The Benefit of the Covid Pandemic

[BADecker]

The greatest benefit of the Covid pandemic is, it is waking people up. Many people are becoming realists.

Most people sense that something is not quite right in the pandemic proclamation that their governments are making. You can see it in the facts of their marching and rallying against Covid orders that don't make sense.

This is a wake-up time!

Wake up to the reality of life. Wake up to the reality of government people trying to take your freedom away. What government is doing, is many times worse than a pandemic could ever think of being. The vaccines are set to kill way more people than any virus could even think of killing.

In WW2, people started praying. God gave us freedom, but at a price, because of our sins. Turn back to God and pray your head off and your heart out. And when He saves you, remain with Him. Don't turn back to the folly of your sins.

If you don't wake up, you will lose.

The Covid pandemic is a blessing that is causing you to wake up to reality, so that you live and not die.

[franky1]

... oh look badecker is now a holocaust denier.

sorry but in ww2 many religious people died.
it was actually international government military that gave people freedom.

praying would have got you shot. or put in a prison and then gased to death

[BADecker]

... oh look badecker is now a holocaust denier.

sorry but in ww2 many religious people died.
it was actually international government military that gave people freedom.

praying would have got you shot. or put in a prison and then gased to death

Oh look. franky1 is now a liar, again.

We are all sorry that people died in WW2. Governments rarely give people freedom. And there were many people who lost freedom because of the international government at WW2 times. Besides, that government was set up as a precursor to taking over the world.

Being shot in prayer is better than living without prayer. Everybody dies the first death. But those who pray to the God of the Bible won't die in the second death.

[franky1]

so badecker thinks priests won ww2. not soldiers
(facepalm)

governments were originally set up as a collective of local leaders to make decisions for the locals who cant make the big decisions for themselves.

yes governments have in the last 100 years been listening more to corporations than to its citizens. but thats called capitalism. something you hypocritically fanboy over.
since ww2 the capitalist/corporate agenda has been to promote citizens to want the rich to get richer and kill off the idiots.

its why you have become so brainwashed.
you pretend to be anti-pharma but advertise pill mill doctors and medications that just make expensive urine
you pretend to be anti-gov yet you keep referencing laws made by them as your reason to remain ignorant to reality.

a true government that does its best for its citizens is one where the tax funds pay for citizen stuff.
yes thats socialism. and i think it will be many years until you realise you are brainwashed/indocrination into the mindset that causes citizens to lose out in capitalism as being good.

yes nazi's were communist. russians were communists. but this is not the same as socialism
its the capitalist propaganda that has brainwashed you into thinking they the same thing
and further brainwashed you into then thinking some mythical entity you never met will save you.

yep capitalists want to syphon the money. and then blame any debt on others. they will blame citizens, god.
yep god is an invention to shift the blame away from the real rule makers.

try to wake up. stop 'believing' that some entity you have never met or seen will save you.
stop believing that the capitalist government is your saviour when its actually the real factors of the things you hate about government.

the international coalition that went into europe to fight against the nazi was a socialist act. yep governments went socialist to fight the communists.

it was not priests that won the war. it was not god. it was governments that while capitalist profiting at the start of the war. switched to socialist government to end the war

[BADecker]

^^^ Too bad you don't understand how the universe works, and the way God gives you freedom to remain in ignorance if you so desire.

But, just to clarify, people ask for things directly by asking, and also by fighting. When they ask, it usually is simple wording. When they fight, they are showing that their asking is really sincere.

God gives the answers every way... no matter which of the many ways to ask, the people use when they ask.

[Slow death]

this is time that people need to open their eyes and realize that they must respect governments when they talk about the various issues that involve diseases and must respect science. because it is the science that is managing to save people's lives and not religion. you must have heard that priests die due to this pandemic and see that all the churches in the world that kept talking about doing miracles were not able to cure the coronavirus, so much so that the churches were closed. it just came to clearly show the difference between illusion (religion) and reality (science)

[Jet Cash]

Viruses existed before animal life was on earth, and Corona viruses were first recorded in the 1930s. Mother Nature develops cures for all these diseases and infections, and without this man and other animals would have failed to prosper. Governments and the pharmaceutical industry makes vast amounts of money from selling destructive snake oil, and it also uses this as a tool to control the population. Church communities often provide self-help groups, and venues for moral and political discussion. This is contrary to the interests of the government, and the supra-national elite, and this is the reason for the banning of church ( and pub ) meetings - it has nothing to do with the spreading of infection, and , in fact, the meeting will spread immunity to the virus, and remove the need for damaging vaccines.

I'm saddened when I see schoolchildren dragging their parents over to sanitisation stations, and forcing their parents to destroy the protective bacteria on their skins. This illustrated the control that has been gained over the snowflake teachers that are moulding the serfs and slaves of the future.

