Non funded projects vs funded projects

[Ken_terrance]

Is it just me or there are many others thinking same thing? Non ICO/IEO projects always have longer life span, where as new projects are all running after funds for better future of their projects, how about those projects that have no ICO, no premine? Some are even funded by the teams without the public penny


There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.

[1714929981]

1714929981

[1714929981]

1714929981

[1714929981]

1714929981

[RussianEnglishTranslation]

Is it just me or there are many others thinking same thing? Non ICO/IEO projects always have longer life span, where as new projects are all running after funds for better future of their projects, how about those projects that have no ICO, no premine? Some are even funded by the teams without the public penny


There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.

Agree. When a project doesn't hold an ICO or IEO it means they have to build something with utility to generate funds for the devs to be successful. That's why I only invest in POW projects like 0xMonero and Raven.

[Dragonfund]

I have came across several non funded projects that has performed extraordinary, though if a project is lucky to be listed like binance, Okex, Gate exchange and some popular reputable exchanges seems to perform better too.
I have also experience some ico projects like DIA raised $18m during their bonding curve sell, their token increased in price from $0.8 to $5 but was dumped due to kucoin hacked. It's still hasn't go below ICO price which is a good thing.
Do proper and personal research, there are good coins that worth investing on either for long and short term.

[jahepahit]

If the team are not greedy and passionate about their project, there is nothing bad in conducting an ico/ieo. Many of the funded project are not in haste to achieve anything, they do things at their own pace unlike the non funded. It all depends on the team members and how futurely commited and passionate about the project.

[Koutami]

Is it just me or there are many others thinking same thing? Non ICO/IEO projects always have longer life span, where as new projects are all running after funds for better future of their projects, how about those projects that have no ICO, no premine? Some are even funded by the teams without the public penny


There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.

For have coins alive you dont need money, but for listing purposes you cant do much since money is important thing to have listing ticket. So for infamous coin, money is needed mostly for marketing purposes, imo

[Tahid12]

I think funded project are best to choose for investment between non funded & funded projects.because non funded  projects need money to development, need money to list that on exchanges.even listing on good exchange like Binance is so costly, that they can't afford.even can scam but people can trust on funded project.they can check processes and feel free to investment there. Although funded projects could also cheat with people too

[Sirait]

^ When a project is built without funding like an ICO or IEO they have no burden on anything, they only focus on being able to develop their project to success without thinking about "profit". Most projects fail because they are not able to profit and return the capital they have used for marketing, bounties, development, listings, etc., so they have to end their project.

[militiariko]

Is it just me or there are many others thinking same thing? Non ICO/IEO projects always have longer life span, where as new projects are all running after funds for better future of their projects, how about those projects that have no ICO, no premine? Some are even funded by the teams without the public penny


There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.

I think it works both ways; there are several non funded projects with long life span; and also there are funded projects in the crypo currency who also have a long time spam. The most important feature to look out for is that the developer and team are genuine and true; the product is real and achievable. Any project with such feature either funded or non funded will definitely be around for a long time.

[ryzaadit]

I love the non-funded project because :
- The supply more friendly
- The price can more reasonable calculated from the mining hash
- Entering with an early adopter

But, as always before entering a non-funded project you should know the project was riskier than other projects with having a fund and need long patience. I got a few project with non-funded like ICO/IEO and a few of them give me a good profit around x10-x20 with around 6 month for the faster and more than 1 years for a long wait.

[kaya11]

It depends, sometimes the team are known to both crypto and the tech world, famous bankers, influencer, businessman, actors and actresses are also part of them. They also have the money and in the end they d not need to do ICO and the sorts just to fund their project. So investors will definitely be engaging because they will feel secure knowing those famous people are somewhat related. They give positive vibes, I remember some of the alts way back and surprisingly they have managed to make it until now.

[coinporch]

Is it just me or there are many others thinking same thing? Non ICO/IEO projects always have longer life span, where as new projects are all running after funds for better future of their projects, how about those projects that have no ICO, no premine? Some are even funded by the teams without the public penny


There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.

yes, but not all non funded project have a better future buddy
sometimes non funded project will use their own fund to start the project my friend
and in my opinion thats a big sign if the project team is very serious to develop their project

[Kavelj22]

^ When a project is built without funding like an ICO or IEO they have no burden on anything, they only focus on being able to develop their project to success without thinking about "profit". Most projects fail because they are not able to profit and return the capital they have used for marketing, bounties, development, listings, etc., so they have to end their project.

