If crowdfunding started from IEO

[Dariusburst]

I'm just curious, if IEO was the first crowdfunding that came out with full hype just like ICO in 2017 would there still be better trusts on new projects today? I believe that IEO delivers more trust through top exchanges and that's why they are still very much alive today compare to ICO, what do you say?

[1714884211]

1714884211

[1714884211]

1714884211

[1714884211]

1714884211

[1714884211]

1714884211

[TanakabZX]

I heard that IEO was around before ICO in 2017, people start switching to IEO after ICO projects are turning scam, at first no one cares about IEO but later IEO seem to be the only option left, moreover top exchanges are there to take the blame if anything goes wrong, unlike ICO where nothing stands between investors and tbe project

[GreatArkansas]

What I observed with IEO is, it can be lessen the scam projects, LESSEN only, I still believe that we can't totally remove all scam projects with any type of offering.
But in IEO, it can be more expensive for sure than ICO.
But I believe, if the project is really quality, investors will put their money in any type of offering, even it is just an ICO or IEO, I can say that because some of the projects that are quality indeed are done via ICO before.

[jessyj48]

People want some kind of assurance nowadays when in eating in new projects, ICO can't give that anymore since scammers took over but IEO is still standing strong because of this, top exchanges involvement clears every doubts for IEO fundraising, the trust is highly present

[Vaskiy]

What I observed with IEO is, it can be lessen the scam projects, LESSEN only, I still believe that we can't totally remove all scam projects with any type of offering.
But in IEO, it can be more expensive for sure than ICO.
But I believe, if the project is really quality, investors will put their money in any type of offering, even it is just an ICO or IEO, I can say that because some of the projects that are quality indeed are done via ICO before.

IEO was believed to lessen the scams, but things didn't happen as believed. As IEO were done through different launch platforms, project owners started to pay the exchanges. This way more scam exchanges and IEO got promoted through IEO and reached the market. This ruined the true value of IEO.

[Psynthax]

Gonna be the same situation as it is right now.
Even ICO is still alive you know and if IEO happen to be the first method of crowdfunding before ICO then there gonna be much more 3rd tier exchange created than what we have right now which in turn might be a lot more scamming rates with IEO

But, maybe ICO not gonna exist and be replaced by another crowdfunding method because security concern.

[SaRmY]

I'm just curious, if IEO was the first crowdfunding that came out with full hype just like ICO in 2017 would there still be better trusts on new projects today? I believe that IEO delivers more trust through top exchanges and that's why they are still very much alive today compare to ICO, what do you say?

I think there is no one in this market who cannot give us guarantees. Who will work. How much will toit or another product cost. I still think that cryptocurrency is poorly integrated into society. When wrapping meleards, it passes 95% of people. Even after many years, sometimes I continue to make investment mistakes. There is nothing to be done. IcO IEo Defi - no matter the name if the projects would work.

[coin-investor]

I'm just curious, if IEO was the first crowdfunding that came out with full hype just like ICO in 2017 would there still be better trusts on new projects today? I believe that IEO delivers more trust through top exchanges and that's why they are still very much alive today compare to ICO, what do you say?

Compared to ICO, IEO is more convenient for investors to invest, because the responsibility lies with the exchange, they also have a responsibility to their traders that they only accept project with good potential, but do not trust 100% do your research also not all project who did IEO are still profitable, there is still a risk, the volatility of the market should warn traders to always on watch.

[Lavander]

I'm just curious, if IEO was the first crowdfunding that came out with full hype just like ICO in 2017 would there still be better trusts on new projects today? I believe that IEO delivers more trust through top exchanges and that's why they are still very much alive today compare to ICO, what do you say?

It's true that ICO was the first crowdfunding and the IEO is much better since it has an assurance that it will be listed on the exchange site unlike the ICO where there's no assurance whether the coin will have any value.

[Coin_trader]

I'm just curious, if IEO was the first crowdfunding that came out with full hype just like ICO in 2017 would there still be better trusts on new projects today? I believe that IEO delivers more trust through top exchanges and that's why they are still very much alive today compare to ICO, what do you say?

By the time ICO become famous, there's a lot of issue about exchange being hack or turn into scam so if IEO starts first before ICO, I believe the result will be worst and tons of investors of money will be loss. By that time, there is no funds insurance on exchange so if exchange hacked and loss tons of traders money. That loss will never recover so I believe ICO is better to come first so that the exchange become established by the time IEO introduced.

[safari88]

I'm just curious, if IEO was the first crowdfunding that came out with full hype just like ICO in 2017 would there still be better trusts on new projects today? I believe that IEO delivers more trust through top exchanges and that's why they are still very much alive today compare to ICO, what do you say?

yes that's true IEO is much better than the ICO most of the coin from ICO wasn't listed on the exchange and ended up as a scam. well it's one of the effective way to give security to the investors i've seen a lot of scams before on ICO.

[Jating]

I'm just curious, if IEO was the first crowdfunding that came out with full hype just like ICO in 2017 would there still be better trusts on new projects today? I believe that IEO delivers more trust through top exchanges and that's why they are still very much alive today compare to ICO, what do you say?

That's the only main difference, IEO was launch from reputable exchanges, but that's it. At the end of the day, just the same, hype, then investors flock to buy to push the price massively and then follow by a huge dump. And then delisted by the exchange that launch them, how ironic.

