Rmcdermott927 admits to abusing the flag system

[Vod]

Based on this thread:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5231936.0

Facts are:

Rmcdermott927 and chradams made a deal.
Rmcdermott927 chose OGNasty as the escrow.
Rmcdermott927 sent OGNasty an escrow fee.
chradams backed out after reviewing escrow..
OGNasty kept the escrow fee.
OGNasty supported a flag against chradams for causing Rmcdermott927 to lose the escrow fee..

Disagreement is:

OGNasty claims he returned the fee, but won't prove it.  
Rmcdermott927 left chradams negative feedback saying he lost his escrow fee.

I feel OGNasty is wrong to use two accounts to damage a person simply for researching an escrow.  
OGNasty says "it is time" for the community to DT blacklist anyone who agrees with me.

I'll reply to back up accusations that other people cannot find (like rc's edited feedback).  Otherwise - evidence is there and any other information I provide would be redundant.

 

[OgNasty]

What a load of lies and bullshit.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5290559.0

Vod is harassing users of my escrow service as retaliation of exposing his current scam attempt: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5232165.0

Facts are:

You need to read the flag, as your "facts" are full of lies. 

The flag doesn't mention anything about a fee because I refunded the fee. 

This is clear to see on the blockchain and the flag complaint.

/thread

[Chradams]

Thank you for posting this. Every time I try posting evidence in their threads it just gets deleted.

[Vod]

Update:

Rmcdermott927 still claims he lost his escrow fee.  His feedback and flag are lies.

Also notice how OG always responds.  "Vod is a liar.  Look over there!"

[Rmcdermott927]

Update:

Rmcdermott927 still claims he lost his escrow fee.  His feedback and flag are lies.

Also notice how OG always responds.  "Vod is a liar.  Look over there!"

No I didn’t, several hours ago I posted that he in fact did.   I posted the feedback before the fee was given back.   I will revise it to reflect that since fine details are so important.

[Vod]

No I didn’t, several hours ago I posted that he in fact did.   I posted the feedback before the fee was given back.   I will revise it to reflect that since fine details are so important.

So what is the reason you left him a flag?  You lost nothing.

[Rmcdermott927]

No I didn’t, several hours ago I posted that he in fact did.   I posted the feedback before the fee was given back.   I will revise it to reflect that since fine details are so important.

So what is the reason you left him a flag?  You lost nothing.

He’s likely a scammer, probably was hoping I would just send first.   Wasted my time, and then after the deal was cancelled posted 6-8 times saying I was trying to scam him.  Most of those posts were deleted by moderators.   This is the last I am going to say on this topic because my time is obviously far more valuable than yours.   This is all the time I am willing to spend on a newbie scammers account.  He will be back with another throwaway soon enough. 

[Vod]

He’s likely a scammer, probably was hoping I would just send first.  

That's not a reason for a flag.

As long as you don't complain when other people leave you a flag for their thoughts/feelings.  

[Chradams]

No I didn’t, several hours ago I posted that he in fact did.   I posted the feedback before the fee was given back.   I will revise it to reflect that since fine details are so important.

So what is the reason you left him a flag?  You lost nothing.

He’s likely a scammer, probably was hoping I would just send first.   Wasted my time, and then after the deal was cancelled posted 6-8 times saying I was trying to scam him.  Most of those posts were deleted by moderators.   This is the last I am going to say on this topic because my time is obviously far more valuable than yours.   This is all the time I am willing to spend on a newbie scammers account.  He will be back with another throwaway soon enough. 

Because you were trying to scam me. You send messages to one person setting up escrow. You were waiting for a reply. Then magically changed escrow to OgNasty. Which, by the response of many people on the forum is not trustworthy.

[Vod]

I will revise it to reflect that since fine details are so important.

Fine details are important only when others are paying attention?

Could you take care of another fine detail?   You keep claiming I've messaged you "multiple times".  That's misleading, as "multiple" can mean 2, 5, 100, etc.  But I don't think it means once.  Using fake qualifiers like that is also something OG does every times he posts.  (Every time, long history, etc)

[Vod]

This is a good example of why people are shy of crypto.

Man lies, costs millions of dollars in damages, receives no penalty. 

Compare that to this case:  Chradams pulls out of deal after researching scammer OGNasty.  Costs Rmcdermott927 a few pennies in damages, but he receives a flag and negative trust from the scamming duo.