[franky1]

churches and pubs were closed because in some towns people ignored the ADVICE to keep a distance. and so they then needed to ENFORCE it.

if people just used common sense and their own will to not spread the virus by keeping distance under their own concept of common sense. then it would not need to become enforced.

yep
if everyone actually respected others personal space under their own will. there would be no reason to make it into a law.

those advertising for people to mingle and spread the virus are their own worse enemy that causes the rules to become enforced.

jetcash is one of those idiots trying to get people to mingle and spread the virus. hence where jetcash lives he sees rules for those he knows being enforced due to those around him not following the advice on their own.

[BADecker]

churches and pubs were closed because in some towns people ignored the ADVICE to keep a distance. and so they then needed to ENFORCE it.

if people just used common sense and their own will to not spread the virus by keeping distance under their own concept of common sense. then it would not need to become enforced.

yep
if everyone actually respected others personal space under their own will. there would be no reason to make it into a law.

those advertising for people to mingle and spread the virus are their own worse enemy that causes the rules to become enforced.

jetcash is one of those idiots trying to get people to mingle and spread the virus. hence where jetcash lives he sees rules for those he knows being enforced due to those around him not following the advice on their own.

^^^ As usual you have it backwards. Churches and pubs were closed because in some towns people ignored accepted the ADVICE to keep a distance.

When are you going to understand that, even in most civil law countries, the government isn't a dictator. Even if government has to force closure, the people are still accepting the forcing, willingly, if they don't use the law to prosecute government people for messing with their rights?

[CryptocurencyKing]

A great suffering is often followed by an equivalent level of success. The Covid19 complication surely put the world in a corner where the people endured to their elastic limit according to physics and before they could get to their breaking or yield point, they realised the lies of politics and the need for investments that isn't based on government policies.

To some extent it helped, the fee agitations on unjust policies showed the people the power they have as a citizen to right the wrongs in governance and it's a good thing.
The pandemic also made some persons realise the importance in saving as emergencies are always going to come as a surprise to the unprepared but, lots of citizens of nations have learnt it the hard way and I think are better equipped with that knowledge now.

[BADecker]

A great suffering is often followed by an equivalent level of success. The Covid19 complication surely put the world in a corner where the people endured to their elastic limit according to physics and before they could get to their breaking or yield point, they realised the lies of politics and the need for investments that isn't based on government policies.

To some extent it helped, the fee agitations on unjust policies showed the people the power they have as a citizen to right the wrongs in governance and it's a good thing.
The pandemic also made some persons realise the importance in saving as emergencies are always going to come as a surprise to the unprepared but, lots of citizens of nations have learnt it the hard way and I think are better equipped with that knowledge now.

Bump!

[franky1]

^^^ As usual you have it backwards. Churches and pubs were closed because in some towns people ignored accepted the ADVICE to keep a distance.

When are you going to understand that, even in most civil law countries, the government isn't a dictator. Even if government has to force closure, the people are still accepting the forcing, willingly, if they don't use the law to prosecute government people for messing with their rights?

get out of your own basement and see the wider world

in many countries they have a tiered system. by which if people do willingly follow the advice the cases stay low they dont have restrictions applied to them. but when its seen that the number of people are not following the advice. the laws are strengthened (raised to a higher tier of laws)

i know you live in a small world of thinking its a 'all or nothing' 0 or 10 situation. but the actual reality is not like that.

take your own state.. you thought your states golf courses were closed. but they were not.
because smart golfers actually respected personal space. thus the state did not restrict golf courses

but if cases rose in the golfing community where by its seen that the virus was spreading in hotspots at golf courses then they would make a law to close the golf courses. because obviously golfers were not following the advice.

in some places churches are open. fully. but if a virus spread hotspot occurs due to church visitors spreading the virus by disrespecting personal space. then restrictions would be added
in some places churches are open but with limitations. but if people disobey and abuse the limits. the restrictions would be tightened further

..
when you realise the virus has no arms or legs and can only be spread by humans.
when you realise the virus has no eyes or ears and is not spread purely due to laws

you realise that people are the cause. and its people that need to change habits to reduce the spread
and when they disobey/ignore. then laws are applied to people.

when laws are made its not a situation that people can carry on as normal and somehow the virus will take on the legal changes and the virus obeys/disobeys.
its actually the people that need to change habits via volntary advice.. or if ignorant. in enforced laws.

[sort_cirkit]

Viruses are deadly. But looking at COVID-19, it doesn't seem like it's very active. The government is deceiving us with this. Look at your environment, how many people have died or been infected as a result of COVID-19. I saw the hospital doing business with it. I had a fever and tested for Covid, which was positive. But it was not affected by COVID-19. Really ridiculous.

