Moneta Holdings17, create new acc. to give yourself a false positive feedbacks

[examplens]

After opened scam accusations against user Moneta Holdings17 and after he received few neg tag, suddenly appeared several newly created accounts, checked his WP determined that it was not plagiarism, gave positive feedback and oppose flag.


User: BitcoinStar80

Date Registered:   09 December 2020

Posted one post engaging in a pointless debate initiated by Moneta Holdings17

A nest of poison was discovered by MonetaHolding17. What a great job. No wonder this forum is just about scammers. Most of them have phony whitepapers and their websites are pure scams. I’ve checked holydarknes, he is pure Fraud. A basic look at their team members make me laugh. False linkedin profiles, false social media. I will check the other members of this group and who knows what is to be discovered. So far, these scammers support each other in attempt to consolidate their false accusations, however their case falls apart at a rapid pace.

Next fraud detected:
ScamViruS - very suspicious account, dodgy website. No team, no wp. Claiming Incorporation in the USA, no traces since 2010 of reports. Another claim Hong Kong, just makes me laugh. ))) anyone genuine here???

I suggest making Threads about every member of this wasps nest and reveal their true identities, it would clear at least some dirt on bitcoin talk. What amazes me is all of them are seniors, golds, ninjas etc.)))) Do they buy this accounts? I checked those two websites Moneta posted, indeed you can buy accounts from $275. The price goes up with seniority. That explains why scammers have high stats on their accounts.

also, oppose flag and leave a positive tag:

BitcoinStar80

2020-12-10

The group shall be unbiased, detail oriented, able to ask questions in a sensitive way. Shall have knowledge of basic legal concepts. All i can see is bullying and gut-feelings and hunches that override objective evidence and analysis. It does not give anyone license to rush to judgements.

User Masternode55

Date Registered:   11 December 2020

Only one post, of course, defending Moneta in scam accusation https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2901916;sa=showPosts

Oppose Flag and write positive feedback:

Masternode55

2020-12-11

Reference

I’ve run the whole wp through copyscape, no trace of plagiarism. Is it some sort of i don’t like you retaliation? As per forum rules you need evidence of wrongdoing, all you have posted are some images that prove nothing. Where did you get those images?

Username VoVaN-S

Date Registered:   Today at 11:46:48 (15. December 2020)

he did not write a single post

Oppose Flag and leave nice and positive feedback on Moneta Holdings17 trust page

VoVaN-S

2020-12-15

Reference

Moneta is a Genuine Project. There is no plagiarizm and Your false accusations have been taken to Scammers Group Identified - False Accusations and Ransomware. Please read as it explains about your scammers group, who you are and what you are doing.

User SoulJ

Date Registered:   Today at 12:43:46 (15. December 2020)

he did not write a single post, but also oppose flag and leave positive feedback

SoulJ

2020-12-15

Reference

Checked WP, citations in place, references ok. One can give only superb feedback!!! Holydarkness claims are false!

Also, Full member waiberz write positive feedback, but I have not researched whether there is a connection with other accounts.

[Rikafip]

Yeah Moneta Holdings17  created several threads in scam accusation board, attacking everyone who either tagged or supported the flag, leaving retaliatory feedbacks and accusing of ransomware. In short, he completely lost his mind and started babbling about some big conspiracy going on.

Regarding Full Member @waiberz that opposed the flag, he created the first version of Moneta ANN on December 4th,  but it was deleted next day. Here is the archived version https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5574/55749377.html

According to  @Moneta Holdings17, he is part of their team so no surprise that he opposed the flag.

Waiberz is a member of our team. He is involved with our social media campaign. He suggested joining forums we are on now. We agreed on starting the Threads, however, he took the initiative and started creating threads from his personal accounts. Moneta Dev team decided to go for their exclusive accounts. So we asked waiberz to delete started threads and republish from Moneta exclusive accounts.

[examplens]

..

now he has begun to create flag against @holydarkness using their alt account. I'm not sure he understands that flag will not be active if it only has support from its newly created accounts.
"Masternode55 alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with holydarkness is at a high risk of losing money"

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2527
The flag is opposed by my end.