ㅤ

[Symmetrick]

ㅤ

[jademaxsuy]

Digital currency but not the type like cryptocurrency right? Sorry I was not reading because the post was too long and I was only scanning. Well, when it comes to money from central bank their task is only to keep records from the asset that a certain country has that will going to disclose its value and also the one task to determine the growth of the economy of he certain country. The value of fiat currency they issue will be basing on the value of the economy of the certain country so mixing up or emerging the fiat to digital currency would be possible but in my own opinion it would be still good to have fiat as back up as reserve to digital currency.

[Xal0lex]

An example of how the current situation in the world is pushing many national banks to accelerate the implementation of CBDC.

Deutsche Bank: CBDCs Will Replace Cash

In a report titled "Konzept #19 - What We Must Do to Rebuild" that was published this week, Deutsche Bank listed economic evaluations and proposals to aid global economies hit by the COVID-19 pandemic. Containing sections related to environmentalism, small business protection, and the radical "work from home tax" proposal which got under fire globally, the report further discusses a shift to digital currencies and, more specifically, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).

Citing that "cash has come under much scrutiny during the pandemic" due to concerns about virus transmission, Deutsche Bank Macro Strategist Marion Laboure writes of a need to "promote" digital currencies so as to not fall behind the countries that already do.

[witcher_sense]

~
The difference between CBDC and cryptocurrency is that the national bank is responsible for it and it has a stable value, which is not the case for conventional cryptocurrency. CBDC is as much part of the money supply as paper money.

If what you say is true and governments and bankers are going to inject all CBDC into the total supply of money, then we should be expecting an unprecedented rise in the inflation rate because of uncontrolled issuance. For me, the main difference between cryptocurrencies and central bank digital currencies is that the former aims to reform the current financial order and tries to deprive governments of the right to issue money. The latter is a conservative approach and is aimed to preserve the established order and empower central banks.

[Smartprofit]

In 2017, I read a futurist prediction in whice author predicted the emergence of CBDC.  He wrote that all people will use CBDC. It will be convenient to use such a currency.

At the same time, CBDC is the main threat to Bitcoin.  Bitcoin will not be able to become a means of settlement (as conceived by Satoshi Nakamoto).  

CBDC is the currency of central banks.  Consequently, based on this, in the future there will be no credit institutions (only Central Banks will remain).

Control over all income and expenses will become total.

Cash is freedom.  What will the world be like without cash?

[witcher_sense]

At the same time, CBDC is the main threat to Bitcoin.  Bitcoin will not be able to become a means of settlement (as conceived by Satoshi Nakamoto).
~

To my way of thinking, it's quite the opposite. The emergence of central banks digital currencies, as well as the elimination of physical cash is going to be beneficial for bitcoin as a whole, its adoption, and its development. Both these processes are going to make it evident that bitcoin has the advantages of "former" cash, and, at the same time, it doesn't have the disadvantages of government-issued digital currency. If most people today were to be suddenly deprived of the ability to transact by physical means, they would suddenly realize that they now couldn't buy anything without the permission of the bank and started searching for alternatives. They would discover bitcoin: the best digital alternative to cash.

Cash is freedom.  What will the world be like without cash?

It would look like an Orwellian world if we didn't have bitcoin to replace cash.

[Ridcan]

hello my dear friend @Ratimov.  Like every subject you have opened, this topic has attracted my attention.  we even found something of ourselves.  Only, my country, in Turkey, I want to say that there are no studies known as the CBDC.  or I have no information on this subject.  The central bank is currently studying blockchain technology.  If they does a study on such a situation soon, I would love to write on this thread.

Best Regards !

[Lorence.xD]

Nice post as always. I am not meaning to be demanding but man you should create your own website with this quality writing. In my opinion, CBDC is a big help for an economy of a country, contrary to the belief that it will cause inflation, it will not. CBDC helps in injecting money in the economy without the cost of printing money thus reducing the paper in circulation which prevents hyper inflation in these trying times.

[Smartprofit]

At the same time, CBDC is the main threat to Bitcoin.  Bitcoin will not be able to become a means of settlement (as conceived by Satoshi Nakamoto).
~

To my way of thinking, it's quite the opposite. The emergence of central banks digital currencies, as well as the elimination of physical cash is going to be beneficial for bitcoin as a whole, its adoption, and its development. Both these processes are going to make it evident that bitcoin has the advantages of "former" cash, and, at the same time, it doesn't have the disadvantages of government-issued digital currency. If most people today were to be suddenly deprived of the ability to transact by physical means, they would suddenly realize that they now couldn't buy anything without the permission of the bank and started searching for alternatives. They would discover bitcoin: the best digital alternative to cash.

Cash is freedom.  What will the world be like without cash?

