OXSIGN STAKING FARM

[OXSIGN]

http://

OXSIGN STAKING FARM


Let's welcome the OX year 2021 Yieldfarming!

TOKEN INFO
Total Supply = 21,000 Tokens
Presale : 13650 Tokens (65%)
Private-sale : 10% of the Pre-sale Token
Allocation : 1 ETH to 2 ETH (No Big Whale)
UniSwap Listing : 8190 (60% of Presale will be lock)
Farming : 7350 Tokens (35%)


You can follow us on :
Telegram Group: https://t.me/OXYSIGN
Telegram Announcement Channel : https://t.me/OXannouncement
website : https://oxs.finance/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/CrisThompson20

STAKING PLATFROM WITH A LOW APY  FOR THE SUSTAINABILITY AND MAINTAIN THE A GOOD VALUE OF THE TOKEN!

[1714614377]

1714614377

[1714614377]

1714614377

[1714614377]

1714614377

[Coin_trader]

Your website looks crappy because you use low quality image and very poor UI/UX. I don't know what's your main goal with finance besides on staking coin like ponzi. You just modify your presale allocation so that it looks like you are not interested in money for limiting the allocation per person.
 
Your image looks like a stolen profile picture of someone in social media. You didn't even make it a high quality.

No whitepaper?
Road map in PDF?

Out of budget for this project? 

[Miiike]

They have the most crystal clear roadmap ever! They even put a great breakdown of their planned milestones in two months! OP, if you want some pixels, I sell some -_-

Seriously though, the name Cris Thompson didn't bring any result on Google, something that's quite strange, given the unique spelling of your name. Plus, your LinkedIn looks like someone's fake ID. Anything you'd like to say on this?

[DU3O]

Another picture of an innocent man got used by a frustrated dev wanna be to use for his evil plans. There is obviously no effort of any sort here. Looks like everything was just created in 1 hour and then the OP decided to post it and hoping he could get easy money.   ooppss.. not here buddy. not here  

[niccuzYe]

Looks like this website and the project at all needs serious rework. It is no much information at all on the website, team consist of one person, also I have questions to your roadmap

[krisnajsadrak]

Your website looks crappy because you use low quality image and very poor UI/UX. I don't know what's your main goal with finance besides on staking coin like ponzi. You just modify your presale allocation so that it looks like you are not interested in money for limiting the allocation per person.
 
Your image looks like a stolen profile picture of someone in social media. You didn't even make it a high quality.

No whitepaper?
Road map in PDF?

Out of budget for this project? 

if you go to the website you will see the whitepaper link my friend
but, seems something strange with this project, i hope people who want to invest in this project, they will learn deeply and ready for the risk

[necromastery]

Looks like this website and the project at all needs serious rework. It is no much information at all on the website, team consist of one person, also I have questions to your roadmap

Yes, so much thing I see that he should do and put into the working list. To me this is just simple fast project, he only want to take our money out of the pocket for short living token. I would suggest to everyone stay away, scam is high probability for the project like this.

[Miiike]

Your website looks crappy because you use low quality image and very poor UI/UX. I don't know what's your main goal with finance besides on staking coin like ponzi. You just modify your presale allocation so that it looks like you are not interested in money for limiting the allocation per person.
 
Your image looks like a stolen profile picture of someone in social media. You didn't even make it a high quality.

No whitepaper?
Road map in PDF?

Out of budget for this project? 

if you go to the website you will see the whitepaper link my friend
but, seems something strange with this project, i hope people who want to invest in this project, they will learn deeply and ready for the risk

It wasn't there yesterday, the button used to be inactive. Besides, their WP looks more like an onepager (it literally can fit in quarter page, actually). And talking about their content, the tokenomic were different from the one listed here. On both cases though, I'm not sure if my math were rusty or what, their numbers just didn't adds up.

For the sake of convenience, I'll use the one on WP as they have a more friendly numbers



Ignore page 4, focus on page 3 and 5.

So Dev, your project will have 21,000 token as total supply, 6,000 will be allocated for staking, 13,500 for ICO and 1,500 for pre-sale (I'm helping you up here by correcting your sale number, and using a better term for your token sale), and then you'll have 60% of sale (that's around 8,100) token locked for liquidity? Like... LOL, seriously? What? You want people to buy, then they have to give their token to be locked for liquidity? Where does that 8,100 token comes from?

Now for page 5, I think we are all know here what's wrong with it. In case you didn't know, although word and excel has a nice charting feature that's fully functional and easy to use, you still need some brainpower to input your number properly into them and label each segment correctly.

[ngocdhbk2]

There is another person open the same ANN thread content, who is the main manager of OXSIGN project at the forum? Is this a really serious project when the roadmap is too bad?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5291806.0

[OXSIGN]

all of you is right, I know everyone here is investigating me its ok for me, yes its not nice that im not adding some cool stuff or some other things in my web.
do I need to put a lot of none sense things just to look that this project is legit? alot of project do that before and then what happen they run, scam and rug and pull.

This is my first project and beside do i need to put all of my information just to show that im legit person?

did other project do that?

a quick update i already submit my KYC to Distx to be part of their presale app and im waiting for their respond.

if my application is approved i will update all of you and eat your words that Im not a legit person!

I don't  beg or ask someone to join in my project.

and by the way I have no Devs team and no Marketing team i do my work on my own.

see you guys thanks for the wonderful comment.

[Miiike]

all of you is right, I know everyone here is investigating me its ok for me, yes its not nice that im not adding some cool stuff or some other things in my web.
do I need to put a lot of none sense things just to look that this project is legit? alot of project do that before and then what happen they run, scam and rug and pull.

