Bitcoin Forum
June 15, 2024, 06:35:55 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: If crowdfunding started from IEO  (Read 258 times)
kpierce77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1002


View Profile
December 11, 2020, 10:13:41 AM
 #41

The major difference that it would have made is to reduce the scam rate that people suffered and also make it easy to tract and hunt anyone that tries to exit scam because an exchange is involved.
Yes, they have both responsibilities and ties to the exchange. although not all exchanges are the same credibility, at least by looking at which exchange the project will do IEO, we can distinguish the quality of the project. here we can see that IEOs are safer and also have a clearer structure in crowdfunding
bayu7adi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 545

dont be greedy


View Profile WWW
December 11, 2020, 10:52:27 AM
 #42

IEOs still exist because of projects launched using an exchange platform, they tend to have done a better job of gaining the trust of large exchangers. The better the exchanger that offers IEO, the higher the level of confidence in the related project.

Investors must also know that there is a special struggle to be able to work to raise funds through IEO. So that project developers who do crowdfunding through IEO get better trust than the crowdfunding method through ICO
Warkop
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 270


Vave.com - Crypto Casino


View Profile
December 11, 2020, 12:02:53 PM
 #43

You are right that IEOs are better than ICOs, since last 2017, I noticed that in current projects no one uses IEOs and most of these new projects use more DeFi than current IEOs, because DeFi is in vogue and most investors judge that projects that use the DeFi concept will be successful in the future, therefore IEO is no longer used for all projects. However, in my opinion, IEO is still very suitable to be used for all projects, it's just that for now the IEO is no longer popular with investors because it is no longer in great demand.

imstillthebest
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 122


View Profile
December 11, 2020, 12:09:52 PM
 #44

whats the difference ? ico do also contribute big in the crypto world because the ico hype brings many people to join here but if that happens to ieo where it will start first before ico will you think the same thing can happen ?

 you will reply yes because you think ieo is good but we are talking about before where most exchange arent good enough than today , that can impact on the performance of ieo and if ico came second i think its effect are also going to be different , maybe the crypto dominance is still low by now .
fia_naila
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 258


The Standart Protocol - Solving Inflation


View Profile
December 11, 2020, 12:22:52 PM
 #45

I'm just curious, if IEO was the first crowdfunding that came out with full hype just like ICO in 2017 would there still be better trusts on new projects today? I believe that IEO delivers more trust through top exchanges and that's why they are still very much alive today compare to ICO, what do you say?

Basicly IEO is just the same thing like ICO, the different is when you want to launch IEO you need to pay a lot of money to exchange, and people think when project doing IEO its proof the project also have back up money. For example : if you want to do IEO at hinance probably you need to pay $1million ti binance. Also if you launch IEO on binance your token also automatically listed on binance.

Decentralized
Asset-Backed Banking

  ▄▄██████████████████
 █████████████████████
█████▀▀
████▀    ████
████     ████
████     ████
         ████     ████
         ████    ▄████
               ▄▄█████
█████████████████████
██████████████████▀▀ 
TheStandard.io█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████
█████████████████▀▀  ███████
█████████████▀▀      ███████
█████████▀▀   ▄▄     ███████
█████▀▀    ▄█▀▀     ████████
█████████ █▀        ████████
█████████ █ ▄███▄   ████████
██████████████████▄▄████████
████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████
bison
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 778
Merit: 100


SmartFi - EARN, LEND & TRADE


View Profile
December 11, 2020, 12:46:34 PM
 #46

The major difference that it would have made is to reduce the scam rate that people suffered and also make it easy to tract and hunt anyone that tries to exit scam because an exchange is involved.
I think it's not a difference, but a new strategy to make investors believe in the project, but in this case the investors are also smart enough to give their trust to the project, even though the strategy made by the team is quite telling.
for now, it is not enough to attract investors. but how to make investors really believe is difficult for a new project to get. They are serious and committed to market planning that will earn investors confidence. We certainly know how the current investor orientation is, of course, the focus is on the market, not only on product development.

Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!