Pawanjin, Cheater on Hhampuz campaign (Duelbits). Need any DT member attention

[cheater detector]

Why this guy still can join on any signature campaign when he admitted by himself he was cheating the campaign with his alt?

I feel sorry for Taki.

Wow, feeling sorry for someone who has abused signature campaigns with multiple high-ranked accounts. Really? I wonder where does all this empathy come from?  

BTC connection:

hello yahoo , would like to apply for your campaign.
Btctalk name: pawanjain
Rank: sr.member
Current post count:1143
BTC address: 3A7XsWneHzbQ3Tcw2PZgN9Khr7dDAPBJQx
Wear appropriate signature:yes
Wear avatar:yes

I confirm receiving another 0.017BTC for the contest:

3A7XsWneHzbQ3Tcw2PZgN9Khr7dDAPBJQx
here is my btc address. Thanks for the consolation prize.
Wapinter told me to send my btc address to you.

ETH connection:

Applying for Sr.member . Will start posting after the current round ends
Bitcoin Talk Name: pawanjain
Bitcoin Talk Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=900041;
Rank: Sr.member
Post Count (including this post): 841
BTC Address: 3A7XsWneHzbQ3Tcw2PZgN9Khr7dDAPBJQx
ETH Address : 0xeF22923235d362Ed5ba31FD2eD3Dc5c84D24EB2a

#JOIN
Bitcointalk username:  hasmukh_rawal
Forum rank: Full Member
Posts count:  232
ETH address: 0xeF22923235d362Ed5ba31FD2eD3Dc5c84D24EB2a

And most importantly joining the same campaign with your alt account:

Accepted

Bitcointalk Username: pawanjain
Rank: Sr.Member
Current post count:  1146
Bitcoin wallet address: 3A7XsWneHzbQ3Tcw2PZgN9Khr7dDAPBJQx
DEPOTWALLET Address: will apply once selected
Wear appropriate signature: Yes
Wear avatar: Yes

Bitcointalk Username: hasmukh_rawal
Rank: full member
Current post count: 459
Bitcoin wallet address : 3A7zerVLsJmyNTPmBo8APJJDjJ1oEtYZV7
DEPOTWALLET Address: later
Wear appropriate signature: Yes
Wear avatar: Yes

The campaign is now full
All participants are required to comply to all rules mention in page 1 of this thread to qualify for weekly payouts.

It was clearly stated on rules said if no one alt account enrolled

Signature Campaign

General Rules:

Payouts will be distributed weekly.
The first week of the campaign will start on Thursday, 03 May 2018.
We reserve the right to increase or decrease the proportion of coins allocated to this campaign.
All participants are required to join our Telegram channel here: Telegram Channel
We reserve the right to eliminate you if we think you haven't been honest with your work or spamming.
We reserve the right to change our signature campaign rules.
Participants with negative trust on bitcointalk.org forum are not allowed to participate in this campaign.
Enrolling with multiple accounts is not permitted.

Here is when pawanjin admitted enrolled his alt on same campaign

Nobody is perfect bud. I have made mistakes in my past but what matters is how you learn from the mistakes and improve yourself. I had faced time when I had no job and my financial status was so low that I had to walk miles to save a few bucks.Signature campaigns helped me a lot in handling my expenses and I thank the forum for that with all my heart. It was during those times when I committed this mistake. The mistake I did was not to read the campaign rules clearly. Although I did apply for it at the same time, once I read the rules clearly, I decided not to go against the rules and I left the campaign not only with one but both of my accounts. You can also see this in the spreadsheet (post count is same) of that campaign.
Link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FKIXSX7mdYykkF29Ls0_vP1y54IraFvExAyNvWciJ2w/edit#gid=0

While the forum rule is that alt accounts are accepted and few of the trusted members here have alt accounts too, I have tried not to spam/shitpost/or any activity which is against the forum rules. I respect the forum for whatever it is. After that incident I have tried not to commit such mistakes again. Do you still think I have done anything wrong or something that is against the forum, if yes please let me know before anybody flags my account. Flagging an account doesn't take much time but building it while complying the rules does take a lot of hardwork and time.

P.S: I have tried to contribute much towards the forum and the crypto community in general. Besides that I have also encouraged people to use crypto and provided them crypto knowledge whatever I had.
When I had no job, I have also educated other people to learn about crypto and this was one of the ways I started earning money through crypto.

