You also tagged me without any proofs and you lied on my trust page, why are you complaining if someone tags you without providing any proofs in public, hypocrite?
you lie moron
it never was
This account is "trust troll".
trust troll said
this idiot is lying that I wrote to him PM but i never contacted him
Well that's a lie in fact you did contact him and both shared a fair amount of messages even though it looked one-sided to me.
i contacted him after it ( after he excluded me by colluding another morons ) before i never contacted
What do people think? Is this a neg-trust deserving behavior? I think it is. If the DT people advise me otherwise, I would gladly remove my feedback or make it neutral.
I would still just distrust in this kind of cases and perhaps would leave a neutral feedback stating that "the user kind of asking me not to distrust him and making a big issue about it".
yes i think too for this behavior he must leave neutral tag and not red but he leave red ) thats incorrect behaviour
@peloso, I hope you understand that this is not really helping you much. Let people do what they want to do with their trust list.
ok no problem) i always ready for peace but all morons and idiots mus be know RED TAG not for revenge..
even posts of some idiots like as marlboroza, mindtrust and others for revenge at me
anyway
1) You sent me a PM on June 3rd asking me to add you to my trust list
1. you excluded me by collusion
2. i sent you PM and NEVER ASK ( here is my first pm to you)
hii
recommend you to include me to your trust list
where here ASK? I recommended you in an orderly tone and did not ask
and it was AFTER this idiot excluded me before it i not contacted him
you lie as a mindtrust
я cyчь
нy этo дa) ничeгo нe мeняeтcя
Did OP PM them to you? That might be a stupid question, but it wasn't stated anywhere. And I think it'd be nice to post the PMs here considering a negative feedback was left and the community (including DT members) ought to have a look-see.
absolutely agree )