maartenhaha --purchased or hacked account

[lovesmayfamilis]

I ask you to take a closer look at this account. Looks like a purchased or hacked account. The password has not been changed.
https://bpip.org/Profile?id=134519

But all other signs indicate that the account does not belong to the original owner.

maartenhaha

Initially, the account belonged to a Belgian.
May 06, 2015 --December 03, 2016

in belgium where i live, i see a possible trend comming up.
people or hack clubs treathning buisnisses to pay a x ammount of btc otherwhise the will put sencitive clientinfo all over the web, negative reviews all over the place in order to destroy the rep of once buisness.... ect...
extortion basicly
it's realy sad .... bad publicity for bitcoins overhere because it comes in the news ns all of a sudden bitcoiners are crimminals

[ archive ]

ja heel stil hier, als je kijkt naar de laatste post

en ja het is jammer dat op andere fora ook bijna geen nederlandstalige gedeeltes zijn en als ze er zijn is het er meestal spinneweb en stof lol

December 26, 2017  (Indonesian)
But after that, the language of the posts changed dramatically to Indonesian. There are a few posts in English, but mostly sweats are in the Indonesian local section.
In addition, this account also had a similar account, which is also suspected of being hacked.

2 Accounts Connected:

1. itos Hacked Account
2. maartenhaha

Proof:

ETH address: 0x5E01D68C0d99E929C4aef10C62c0Cb65FcB3e35c

[ archive ]

ETH address: 0x5E01D68C0d99E929C4aef10C62c0Cb65FcB3e35c

[ archive ]

Related Addresses:

Code:

ETH address: 0x5E01D68C0d99E929C4aef10C62c0Cb65FcB3e35c

[1701695363]

1701695363

[1701695363]

1701695363

[1701695363]

1701695363

[1701695363]

1701695363

[1701695363]

1701695363

[YOSHIE]

I try to check some posts: @maartenhaha.

I'm also a little confused about the account: @maartenhaha, because I found him posting in three local lalanguages.

Dutch local post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1055243.msg11344005#msg11344005
French local post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1180630.msg12533797#msg12533797
Indonesian local post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2175534.msg27160452#msg27160452

Post still around 2015-2017.


Interestingly I found this one.

well.. still waiting on a reply for a password request since 20 august 2015 ... made a second account since i can't acces my original account, starting over from scratch ...
 sended yesterday a friendly poke, still no reply

just waiting patiently

my accountname: maartenhaha

Do not know exactly which account he means cannot be accessed.
Maybe you are right, @maartenhaha, sold or hacked.

[Csmiami]

Do not know exactly which account he means cannot be accessed.
Maybe you are right, @maartenhaha, sold or hacked.

Since the post is in "investor based games" I'd say it's the one from the scam service the user participated; see OP


Regarding the languages; it's not strange that a Dutch national does also speak French and/or German, they're close so it does make sense. Same thing happens in Spain with portuguese and french.

The Indonesian post doesn't really match; there's a posting gap between  December 03, 2016 and the next post is the Indonesian one you provided; December 2017. A one year gap in which the account was probably hacekd and then sold

[LoyceV]

The password has not been changed.[/b]
https://bpip.org/Profile?id=134519

The password could have been changed before BPIP started tracking changes.

Regarding the languages; it's not strange that a Dutch national does also speak French and/or German, they're close so it does make sense.

There are also Indonesians who speak Dutch. I know some of them in the Netherlands, so some of them probably live in Belgium too. However, "Maarten" doesn't sound like an Indonesian name, and he didn't say he speaks Indonesian when he listed his languages in 2015:

3talig: vlaams, engels en frans, roestig duits en hakkel spaans ^^ lezen gaat veel beter met die 2 laatste haha

[hosseinimr93]

The password could have been changed before BPIP started tracking changes.

Correct.
The password was changed on December 26, 2017. Click here to see the reference.

[LoyceV]

The password was changed on December 26, 2017. Click here to see the reference.

It's in my seclog log indeed.

[Insanerman]

Should we flag him first or wait for him to respond and give valid evidences on how he can prove that his account is his own since the day it was created? I see it would be tough to know if he would tell the truth but I guess it is also better if we let him speak. Though the evidences were already adding up to the fact and conclusion of his account being sold/hacked, it is still better to know the opposing side. Supporting the flag as well but would be deleted once the accused user proved himself right.

[lovesmayfamilis]

Should we flag him first or wait for him to respond and give valid evidences on how he can prove that his account is his own since the day it was created? I see it would be tough to know if he would tell the truth but I guess it is also better if we let him speak. Though the evidences were already adding up to the fact and conclusion of his account being sold/hacked, it is still better to know the opposing side. Supporting the flag as well but would be deleted once the accused user proved himself right.

I do not quite understand what flag you are talking about . And if we talk about the opinion of the owner of the hacked account, then if you scroll above, then note that he was here, and even sent some merit. But he did not dispute the fact of full ownership of the account.

[Insanerman]

Should we flag him first or wait for him to respond and give valid evidences on how he can prove that his account is his own since the day it was created? I see it would be tough to know if he would tell the truth but I guess it is also better if we let him speak. Though the evidences were already adding up to the fact and conclusion of his account being sold/hacked, it is still better to know the opposing side. Supporting the flag as well but would be deleted once the accused user proved himself right.

I do not quite understand what flag you are talking about . And if we talk about the opinion of the owner of the hacked account, then if you scroll above, then note that he was here, and even sent some merit. But he did not dispute the fact of full ownership of the account.

Hehe I'm talking about giving red trust to the accused user which I did(I often say flag and prefers to negative feedback lol). Oh, I didn't noticed the merit sent by the accused. Well apparently YOSHIE's finds seems to finalize that maartenhaha's account was sold. If it would be hacked, there would be someone who would initiate a post regarding a hack of an account even back then. Also, the account seemed to just be an alt, so no wonder why he managed to not give a damn about the accusation anymore. Overall, pls lock this thread to prevent unnecessary bumps.