I don't buy story when he said he has no job and difficult financial economy.
Any credit goes to @morvillz7z


UPDATE from @morvillz7z's post

I decided not to go against the rules and I left the campaign not only with one but both of my accounts.
~snip wholehearted/touching story~

That's a beautiful story bud, if I weren't immune to bullshit I'd be shedding tears right now. It's just that when it comes to signature campaign abuse, one thing I learned it's never one or two accounts, there are always more and more. You people have no shame.

This is your third alt account - crptotrader007

ETH connection: 0x89eea1800aeeFaca6Ec81DaE3e94b488aeeD6a5f

Bitcointalk username: crptptrader007
ETH address: 0x89eea1800aeeFaca6Ec81DaE3e94b488aeeD6a5f

Bitcointalk Username: hasmukh_rawal
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1049654
ICOForum Username: hasmukhrawal
ICOForum Profile Link: https://icoforums.net/user/hasmukhrawal
BTT Rank:  Member : Full member
ETH Wallet Address: 0x89eea1800aeeFaca6Ec81DaE3e94b488aeeD6a5f

You and your alt enrolling in the same signature campaigns minutes apart:

CLOSED - Signature campaign for the HODLER Open Source Multi-Asset Wallet

[BOUNTY][PAYING ETHEREUM WEEKLY]-CREBIT.IO-Decentralized P2P Lending Platform

🔴🚀Arianee🔵 Signature Campaign🔵From Member To Legendary[FULL]

[END]⭐ICOForums.net | Signature Campaign | ETH Weekly Payment⭐


This is my favorite part, you were appointed to be the manager of the YuTü.Co.in bounty campaign. Look who you got accepted, I guess it wasn't much of a choice? smh

BitcoinTalk Profile: crptotrader007
Telegram ID      : crptotrader007
Wearing Signature   : yes
Wearing Avatar and Text : yes
ETH Address  : 0xb26ca9F540E729AB114870095a2EA697E2c388F6

Accepted

Do you still think I have done anything wrong

I do

Flagging an account doesn't take much time but building it while complying the rules does take a lot of hardwork and time.

I agree, juggling with 20ish accounts at a time must be mentally and physically wearying.

User: nikjain422
Postion to Apply: Jr. Member
Posts Start: 42
Address: 38QMoiXdgWJrgRRWhTBtZgtdrKKPeePem1

archive

Bitcointalk Name - crptotrader007
Bitcointalk Profile Link-  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1133747
Rank - Full member
Bitcoin Wallet Address- 38QMoiXdgWJrgRRWhTBtZgtdrKKPeePem1
Wearing Appropriate Signature - yes

archive

Another connection between pawanjain and hasmukh_rawal

Hello Lutpin
kindly change my bitcoin address to 35udw85sr4h5m1pteVSjaNJiTfQLU5nZfk

thanks

archive

I am interested in the new signature campaign.
My BTC address : 35udw85sr4h5m1pteVSjaNJiTfQLU5nZfk

archive

Let's get back to nikjain422 and co; Findings by Timelord2067


And another senior account found...

Link to your Tweet about Stamps: https://twitter.com/Nikhiljain422/status/936824461218553856
Twitter followers: 1379
Twitter audit link: https://www.twitteraudit.com/NikhilJain422
Bitcoin address: 13b5KoPzkHKJzLi4RbGKCGvFUHaMbA6ebW
Telegram username: @nikjain422

archive

Bitcointalk name: Sahyadri
Bitcoin Address: 13b5KoPzkHKJzLi4RbGKCGvFUHaMbA6ebW
Rank: Full.Member
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=911871
Email Registered at Stamps or Stamps wallet address: SxP62120f123af5f9cd608c62c46400b02cdb6d1e20f089fde1d45503c108967a56
Telegram username: @Sahyadri01

archive

Sahyadri 2.0

Bitcointalk name: Sahyadri
Bitcoin Address: 3N57S4dWVsGvwWNVix34tovU21K5xfjdns
Rank: Full.Member
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=911871
Email Registered at Stamps or Stamps wallet address: SxP62120f123af5f9cd608c62c46400b02cdb6d1e20f089fde1d45503c108967a56
Telegram username: @Sahyadri01

Hello Sir, please change my btc address from  13b5KoPzkHKJzLi4RbGKCGvFUHaMbA6ebW
To
3N57S4dWVsGvwWNVix34tovU21K5xfjdns

Thank you.

archive

BTT name: crptotrader007
BTT url: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1133747
current posts: 198
Bitcoin address: 3N57S4dWVsGvwWNVix34tovU21K5xfjdns
Avatar and personal message: Done

archive

Please stop playing dumb. hasmukh_rawal and crptotrader007 connected both via eth and btc addresses:

The current signature campaign i am working in is over and so I would like to apply for your campaign.
Name: hasmukh_rawal
Rank: Member
Profile Link : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1049654
BTC address: 3A7zerVLsJmyNTPmBo8APJJDjJ1oEtYZV7

Looking forward to be a part of the campaign. Will change the signature as soon as you accept me.

