Reputation: nullius is a cunt ✔

[arabspaceship123]

I don't know nillius except he's a cryptocurrencies technical genius. Some of nillius posts upset people but it could've been different if he'd accepted his mistake. You didn't try stealing private keys he misunderstood your intention.

You're polite and composed you haven't shown aggressive, offensive or shady attitude. I'm thinking you're forgiving so you'll be open if nillius came to say sorry.

Dear Nullius,
I waited for an extended period before answering this post, which is probably the first one I am addressing to you, and for sure, the last one.

I will not counter your reasoning on the specific matter of the accusation that I am running a vast operation aimed at stealing everyone's private keys for my personal profit.
This accusation is incomprehensible to me, and you are intelligent and knowledgeable. I am sure you will outsmart me in every possible discussion we have on this topic.

All the intervention of many users who spent their time in this very depressing drama should have made the situation pretty clear to you.
One, in particular, was spot on in explaining my feelings on that two-year-old post.

My interactions in this community were always aimed at improving my knowledge of bitcoin and exchanging my knowledge with others.
I made (a lot of) errors writing them, I made corrections, I had thoughtful exchanges with many members of this community, and for sure, I learned a lot.
Many times I have been corrected on many factual errors, inaccuracies, and superficialities in my posts, and I think I was always receptive to such corrections.
I think I never wrote anything where I had an aggressive, offensive or shady attitude toward any member of this community. And I am taking pride in this.

If you had any doubts you could have expressed in the thread, I would have been happy to discuss them with you. I could have even accepted making unnecessary amendments to the thread to reassure you about my intentions.

Instead, you let your action speak for yourself.

Let me have the same privilege.

Adieu.

[PowerGlove]

I just want to caution everyone to be gentle with nullius. My first impression of him was "WOW, what an insufferable know-it-all." but after going through some of his old posts it seems to me (just a guess, I'm no expert) that he's struggling with something personal (and has been for some time). He seems to deeply miss Lauda which I find kind of endearing. He also seems to be grasping at straws (like accusing fillippone). His mental state is probably more fragile than you realize and I don't think piling on is going to serve anyone.

Take the high road, and use the Ignore button until he finds himself again...

[GazetaBitcoin]

In the moment when fillppone received that incorrect feedback, he was on DT and, as a consequence, his feedback reflected on fillippone's Trust score.

That can't be: nullius is at DT1 (-12), and has been excluded for a long time. He was on your Trust list, which explains why you saw the negative feedback.

Ummm... I am not sure that I properly understand this... As far as I see, he was on DT at the reshuffle from August 1st, right? And this also confirmed by your post from the topic DefaultTrust changes. He does not appear there as removed, therefore this should mean he still was in DT (as he was previously elected at the reshuffle from July 1st)... Maybe I am not looking at the right data?

Besides that, even if he was not in DT1, at that moment he was in DT2, thus he was still able to influence the Trust score...

[LoyceV]

Ummm... I am not sure that I properly understand this... As far as I see, he was on DT at the reshuffle from August 1st, right?

Correct.

And this also confirmed by your post from the topic DefaultTrust changes.

Correct.

Maybe I am not looking at the right data?

You're looking at incomplete data: those 2 lists don't account for his DT-strength, which can be seen from Default trust breakdown: (-12). That means he has 12 more exclusions than inclusions, which effectively means he's not no DT1.

Besides that, even if he was not in DT1, at that moment he was in DT2, thus he was still able to influence the Trust score...

He'll (almost certainly) have more DT1 exclusions than inclusions when he's on DT2, so his feedback won't show up by default. Unless you add him to your own Trust list, that overrules DefaultTrust.

[GazetaBitcoin]

Oh, oh, I understand now. Thanks for explaining this, LoyceV!

[suchmoon]

Take the high road, and use the Ignore button until he finds himself again...

That's a good advice in most forum situations involving personal dislike, but when you ignore wordy trolls like nullius their posts without opposition suck out even more oxygen from the already barely breathable atmosphere here.

Ideally moderators should take care of attacks like the one on fillippone instead of forcing everyone to scroll through that BS in an otherwise interesting thread, but that's not how this forum works unfortunately.

As for personal issues, internet in general and this forum in particular is a bad place for people with mental problems. Particularly if the user is purposefully looking for conflict.

[Cryptotourist]

Particularly if the user is purposefully looking for conflict.

You reckon? Because I don’t.
The main difference nullius has from the bunch of you, is that his ethical compass and moral standards, are not negotiable.
His principles - are exactly that - principles, that he lives by - day in, day out.

“In the world of the blind, the one eyed man is the king”.
Better show some respect, where respect is due.

[suchmoon]

his ethical compass and moral standards, are not negotiable.

I doubt anyone cares to negotiate his "moral standards" of sockpuppeting trollfuckery. There is enough of that crap in this forum.

[JayJuanGee]

Particularly if the user is purposefully looking for conflict.

You reckon? Because I don’t.
The main difference nullius has from the bunch of you, is that his ethical compass and moral standards, are not negotiable.
His principles - are exactly that - principles, that he lives by - day in, day out.

“In the world of the blind, the one eyed man is the king”.
Better show some respect, where respect is due.

