DYP became another shit bounty project

[martina14]

They just banned my from their both group for asking about bounty managements question. They changed bounty rules like their nightdress and banning and burning hunter stake for a minor excuse. Just locked 200 ETH for bounty but now they are reducing hunters stake without properly stating the reason even they remove a name from the spreadsheet. I didn't see any project that removed many hunter's entries. If they can do that with hunters then I do not think they are not fully honest in their work. Be careful with such a project guys.

I've seen this DYP project campaign, and based on their announcement they've paid their participants with a total of 20, 000$ in Ethereum, that amount of value anyway not bad at all, then if they change the rules suddenly, well according to them are some person who tried to attempt to hijack the project. Though, a project like this DYP it has a risk actually.

[1715434695]

1715434695

[1715434695]

1715434695

[1715434695]

1715434695

[1715434695]

1715434695

[1715434695]

1715434695

[1715434695]

1715434695

[joseyphil82]

DYP isn't a shit project for bounty hunters, as for investors I can't say because I don't know how long this project will be alive for but they paid bounty hunters over 20,000$ tokens,  if you are banned it's because you failed to follow the bounty rules which many bounty hunters like breaking this days anyways.

[lobo13hf]

DYP isn't a shit project for bounty hunters, as for investors I can't say because I don't know how long this project will be alive for but they paid bounty hunters over 20,000$ tokens,  if you are banned it's because you failed to follow the bounty rules which many bounty hunters like breaking this days anyways.

It looks like true and i have checked the bounty hunter's address and some people have been getting paid by the developers. This is usually happening when there were some hunters who didn't follow or can't deal with the rules and they have been getting banned by the admin.
Sometime the hunters must also see themselves whether there's something wrong with them.
Im not a supporter of this project but it seems like there was a lot of accusations for this project.

[bakasabo]

They just used that 200 ETH announcement to attract hunters. Don't know they will pay for the remaining hunters or not.

A lot of projects, that run bounty campaigns do that. That is not new. This is like "1,000,000$ bounty pool" with "in tokens" somewhere in the text.
You seems to have registered ages ago, but still believe what projects say. You have just faced an example of dishonest project, which has all right to do that (as they write, that they can change rules whenever they want).
What I advice you to do is to support topic in Scam Accusation and write your negative feedback in BM trust. But from other point of view, when you joined their campaign, you agreed to their rules, so there is not much you can do and complain about.

[Kopetunto]

They just banned my from their both group for asking about bounty managements question. They changed bounty rules like their nightdress and banning and burning hunter stake for a minor excuse. Just locked 200 ETH for bounty but now they are reducing hunters stake without properly stating the reason even they remove a name from the spreadsheet. I didn't see any project that removed many hunter's entries. If they can do that with hunters then I do not think they are not fully honest in their work. Be careful with such a project guys.

so if you follow a good bounty project, see who the bounty manager handles it,
if they use a professional bounty manager, then there will be no such incident,
you must be patient if rejected.

[JeffBrad12]

If the team was kicking the users and it will probably due to various reasons. I see that sometimes the uneducated hunters were not following the instruction and that's why they were getting removed from the campaign without any payment.
When you are not allowed to post into the main chat group and you must also follow such instruction as the team is a party who has been creating the rules.
I see that another members were getting their payment from the team and i expect they follow all of the rules.

[nomenclatur]

There will be a reduction in prizes for bounty hunters suddenly, there have been several times a project like this will be a scam, it's just a matter of waiting to time see greedy people, I'm fed up, especially when they suddenly cross out the bounty participants at the end of this campaign. hunters stop following projects like this it's better if you leave the telegram and unfollow all of their social media accounts.

[RealMalatesta]

There are many projects that are really shit, but this one doesn't look like that for now, it just looks like a failed part of a project and this could definitely lead to a shit project or maybe they will recover from it. I have always said that when project team doesn't respect bounty hunters or anyone and telegram has people banning others left and right, that usually indicates that project doesn't want to be questioned and that is never something I could be fine with.

There are trolls that you should ban in order to save everyone time, but banning a troll versus banning a hater are different things, a hater needs to first like that project in order to hate it later, you don't start with hate from zero because you would not even care about them if you didn't like them first.

[Adreman23]

Its not fair to other bounty hunters that are removed in spreadsheet without violating the bounty rules, and if they are removed because they did not follow the bounty rules i think removing thier names on spreadsheet is not the solution or not right action of team. Maybe better to mark their names as red and make a note and state what are the rules they violate so that they can understand their mistake.