[BADecker]

^^^ As usual you have it backwards. Churches and pubs were closed because in some towns people ignored accepted the ADVICE to keep a distance.

When are you going to understand that, even in most civil law countries, the government isn't a dictator. Even if government has to force closure, the people are still accepting the forcing, willingly, if they don't use the law to prosecute government people for messing with their rights?

get out of your own basement and see the wider world

in many countries they have a tiered system. by which if people do willingly follow the advice the cases stay low they dont have restrictions applied to them. but when its seen that the number of people are not following the advice. the laws are strengthened (raised to a higher tier of laws)

i know you live in a small world of thinking its a 'all or nothing' 0 or 10 situation. but the actual reality is not like that.

take your own state.. you thought your states golf courses were closed. but they were not.
because smart golfers actually respected personal space. thus the state did not restrict golf courses

but if cases rose in the golfing community where by its seen that the virus was spreading in hotspots at golf courses then they would make a law to close the golf courses. because obviously golfers were not following the advice.

in some places churches are open. fully. but if a virus spread hotspot occurs due to church visitors spreading the virus by disrespecting personal space. then restrictions would be added
in some places churches are open but with limitations. but if people disobey and abuse the limits. the restrictions would be tightened further

..
when you realise the virus has no arms or legs and can only be spread by humans.
when you realise the virus has no eyes or ears and is not spread purely due to laws

you realise that people are the cause. and its people that need to change habits to reduce the spread
and when they disobey/ignore. then laws are applied to people.

when laws are made its not a situation that people can carry on as normal and somehow the virus will take on the legal changes and the virus obeys/disobeys.
its actually the people that need to change habits via volntary advice.. or if ignorant. in enforced laws.

Laws are made by people for people. People are people whether or not they make any laws. When the laws that some people make become repugnant to other people, why shouldn't the other people remake the laws into laws that they like for themselves? Because franky1 wants to keep them in slavery?

Realize that it is seldom that the lawmakers keep their own laws.

[franky1]

Viruses are deadly. But looking at COVID-19, it doesn't seem like it's very active. The government is deceiving us with this. Look at your environment, how many people have died or been infected as a result of COVID-19. I saw the hospital doing business with it. I had a fever and tested for Covid, which was positive. But it was not affected by COVID-19. Really ridiculous.

the real government scam is not that covid is fake.

its that hospitals only have 200 beds per 100,000 people
if the government invested more money to secure healthcare, by giving it more support than 'normal' those 200 beds per 100k would be 400 or 1000 or more. meaning a hospital can cope by 2x-5x and not need to then worry about overloading the healthcare system as much,,,,,, thus not needing to lockdown

lessons to learn. more hospital beds more medical equipment

even without covid people on both medicare and medicaid end up having to coerce doctors to do tests. not because doctors are evil but because they have limited resources

[franky1]

Laws are made by people for people. People are people whether or not they make any laws. When the laws that some people make become repugnant to other people, why shouldn't the other people remake the laws into laws that they like for themselves? Because franky1 wants to keep them in slavery?

Realize that it is seldom that the lawmakers keep their own laws.

if those that cant make the laws dont like the laws. then they can and should do things to not cause the laws to be strengthened.

by disobeying a law will make that law become more restrictive.
EG gun control would not be an issue if people were not stupidly walking down a street waving a gun around screaming 'im open carrying coz republic'.. if they instead just kept their gun secure and only used/handled it when actually needed/appropriate. basically in places where it wont frighten other people.. then they woud find that they would not be questioned about their handling of their gun

its like the common sense is to not pull down your pants and do a crap in the middle of the street.
if idiots then started crapping in the middle of the street. laws would be strengthened to make that act a criminal offense.

however if people just didnt do it. out of respect for their fellow citizens. then it wont be an issue
but we all know badecker will now start pushing out his feacal matter in public just to cause chaos to those watching and to the street and to cause new laws to be enforced about doing a crap in public.

[BADecker]

Laws are made by people for people. People are people whether or not they make any laws. When the laws that some people make become repugnant to other people, why shouldn't the other people remake the laws into laws that they like for themselves? Because franky1 wants to keep them in slavery?

Realize that it is seldom that the lawmakers keep their own laws.

if those that cant make the laws dont like the laws. then they can and should do things to not cause the laws to be strengthened.

by disobeying a law will make that law become more restrictive.
EG gun control would not be an issue if people were not stupidly walking down a street waving a gun around screaming 'im open carrying coz republic'.. if they instead just kept their gun secure and only used/handled it when actually needed/appropriate. basically in places where it wont frighten other people.. then they woud find that they would not be questioned about their handling of their gun

its like the common sense is to not pull down your pants and do a crap in the middle of the street.
if idiots then started crapping in the middle of the street. laws would be strengthened to make that act a criminal offense.

however if people just didnt do it. out of respect for their fellow citizens. then it wont be an issue
but we all know badecker will now start pushing out his feacal matter in public just to cause chaos to those watching and to the street and to cause new laws to be enforced about doing a crap in public.