It would look like an Orwellian world if we didn't have bitcoin to replace cash.

In my opinion, bitcoin is not suitable for the role of cash. 

The transparency of the Bitcoin blockchain allows tools like the Bitfury Crystal to track and analyze Bitcoin transactions.  Hence, Bitcoin is not an anonymous and confidential cryptocurrency. 

Also, bitcoin coins are not fungible.  There are white (miner) bitcoins.  There are black bitcoins obtained by criminal means.  There are gray bitcoins obtained from cryptocurrency exchanges (which do not use KYC and AML procedures). 

A full replacement for Cash is not Bitcoin, but Monero (XMR). 

Monero is 21st century digital cash (antagonist and alternative to CBDC).

[bearexin]

This is one of the best educational topics I have ever seen in my bitcointalk life. It has depth, it is simple to understand, it has images that explains and compliments the topic, this is by far the best class I have taken in any topic let alone something as specific as CBDC topic.

I already knew what it was in theory but I have learned so so much more while reading in details as well, I feel like I could take this, print it out, and go to any finance class in any college and could give a class about CBDC only using this as my source material and I wouldn't have any problems, even if kids ask questions about it, I am sure this has an answer to it in it somewhere.

Kudos and I think CBDC will definitely be a standard in the future, banknotes are too old fashioned to exist forever.

[witcher_sense]

In my opinion, bitcoin is not suitable for the role of cash. 

The transparency of the Bitcoin blockchain allows tools like the Bitfury Crystal to track and analyze Bitcoin transactions.  Hence, Bitcoin is not an anonymous and confidential cryptocurrency. 

Also, bitcoin coins are not fungible.  There are white (miner) bitcoins.  There are black bitcoins obtained by criminal means.  There are gray bitcoins obtained from cryptocurrency exchanges (which do not use KYC and AML procedures). 

A full replacement for Cash is not Bitcoin, but Monero (XMR). 

Monero is 21st century digital cash (antagonist and alternative to CBDC).

Strictly speaking, it is a layer one (bitcoin blockchain) that is transparent, traceable, analyzable, and therefore doesn't fit in the role of cash. Higher levels of bitcoin, however, could potentially serve as a basis for the realization of characteristics of physical money. On a base layer, it must be transparent, so that we can always perform an audit of its total supply, check if consensus rules are followed, etc. We can't perform such audits when it comes to cash, central bank digital currencies and also Monero.

Ironically, according to your "definition" of fungibility, Monero could never be considered "white" currency due to its anonymity and non-traceability. Every surveillance company would assume that if you make transactions in Monero, you are a criminal until proven otherwise.

[Karartma1]

What I find truly astonishing is that we already have digital currencies: credit cards, bank wires, SWIFT payments they are all in digital form. We have 0s and 1s on a database somewhere that implies how much do we have. If they don't implement a blockchain-based CBDC nothing much will change really. They had to find some way to tackle bitcoin's humongous superiority and they came up with CBDC.
On the topic of anonymity, I would never trust an anonymity voucher issued by a central bank.

[witcher_sense]

Yesterday, Andy Haldane, who is a Chief Economist at Bank of England and Member of the Monetary Policy Committee, gave a speech to TheCityUK. The pdf version of the speech is available here Seizing the Opportunities from Digital Finance

In this speech, he envisions a future, in which physical cash is completely replaced by central bank-issued cryptocurrencies. He argues that CBDC will eliminate "technological constraint on the ability to pay or receive interest in physical cash, whether positive or negative."

In other words, CBDCs are meant to help bankers to seize our money via negative interest rates. Savers will be incentivized to spend their money, and such a state of affairs will allegedly provide economic growth and overall prosperity.

But we all know what is really able to save us, bitcoin fixes this.

[stompix]

If anyone finds this tl;dr, here is the shorter version: "We're fu*" !

When I saw that radar graph from the IMF when the CBDC were doing everything better than the rest and had just anonymity at medium, yeah right, I was thinking why do they ut so much effort right now to push with this thing? There is a huge difference between the current state in Sweden where the e-krona project appeared and how it was supposed to work compared to the marketing they are trying to push down our throats with this.

Real-time monitoring and tracking options, as well as control over the money supply, will help banks and regulators in the fight against money laundering and in supervision.
<>
Account-based CBDCs are tied to identity information. Combining the qualities of cash as an inclusive and crisis-resistant means of payment with the characteristics of anonymity can be challenging. This is the most popular concept - five central banks are considering it.

One push of a key button and you're no more, your money is gone, your assets are gone, your identity is gone...welcome to the matrix.

In my opinion, CBDC is a big help for an economy of a country, contrary to the belief that it will cause inflation, it will not. CBDC helps in injecting money in the economy without the cost of printing money thus reducing the paper in circulation which prevents hyper inflation in these trying times.

