks on the first part of the sentence (before the comma) and do a full phrase search, google will correctly identify the source and list the specified book in the search results.

There are more examples like this where the identical sentence structure as well as their order as in the original material is clearly visible. I understand why SiNeReiNZzz does not accept this, but in my opinion this is a classic case of plagiarism. There are too many matches to be accidental.

[SiNeReiNZzz]

~

I just spent an extra five minutes on this.  
As it turns out, google won't be of much help if some form of word spinning and article rewriting tools are used, as it is done in this case. So I tried with some other sentences and phrases from the post in question.

Take this, for example:

Logistics platforms based on blockchain technology are not only technically demanding, but also require the clarification of many legal issues.
...

If we put quotation marks on the first part of the sentence (before the comma) and do a full phrase search, google will correctly identify the source and list the specified book in the search results.

There are more examples like this where the identical sentence structure as well as their order as in the original material is clearly visible. I understand why SiNeReiNZzz does not accept this, but in my opinion this is a classic case of plagiarism. There are too many matches to be accidental.

Oh man, what do you want to explain?
I've pointet out my sources... NO TEXT SPINNING!  

This is a Translation from the ...PDF below...

Not only one times I have explained before I did a 'project work' in the context of a further education...
The information that I have chosen for this project, I have translated into English, only for the text here in the Forum!
And they all come from the publication of this professor:

Prof. Dr.Andreas Furrer:
https://www.unilu.ch/fakultaeten/rf/professuren/furrer-andreas/

For you AGAIN:
https://jusletter.weblaw.ch/fr/dam/publicationsystem/articles/jusletter/2017/917/der-einsatz-der-bloc_776b0ed3df/Jusletter_der-einsatz-der-bloc_776b0ed3df_fr.pdf

From other Sources surely not, i know it.
I have never try'd to hide something about this case, why should I do this now?

I would be happy if we could bury the hatchet!
But I don't think that will be possible, with the hate you have for me...

I can even understand what bothers you... sure!
 
But what should I do?  
I only can let this be a lesson to me and do not let it happen again...
As I have explained 100 times in the past months!  

I myself have reported on things too, that have been shot down! (4 of them never solved)
I am not angry about it, I accept it because that is what it is all about!
If ordinary members like you and me find that something is not in accordance with the rules, we can report it and well...
Decision is not our work!  

But here you report the same thing over and over again, mostly publicly in countless posts or threads.  
This is bad, and I think, not good for our forum either!  

And now even in this separate thread, asking DT1 members to give me a bad review, for which there are no reasons except that they are not using the system properly, as he explained himself!

I never wanted to give you bad feedback, but YOU come after months, can't understand that I'm still here and suddenly leave bad feedback at my profile?
Couldn't you have done this directly in response to your accusation?  

No, as I said, months later you do!  

After months of me working, doing good and definitely learning from my mistake...

And it just smells like you want to do it personally!
That's the reason why I have also left feedback at your profile.
Because I think it's absolutely unfair and not the idea behind a technical community forum!  

I come here to exchange ideas and have nice conversations!
When I want to fight, I go to the boxing club.  

You say that the moderators didn't solve it because it's open case.
But maybe it's just there, because the moderators want to see if it was a lesson for me or if I'll continue with it...
But I don't know this, and it's not my fault that it be, as it be!  

Do you really think you can achieve this in this way?  

If I have said it many times before, I do not want a war with you, but from your side comes nothing as hate and the same old accusiation...