So nothing has change really, and probably the same people behind the ICO hype are the same people who created the hype around IEO in late 2019 to early 2020. Now we have the next hype, Uniswap and Defi.

[ScamViruS]

I'm just curious, if IEO was the first crowdfunding that came out with full hype just like ICO in 2017 would there still be better trusts on new projects today? I believe that IEO delivers more trust through top exchanges and that's why they are still very much alive today compare to ICO, what do you say?

yes that's true IEO is much better than the ICO most of the coin from ICO wasn't listed on the exchange and ended up as a scam. well it's one of the effective way to give security to the investors i've seen a lot of scams before on ICO.

IEO has also been misused by many exchanges. Most IEO creates hype in the market for a while and dumps the coins and goes into a very bad condition. In doing so, subsequent buyers have incurred huge losses. So I think any offering ICO/IEO is a trap for retail investors. And the IEOs of the top exchanges are different. The problem here is whether you can invest in the ieo of the top exchange. Because it is not an easy task to participate in IEO in a big exchange, it is very difficult to invest in that Ieo.

[slashz9]

the advantage is that the IEO guarantees that the project will be listed on the exchange where they hold the IEO. ico is also still used in several projects that raise funds, although not as much or as less than the IEO

[Beparanf]

I'm just curious, if IEO was the first crowdfunding that came out with full hype just like ICO in 2017 would there still be better trusts on new projects today? I believe that IEO delivers more trust through top exchanges and that's why they are still very much alive today compare to ICO, what do you say?

By the time ICO become famous, there's a lot of issue about exchange being hack or turn into scam so if IEO starts first before ICO, I believe the result will be worst and tons of investors of money will be loss. By that time, there is no funds insurance on exchange so if exchange hacked and loss tons of traders money. That loss will never recover so I believe ICO is better to come first so that the exchange become established by the time IEO introduced.

You have a point here. During become hit during 2017, Many exchange exit scam like CCEX, Cryptopia and many more. So if IEO introduced earlier maybe many project will be bankrupt since most there funds still there. If that multiple exchange exit scam happened. There will be a huge trust issue on exchange and cryptocurrency in general until today. Mt.Gox is the best sample why crypto user don't trust anymore CEX.

[pungopete468]

the advantage is that the IEO guarantees that the project will be listed on the exchange where they hold the IEO. ico is also still used in several projects that raise funds, although not as much or as less than the IEO

Even if the exchange is guaranteed if the project is not good enough no one will buy the coin and no one will be interested on the project and in result even if the coin is listed the coin has no value at all since the project is not good.

[Akiko]

I'm just curious, if IEO was the first crowdfunding that came out with full hype just like ICO in 2017 would there still be better trusts on new projects today? I believe that IEO delivers more trust through top exchanges and that's why they are still very much alive today compare to ICO, what do you say?

.
Its depend on the exchange where you will list your crowdfunding even you make an IEO if you only list in unpopular exchange you will not have a good result . Exchange like binance if you want to have successfull funding of your project . Trust of the exchange is the main issue why there are so many people don't use other exchange and doesn't get enough fundings.

[WalkerIVIV]

I'm just curious, if IEO was the first crowdfunding that came out with full hype just like ICO in 2017 would there still be better trusts on new projects today? I believe that IEO delivers more trust through top exchanges and that's why they are still very much alive today compare to ICO, what do you say?

it's wrong, the majority of major coins have been coming from the ico. I remember about ethereum ico in 2014. There are so many IEO projects already dead. You should not put IEO will determine anything. If you are looking for the fast profit and then IEO could be the best answer but it's not about the successful of project itself.
So many coins in top 100 came from the ICOS.

[john_nautica]

the advantage is that the IEO guarantees that the project will be listed on the exchange where they hold the IEO. ico is also still used in several projects that raise funds, although not as much or as less than the IEO

Even if the exchange is guaranteed if the project is not good enough no one will buy the coin and no one will be interested on the project and in result even if the coin is listed the coin has no value at all since the project is not good.

You are right it still depends on the project not because it is listed on exchange it is a good project since anytime projects can leave or dump the project and the coins will be worthless instantly there's still always a risk either it is ICO or IEO.

[Chuky92]

I'm just curious, if IEO was the first crowdfunding that came out with full hype just like ICO in 2017 would there still be better trusts on new projects today? I believe that IEO delivers more trust through top exchanges and that's why they are still very much alive today compare to ICO, what do you say?

That is true, had it been IEO was around before ICO I believe there will be lesser scam projects and lesser exit scams. ICO gave many scammers and many fraudulent projects the opportunity to raise funds easily and also abandon the project easily. Also, ICO gave project teams the liberty to list on whatever exchange they want and mostly small exchanges, just to fulfill their obligations and then abandon the project. But in the case of IEO, it was entirely different, that is, investors have the opportunity to decide based on the type of exchange since it was seen that, IEO on top exchanges comes from reliable projects. Also, in IEO, project team can't easily exit scam unless it is on questionable exchanges, since investors will already have their tokens before trading starts.
Last but not the least, IEO gave investors the choice of becoming holders or not, unlike in ICO where they are forced into holding their tokens because of no exchange or low price.
However, irrespective of the bad experiences with ICO, there are still major projects today which did ICO and the platform still functioning till today. On the other hand, there are still IEO projects that are dead, but in all ramifications, IEO is far better.