Honestly, I did not read why loyce decided to oppose
It literally shows at the top of my OP:
even if I think it deserves the flag for the inconvenience it may have caused.
Have you read
the Flag description?
artsidim alleged the following, but later withdrew it: MyCryptoMixer violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. MyCryptoMixer did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around November 2020. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.
The victim was
made whole and forgave the act.
With that, Supporting the Flag is no longer in line with theymos' Trust Flag guidelines:
Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements. If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP. People who are habitually wrong, even not knowingly, should also be removed.
I am quite unsure if I've done correct. Because, yes mycryptomixer may have resolved it, but still inconvenience of this kind is worth a flag, especially for mixer services.
Inconvenience is
not worth a Flag once resolved.
Sorry if I'm struggling to make sense. Or should I just delete my opinion coz its unclear for me?
I think that's the best solution