If a project don't hold a public fundrising like ICO or IEO, this doesn't mean that it's a non funded project. There should be some private investors or the team itself financially support the project by their own money.
Any project needs a minimum budget to start, even those who run an ICO, they need a budget to do so.
This has nothing to prove about if the project is a success or not.

[tabas]

Is it just me or there are many others thinking same thing? Non ICO/IEO projects always have longer life span, where as new projects are all running after funds for better future of their projects, how about those projects that have no ICO, no premine? Some are even funded by the teams without the public penny


There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.

The early non funded projects were experimental and serious with the development and experimentation. But the new projects are aiming the same thing and that is to earn out of the presale. They sell promises from the air which is being bought by many investors.
In the long run, serious projects will win. Those projects that have dedicated developers to prolong the life of the project through usecase and adoption.

[Rengga Jati]

There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.

Current conditions are not as easy as before. It seems that in the past there were very few new projects so they didn't do an ICO and they could survive as long as their team committed to project development. However, for now, many new projects have emerged and the number of competitors has made the crowdfunding process flourish as well. And now is having funds first before funding as it is important too. Because with a team that has sufficient funding, they can choose the top exchange for listing their tokens, right?

[kidbounty]

it's just about serious or not developing their project. no matter where the development funds come from, the most important thing is that they must be serious about project development. average old projects are seriously under development and even though their platform is operational they are still trying to update it to make it better. in contrast to the current projects, they are all money-oriented. when the developer has the funds, they seem to forget the original purpose. and in the end everything that was planned could not be realized.

[CuriousGeorge]

There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.

Many? you may wrong about this dude. The majority of ico coins are dominating the top 100 CMC?
What about namecoin?
Litecoin is also having problem with its development progress as it lack of funding. Charlie has also confirmed it in the past.

In fact it the top coins are still dominated by the funded projects. Those old non funded projects were getting the momentum. There are also so many dead non funded projects.

[DoubleAweSeven]

I won't agree to that because most non-funded projects tend to have not enough funds to keep the project alive, especially if they don't market their project which needed a lot of budget in the first place. I guess it just depends on the will of the project developers. I've seen a lot of non-funded dying projects that is still alive today but I don't think they will ever rise up.

Those non-funded projects are like the founders of the cryptocurrency so that's why you only see few, most are garbage nowadays.

[Maxstl007]

Is it just me or there are many others thinking same thing? Non ICO/IEO projects always have longer life span, where as new projects are all running after funds for better future of their projects, how about those projects that have no ICO, no premine? Some are even funded by the teams without the public penny


There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.

For have coins alive you dont need money, but for listing purposes you cant do much since money is important thing to have listing ticket. So for infamous coin, money is needed mostly for marketing purposes, imo

How about If the team list their tokens or coins themselves? How did Monero and Veil project get listed on exchange without ICO or IEO? It shows that they are more serious about their projects and the projects will have a very longer life, fund raising isn't everything, 99% of scam projects are all ICO funded

[bitkanu]

Is it just me or there are many others thinking same thing? Non ICO/IEO projects always have longer life span, where as new projects are all running after funds for better future of their projects, how about those projects that have no ICO, no premine? Some are even funded by the teams without the public penny


There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.

For have coins alive you dont need money, but for listing purposes you cant do much since money is important thing to have listing ticket. So for infamous coin, money is needed mostly for marketing purposes, imo

How about If the team list their tokens or coins themselves? How did Monero and Veil project get listed on exchange without ICO or IEO? It shows that they are more serious about their projects and the projects will have a very longer life, fund raising isn't everything, 99% of scam projects are all ICO funded

I could agree for monero but it's not about veil. As far as I know, if veil was a forking coin from the pivx project and it's almost dead right now. Can we still consider it as a legit coin that could survive in the long term? We could not.
It seems like that if you are a newcomer and you didn't know how POW coin was flooding the market in the past.

[Wingsbtc]

Years ago when POW algorithm was still a big thing many new POW coins showed up then and they confused many to start mining, what you don't understand is Non ICO projects scammed many through POW algo, when you are busy mining and they list on exchange, the team will dumped the coins and exit scam, leaving few liquidity left