If then what you are saying true , there is a vulnerability i guess in the transaction mechanism
There is no vulnerability.
As I said before the transaction happened well before the spike in fees, they just paid the average at that time, but people don't read anymore..
I mean for those people who looking to avoid high fee while they will have to move the bitcoin pretty often , they could make a deal with certain mining farm / miners to make it have a low fee periodically.
You think it is possible and makes sense guys?
Yes, it is possible, yeah it would make
a little sense for an exchange that owns a huge chunk of a mining farm to make sure that their huge consolidation transaction gets top priority and the competition is forced to pay more. But, digging deeper, why would a miner accept a lower fee? If they accept lower fees for certain transactions it must be because they are paid extra over the counter, and then we're at a point where you're paying a miner more to prioritize your low transaction fee when you could simply increase the fee and not have to go through deals and other stuff, not even mentioning you won't have to wait for that certain miner to mine a block.
Besides, we're talking about millions and 10$ in fees, common..