Everybody makes laws all the time. Mostly these laws are the common law... what kind of clothes they will wear to church, standard breakfast menu at home, walk to work or drive, general respect towards friends and neighbors, etc., etc.

In common law countries - like the USA, the UK, Canada, Belize, Australia, and a few more - the laws are for citizens (you mentioned citizens in a different post). Men and women can exercise citizenship, but they can stand as man/woman not under citizenship. When they are brought to court, they have the right to stand as they wish regarding this status, but only in common law countries.

Government laws apply to citizens. But in common law countries, government laws don't apply to men and women except under two circumstances:
1. The man/woman in question voluntarily accepts the position of citizenship;
2. The man/woman in question has harmed someone or damaged his property.

The problem that makes people fight government is that they don't know this. They don't realize that they don't have to stand as citizens. The few who DO know, don't understand how to stand as man/woman in court when the court tries to force them to be citizens. Government likes it this way, because they can make lots of money off their citizen-slaves this way.

Now, my experience has been that you don't like this idea. But liking it or not has to do with the fact that you don't like me. It doesn't have to do with the fact that people make this work all the time in the courts. Much of the time the judges/magistrates back off when they see the people going this direction. But they back off mostly so that the people won't find out how it really works.

I have talked a lot about Karl Lentz in the past. He uses the common law process. Check out his info here - https://www.youtube.com/c/CraigLynch/videos - and do searches on "Karl Lentz common law."

Lately I have found this website - https://awarriorcalls.com/a-warrior-calls-landing-page/ - where the  main guy is doing similar to Karl, actively helping others.

[franky1]

remember this fact that debunks your lentz scripts

even you highlighted it now and again.

who's court is it.
when a government invites you into their house. its their house rules that apply. not yours
you can be invited into their house and then act like its your house. but it still isnt your house and not your rules
you just end up looking like an idiot doing some weird dramatic dance act in someones house.

so while you pretend you can make up and choose the rules.. you will find out the hard way you cant.
and thats why lentz gets it wrong.

he tries entering other peoples houses and setting his own rules for their house. he completely ignores the house rules.

a smart person would learn the house rules and use the house rules against the house owner.
just realise that.

when you go to a gym and it has members rules. you cannot just make up your own rules and ignore the gym rules..
and no its not that easy to end your membership and still want to remain in the gym. because then you wont be allowed in the gym(country: illegal migrant) and there are consequences of being in that place without being a member

..
for instance in the UK
the government(queens management company) use government laws and they have government courts(their houses)..
the queen separetly has a house for common law.

trying you fight using common law in a government court is futile.
..
this is why trump never gets a chance in supreme court because he is playing around in the government courts which follow the government laws that he dislikes.

but even when trump tries to get into supreme court. his cases get dismissed at the filing stage because he has no valid claim.

in short you cant just turn up at queens bench/supreme court and be heard. you have to have a valid claim that makes lawful sense.
which again is lentz's failing. he pretends he is auto invited to supreme court/queens bench just by walking in

..
oh and that awarriors guy. just watching his first foundation video. he debunks himself

'only by concent or contract binds a man or women'
well the laws state that being born in a country contracts you to then be a citizen(member) by default.
well the laws state the process of a migrant to be allowed/disallowed

so by consent of being on the land. means you are then contracted into the laws.

so he cant then claim laws dont apply or make up his own rules
also you cannot yourself just pretend to be a diplomat. you cannot just avoid the laws using your own acts
you have to seek permission from the law makers to be allowed diplomatic immunity

[BADecker]

^^^ You show your ignorance, yet, again. Where did the money and the labor come from to build the courthouse? The people, of course. The government doesn't do anything without the people.

Karl Lentz doesn't accept invitations into government court. If he winds up in one, he immediately turns it into his court. The people of the court are on his turf this way.

All your blab makes sense if that's the way you want to do it. But it doesn't make sense for people who do things differently.

[Jet Cash]

Viruses are deadly. But looking at COVID-19, it doesn't seem like it's very active. The government is deceiving us with this. Look at your environment, how many people have died or been infected as a result of COVID-19. I saw the hospital doing business with it. I had a fever and tested for Covid, which was positive. But it was not affected by COVID-19. Really ridiculous.

Viruses are not deadly to healthy people.

Covid is extremely active, but it has little effect on healthy people.

Everybody will be infected eventually, but no healthy people will die from Covid. It's the social and pharmaceutical attacks on our immune systems that kill people.

Fever is your immune response to a virus infection. You should feed it to kill the virus quickly.