Link to your Tweet about Stamps: https://twitter.com/crptotrader007/status/936817297968152577
Twitter followers: 1457
Twitter audit link: https://www.twitteraudit.com/crptotrader007
Bitcoin address: 3A7zerVLsJmyNTPmBo8APJJDjJ1oEtYZV7
Telegram username: @crptotrader

Bitcointalk Username: hasmukh_rawal
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1049654
ICOForum Username: hasmukhrawal
ICOForum Profile Link: https://icoforums.net/user/hasmukhrawal
BTT Rank:  Member : Full member
ETH Wallet Address: 0x89eea1800aeeFaca6Ec81DaE3e94b488aeeD6a5f

Bitcointalk username: crptptrader007
ETH address: 0x89eea1800aeeFaca6Ec81DaE3e94b488aeeD6a5f

[1715479750]

1715479750

[1715479750]

1715479750

[1715479750]

1715479750

[1715479750]

1715479750

[pawanjain]

I don't buy story when he said he has no job and difficult financial economy.
Any credit goes to @morvillz7z

How will you ?
You were not there when I was going through the situation.
The story is true whether you believe it or not. But over the years I have learnt a lot thanks to bitcointalk. You can also see through my progress and my contributions towards the forum. Rest is upto you guys.
I cannot change the past. Besides, All those accounts you mentioned are inactive since a long time anyway.

[cheater detector]

How will you ?
You were not there when I was going through the situation.
The story is true whether you believe it or not. But over the years I have learnt a lot thanks to bitcointalk. You can also see through my progress and my contributions towards the forum. Rest is upto you guys.

If anyone do believe with your story, there will be no any cheater around. Your story just like "it's my brother/sister/father/mother/granny/bf/gf account". You are same with 456 cheater accounts i've found until now. A cheater always be a cheater, nothing else.

This forum doesn't owe you money, this is not a place for you to earn money, feed you, or helping your financial problem. Go get real f*cking job and earn money through there.

You have used your alt accounts many times in few different bounties. Does it make sense you always "forgot" to read all rules from different bounties before you joined/applied?

The mistake I did was not to read the campaign rules clearly.

[Slow death]

Why this guy still can join on any signature campaign when he admitted by himself he was cheating the campaign with his alt?

maybe it's because those cases that you reported on this thread are cases from the past. do you have any recent complaints? because all I saw are things that happened in the past years and I don't see why someone would be leaving negative feedback because of something that happened 1 year or more years ago. My point is that people can change and we have to make judgments based on the present and not the past when we leave negative feedback and about why the manager accepts him to participate in the signature campaign I think the answer is quite simple:

each manager can accept anyone he wants, even if that person had a hundred alt accounts, a hundred negative feedbaks, the manager can still accept him.

The rules for each signature campaign were created by the managers, this means that they can change or simply ignore the rule and accept whoever they want

[cheater detector]

maybe it's because those cases that you reported on this thread are cases from the past. do you have any recent complaints? because all I saw are things that happened in the past years and I don't see why someone would be leaving negative feedback because of something that happened 1 year or more years ago. My point is that people can change and we have to make judgments based on the present and not the past when we leave negative feedback and about why the manager accepts him to participate in the signature campaign I think the answer is quite simple:

each manager can accept anyone he wants, even if that person had a hundred alt accounts, a hundred negative feedbaks, the manager can still accept him.

The rules for each signature campaign were created by the managers, this means that they can change or simply ignore the rule and accept whoever they want

Are you kidding me? Then tell all admins and Global moderators to not ban any account which get caught copy-pasting even if they did that 3 years or older than that. Even few reputable members still get ban and signature ban. Do you want me to give you list of that users?

Your post told me like this,
Make mistake -> wait until other user caught you for your mistake -> admitted your mistake -> "trying" to be "a good user/member" -> you are free from your punishment

Still waiting for other DTs, How can it be this thread has been viewed more than 65 times but only 1 DT member post on here?

Still waiting for Pawanjain's answer for this, he was online but don't reply on here

You have used your alt accounts many times in few different bounties. Does it make sense you always "forgot" to read all rules from different bounties before you joined/applied?

