KRACH´S PARLAYS - GET RICH WITH PARLAY BETS ACCA MULTI BET BOOM 10000% WIN!!!!

[krach]

Now that I have your attention Im going to post my parlays here. Comment about if you think they will hit, what your parlays are and if you think parlays are even worth it.

Here is the one I have open now:




KEEP IN MIND....

THREE PARALYS

1 MISSED BY ONE PICK

SECOND HIT!

ONE OPEN

total risk 25$ (with one open parlay)

Total win 383$


You can find me in the telegram sports betting community http://t.me/sportsbet
........



THIS ONE LOST

[1715443948]

1715443948

[1715443948]

1715443948

[1715443948]

1715443948

[Saint-loup]

LOL are you kidding ? You really think you can win that bet? You have 99% chances to lose it.
This kind of parlays is not sport betting, it's pure gambling.

[Darker45]

Well, I like your subject. It indeed got my attention! Very quickly!

But, just like what I was suspecting, I'm going to be somewhat disappointed. But I'm still surprised! Why the heck would you parlay your bets with odds as high as 3.30, 3.85, 4.20, and so forth?

Make no mistake, I know nothing about the teams on which you placed bets but I am in high doubts that this parlay will turn out positive. But I'm still wishing you extreme luck. You really need it this time!

[krach]

LOL are you kidding ? You really think you can win that bet? You have 99% chances to lose it.
This kind of parlays is not sport betting, it's pure gambling.

No I am not kidding, explain to us how this is more "gambling" than taking a single bet.

It is like saying "why would you play bitcoin dice with 99% odds, you should always do 51%!!!!"

But, just like what I was suspecting, I'm going to be somewhat disappointed. But I'm still surprised! Why the heck would you parlay your bets with odds as high as 3.30, 3.85, 4.20, and so forth?

Because it is easier to predict and find value in a few events as opposed to many events. I prefer one 4.20 bet vs. 10 1.25 bets, with 1.25 I need to be right 9 out of 10 times to make any profit. Wtih 4.20 I need to be right 3 times out of 10 to be in profit. Just a little back of the napkin math.



BTW

Gladbach REKT my ACCA

[krach]

Here is my new pleb ACCA

It is for a promo, the rules are that you have to bet asian total, no pushes, no cashouts
must be at least 8x and have at least one EL game

[Yogee]

Just two games in and your multibet is already over hehe. I kind of agree with Darker45 on including odds with over 3 in a parlay. It's not our business how you bet but I'm also wondering why you would do matches on different dates.

Your second multi is the complete opposite of the first. I hope you get it this time.

[krach]

Just two games in and your multibet is already over hehe. I kind of agree with Darker45 on including odds with over 3 in a parlay. It's not our business how you bet but I'm also wondering why you would do matches on different dates.

REKT before RICH

Notice that a "normal odd" bet is the one that killed the slip.

Everyone feel free to post your parlays in this thread too!

[swogerino]

I hope you get rich with parlays but that looks like an utopia here as a big parlay with big odds is hit rarely if hit at all.I have seen people playing parlays with 10 games with a max odd for a game 1.15 and lose this kind of bet.This shows how difficult it is to become rich with parlays.

[bitbollo]

it's very hard to predict 7 or more games in same parlay even with low odds.
if you are searching a profit, you should try to change your playing style or you will lose for sure in the long run.
if you are playing in order to get some bonus, the idea isn't to bad, but with 0 or minimal chance to win, this is just a waste of time...

[Ucy]

Lol, your "get rich" and prize money headline wasn't what  attracted me, just thought it was a new topic I probably haven't commented on before.
Hope you do your selections based deep knowledge about the teams past/current performance and fitness. There would be factors to consider like weathers,, foods, and other things that could affect the players.

[janggernaut]

There is no any problem with parlays games, doesn't matter how big your odds or your matches (idk how many max matches allowed on stake, but on other site i've ever known were 13 bets in 1 parlay). I had a friend who won 1 btc from parlay bets, he was betting with 0.001 btc at 1000 odds (i saw it by myself he got his winnings), so it's not impossible to win huge amount from parlays.

But, what misleading people on here is your title, saying 10,000% win, obviously it's like a joke since you can't be sure you can always win in each parlay you have picked.

[madnessteat]

You are a very risky person if in the first match you decided to bet on Lokomotiv Moscow and not on Bayern Munich. I know for a fact that the Russians can never make a better car than the Germans and play soccer.

I bet a few times on multi betting, but then gave up the idea because none of the games led me to victory.

[Darker45]

But, just like what I was suspecting, I'm going to be somewhat disappointed. But I'm still surprised! Why the heck would you parlay your bets with odds as high as 3.30, 3.85, 4.20, and so forth?

Because it is easier to predict and find value in a few events as opposed to many events. I prefer one 4.20 bet vs. 10 1.25 bets, with 1.25 I need to be right 9 out of 10 times to make any profit. Wtih 4.20 I need to be right 3 times out of 10 to be in profit. Just a little back of the napkin math.

I'm afraid the math would prove to be wrong if high bets are bundled up together with relatively low bets in a 6-game parlay.

You seem to be chasing the big money here. I know you understand that you have to hurdle very high risks in order to get there. And probably in a hundred attempt like this, you're lucky if you succeed once. I'd be glad to hear success stories from you with this betting strategy of yours.

Well, your money your betting style. To each his own.