Oh gawd.. how much dick have you come back to suck Cryptotourist?

None of us should be put on such a high pedestal, and I am not even bashing on nullius because even I am going to concede that he had/has a decent number of great ideas and decently good ways of presenting his ideas, but he also seems to get into trouble because of his either not compromising on some issues and/or becoming a bit arrogant about some of his views, especially seeming to have difficulties when people call him names, such as calling him a cunt.. and he might not even be a cunt, but then his various reactions to this thread, ideas around this thread might have highlighted his inabilities to deal very well with criticisms, whether the criticisms are warranted or not..   ... and those are not necessarily positive characteristics in a forum when frequently we will need to account for the views of others and even to be able to deal with bad information, differences of opinions and/or people who might unwarrantly attack your ideas or to unwarrantly attack you personally...

[PowerGlove]

Particularly if the user is purposefully looking for conflict.

You reckon? Because I don’t.

I side with suchmoon on the whole "looking for conflict" thing, because when I wandered into this topic (with a little less experience than I have now) and naively stuck up for nullius (a few posts up), it somehow inspired him to leave me some pretty perplexing trust feedback. Still scratching my head over that one...

[Cryptotourist]

I doubt anyone cares to negotiate his "moral standards" of sockpuppeting trollfuckery. There is enough of that crap in this forum.

Speak for yourself.
And please don’t tell me that you’ve never had an alt account.

Oh gawd.. how much dick have you come back to suck Cryptotourist?

I don’t suck dick Jay. Men don’t suck dicks, only women and faggots suck dicks Jay, literally and metaphorically.
nullius doesn’t suck dick either, also literally and metaphorically.

So now that we’re clear that we’re both men, how do you suggest I express my respect to him, opposed to a bunch of faggots and women such as yourselve(s)?

I side with suchmoon on the whole "looking for conflict" thing, ~

But of course you do.

 

[DireWolfM14]

Oh gawd.. how much dick have you come back to suck Cryptotourist?

I don’t suck dick Jay. Men don’t suck dicks, only women and faggots suck dicks Jay, literally and metaphorically.
nullius doesn’t suck dick either, also literally and metaphorically.

Having grown up in an area known for it's homosexual population I have known a few men who readily admit to physically sucking dick, but I would not categorize as the type to suck metaphorical dick.  I've also known plenty of heterosexual men about whom I would say the exact opposite.  I've also known homosexuals who are rather indifferent about being labeled faggot, homo, flamer, or, for that matter, cock-sucker.  Because they are men, they are comfortable with who and what they are, so they consider slanderous phrases of those types as a reflection on those who utter them rather than a slight on themselves.

Anyway, sorry to veer off topic, as you were.

[JayJuanGee]

Oh gawd.. how much dick have you come back to suck Cryptotourist?

I don’t suck dick Jay. Men don’t suck dicks, only women and faggots suck dicks Jay, literally and metaphorically.
nullius doesn’t suck dick either, also literally and metaphorically.

So now that we’re clear that we’re both men, how do you suggest I express my respect to him, opposed to a bunch of faggots and women such as yourselve(s)?

For some reason, I missed your response until now, Cryptotourist.

Yes.  Even though you are in denial regarding the seeming "overboardedness" of the content of your post, you provided the categories for what I was trying to say.

In other words, it seems that I was referring to your "sucking dick" in a metaphorical way, not in a literal way.  

I was likely attempting to suggest that you seem to have had gone overboard in terms of "expressing your respect" to nullius, but hey perhaps I was being a wee bit too judgmental regarding how you choose to express yourself.  

In any event, I feel that I said more than enough on the topic.... maybe even, to some extent, regretting that I said anything.. and leave you to whatever level of fawning you determine to be "necessary" to the situation.  

Ditto in regards to DireWolfM14's statement - and "as you were soldier."  

[Cryptotourist]

Excellent replies, bravo!

I have nothing against homosexuality, it’s just not my cup of tea.
I have nothing against JJG wanting to suck miles long dicks, nor with any of the faggots involved in this thread for that matter.

But just to clarify.
When you’re consistently lying because of reasons, and you’re a biological male - you do not honour the driving force of a man, the ballsack - thus you must be a faggot. Whether you know it or not and regardless of sexual orientation at the time. Lying is in a woman’s nature not a man’s - and that’s by default. How do you think I know for sure that suchmoon is a woman? Because she is a talented liar.

As for you JJG, I don’t claim that you’re lying, but rather implying that you’re eager to experience anything outside of your digital realm.

[NotATether]

Lying is in a woman’s nature not a man’s - and that’s by default.

I dispute this part (or rather, both of these parts).

[Cryptotourist]

Lying is in a woman’s nature not a man’s - and that’s by default.

I dispute this part (or rather, both of these parts).

Knock yourself out.
Either you know shit about women, or you’re a very lucky man.

[digaran]

Deleting a post made you post this thread? This world is just moving train, not worth it to fight and hate on eachother, think about the destination. Some day we all have to answer for our actions, be careful what you do and be nice to others even if they hurt your feelings/ego, forgiving requires a big heart, showing forgiveness also shows how great you are as a person.