The mistake I did was not to read the campaign rules clearly.

[Slow death]

Are you kidding me? Then tell all admins and Global moderators to not ban any account which get caught copy-pasting even if they did that 3 years or older than that. Even few reputable members still get ban and signature ban.

so I see the problem that @pawanjain has to do with having too many accounts participating in the signature campaign and he did not plagiarize or he did and I am not seeing this thread?

it is like I said: Signature campaigns have rules created by signature campaign managers and signature campaign managers have the right to do whatever they want in their signature campaign

you can't say what a manager should do or not do in the campaign he manages

and from what I see there is no case of post copy/paste and the case you posted about @pawanjain having too many accounts participating in the signature campaign are cases from years ago.

Do you want me to give you list of that users?

you will be posting a list of people who broke the forum rules, this will have nothing to do with the problem of this thread. if @pawanjain had broken the forum rules he would also be banned, but he broke the rules of signature campaigns in the past, there are different cases and with different sanctions

Your post told me like this,
Make mistake -> wait until other user caught you for your mistake -> admitted your mistake -> "trying" to be "a good user/member" -> you are free from your punishment

The forum administrator created forum rules that do not allow people to have second or third chances in the event of an infraction the person will be banned

Signature campaign managers created their own rules (some according to forum guidelines), but any infraction only the campaign manager can judge, but regardless of sanction the member will not be banned of the forum and another manager may have another perception and accept it in their campaign the person who was removed from the other campaign

Still waiting for Pawanjain's answer for this, he was online but don't reply on here

I see that this thread will still become another Netflix series

[Joel_Jantsen]

maybe it's because those cases that you reported on this thread are cases from the past. do you have any recent complaints? because all I saw are things that happened in the past years and I don't see why someone would be leaving negative feedback because of something that happened 1 year or more years ago.

I think you've been a member long enough on the forum to know how far someone can go to get someone tagged for something they did ages ago. 

@cheater detecter - Is there any recent suspicious activity that triggered you about this account? Having said that, all other cases are okay but managing a campaign and enrolling your alt's in it is sketch as fuckk.

[Slow death]

maybe it's because those cases that you reported on this thread are cases from the past. do you have any recent complaints? because all I saw are things that happened in the past years and I don't see why someone would be leaving negative feedback because of something that happened 1 year or more years ago.

I think you've been a member long enough on the forum to know how far someone can go to get someone tagged for something they did ages ago. 

unfortunately this type of behavior was very common in times of big battles to become DT or to remove some DT. Now that many of the actors who were fighting big battles in this and the scam section are gone, the forum has become empty

[pawanjain]

so I see the problem that @pawanjain has to do with having too many accounts participating in the signature campaign and he did not plagiarize or he did and I am not seeing this thread?

Neither have I ever Plagiarized nor will I ever do it. All the issues mentioned were in the past which I still regret but at the same time I took it upon myself to contribute more towards the forum.
I have even started to contribute towards bitcoin core although it is not worth mentioning right now. 

I see that this thread will still become another Netflix series

I certainly don't want it to become a Netflix series  

Still waiting for Pawanjain's answer for this, he was online but don't reply on here

Not all the campaigns had a rule that alt accounts are not allowed. A few of them did have the rule and may be I overlooked  
Apologies for that but it doesn't mean I always did it. I am just using this one account since a long time now and tried to contribute as much as I can to the forum.

@cheater detecter - Is there any recent suspicious activity that triggered you about this account? Having said that, all other cases are okay but managing a campaign and enrolling your alt's in it is sketch as fuckk.

I know how that sounds but I was only managing the signature campaign at that time. All the rules and guidelines were from the owner of Yutu.co.in
There was no such rule that Signature campaign cannot have alt accounts and besides that I had already conveyed to the campaign owner that I will be promoting the campaign myself with whatever way possible. Also, I was not paid for all the efforts I had put for Yutu.co.in. In the end I had to argue with the owners and all I got at the end was 10k yutu coins which were of 0 value as it never got launched.

[cheater detector]

^Bullshit story ever. There never be a rule you can enroll your alt on your campaign. You were taking advantage by enrolled your alt in your own campaign which i can call that you (tried) scammed the project you managed.

I've found other manager who enrolled his alt in their campaign as well, and 2 DT member, hilariousandco & Actmyname were left the negative trust for them

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3195586.msg33204462#msg33204462

I'd already made the connection between Lorrylore and hua_hui:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=239151 lorrylore
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=553644 namelessname
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=332981     hua_hui

hua_hui is also running the PolicyPal campaign but his alt lorylore is also on it as is his own account:



Which is against his own campaign terms:

Rules:

- No multiple accounts/farming accounts.

