Bounty rewards

[coin-investor]

Since bounty hunters are being blamed for the projects price drop,
Why not ask the projects owner to pay the bounty reward in BTC or whatever the investors used to invest in their project?
They've promised their hunters a reward that has a total of $ value on their token/coin but they couldn't deliver it.
Wouldn't this kind of payment would solve both the investors and hunters problem?
The project price wouldn't dump after the reward has been given to the hunters and the hunters would get what has been promised to them.
I think the BM's could try and convince their clients for this kind of payment if they give it a try.

This has been asked so many times before and my answer is still the same, they do not have a budget for this they also rely on their IOU token to pay bounty hunters, why would they have to buy Bitcoin or Ethereum when they can use their own token to get free advertisement, they also do not trust their token to have a good value when it hit the market, so they want to keep all the coins they've got from their sales.

[Bitstar_coin]

Since bounty hunters are being blamed for the projects price drop,
Why not ask the projects owner to pay the bounty reward in BTC or whatever the investors used to invest in their project?
They've promised their hunters a reward that has a total of $ value on their token/coin but they couldn't deliver it.
Wouldn't this kind of payment would solve both the investors and hunters problem?
The project price wouldn't dump after the reward has been given to the hunters and the hunters would get what has been promised to them.
I think the BM's could try and convince their clients for this kind of payment if they give it a try.

HA!
HA!
HA!

So, most of the altcoin bounties don't have any money to pay promised amount in BTC, so they pay in their own token.
Basically they play the odds.... offer a bog bounty, and if the project pics up, they reduce payment, and if it fails, it's hunters fault.

What projects should do, is define a reasonable bounty pool, and expect reasonable results.

Very true, sometimes project owners give unrealistic reward to hunters and when the project becomes successful they find it difficult to pay, better they have a limited amount of reward pool or specified payment for each rank, by doing this there won't be any fear of dump from hunters because they don't have too many tokens at their disposal.

[Banulit]

Since bounty hunters are being blamed for the projects price drop,
Why not ask the projects owner to pay the bounty reward in BTC or whatever the investors used to invest in their project?
They've promised their hunters a reward that has a total of $ value on their token/coin but they couldn't deliver it.
Wouldn't this kind of payment would solve both the investors and hunters problem?
The project price wouldn't dump after the reward has been given to the hunters and the hunters would get what has been promised to them.
I think the BM's could try and convince their clients for this kind of payment if they give it a try.

This is really true that so lessen that blaming for the price dump which they always associated to the bounty hunter, it is really a good idea and method to give the rewards/payment for the work of every bounty hunters in terms of btc, eth or other stablecoins. In these way, the dumping scheme can be eliminated and I think its a Win-Win situation for all of us.

[NoG-NoG]

There are several threads with regards to this matter that is still not happening. There are a few bounty campaign (mostly about gambling) who uses bitcoin as mode of paying rewards which I think is good for their project. And if ever this kind of way the project developer consider paying every bounty hunter with some stablecoins it will really be a big help for them to eradicate the dumping of their own token.

[Maestro75]

Since bounty hunters are being blamed for the projects price drop,
Why not ask the projects owner to pay the bounty reward in BTC or whatever the investors used to invest in their project?
They've promised their hunters a reward that has a total of $ value on their token/coin but they couldn't deliver it.
Wouldn't this kind of payment would solve both the investors and hunters problem?
The project price wouldn't dump after the reward has been given to the hunters and the hunters would get what has been promised to them.
I think the BM's could try and convince their clients for this kind of payment if they give it a try.

I like this suggestion you made here. And it was that way with most projects running signature campaigns in 2017 and a few only running bounties. I do not know how all that changed and projects now all want to run bounties so they can cheat hunters out of their rewards and blame them later when project failed. I want managers to return to the past so that the cheating of hunters and blame can stop.

[fvb]

The offer is certainly good.  But I don't even know who will do this.  The projects themselves are happy to collect BTC and promote their company through investments.  So this is unlikely to suit the founders of the platform.  This is all described above, but I think that you yourself understand everything.

[gurunanakji777]

I somehow agree with you and in this way, investors or hunters problems will be solved but I believe it's practically tough to pay in Bitcoin or Ethereum because paying in their own token does not cost a lot to the dev that's why we get paid in project tokens.

[meldrio1]

BTC or stable coins for the bounty rewards that would be good for us as a hunter but I don't think that bounty managers can convince their clients to pay hunters a bitcoin. For sure the project team will prefer their own coin to pay to the hunters because they don't have money yet to pay bitcoin. We never know that one day their project will be successful and the coin has valuable.

[Anish02]

I think it would be a really good solution for all the bounty hunters as well as the team behind the project. Because after the token distribution projects team probably assume all the dumps have happened due to the bounty hunters but most of the time these projects failed to achieve their goal and hence their social token become useless neither project get succeeded nor hunter get decent reward work they have done. So we have to fix this issue as early as we could for the bounty hunter to make their work worthwhile.

[goddess116]

This is a fabulous suggesting，comparing to pay in project token，i prefer BTC or the other strong coin. But why pay in BTC rarely，may be the reason is just few project can afford to it.

[Lorokan]

Since bounty hunters are being blamed for the projects price drop,
Why not ask the projects owner to pay the bounty reward in BTC or whatever the investors used to invest in their project?
They've promised their hunters a reward that has a total of $ value on their token/coin but they couldn't deliver it.
Wouldn't this kind of payment would solve both the investors and hunters problem?
The project price wouldn't dump after the reward has been given to the hunters and the hunters would get what has been promised to them.
I think the BM's could try and convince their clients for this kind of payment if they give it a try.

