dApps vs. hApps

[wjohnson1988]

dApps are seriously stalling right now due to the high transaction fees/slow speed, and very few are in use except for DEXs like Uniswap. Some projects like Sentivate are developing hApps as an alternative, which use a hybrid of centralized and decentralized processes to help solve this issue. What is your opinion on these? Is the addition of some centralization necessary to make these applications go mainstream? Here is an article that talks about the differences, btw.

[claire_lovely]

I think that having multiple types of options is a good thing, depending on whether users seek the advantages of centralized apps, decentralized apps, or both. I think that a hybrid idea can allow creators of a project to maintain control over the direction while implementing anti-censorship features and irreversability.

[zasad@]

I don't understand why this technology is good.
We run decentralized applications on the centralized Internet and we are also offered to transfer part of the calculations to centralized servers.
Maybe it is worth focusing on the development of a blockchain that would have the maximum bandwidth and computation speed.

[benthach]

dapp, happ, plugin(ark.io), sidechain, Bridgechain(ark.io) or whatever people preferred to call it I think it could be the ico, defi, or any scam ideas destroyer. this things is the best if people put their hard work into creating useful stuffs with it instead of many ideas on scams. example in ark.io wallet you can creating endless useful dapps and plugins.

[tofupanda]

I don't understand why this technology is good.
We run decentralized applications on the centralized Internet and we are also offered to transfer part of the calculations to centralized servers.
Maybe it is worth focusing on the development of a blockchain that would have the maximum bandwidth and computation speed.

Yes, like TRON for example.