This is why there should be more scrutiny on random accounts becoming campaign managers because there far too much incompetence and shadiness going on with them. His campaigns should probably be looked into because I'm sure he's probably paying a load more of his alt accounts.

I will pm both DT member (Hilariousandco & actmyname) to give their opinion about this. If hua_hui was got negative trust, why pawanjain didn't? Both were enrolled his own alt on their own campaign.

BUMP!!!

[Timelord2067]

I can't help but wonder why the OP would gather up multiple posts by user morvillz7z post them in one new thread and stress out that nothing is being done to those who've been identified as alts?

Why not contact the Campaign Managers directly and send them links?  Have you tried this?  What was their response?

Why these two?  Why now?

[actmyname]

to give their opinion about this. If hua_hui was got negative trust, why pawanjain didn't? Both were enrolled his own alt on their own campaign.
BUMP!!!

I say that if there's another link between the set of users crptotrader, nikjain, Sahyadri and the pawanjain/hasmukh_rawal group then you can conclude decisively that they are, in fact, connected.

Shenanigans have appeared enough in the past for me to hesitate on fully committing to the A->B link from crptotrader007 taking on the reputation of hasmukh_rawal - this is a very thin thread to follow and if you are willing to compromise rigor and affirm the consequent instead of creating a tautological A<->B link with multiple posts connecting the two, then you are free to do so. However, operating under such a system opens up the opportunity for malicious agents to fabricate links.

[cheater detector]

I can't help but wonder why the OP would gather up multiple posts by user morvillz7z post them in one new thread and stress out that nothing is being done to those who've been identified as alts?

Because this cheater still can joined in any campaign he wants.

Why not contact the Campaign Managers directly and send them links?  Have you tried this?  What was their response?

I did. No response from Hhampuz

Why these two?  Why now?

Because both Hilariousandco & actmyname were left negative trust on hua_hui account, who got caught enrolled his alt in his own campaign (i've told this above). Which is same with pawanjain, who enrolled his alt as well in campaign he managed.

to give their opinion about this. If hua_hui was got negative trust, why pawanjain didn't? Both were enrolled his own alt on their own campaign.
BUMP!!!

I say that if there's another link between the set of users crptotrader, nikjain, Sahyadri and the pawanjain/hasmukh_rawal group then you can conclude decisively that they are, in fact, connected.

Shenanigans have appeared enough in the past for me to hesitate on fully committing to the A->B link from crptotrader007 taking on the reputation of hasmukh_rawal - this is a very thin thread to follow and if you are willing to compromise rigor and affirm the consequent instead of creating a tautological A<->B link with multiple posts connecting the two, then you are free to do so. However, operating under such a system opens up the opportunity for malicious agents to fabricate links.

All evidence & proofs of connection have been found by morvillz7z's. All of those account are connected with same ETH address and bitcoin address, and pawanjain has admitted above if he enrolled his alt account in his own campaign.

I know how that sounds but I was only managing the signature campaign at that time. All the rules and guidelines were from the owner of Yutu.co.in
There was no such rule that Signature campaign cannot have alt accounts and besides that I had already conveyed to the campaign owner that I will be promoting the campaign myself with whatever way possible.

I'm still waiting from hilariousandco's opinion.

[pawanjain]

Because both Hilariousandco & actmyname were left negative trust on hua_hui account, who got caught enrolled his alt in his own campaign (i've told this above). Which is same with pawanjain, who enrolled his alt as well in campaign he managed.

To make it clear the forum has no rule that we can't enroll our alt in the campaign we manage. The case you are talking about has the rule in the campaign that alt accounts are not allowed.

Rules:

- No multiple accounts/farming accounts.

Whereas the Signature campaign I enrolled in did not have any such rule.

Rules:

⦁   Participant must be at least Jr Member or above to participate in this campaign.
⦁   A minimum of 21 constructive posts per week is required.
⦁   Posting in our ANN thread is not mandatory but would encourage quality discussions.
⦁   Posts must be at least 300 characters in length.
⦁   No spamming/abusing/multiple signatures/off topic posts.
⦁   Signature, avatar and personal text should not be changed throughout the campaign.
⦁   Posts in Off-topic, Beginners & Help, Politics & Society, Local and Gambling section won?t be counted.