[Galley]

They just banned my from their both group for asking about bounty managements question. They changed bounty rules like their nightdress and banning and burning hunter stake for a minor excuse. Just locked 200 ETH for bounty but now they are reducing hunters stake without properly stating the reason even they remove a name from the spreadsheet. I didn't see any project that removed many hunter's entries. If they can do that with hunters then I do not think they are not fully honest in their work. Be careful with such a project guys.

so if you follow a good bounty project, see who the bounty manager handles it,
if they use a professional bounty manager, then there will be no such incident,
you must be patient if rejected.

Everything does not always work out smoothly, even if the bounty company is run by a professional manager. The last decision always belongs to the project managers, regardless of the opinion of the bounty manager himself. I have already encountered this situation. We can either accept or refuse to participate in the project.

[ilovealtcoins]

It looks like this bounty project is trying to remove the bounty participants' stakes as PAYACCEPT did.
I think the reason they are looking for ways to reduce their bonuses is to avoid the cost of the project they create after the bonus has been distributed.
Bounty projects related to DEFI are very vulnerable, and for that, I am very little involved in them.

[Winscosinally]

This is a false accusation OP, why are you the only one saying that DYP banned you for asking questions on their group? Are you sure that's all you did? You must have annoyed the team somehow and infact the bounty rules says hunters must not talk about bounty in main group

[Onika84]

Because of that, sometimes I hesitate to follow DeFi based projects. Most of them just follow trends and are not transparent. It is not easy to choose the available options, stay alert and be careful.

[CryptoTrip]

I dont know what happened with you, I participated in Twitter for one week and paid as much as promised. In the rules it was written that in the main group it was impossible to ask about the bounty otherwise a ban, so you need to carefully read the rules. It was also written that there should be at least one message in the main group per week, I know that many people didnt write, so their awards were reduced. It seems to me that simple carelessness played a role here, although maybe I'm wrong

[abel1337]

They already write this rules, if you join a bounties with such rules... you're agree if they can change a rules many times, add more strict rules or excluding you from the campaign.

We reserve the right to change the terms and conditions. Any behavior we consider unethical will result in removal from this bounty campaign.
We reserve the right to adjust the reward amount per campaign depending on the number of applicants. Safety of your wallets is your own concern, if there’s any mistake of addresses on the spreadsheet tell us before the end of the bounty campaign.

That’s right so its hard to say that this is a scam project since they already stated if on their terms and conditions which you have to understand first before joining the bounty. I don’t mind kicking bounty participants as long as they have a proof that those bounty participants are cheating but if they do made a major changes on the terms and condition right before the end of the bounty, then its indeed alarming to me.

I didn't say this is a scam project. They just trick hunters by changing rules often so that they can blame hunters for not following the rules and ban them from the campaign. They can change the rules but is that honest work if they do that very often? I do not think so. Also, they didn't announce that in their forum post so that hunters can understand.

Projects can possibly change their rules due to unseen circumstances and it is the bounty hunter job to keep in touch, As you deal with bounty projects it is expected that one of the main communication will be a telegram. As we know that bounty campaigns are getting abused often and I can understand the reason why bounty managers are changing the rules to avoid cheaters. I don't understand why did the campaign ban hunters for not following rules, They could just forfeit the week pay for a week not following the rules. The banhammer is for the cheaters and not for the one who didn't follow the rule.

[Cadaver20]

Projects can possibly change their rules due to unseen circumstances and it is the bounty hunter job to keep in touch, As you deal with bounty projects it is expected that one of the main communication will be a telegram. As we know that bounty campaigns are getting abused often and I can understand the reason why bounty managers are changing the rules to avoid cheaters. I don't understand why did the campaign ban hunters for not following rules, They could just forfeit the week pay for a week not following the rules. The banhammer is for the cheaters and not for the one who didn't follow the rule.

I agree with you. But a bounty hunter works in many bounties. It is not possible to check the telegrams of each bounty campaign every day.  Maybe check once a week. The DYP project was for 5 weeks. They gave a new rule on Telegram on the first day of last week and after 24 hours banned those who did not see it from the campaign and privatized the Telegram group. But my question is, could this new rule not be updated on the bounty thread? If not, what are the bounty managers managing bounty for? Is it right to go to such a hard line with a news for such a short period of time? I think these are tricks not to pay Bounty Hunters.