This is my first project and beside do i need to put all of my information just to show that im legit person?

did other project do that?

a quick update i already submit my KYC to Distx to be part of their presale app and im waiting for their respond.

if my application is approved i will update all of you and eat your words that Im not a legit person!

I don't  beg or ask someone to join in my project.

and by the way I have no Devs team and no Marketing team i do my work on my own.

see you guys thanks for the wonderful comment.

Nice tantrum, err... I mean, speech. By the way, while we're waiting for your KYC to pass (I didn't know how reputable distx, by the way, but that's a different matter for different time), can you answer the math behind your token allocation? It was on my previous post on this thread.

[OXSIGN]

My total supply is 21,000

Pre-sale is 15000 and 10% of pre-sale is 1500 for private sale
60% of pre-sale will be liquidity and the rest is for farming!

hope it was clear for you if you any question i can answer if i have mistake i can correct.

[Miiike]

My total supply is 21,000

Pre-sale is 15000 and 10% of pre-sale is 1500 for private sale
60% of pre-sale will be liquidity and the rest is for farming!

hope it was clear for you if you any question i can answer if i have mistake i can correct.

Lord! I didn't know that my question was not obvious and clear enough. Here, let me break them by number and color:

You have 21,000 from total supply
From this number, 1,500 were for private sale, 19,500 remains unallocated from total supply
Next, 13,500 were for pre-sale (or token sale, given you don't have any other token sake after that, so the prefix "pre" were rather useless), 6,000 remains unallocated from total supply
Next, 6,000 were for farming. 0 remains unallocated from total supply.
Last, 60% of 13,500, or 8,100 were for liquidity pool. Where does it came from?

Here, the equation
total supply - private sale - pre-sale - farming - liquidity pool = 21,000 - 1,500 - 13,500 - 6,000 - 8,100 = -8,100

So which one's your plan?
A. Magic-ing 8,100 from thin air
B. Taking 8,100 from what people bought and locking them.

[OXSIGN]

yeah your right for the sake!

your good person in mathematics, but in reading i dont know

it is not clear that ? 10% of presale  will be in private sale?

21,000 total supply

15000 presale - 10% which is 1500 private-sale = 13500 will be in the pre-sale after 60% will be lock as liquidity
the remaining token will be in farming?

Where do you read that 1500 will be deducted in total supplies of 21,000?

Tell me?

[Miiike]

yeah your right for the sake!

your good person in mathematics, but in reading i dont know

it is not clear that ? 10% of presale  will be in private sale?

21,000 total supply

15000 presale - 10% which is 1500 private-sale = 13500 will be in the pre-sale after 60% will be lock as liquidity
the remaining token will be in farming?

You literally renders me speechless for a moment.

Here's the situation, yes I know and understand that you'll have 15,000 token for sale, and from it, 10% were for private sale. That is why I wrote your private sale to be 1,500, and presale to be 13,500 (15,000 - (15,000 x 10%) = 15,000 - 1,500 = 13,500). In total, there is 15,000 token for sale and 6,000 token will be for farming. These two took the entire allocation of total token supply, (15,000 + 6000 = 21,000).

So, from where do you allocate token for liquidity pool? Were you trying to say that 60% of the presale token will be locked? As in, people buy 1 eth worth of token, and only got 0.4 worth of token because the 0.6 will be forcefully taken from them to be locked on LP?

Where do you read that 1500 will be deducted in total supplies of 21,000?

Tell me?

This. Is. Where. You. Renders. Me. Speechless. The 1,500 token on private sale was not part of the total supply? The total supply??

[as9ardia]

~

He already changed the whitepaper 



Dear OP,
on another thread you said

yes its only me, that why i dont have Devs Token and Marketing Token.
its hard to accept that one man can do a project?
i do project before in tron project MLM matrix program
you can check it cryp-tron.io < webpage
with total participant right now is 5287
https://tronscan.org/#/contract/TKoW5KTiBFH9jqtSZY5zoHUhaEsnWrzeeS/code

You can proudly say that you can develop your project by yourself, even if you are proud to mention that your previous project had 5287 participants (although I'm not sure the intended participants are really participants or only token holders*). But seeing your conversation with Miike made me skeptical of your project.

[sukoyomi]

Is this a really serious project when the roadmap is too bad?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5291806.0

Not only the roadmap was bad, that only looks like a "line" without date, so we can't know when it should be completed or achieved, but I see the whitepaper that only have 8 pages, it's not something professional in my opinion. Unfortunately he said like this "by the way I have no Devs team and no Marketing team i do my work on my own" while he can hired someone to work with him to get something even better.

[serhammeg]

1% daily staking reward, 30% Monthly staking reward and 365% yearly staking reward - sounds a little strange but interesting

[Miiike]

~

He already changed the whitepaper 

And it was rather funny (borderline to suspicious) how the numbers were once again didn't match between the pages. I didn't know which fact is more disturbing: dev thought that he can change the tokenomics at will or dev didn't plan the whitepaper thoroughly (hence the fatal errors on the first place)

[as9ardia]

~
And it was rather funny (borderline to suspicious) how the numbers were once again didn't match between the pages. I didn't know which fact is more disturbing: dev thought that he can change the tokenomics at will or dev didn't plan the whitepaper thoroughly (hence the fatal errors on the first place)

considering that he's the only one who's developed this project, then he would like to say "why not"
to be honest, I'm even think it's not a whitepaper