I can't help but wonder why the OP would gather up multiple posts by user morvillz7z post them in one new thread and stress out that nothing is being done to those who've been identified as alts?

Because this cheater still can joined in any campaign he wants.

Why not contact the Campaign Managers directly and send them links?  Have you tried this?  What was their response?

I did. No response from Hhampuz

That pretty much sums it up that OP is desperately trying to get me tagged for something that was done years ago.
Tell him to post any recent suspicious activity and I bet he won't find any. All he wants is to get me tagged which is why he is keeping on bumping this thread every now and then.

Cheater detector, stop wasting everyone's time and bringing up old posts which was already reported.

[actmyname]

Because both Hilariousandco & actmyname were left negative trust on hua_hui account, who got caught enrolled his alt in his own campaign (i've told this above). Which is same with pawanjain, who enrolled his alt as well in campaign he managed.

To make it clear the forum has no rule that we can't enroll our alt in the campaign we manage. The case you are talking about has the rule in the campaign that alt accounts are not allowed.

If the basis for rule-following is just obeying the forum rules, then the default state of the forum would be nothing more than a bunch of polite scammers that refuse to copy each other's scam techniques.

I would probably say that the act of using your own clandestine alt isn't the most trustworthy way to do things, especially if you could simply manage the campaign and advertise it in your signature at the same time. The incentive of being paid according to one's post quality in a limited campaign makes it easy for a manager to judge their posts in a biased manner - where one might be less inclined to spam in other campaigns, someone who both runs and participates in a campaign could effectively reward themselves for spam to maximize their time. This is especially important if they had multiple accounts and had to create a constant slew of posts.

[pawanjain]

Because both Hilariousandco & actmyname were left negative trust on hua_hui account, who got caught enrolled his alt in his own campaign (i've told this above). Which is same with pawanjain, who enrolled his alt as well in campaign he managed.

To make it clear the forum has no rule that we can't enroll our alt in the campaign we manage. The case you are talking about has the rule in the campaign that alt accounts are not allowed.

If the basis for rule-following is just obeying the forum rules, then the default state of the forum would be nothing more than a bunch of polite scammers that refuse to copy each other's scam techniques.

I would probably say that the act of using your own clandestine alt isn't the most trustworthy way to do things, especially if you could simply manage the campaign and advertise it in your signature at the same time. The incentive of being paid according to one's post quality in a limited campaign makes it easy for a manager to judge their posts in a biased manner - where one might be less inclined to spam in other campaigns, someone who both runs and participates in a campaign could effectively reward themselves for spam to maximize their time. This is especially important if they had multiple accounts and had to create a constant slew of posts.

I completely agree with you. I should not have done that but that was something that's done years ago. I was dumb to do something like that but things have changed and never have I ever done anything that goes against the forum rules recently. I have already accepted my fault previously and won't deny it now too. Cheater detector is playing the rules card which is why I made the post above.
While I know enrolling alt in a campaign are not good ethics I apologize for the same. I can't change something done in the past and I have already acknowledged that and changed myself completely to serve the forum by making good contributions.

P.S: That sig campaign was never started, if that makes a difference.

[cheater detector]

That pretty much sums it up that OP is desperately trying to get me tagged for something that was done years ago.
Tell him to post any recent suspicious activity and I bet he won't find any. All he wants is to get me tagged which is why he is keeping on bumping this thread every now and then.

Because you are deserve for it. You have broke forum rules MANY TIMES (joined in a same campaign with multiple accounts & enrolled your alt on your own campaign).

Cheater detector, stop wasting everyone's time and bringing up old posts which was already reported.

I'm not wasting everyone's time. You are the one who should leave this forum, cheater

If the basis for rule-following is just obeying the forum rules, then the default state of the forum would be nothing more than a bunch of polite scammers that refuse to copy each other's scam techniques.

I would probably say that the act of using your own clandestine alt isn't the most trustworthy way to do things, especially if you could simply manage the campaign and advertise it in your signature at the same time. The incentive of being paid according to one's post quality in a limited campaign makes it easy for a manager to judge their posts in a biased manner - where one might be less inclined to spam in other campaigns, someone who both runs and participates in a campaign could effectively reward themselves for spam to maximize their time. This is especially important if they had multiple accounts and had to create a constant slew of posts.

Tell me, will you give negative trust or not to pawanjain? I pm'ed you because i thought you would do same like you did on hua_hui's case.

Is joined in same campaign with alt accounts was right?
Is enrolled your alt account in your own campaign was right?

[cheater detector]

BUMP!