Please do elaborate on this...
I'm quite interested in how increasing everyone's personal account let's say ten times this will trigger no inflation.

[Smartprofit]

What I find truly astonishing is that we already have digital currencies: credit cards, bank wires, SWIFT payments they are all in digital form. We have 0s and 1s on a database somewhere that implies how much do we have. If they don't implement a blockchain-based CBDC nothing much will change really. They had to find some way to tackle bitcoin's humongous superiority and they came up with CBDC.
On the topic of anonymity, I would never trust an anonymity voucher issued by a central bank.

CBDCs are not anonymous, they are confidential. 

The central bank and regulators will know everything about the users of the system.  At the same time, users of the system will not have information about other users of the system.  This will ensure the privacy of the CBDC. 

However, in this case, information leaks are possible.  Specialists in the field of Big Data will be involved in working with CBDC.  They will sign non-disclosure documents of confidential information. 

Nevertheless, there will still be information leaks.  In the system, the weakest link is always the person.

[Harlot]

We all know that the EU is in talks regarding having a digital version of the Euro I don't see the article I have read a few months ago but here is one of their explanations why they are creating or seeing as a benefit with regards to creating a digital version for it.

A pandemic may also be considered to fall under this scenario, for example because
social distancing might modify consumers’ payment habits. Consumers may even perceive cash to be a vector of infection, in spite of the lack of evidence of any specific risks of infection associated with the use of banknotes.23 They might therefore become less willing to use cash and more inclined to use contactless and online payments.

The pandemic is one of the main catalyst why they are trying to create a digital version of the Euro, contactless payments is what they are trying to do for the fiat currency since the physical currency alone cannot do that. I guess this helps for one of the reasons why central banks are trying to create a digital currency.

[Ozero]

Nice post as always. I am not meaning to be demanding but man you should create your own website with this quality writing. In my opinion, CBDC is a big help for an economy of a country, contrary to the belief that it will cause inflation, it will not. CBDC helps in injecting money in the economy without the cost of printing money thus reducing the paper in circulation which prevents hyper inflation in these trying times.

Of course, the stablecoins of the central banks of states are a step forward compared to their cash and non-cash money.  However, this is the same currency of states, only in digital form and using blockchain technology.  States' stablecoins will not cause additional inflation, since the methods of their control and management will practically remain the same.

[Smartprofit]

Yesterday, Andy Haldane, who is a Chief Economist at Bank of England and Member of the Monetary Policy Committee, gave a speech to TheCityUK. The pdf version of the speech is available here Seizing the Opportunities from Digital Finance

In this speech, he envisions a future, in which physical cash is completely replaced by central bank-issued cryptocurrencies. He argues that CBDC will eliminate "technological constraint on the ability to pay or receive interest in physical cash, whether positive or negative."

In other words, CBDCs are meant to help bankers to seize our money via negative interest rates. Savers will be incentivized to spend their money, and such a state of affairs will allegedly provide economic growth and overall prosperity.

But we all know what is really able to save us, bitcoin fixes this.

Very interesting post.

Several months ago, I read about the digital money of the Central Bank of China on Forklog.  I also noticed that CBDC does not offer deposits for system users. 

The time value of money is one of the basic principles of finance.  Money is more valuable today than money tomorrow.  One of the functions of money is the function of savings. 

As a result of the reform, CBDC users will be robbed.  They will not be able to receive interest on deposits.  Why does the state need it?  To stimulate consumption?  But this means that people in the future will be slaves without their own savings.

[witcher_sense]

~
As a result of the reform, CBDC users will be robbed.  They will not be able to receive interest on deposits.  Why does the state need it?  To stimulate consumption?  But this means that people in the future will be slaves without their own savings.

Exactly. The primary goal of CBDC is to entirely eliminate the ability of people to postpone consumption. When all the money in the economy is digitalized and cash is eliminated, it will not be possible to make savings; you will be forced to spend your money as quickly as possible to avoid losses. You will be forced to increase your consumption of things you don't like and spending on things you don't need, and consequently will find yourself having a very high time preference. You will spend everything you earn, which means your kids will not receive an inheritance and will have a lot worse living standard than you did.

[wiss19]

When people say CBDC is being created because of coronavirus, I just don’t get it. It’s just like as if there isn’t other contactless payment methods that we can use, there are so many of them out there and even the mobile bank applications we are using these days are contactless, you don’t need to make any physical or hand contact with the person you’re sending money, you just ask for their account number and you open your app and send.

Not to talk about Bitcoin, there is PayPal, there is also Payoneer, there is Square Inc., and so many ways we can send money without making contact, so how exactly are they saying CBDC is saving us from Coronavirus? They should simply say it’s just an advancement in technology and using unnecessary description.