Is Base protocol trying to rip bounty hunters

[gaston castano]

I don't know for sure but it can't be assumed that the project was really not being taken care of. maybe the manager has already made a spreadsheet summary at another place and hasn't had time to update the existing spreadsheet. but when viewed from the duration which is more than 7 weeks. Then people will think that they will not be paid or the project is bad.

[harapan]

I don't know for sure but it can't be assumed that the project was really not being taken care of. maybe the manager has already made a spreadsheet summary at another place and hasn't had time to update the existing spreadsheet. but when viewed from the duration which is more than 7 weeks. Then people will think that they will not be paid or the project is bad.

even if they make a new summary spreadsheet it must be announced because the bounty manager and hunter must be transparent because bounty hunters also want to see the results of their work while supporting the campaign

[South Park]

I don't know why people seems to be making noise about this, remember Radix bounty when the team decided to just come ou with token distribution and not with the final stake and when the team was asked we were told to just shut up and take it. Until people start demanding that this project be held accountable to their initial agreement there is no way to go around this. If a project can't be trusted with issue like bounty, why would I trust them to do what they promised they wanted to do.

Does this help? Never seen that after demanding something, relationship between hunters and the project become better. It is easy to find out those who “demand” in spreadsheet, kick them first and let others wait or leave free to go.

I think he is talking more in a general sense than anything, bounty hunters are abused all the time by campaigns managers without reputation, it is because of this that I recommend bounty hunters to not join any bounty unless the manager has its own reputation at stake and has been in the forum doing that for years, otherwise it is extremely easily for those managers to abuse their position and power without being held accountable because in the case they do they will just create another account and keep abusing bounty hunters.

[oHnK]

I think he is talking more in a general sense than anything, bounty hunters are abused all the time by campaigns managers without reputation, it is because of this that I recommend bounty hunters to not join any bounty unless the manager has its own reputation at stake and has been in the forum doing that for years, otherwise it is extremely easily for those managers to abuse their position and power without being held accountable because in the case they do they will just create another account and keep abusing bounty hunters.

Yes, I couldn't agree more. The reputation of the campaign manager can be used as a measure of whether the project is worthy of being followed or not. Because, a campaign manager who has a very good reputation will not carelessly choose a project that will have the potential to damage his reputation so far. I've been caught up in scam projects several times and become a bounty hunter. This will be very detrimental to the bounty hunter, absolutely it is the bounty hunter who is completely sacrificed.

[JeotQ]

I got my base tokens but what I don't get is after every rebase the tola amount of base token I owned goes way down, at first it was 116 tokens and later it turn to 111 tokens and today it goes down to 92 tokens, the fact is the value isn't increasing, this is a very bad token to hold for long time lol, I had to sell of real quick

[Chuky92]

Many bounties which were managed in such manner always end up badly for the hunters, that is, it's either they don't get their full rewards, or the team will reduce the reward or there will be discrepancies in the spreadsheet and hence not all hunters will get their appropriate rewards; even most bounties with hidden spreadsheet do not end up well. Now by banning anyone who ask questions in the main group about bounty is another approach to keep the hunters in the dark and probably gradually silence them.
It is disheartening to witness such but the only thing bounty hunters can do is to wait till the spreadsheet is unlocked or updated so that they will really understand the main motive of the bounty manager and the team.
Actually, such experiences from some managers is the reason most people only stick to good and active bounty managers so that they will be sure everything is done accordingly.

[Mighty_crypt]

The first red flag I see with base protocol bounty is that the campaign was managed by the team themselves, they are so busy that they have no time to update the spreadsheet, people gives advice to hire bounty manager but the team don't feel comfortable about it, I still make a little over 150$ from this project anyway

[BitcoinPanther]

It is indeed a shady thing to lock a bounty campaign spreadsheet to hide stuff.  The fact that the allocation of stakes hasn't been done during the weekly campaign will result in an erroneous calculation.  Thus a possible cheating of the campaign manager.  This is not a new trick and most often, participants won't get paid. 

[HerbertMarcel]

Bounty programming is the main means of attracting investors to bring a company's token to the market. Here IEO hosts the most so experienced and inexperienced bounty hunters come here to be deceived by others or fall prey to scams. However, Bounty managers are always busy with one thing or another and this also happens due to lack of manpower. But it is not a man thinking because many more scamming teams are familiar with this type behavior.

