Any results for RX 6900 XT ?

[batsonxl]

Hello everyone.

Today is 8Dec 2020, it is 6900xt release date, so did anyone got one those and tested on mining? Who are these lucky people share please your experience.

[sakmsb]

Hello everyone.

Today is 8Dec 2020, it is 6900xt release date, so did anyone got one those and tested on mining? Who are these lucky people share please your experience.

It would be same as 6800/6800 XT. Don't except anything more.

[rdbase]

As said above, it looks like the 6800xt are identical to the 6900xt except it is a higher binned silicon so it will overclock more stable than the prior release version.
The number of compute units should offer more hashrate but only by fine margins. Much like the 570 vs 580 it all depends on your overclocks used to gain 1-1.5Mh/s more.

[rdluffy]

As said above, it looks like the 6800xt are identical to the 6900xt except it is a higher binned silicon so it will overclock more stable than the prior release version.
The number of compute units should offer more hashrate but only by fine margins. Much like the 570 vs 580 it all depends on your overclocks used to gain 1-1.5Mh/s more.

The first video of 6900xt I think: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcZzc8D2cvQ

62 to 64Mhs, as you said, only a few Mhs more

So, we have to wait for some bios mod to do some magic on these 6800 and 6900 series, but none of these cards are what we expect, AMD did this series of cards to gamers
Probably will gain a few extra Mhs with miners update, drivers, some tweaks and eventually bios mod, but I expect maximum of 3 or 5 Mhs

[alikait]

As said above, it looks like the 6800xt are identical to the 6900xt except it is a higher binned silicon so it will overclock more stable than the prior release version.
The number of compute units should offer more hashrate but only by fine margins. Much like the 570 vs 580 it all depends on your overclocks used to gain 1-1.5Mh/s more.

The first video of 6900xt I think: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcZzc8D2cvQ

62 to 64Mhs, as you said, only a few Mhs more

So, we have to wait for some bios mod to do some magic on these 6800 and 6900 series, but none of these cards are what we expect, AMD did this series of cards to gamers
Probably will gain a few extra Mhs with miners update, drivers, some tweaks and eventually bios mod, but I expect maximum of 3 or 5 Mhs

BBT just did a video, looks like barely optimized hits 89!

[philipma1957]

As said above, it looks like the 6800xt are identical to the 6900xt except it is a higher binned silicon so it will overclock more stable than the prior release version.
The number of compute units should offer more hashrate but only by fine margins. Much like the 570 vs 580 it all depends on your overclocks used to gain 1-1.5Mh/s more.

The first video of 6900xt I think: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcZzc8D2cvQ

62 to 64Mhs, as you said, only a few Mhs more

So, we have to wait for some bios mod to do some magic on these 6800 and 6900 series, but none of these cards are what we expect, AMD did this series of cards to gamers
Probably will gain a few extra Mhs with miners update, drivers, some tweaks and eventually bios mod, but I expect maximum of 3 or 5 Mhs

BBT just did a video, looks like barely optimized hits 89!

links please.

[P00P135]

just the normal 65 the 83MH was a bug he couldnt replicate.

[Metroid]

Infinity Cache = not good for mining, the good thing, will be plenty of these 6800 for gamers, miners will not buy any gpu with infinity cache. I guess nvidia will be the only choice for miners cause i think amd will keep using cache instead of raw memory performance. AMD gpus are done for mining, even the low end will come with it, so amd will always use crap gddr6 + cache.

Where I live 3080 and 3070 are easily being bought with 2 x msrp price, 6800 and 6800 xt are not selling at all, people are paying $1100 for the 3080, not paying $1050 for the 6800 xt. The interesting thing here is, the 16gb on 6800 xt is making no difference at all.

I wonder what will be the excuse for gamers when there are no 3080 to be sold and plenty of 6800 and they still complaining about it.

The reality here is people want multi task gpus, better buy a gpu which can do everything like 3080 than the 6800 which can do gaming and nothing else.

[alikait]

As said above, it looks like the 6800xt are identical to the 6900xt except it is a higher binned silicon so it will overclock more stable than the prior release version.
The number of compute units should offer more hashrate but only by fine margins. Much like the 570 vs 580 it all depends on your overclocks used to gain 1-1.5Mh/s more.

The first video of 6900xt I think: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcZzc8D2cvQ

62 to 64Mhs, as you said, only a few Mhs more

So, we have to wait for some bios mod to do some magic on these 6800 and 6900 series, but none of these cards are what we expect, AMD did this series of cards to gamers
Probably will gain a few extra Mhs with miners update, drivers, some tweaks and eventually bios mod, but I expect maximum of 3 or 5 Mhs

BBT just did a video, looks like barely optimized hits 89!

links please.

https://twitter.com/BitsBeTrippin/status/1336416481454731280?s=19

[alikait]

just the normal 65 the 83MH was a bug he couldnt replicate.