And, by the way, I also placed a little bet on the particular match with the highest odds. I'm just amazed at how confident you are in including a bet with 4.20 odds in a 6-game parlay. You could have set it aside and placed a separate bet on it to reduce the risk. Oh well...

[NotATether]

You're supposed to make money through incremental small bets, not with a few large bets. The former will give you small profit over a given amount of time (but goes up as time increases) but the second will put you at a loss of more money very quickly.

You have an 11% chance of winning your second parlay. It's better than your first one which had 0.375% chance of winning. No seriously, you can calculate the probabilities by so dividing 1 over your odds, and these are the results.

I recommend taking a maximum of 3.2x odds per bet, with a 31.25% chance of winning. This gives you a realistic chance of winning your bet sometimes. But your parlays should have combined odds between 2.4 and 1.7 odds for the the best chance of winning a decent amount, from my own analysis.

[krach]

You're supposed to make money through incremental small bets, not with a few large bets. The former will give you small profit over a given amount of time (but goes up as time increases) but the second will put you at a loss of more money very quickly.

No you are supposed to do it how you want.

You do indeed have to adjust the stake. The lower the odds the less volitile your bankroll is, it does not however it does not mean "a loss of money very quickly".

[tokeweed]

^ ^  And you're supposed to have a proper bankroll to weather the storm to begin with.  It's standard practice to make 1 unit = 1% of your total BR.  So if you make 100 USD bets, you would need 10k USD.

The requirement is huge, that's why some people start building their BR by playing poker at small stakes because the requirements are just ok.  Like around 20 - 30 buy ins at any given stake.  

[hahay]

You are a very risky person if in the first match you decided to bet on Lokomotiv Moscow and not on Bayern Munich. I know for a fact that the Russians can never make a better car than the Germans and play soccer.

I bet a few times on multi betting, but then gave up the idea because none of the games led me to victory.

If you pay attention, the two early matches did not produce a profit, even if he made a single bet. Lokomotiv Moscow (2), the final result is 2-0 Munich wins and means the bet (push). Monchengladbach (1), the end result is 2-0 Madrid win and means the bet is clear (lose).
Then, OP makes a new bet with an Over-Under bet but look at the odds there.
I'm just wondering what odds are you looking for, because when you only choose odds of 1.1x, 1.2x then it can be said to be a safe bet but strangely, you are still entering odds of 1.5x, 1.9x and I don't think there's a strategy that you apply there, maybe can be say you only make random bets. Be careful because it is a gambling habit that you should change.

Here is my new pleb ACCA

It is for a promo, the rules are that you have to bet asian total, no pushes, no cashouts
must be at least 8x and have at least one EL game

[Bttzed03]

Too many analysis/computations on odds or whatever  

Whatever analysis you come up it, you are still betting. Your odds of winning could be higher or lower but there's still that element of surprise. Just play it however you want it. You can mix it up based on stats or just based on your gut feel but make sure you're not risking everything.

^ ^  And you're supposed to have a proper bankroll to weather the storm to begin with.  It's standard practice to make 1 unit = 1% of your total BR.  So if you make 100 USD bets, you would need 10k USD.

I couldn't agree more.

Some people have a different strategy like if they win their first bet, then they have money to spare for parlays with over 10 or more odds.

[NotATether]

You're supposed to make money through incremental small bets, not with a few large bets. The former will give you small profit over a given amount of time (but goes up as time increases) but the second will put you at a loss of more money very quickly.

No you are supposed to do it how you want.

When you are wagering on large units like the ones you've shown, your chances of winning it are low. That is how the probabilities work. That's why it's better to e.g. make 4 single 2.0x (possibly each of them parlayed) bets than a single 8x bet. The difference here is having a bunch of 50% bet vs a 12.5% bet. From a gambling point of view here scenarios look exactly equivalent but the extra confidence in sports betting comes from taking advantage of human error which increases your chances of winning some of the singles by an arbitrary percentage.

For example you can take note that in one of the upcoming matches, one of the teams easily gets red cards, and in another match, another team usually scores less than a certain number of goals, and sports bettors can get better odds from those matches with this information.

Whereas if you put all your eggs in one match, you only get one chance to estimate human error.

Most gamblers play at sportsbooks to make money (of course there is also the fun element). Nobody's stopping you from playing consistently with high odds it's just that you will lose money more often. If you can afford the risk then great! There's no problem.

You do indeed have to adjust the stake. The lower the odds the less volitile your bankroll is, it does not however it does not mean "a loss of money very quickly".

I disagree about adjusting stake. Keeping your stake fixed keeps your units won constant but it also keeps your units lost constant and allows you to survive dozens of lost bets without going bust. And I should clarify that constant stakes is what I meant when I said "small increments".

Again, if you put a larger than usual amount of stake on a bet thinking it's going to win (and a lot of the time it doesn't), that single bet puts you down by a ton of units and it'll take several more bets with lower stakes to bring you back to break-even point.

[ReiMomo]

I'm not confident that the strategy you are using will make you win in the end.

I guess at some point it can make you win but that is only because of luck. The way you place your wager with parlays is absolutely against the teaching of probability and the 10000% win that you are saying may turn into 10000% loss for numbers and math will never deceived us in fact they can be of great help and useful in positioning our gambling strategies.

However, if you are confident about this and you found excitement in it then you may do so besides for me gambling is for fun and entertainment just always bear in mind to bet only the amount that you can afford to lose.