[Malam90]

They have opened another rounds for twitter participants. Old spreadsheet is locked for update probably. Every participants will receive good amount of payment if they pay the hunters. I haven't worked after joined for watching red trust of Bounty manager in the first round. If they pay the first round, it is ok.

[Claudio99]

They have opened another rounds for twitter participants. Old spreadsheet is locked for update probably. Every participants will receive good amount of payment if they pay the hunters. I haven't worked after joined for watching red trust of Bounty manager in the first round. If they pay the first round, it is ok.

They paid the first round and I received my payment, the second round is social media campaigns only that's the different, I'm sure they can be trusted, right now base token is a bit over 1$ but the rebase function is what I don't like, this thread needs to be locked right now

[bitkanu]

They have opened another rounds for twitter participants. Old spreadsheet is locked for update probably. Every participants will receive good amount of payment if they pay the hunters. I haven't worked after joined for watching red trust of Bounty manager in the first round. If they pay the first round, it is ok.

What I know for the first round has been paid for all bounty participants even though they did not work optimally, only the spreadsheet was still locked when the first distribution took place, and for now I no longer see the progress of this project, because I think they are less transparent in terms of this.

This project is still alive and baseprotocol created the second round for the social media platform. The participants in the first round got deceived consider when their tokens being distributed and the total supply has been changed due to the rebase event.
I see that if the team was not so transparent to the investors.
The progress is still running if you are checking the telegram group.

[Apostlekin$$$]

I participated in the first round of base protocol bounty campaign and there are few red flags that makes me dislike the team

1. The find it hard to hire a qualified bounty manager
2. They manage the campaign themselves and too lazy to update stakes
3. After bounty ends they decided to distribute to all participants that signed up for the campaign, those who don't complete posts as requested are given tokens as well.
4. Every bounty hunters don't have access to the final spreadsheet, automatically they don't know what they earned

Base protocol team are 👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎

[Francis Freeman]

This is becoming a trend nowadays. They attract many people to promote their projects promising immediate release of bounty payments and then take months to process them.
I can understand that they want to protect the investors but just say it cleasly in that bounty post that the tokens would be distributed after a certain duration. That solves all the issues.

[JHORN]

As rewarding as the first base protocol bounty campaign was I don't dare go for the second campaign because the team are so annoying in every ways, they failed to keep their own rules, all promises are broken except payment only, not a good experience, for me when promoting a project it's not about getting paid only, teams must be fair and square but base protocol team aren't

[bluebit25]

I couldn't understand how its token works, and i really didn't want to learn it further because it felt like a hoax. But the token that i have in my personal wallet is going down and its value hasn't increased, which is ridiculous but that is not being discussed by everyone and the project is giving me a feeling of no good about it.

[Greatdev]

The team kept their promise, they paid but not in the right manner, they never cheated but no calculations were done, they team are too lazy to even keep records of stakes earned every week, it's such a bad bounty experience, it's why I don't care about the second campaign

[disconnectme]

The way the team managed their bounty is not transparent and they allowed cheater to profited from the bounty, those that did a good job promoting the project were short changed. Someone used my profile to applied for campaign and we were two in the same campaign, called the attention of the team to it but he didn't remove the guy and paid the him.

[TastyChillySauce00]

The way the team managed their bounty is not transparent and they allowed cheater to profited from the bounty, those that did a good job promoting the project were short changed. Someone used my profile to applied for campaign and we were two in the same campaign, called the attention of the team to it but he didn't remove the guy and paid the him.

It looks like the team didn't even care about their bounty, I guess you have reported him too. I know that from their telegram group if the team was not even being transparent with the investors too.
this team is always lying and remember we don't know what's happening with 3k ethereum in the past that raised by spectiv they have claimed they did refund but none received their ethereum.

[Wulan_maniez]

We have heard bad news for the Base  Protocol  team. In fact, they've  committed  fraud in the  past  on  different  ICO  projects,
and they're taking action again to make a quick profit when DeFi hypes up now. I'm not sure if   the  Base Protocol project will be
good in the future if we look at the profiles of teams that have a poor track record and have negative cases in the crypto industry.