You're thinking of the 6800xt, the 6900xt does 87 stock. look at my previous post.

[mak013]

just the normal 65 the 83MH was a bug he couldnt replicate.

You're thinking of the 6800xt, the 6900xt does 87 stock. look at my previous post.

I`m not sure that 87MH is a stock. But in anyway we have to wait about several months to get new drivers, to study flashing, to unblock BIOS, etc. Right now 1660ti, 5600XT, 3060ti are the best choice by their ROI.

[P00P135]

just the normal 65 the 83MH was a bug he couldnt replicate.

You're thinking of the 6800xt, the 6900xt does 87 stock. look at my previous post.

You have to be some kind of stupid to think a 6900xt is doing 87stock.  As I said before it was a bug he couldnt replicate.

[Metroid]

just the normal 65 the 83MH was a bug he couldnt replicate.

You're thinking of the 6800xt, the 6900xt does 87 stock. look at my previous post.

1 video showing 87 and other videos showing 65, on the video that showed 87, the guy got just one time, failed other attempts, must have been a bug or some sort.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMYRXrE2yhw

You have to be some kind of stupid to think a 6900xt is doing 87stock.  As I said before it was a bug he couldnt replicate.

That is called desperation, they want it to do 87 and if you say it was a bug, it can't do, they deny reality, reality hurts them.

[aclass]

I'm just wondering ... why the bugs always happen to BBT and then he can't reproduce?

[Metroid]

I'm just wondering ... why the bugs always happen to BBT and then he can't reproduce?

That is a good question, it reminds me of some people posting rx 580 doing 45 mhs plus and scamming people with said magical bios mod.

[P00P135]

I'm just wondering ... why the bugs always happen to BBT and then he can't reproduce?

I don't know its weird, but if you watch the youtube stream you can see it doesnt break 65MH and the power draw is kind of nuts making the 5XXX and 3060Ti the best options currently.  My guess is the 6XXX is crippled by drivers and he's able to get a glimpse at what i should be able to do with a bug in the drivers.

[aclass]

But if 6900 XT is able to get that with it's 256-bit memory interface, then how much will 3060 Ti be able to do with the same type of memory and interface.

I'm just wondering ... why the bugs always happen to BBT and then he can't reproduce?

I don't know its weird, but if you watch the youtube stream you can see it doesnt break 65MH and the power draw is kind of nuts making the 5XXX and 3060Ti the best options currently.  My guess is the 6XXX is crippled by drivers and he's able to get a glimpse at what i should be able to do with a bug in the drivers.

[rdbase]

just the normal 65 the 83MH was a bug he couldnt replicate.

You're thinking of the 6800xt, the 6900xt does 87 stock. look at my previous post.

You have to be some kind of stupid to think a 6900xt is doing 87stock.  As I said before it was a bug he couldnt replicate.

During the livestream done last night having the two 6900xt in the see thru case on the test bench, he mentions amd drivers are causing issues with the mining and it is not stable at these numbers given for any amount of time.
Sound familiar from the previous gen cards a year ago? Gamers complaining their 5700xt would give a black screen in the middle of game play. Multiple driver updates later, amd had finally fixed the problem and so the 5700 line of cards were stable enough to game on thus stable enough to mine with going full boar 24/7.

Side note, he says if these cards were to work at a good 80-90 mh/s then they would with some amount of 'trickery' involved possibly with the infinity cache or whatever it is causing the dual streams.
He stated he will eventually have it running on a pool and provide the mining pool address so everyone will be able to follow it's progress for themselves once it is stable enough to do so.

[rdbase]

BBT just did a video, looks like barely optimized hits 89!

links please.

Full video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMYRXrE2yhw

I jumped in the tail end of the stream while it was still in progress but the results of their test was what really interested me and not the gaming performance of these cards.

[alikait]

just the normal 65 the 83MH was a bug he couldnt replicate.

You're thinking of the 6800xt, the 6900xt does 87 stock. look at my previous post.

You have to be some kind of stupid to think a 6900xt is doing 87stock.  As I said before it was a bug he couldnt replicate.

Seriously? Don't resort to name calling for no reason, I stated what I saw, posted my sources and because I didn't have the hardware to test it myself I took what he said at face value.  You have to be some kind of stupid to think that you're smarter than everyone else because you're posting on a forum. Done with this community and it's followers, y'all toxic af.