Bitcoin Forum
May 22, 2024, 05:27:40 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Does this idea for the possible implementation of "Smart Addresses" make sense?  (Read 545 times)
josiah__Coinsetter (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 24, 2014, 03:33:41 PM
Last edit: March 24, 2014, 03:51:33 PM by josiah__Coinsetter
 #1

I posted this on reddit the other day, but I realized you guys would probably be a better crowd to share this with.

99% of payment for product or service is sent in Bitcoin by buyer to a smart address (escrow address that is supported by the network). 0.05% is sent to the smart address as well by the merchant or provider of service. When the product is delivered or the service is serviced, the buyer sends the last 1% and the merchant/service provider sends another 0.05%.

Since both the buyer and seller sent coins before the physical transaction occurred (and signed by each party's private keys), the smart address "knows" where to send the coins after all four deposits have been received (to the seller).

The address would also include a functionality which would would release the coins back to the buyer after a certain amount of time lapses before the post-transaction 1% is sent by the buyer.

I understand there is a lot of work before such addresses can actually be implemented, but I thought I might as well throw the idea out there.
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4326
Merit: 3234



View Profile
March 24, 2014, 07:08:56 PM
 #2

Escrow can be done easily using multi-sig transactions. Oh and your numbers don't add up to 100%.

Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
josiah__Coinsetter (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 24, 2014, 09:17:23 PM
 #3

@odolvlobo

That was intended haha. The extra 1% is because the seller is also inputting funds.

Also, this surpasses the capabilities of purely multi-sig based escrow.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!