Most project developers are cowards lol; some even struggle to pay community moderator charges in usdt not to mention bounty hunters; I think one problem they get faced is because team themselves do not believe in their project; this is why they promise $100 million for bounty hunters; and then scrabble and refuse payment when it is time to pay rewards because the token succeeded in price and value beyyond what the team expect.

[sayaya17]

It’s actually commonplace for developers and teams to blame bounty hunters if their coins fall when token first enter the market.
But it wasn’t entirely due to bounty hunter errors. Instead of that investors also have a role there, when they feel they have made a profit,
they will throw away their tokens. But bounty hunters are weak on this side. Very rare if there is a new project that will pay participants
with usd or altcoins such as eth. They mostly don’t have the funds for that. Unless you follow the bounty as I follow it.

[coinswebid]

Since bounty hunters are being blamed for the projects price drop,
Why not ask the projects owner to pay the bounty reward in BTC or whatever the investors used to invest in their project?
They've promised their hunters a reward that has a total of $ value on their token/coin but they couldn't deliver it.
Wouldn't this kind of payment would solve both the investors and hunters problem?
The project price wouldn't dump after the reward has been given to the hunters and the hunters would get what has been promised to them.
I think the BM's could try and convince their clients for this kind of payment if they give it a try.

for few project its already pay their hunters with bitcoin especially for signature campaign
but, for me, not all bounty hunters will sell their tokens as soon as they receive their rewards my friend
and sometimes a new project didn't have enough money to pay the rewards in bitcoin, so they pay with their tokens

[crzy]

There’s a lot of bounty rewards being paid in Btc and I believe those projects are willing to spend some money so they can get more from the future investors, they took risk first. On the side, those paying thru their tokens don’t want to carry all the risk and this is why they are sharing it to the bounty hunters in return of working with the project. Well, we can’t totally blame the hunters from the price drop this is an old saying of a failed project.

[Traderbtcc]

Since bounty hunters are being blamed for the projects price drop,
Why not ask the projects owner to pay the bounty reward in BTC or whatever the investors used to invest in their project?

The team of those projects don't have any money of their own that's why they decided to give you their token in exchange for the services you rendered, sometimes those tokens maybe turn out to be a gem or sometimes it's might just be another shit coin  that will be stuck in your wallet,it all depends on the how the project turn out to be.

They've promised their hunters a reward that has a total of $ value on their token/coin but they couldn't deliver it.

Sometimes after paying bounty hunters, most of the bounty hunters dump their reward that's why you don't always get the value they promised after distribution.

I think the BM's could try and convince their clients for this kind of payment if they give it a try.

Bounty managers are not responsible for the success of the project, although  BM's can be paid in BTC but for the bounty hunters nah, projects will most time prefer to pay in their own token.

[taufik0911]

There’s a lot of bounty rewards being paid in Btc and I believe those projects are willing to spend some money so they can get more from the future investors, they took risk first. On the side, those paying thru their tokens don’t want to carry all the risk and this is why they are sharing it to the bounty hunters in return of working with the project. Well, we can’t totally blame the hunters from the price drop this is an old saying of a failed project.

I really like projects that pay using ETH or BTC where they don't want to break the price of their token
like the experience that has been that some bounties who use their tokens too much for bounty rewards will experience a rapid price fall, this will be very confusing for investors

[Untomabur]

bounty prizes are not fixed, in the altcoin section the bounty prizes depend on the price of the coin,
if you compare it to the prizes from Bitcoin payments I would suggest that,
because if bounty payments use Bitcoin people will get prizes according to their work, and it's very effective.

[FanEagle]

This isn’t something that we should still be talking about by now, we have discussed this a lot of times here.
I don’t know why anyone would come and blame hunters, anyone blaming hunters for the price of tokens that fall is dumb asf.

Why would you be blaming hunters like it has anything to do with them? They were hired to work and after they finish working hard you expect them to not take the reward for their work because you think them taking it is the reason for the project falling? This is a complete dumb excuse. How about we blame the investors who will even pump the tokens and dump them later?

[Ratash]

Yes they should because the bounty hunters are doing everything they can to promote their projects but if the idea is not innovative and unfortunatly some of them fail due to different reasons the bounty hunters do not receive their rewards and that can have a negative impact on their future work. And also we've seen a lot of tokens that did not even hit the market or they got dumped just minutes after hitting the exchanges.

[Genemind]

Since bounty hunters are being blamed for the projects price drop,
Why not ask the projects owner to pay the bounty reward in BTC or whatever the investors used to invest in their project?
They've promised their hunters a reward that has a total of $ value on their token/coin but they couldn't deliver it.
Wouldn't this kind of payment would solve both the investors and hunters problem?
The project price wouldn't dump after the reward has been given to the hunters and the hunters would get what has been promised to them.
I think the BM's could try and convince their clients for this kind of payment if they give it a try.

HA!
HA!
HA!

So, most of the altcoin bounties don't have any money to pay promised amount in BTC, so they pay in their own token.
Basically they play the odds.... offer a bog bounty, and if the project pics up, they reduce payment, and if it fails, it's hunters fault.

What projects should do, is define a reasonable bounty pool, and expect reasonable results.

It's a favorable condition for project developers to pay in their own token, and you are correct, even if they even have money to pay in BTC they would rather spend their own token to pay for promotions, so the market will decide whether they paid nothing or just a little amount for their marketing.

In my own opinion, the bounty pool is just a piece of a chunk of the total supply of a certain project. The one who dumps once token is listed are early investors or the team.